Last Concorde Flight..... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 423 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Last Concorde Flight.....
 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 09:37 [#00916555]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



today British Airways operated the last revenue service of
the great Concorde aircraft. A sad day for aviation people
like myself :(

lots of people got lots of pictures, the today shots are
here on airliners.net: Concorde Thread

the ace ones are here Concorde


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-10-24 09:39 [#00916558]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



Massive cover-up behind that incident


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-10-24 09:39 [#00916560]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



yeah .. they sold the last tickets for a rediculous prize

this ends the era where aviation was still something good
and classy then i think..

:(


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2003-10-24 09:39 [#00916561]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict



nice price for flight it was for sure - above 10.000$ for
flight. i wouldnt take it even if i were richman , although
concorde is a beautiful plane.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-10-24 09:39 [#00916562]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i read about this in the paper...its going to be pretty
expensive...im still thinking about it, im not sure whether
to buy a house or fly the concorde


 

offline hyakusen from 8=============> on 2003-10-24 09:39 [#00916563]
Points: 7021 Status: Addict



correction: was


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2003-10-24 09:53 [#00916577]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



they should put them on auto pilot and fly them straight
toward the moon... see how far them puppies get.

seems a shame just to retire them and sell them for scrap.
there's gotta be cool things you could do with 'em.


 

offline nanotech from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2003-10-24 09:54 [#00916582]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #00916577



thaz pretty bad ass idea


 

offline telica from london/york on 2003-10-24 09:56 [#00916584]
Points: 789 Status: Regular | Followup to epohs: #00916577



nah, they won't sell 'em for scrap. they're part of aviation
history(?!) so they'll keep them in a museum etc.

some mad rich person's bound to want to buy them anyway. i
wonder how much it would cost. we should all chip in our
pocket money and get an xlt concorde. how ace would that
be?? hehe.


 

offline epohs from )C: on 2003-10-24 09:58 [#00916586]
Points: 17620 Status: Lurker



"we should all chip in our pocket money and get an xlt
concorde."


i got five on it!


 

offline nacmat on 2003-10-24 10:04 [#00916589]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



I would like to live in a concorde


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-24 10:09 [#00916597]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



I went to see Concorde in Cardiff yesterday! Such a sad
loss to our country.

Damn shame those wankers at BA wouldn't sell it to Richard
Branson


 

offline nacmat on 2003-10-24 10:10 [#00916599]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00916597



I think aphex bought one of those for his next video


 

offline big from lsg on 2003-10-24 10:20 [#00916614]
Points: 23728 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



so who are you over there mr jockstick blatant?


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-24 10:33 [#00916630]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



Absolute damn shame, all of it. The government should step
in and make BA do something with it. Its part of our
countries heritage. :'(



 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-24 10:34 [#00916632]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00916555



Awesome pics by the way.....the one with the Red Arrows is
now my wallpaper.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-10-24 10:43 [#00916663]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to epohs: #00916577



I have no idea what Air France are doing with theirs, but
British Airways are sending two to a museum at Filton.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-10-24 10:44 [#00916668]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #00916562



Well, you can't fly Concorde anymore, so it will have to be
the house.

Or buy lots of cool stuff.


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 10:47 [#00916678]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00916632



The problem is the Airbus Industries has said they will stop
mx support for Concorde by October 31st.

Even if Branson got them for $1 each, he couldn't fly them
for more than a week, even if they used a couple of the
planes as parts only.

In regards to TonyFish, I assure you you haven't the
slightest idea what you are talking about.


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 10:49 [#00916684]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



nice NYTimes article that sums things up nicely.

Yes you have to register


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2003-10-24 11:05 [#00916727]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



A fine aircraft, but sadly an environmental and economic
failure.

Still one of the coolest planes out there, though. There
was a funny story about a guy who ate £800 worth of
biscuits to win a ticket aboard the last flight.


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-10-24 11:13 [#00916736]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to xlr: #00916727



An economical failure yes, but there are people such as
Richard Branson who want to continue to run it, even at a
loss!


 

offline eric_hard_jams on 2003-10-24 15:19 [#00917008]
Points: 1986 Status: Addict



fun day out for super-rich fuckwits


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-10-24 15:43 [#00917042]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00916678



I assure you I do.


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 16:36 [#00917101]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to TonyFish: #00917042



typically I won't bother with trolling of this magnitude,
but ok, I bite.

show me what you got.


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-10-24 16:38 [#00917106]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



trolling? Fuck off


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 16:40 [#00917107]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to TonyFish: #00917106



so I call your bluff and this is what you give me?

jeebus, weak hand


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-10-24 16:47 [#00917120]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



I don't appreciate your attitude.
I watched a very interesting program about the various
problems which had occured over the previous one or two
years and the fact that these had not been dealt with
approapriately. I'm not going to go into technicalities
which I can't even remember but the general gist was that
the explanation given to the public was a load of bullshit.
Happy?
Now you can fuck off.


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 16:53 [#00917128]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to TonyFish: #00917120



lol, listen, I just know a troll when I see when.

I figured you watched a telly show and new all the details.

Wasn't Prince Charles in a plane nearby, and the pilot
didn't want to abort take off and hit his plane?

right.

--------
Tires blows upon hitting runway FOD (Foreign Object Debris)
after V1 (after V1 you don't abort t/o, you go).

Tire shreds, punctures fuel tanks, etc. Flames, and the
like. Two starboard engines shut down, (the reasoning
behind this is the only suspect part)

Crew try for straight into airport ~miles away. With 2
engines in/op, high drag with gears down, plane stalls and
crashes a few miles from runway.

Yes I've read the transcripts. Yes I've read the reports,
yes I have the video, yes I have the recordings. Yes I've
discussed this with pilots and mx engineers that work on
Concorde (BA, not AF though)

Changes made were Kevlar lining of fuel tanks, NZG tires
(net zero growth, so they don't explode if they deflate) and
more thourgh search for FOD on active runways.

you sir = troll


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-10-24 16:54 [#00917129]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



you sir seem to have a bit of an attitude


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 16:54 [#00917130]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00917128



regret typos


 

offline eXXailon from purgatory on 2003-10-24 16:56 [#00917131]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker



too much hate, you two should hug and make up.


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 16:57 [#00917132]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to TonyFish: #00917129



no, I know the facts, I study this shit, and I call BS when
the public thinks they know what they don't have a fucking
clue about.

I don't watch television and call BS about something you
know alot about, like your or something. I don't slag off
on you when I watched one Discovery Show program.


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 16:58 [#00917134]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00917132



god damnit I can't make one sentence look right.

*like your JOB or something*


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-10-24 17:05 [#00917145]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



I appologise if it seemed to you that I was 'slagging off'
on you. That was not the case. I was unaware that you were
so knowledgable in this matter but does that justify
agression? You introduced the note of agression here.

I resent being labelled a 'troll' (whatever the fuck that
is) purely because I'm a 'member of the general public' and
therefore don't know every little detail about the subject.


Apparently the fire started before the FOD as some witnesses
stated. What is your educated opinion on this? (seriously)


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 17:25 [#00917164]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to TonyFish: #00917145



The reason for aggression, is the aviation community gets
this shit a lot, and I don't mean to slag off on you, but it
gets tiring.

---------------
Considering that Concorde is the only commerical airline to
use re-hear (afterburners in military craft). You do SEE
flames every time Concorde takes off, you should see four of
them.

So, a witness afterwords could EASILY be confused with
something like that. I mean that.

Now, in the video, the tower calls to the crew and mentions
the flames, and the pilots acknowledge, they already now.
Considering they would have ZERO view backward, especially
with where the wings are and the engines are placed, they
would have had a number of Master Alarms and such going
off.

What started the fire was the piercing of the fuel tank.
Obviously those tanks are full on take off. Fuel is now
pouring out, where it is pouring out is right by the hot
exhaust/reheat burners.

Flames go up and that sucks. Now, they could have made it
to the diversion airport. There was confusion in the
cockpit (sit in your room, have someone flash ALL the
lights, sirens going off, tower saying your plane is on
fire, I'm sure PAX screaming......engines at full throttle)
and one of the engines was shut off when it was still
producing power.

ANY commerical aviation aircraft, under FAA FAR rules Part
128 (i think it's 128, would have to look) is certified to
take off, at MTOW (max take off weight) with one engine cut
@ V1.

So they COULD have made it. But with the gear down, (they
tried to get it up) it would be a struggle. Add that the
second engine cut out (on concorde you figure one engine
failure= two, as they as mounted together) they were pretty
much doomed.

you CAN sometimes, make it on two, but you would need to be
clean (gear up, etc) and have some speed, and some
alititude.

They had none of these.

When engine #2 quits, it's your job as a pilot to land
straight ahead. They hit a hotel, which is terrible, but
you loose control in a stall like that, they basicall


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 17:26 [#00917166]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



When engine #2 quits, it's your job as a pilot to land
straight ahead. They hit a hotel, which is terrible, but
you loose control in a stall like that, they basically fell
out of the sky.

That day, for aviation, was the darkest I can remeber in a
long time.


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 17:31 [#00917171]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



Photos:

here is a super rear photo of an aborted takeoff about to
happen, one re-heat didn't kick in

Reheat #3 out


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 17:35 [#00917175]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



Here is the photo of the new NZG tires in action.
Tire

See how the tires deflated, but did not expode. That is a
feature of the new tire, built just for Concorde. (now used
on the Space Shuttle I believe)


 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-10-24 17:44 [#00917182]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker



Thanks for the clarification. I was aware of the point of no
return and the fact that Chirac was onboard the Boeing(?) on
the runway wasn't part of my argument. Who cares who was on
it.

I can understand how uninformed people influenced by cheap
sensationist TV programs can be annoying just try not to get
too pissed, it's not our fault ;)


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 17:48 [#00917188]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



don't mean to lash out.

There is a large difference in the pilot community (no I am
not a pilot) between mechanical failure and pilot error.

people get wound up when 100+ people die and others start
judging actions made in a matter of seconds.

they say it kinda simply: "there but for the grace of God,
do I walk and fly"


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 18:10 [#00917231]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



anyway, the last three birds did almost a formation landing
today @ LHR (london)

good end to a great bird, sad, but bittersweet. I hope we
see another Speedbird in the coming decades....


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 21:52 [#00917442]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



and with those typos, you all stoppe caring


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-10-24 22:18 [#00917458]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00917442



last post, I know everyone stopped giving a shit:

official report on crash can be found HERE


 


Messageboard index