Purchasing MUSIC SOFTWARE :D | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 553 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614125
Today 4
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Purchasing MUSIC SOFTWARE :D
 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2003-09-06 08:51 [#00852533]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



I've decided that I'm going PC instead of Mac (which should
be interesting), I've got a new computer comming my way that
I got for very cheap, but now I need to stock it with some
cool music making software. Fuck this fruityloops shit.
Thats kids stuff. Heres what I'm currently looking at:

Acid Pro 4.0 Bundle with Sound Forge Studio 6.0 and Class...

Kompakt Software Sampler

And I'll also have recycle, but thats free for me.

Basically what I want (since I dont have any hardware
synths) is to do everything on my computer. Suggestions are
also welcome as I have not purchased anything yet, but I've
fooled myself into believing that these programs would suit
me well.

I'm hoping that someone will come along and say "Thats some
okay stuff dude, but check THIS out! And its all one program
so you dont need anything else!" And then they would give me
a link and I would check it out and say "Yeah dude, thats
totally phat. Fo shizzle!"

So any recommendations for kick ass music making software
would be nice.


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2003-09-06 09:21 [#00852580]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



the above link has got everything you need basically. i love
soundforge!


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2003-09-06 09:26 [#00852588]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to Phresch: #00852580



Ah, a soundforge user. So if I had soundforge, would the
Kompakt be a waste, or would it complement the soundforge
nicely?


 

offline wilcoooo from Sydney (Belgium) on 2003-09-06 09:29 [#00852594]
Points: 794 Status: Regular | Followup to weatheredstoner: #00852588



soundforge is great but i do find cool edit pro better (more
options and user friendly)


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-09-06 09:30 [#00852596]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



i've heard some interesting things come from cubase and
reason - might try them also. but yes, fuck fruityloops, it
does suck.


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2003-09-06 09:30 [#00852597]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker | Followup to Oddioblender: #00852596



I've used cubase, its really not for me.


 

offline eXXailon from purgatory on 2003-09-06 09:31 [#00852598]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker | Followup to wilcoooo: #00852594



yes, cool edit pro rocks the boat


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-09-06 09:33 [#00852603]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular



I use buzz...
I use it for everything (it's "everything")..... and it's
FREEWARE!

supports VST/VSTi/dx plugins.. etc...
+ it has so many "built in" effects/generators...

check:

http://www.buzzmachines.com

I think stuff like Reason might be better, but this is
freeware, and very good...
you can do great stuff with it.


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2003-09-06 09:35 [#00852605]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



yeah, probably. but you might want a midi controller for
that. i'm not really sure, tho. Acid is great for sequencing
loops (samples), while Soundforge is the only editing
software where you can turn a farting sound into a
flanged-breakbeat with muliple decay.


 

offline dxc from Latvia on 2003-09-06 09:38 [#00852607]
Points: 328 Status: Lurker



hahahaha, i use reaktor and buzz. also buzz is powerfull
sortware (:, but i cant make pure sound, semples always loks
like a biip, miip.. where the problem? maybe i need to
connect more effects? :]]]]


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-09-06 09:39 [#00852608]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to dxc: #00852607



where's the problem, friend?


 

offline dxc from Latvia on 2003-09-06 09:46 [#00852614]
Points: 328 Status: Lurker



i dont know.. ahahahhahahahahhahahahah


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2003-09-06 09:49 [#00852621]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



i reckon that cooledit pro is better than soundforge. the
user interface (UI) is much much better and intuitive, the
tiny .pk files it litters your harddisk(s) with are great!
They allow you to load huge wavs into ram and zip to any
point and play in about 2 secs, whereas scanning a fresh wav
each time may take several seconds/mins (depending on size
of course). Both cooledit and soundforge(my versions are
from the late 90s) can mess up the sample end and start data
when you use the copy to new features which is only a hassle
with outboard gear(although simple to rectify).
Reason is probably worth a look, although for me it causes
more problems than it solves. if you dont like cubase, if it
is cubase vst that sounds about right, if it is cubase sx/sl
then less likely, so if you only tried the god awful vst try
a sx/sl version(i still use vst/24 it sucks tho). if you
really dont like cubase, then logic isnt an option
anymore(unless you get v4 which works on a pc) perhaps
sonar? get a demo or something. i really think you should
get something like reaktor. if you need some dsp power get
the powercore pci board to soup up your audio dsp and use
good vocoders,reverbs,etc. if i were you, forget acid. stay
with recycle. version 2 is the best ever. superb. dont get
rebirth, its old and you dont want a 909 or 808 and you can
get rubberduck for the 303. native instruments do a wicked
softsynth of the sequential prophet5 which is great for nice
'analogue' sounds. hope that helps.


 

offline dxc from Latvia on 2003-09-06 09:51 [#00852626]
Points: 328 Status: Lurker



example i take jeskola bass, create pattern...so this
generator used without effects listens ************, maybe i
need to add effects? im try to experiment - and i dont have
reuslts...


 

offline dxc from Latvia on 2003-09-06 09:57 [#00852639]
Points: 328 Status: Lurker



weatheredstoner - need to stock it with some cool music
making software < hahahahhahahahhahmmmm! i dont know cool
programs, i think musicmaking is not a game...


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-09-06 09:58 [#00852642]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to dxc: #00852626



well the sound you get from simple generators like Jeskola
Bass is really 'plain', so you will need to master the sound
a bit.
But you can add stuff like EQ/chorus/delay/reverb effects to
it to make it sound more like you want it to..

but remember; more is less (e.g. when it comes to adding
effects)! ;)
if you want, just ask me more questions.
I am no pro, but I've used the program for almost 2 years
and I know a little about it...


 

offline gnocelot from Greifswald (Germany) on 2003-09-06 10:01 [#00852649]
Points: 288 Status: Lurker



I also recommend Buzz, definitely. It's not too easy to get
into, reportedly (I don't remember having problems), but it
pays off.

dxc: Uh, yes. There's no point in using Buzz without
effects.


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-09-06 10:02 [#00852652]
Points: 650 Status: Regular



Reason is cool but not serious enough for some people -
Everything sounds a little toy-like I find... (internal fx &
processing, especially compression, is pretty awful!)
I'd definetly suggest checking out Renoise or Buzz - I
prefer Renoise myself, mainly cos I use quite a bit of MIDI
gear too.
I used to use Logic and Cubase for everything, but they're
really not too great for electronic music - Really designed
for recording bands.
Reaktor and Absynth are worth checking out for softsynths,
FM7's worth a look too.
You don't need any kind of software sampler if you're using
Renoise/Buzz, they're like one giant super powered
sampler/hardware-style sequencer.


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2003-09-06 10:05 [#00852659]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker



to make things sound better, add a small amount of
reverb(plate or cathedral maybe) and a digital delay line.
both as send effects as opposed to inserts. ive never used
this buzz thingy(hardware all the way baby!) but you should
be able to adjust the routing on devices?? try converting
sample rates/bit depth of samples which you use, e.g. drums
samples at 16bit resolution then resampled to 12 bit sound
decidedly better. dont forget your 24dB/4pole LP filters
whack up the resonance for great effects. also slow lfo
subtle panning/phasoring/flanging/filtering makes things
sound better. dont forget compression as well. it doesnt
make your sound radically different, but makes it of a more
uniform level, so a typical fx chain would be
input->eq->compressor->fx->mix the eq and compressor can be
swopped around the difference is minimal, i.e. basically
in-audible but the soud can be tweaked before the effect to
make it sound oh so good when added to a song.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-09-06 10:08 [#00852662]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to dave_g: #00852659



I'm not a huge fan of compressors, so I usually just use
one, that I connect everything to (before, or before the
thing before the master)...
What are your thoughts on this?
sHould I use a compressor for every input?


 

offline dxc from Latvia on 2003-09-06 10:11 [#00852664]
Points: 328 Status: Lurker



so question - whats that "cubase cakewalk"?


 

offline dxc from Latvia on 2003-09-06 10:14 [#00852667]
Points: 328 Status: Lurker



im sorry - Cakewalk Sonar


 

offline dave_g from United Kingdom on 2003-09-06 10:19 [#00852673]
Points: 3372 Status: Lurker | Followup to Key_Secret: #00852662



no not really. personally id use a compressor for vocals
with eq, but since almost all wicked music is instamental
thats irrelevant. if i want say a nice drum n bass type
bass, with lots of low frequency boom but some mid frequency
for the filter to play with, id compress then distort, (then
compress again-maybe) cleans it up alot. If you are
recording things like guitars, then a bit of compression is
good for acoustics especially. listenen to the cheesy
compressed fuzz bass on sabotage by the beastie
boys...remember you adjust the ratio of compression, so it
is only a subtle thing, say 2/10 compression just to help
mix all the signals together,etc. with drums you could
really have fun, with say 10/10 compression. i would only
really compress signals which have a wide range between the
quietest and loudest notes, but perhaps a little subtle 1/10
compression on the finished track maybe. it really depends
on the circumstances. play with the attack and release for
more subtle/exagerated effects. sorry for the crap advice,
its tricky to explain properly. look on www.sospubs.co.uk
sound on sound web site then goto the nav. pull down menu
then technique and look up compression or something. good
luck.


 

offline Skeptopotamus from Home (United Kingdom) on 2003-09-06 10:22 [#00852676]
Points: 625 Status: Regular



Compressors are the key to a kickass sounding mix (aside
from eq of course). Buzz has some really great dynamics
plugins too, which is helpful. It took me a while to get
into Buzz, but once you understand it, are familiar with all
the generators and effects and get in-tune with it's
interface you'll find all other software annoying and
counterproductive. It's also free, big plus point that.


 

offline Key_Secret from Sverige (Sweden) on 2003-09-06 10:39 [#00852701]
Points: 9325 Status: Regular | Followup to dave_g: #00852673



thanks... maybe adding [just] a little compression to some
things may make it sound better....


 

offline hepburnenthorpe from sydney (Australia) on 2003-09-07 09:22 [#00853805]
Points: 1365 Status: Lurker



i use project5

and i like it!


 


Messageboard index