|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2003-10-28 07:07 [#00921719]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker
|
|
Which is your fav video between these two Cunnigham's masterpieces?
Vote:
1) Come to Daddy 2) Windowlicker
\/\/.
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2003-10-28 07:09 [#00921721]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker
|
|
I vote for 2... windowlicker, i love when limousine kick out the 2 unlucky guys ;)
|
|
Bob Mcbob
on 2003-10-28 07:11 [#00921724]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular
|
|
ive only seen each video once, but i would have to say come to daddy
but i loved the donkey rhubarb video, when i saw i had to keep watching again and again...
|
|
snAre
from .oO Ghent Oo. (Belgium) on 2003-10-28 07:11 [#00921725]
Points: 247 Status: Lurker
|
|
Windowlicker gets my vote!
(altough... Chris has some other wonderfull masterpieces, Bjork, Portishead...)
|
|
aquagak
from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-10-28 07:44 [#00921763]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular
|
|
both are way different
|
|
pf
from Finland on 2003-10-28 07:44 [#00921768]
Points: 3316 Status: Lurker
|
|
both are good, and much diffrent
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2003-10-28 07:47 [#00921772]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
aqauagak: I downloaded your acid edit video. Nice work mate, :D
|
|
Cheffe1979
from fuck (Austria) on 2003-10-28 07:50 [#00921775]
Points: 4630 Status: Lurker
|
|
is there a better rip of CTD than the common 40MB one?
and is the cunningham dvd out yet?
|
|
aquagak
from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-10-28 07:52 [#00921778]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular | Followup to giginger: #00921772
|
|
thanks giginger
|
|
giginger
from Milky Beans (United Kingdom) on 2003-10-28 07:55 [#00921781]
Points: 26326 Status: Lurker | Followup to aquagak: #00921778 | Show recordbag
|
|
I kept meaning to tell you and I've finally remembered :~)
My lady liked it too!
|
|
mortsto-x
from Trondheim/Bodø (Norway) on 2003-10-28 07:55 [#00921784]
Points: 8062 Status: Lurker
|
|
Both are cool, but I like Windowlicker better
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-10-28 08:01 [#00921790]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
window lick er
|
|
WooferAttack
from Milano (Italy) on 2003-10-28 08:39 [#00921825]
Points: 12920 Status: Lurker
|
|
wow, windowlicker is winning!
|
|
tolstoyed
from the ocean on 2003-10-28 08:41 [#00921828]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator
|
|
another vote for windowlicker - just to make sure
|
|
AlbertoBalsalm
from ReykjavÃk (Iceland) on 2003-10-28 08:45 [#00921834]
Points: 9459 Status: Lurker
|
|
come to daddy
|
|
Jaysuz Jones
from Wasaga Beach (Canada) on 2003-10-28 08:47 [#00921839]
Points: 888 Status: Addict
|
|
As it deserves to, I think.
There's a stronger concept and metaphor being tapped in Windowlicker.
The idea of an audience being slowly de - alienated to such a bizarre, almost bisexual being was, apparently, Cunningham's metaphor for society's desensitization (sp?) towards graphic sex & violence.
Come To Daddy, by comparison, is an industrial spoof. A great one, but not on the same level as WINDOWLICKER.
|
|
cuntychuck
from Copenhagen (Denmark) on 2003-10-28 09:49 [#00921857]
Points: 8603 Status: Lurker
|
|
c ome t o d ad dy!
|
|
xlr
from Boston (United States) on 2003-10-28 10:02 [#00921879]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular
|
|
I really can't decide: they are both good for different reasons. Both have that signature slick production style. I guess come to daddy means more to me in the end, since that was the first one I saw.
|
|
Amnesiac
from ERIE (United States) on 2003-10-28 10:08 [#00921891]
Points: 2084 Status: Lurker
|
|
that's tough, but Come to Daddy
|
|
Messageboard index
|