Why Do You Hate VSnares? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
belb
...and 368 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614116
Today 2
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Why Do You Hate VSnares?
 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-09-06 20:15 [#00853395]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Hahahaha I love the Metallica cello riff in dollmaker.


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2003-09-06 20:24 [#00853404]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker | Followup to S M Pennyworth: #00852884



Oi!!!

: )


 

offline deforrest gate from East London (United Kingdom) on 2003-09-07 03:07 [#00853554]
Points: 127 Status: Regular



"I think he is working within a 4/4 time signature though, I
don't think he uses other time signatures. He just chops it
up a bit more."

Er... no, you're wrong.

He works primarily in 7/8 or 7/16. less often in 5/8 or 10/8
and 9/8 or 9/16 etc...

his 4/4 tracks (off top of head) are suasive chess strategy,
stamina, clearance bin & breakbeat malaria (one of those 2
goes into 5/8 at the end) erm.. lioness I think and a few
others.

Dad for instance is in a very fast 13/16 (and quite hard to
keep track of if you're counting along) but it's groove does
seem to work.

An easy track to count along with (to check) would be Dance
Like You're Selling Nails which is in 14/8 (or 7/8) - just
count along with it; the melodies can help! As they repeat -
just start counting again, they repeat every 14 beats -
gosh! So do the beats - it all hangs together.


 

offline ten fingers on 2003-09-07 03:10 [#00853558]
Points: 32 Status: Addict



Hmm, I really cant hear the 13/16 in "Dad", though Ill take
your word for it since I certainly cant count it in 4/4 :D

Actually I think I just keep getting distracted by wanting
to enjoy the song that I can't finish counting to 13.

Snares gets A+++++++ in my book, would sex again!


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-09-07 03:13 [#00853559]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to weatheredstoner: #00852497



somewhat of an atavism but,

I agree as well!


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-09-07 03:14 [#00853560]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



err, that was in reply to "I think Nepetalactone and Poor
Kakarookee are the same
track, only with a track break in the middle. An amazing,
awe inspiring piece of work. Nigel and Clic agree also it
seems.
"


 

offline DiaZoHeXagoN from The city of angels (United States) on 2003-09-07 03:36 [#00853576]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker



hmmm 13/16, explain to me this time signature....the 16th
note gets the beat but I have never heard of this...........


 

offline WeaklingChild from Glasgow (United Kingdom) on 2003-09-07 03:36 [#00853578]
Points: 3354 Status: Lurker



i enjoy a lot of snares music, but i'm not able to listen to
it for long periods of time, because it starts to just hurt
my brain after a while.


 

offline ten fingers on 2003-09-07 03:39 [#00853584]
Points: 32 Status: Addict



well the first number is how many beats per measure, it can
really be anything. Listening wise, you wont hear a
difference in 8/4 and 4/4 because in 4/4 you just star
counting again after 4 instead of after 8, same deal really,
youd only see the difference in printed sheet music.

So anyhow, 13/16 means "13 beats per measure, 16th note gets
the beat"


 

offline deforrest gate from East London (United Kingdom) on 2003-09-07 04:25 [#00853613]
Points: 127 Status: Regular



Well, more precisely in 13/16 - it means 13 beats in a bar,
each note is a sixteenth note (actually a thirteenth note -
but classical conventions only allow for x/2; x/4; x/8 and
x/16 time signatures). I usually forget about the second
part of a time signature for a song as they really only
relate to individual orchestral parts in notation - telling
the instrument what notes to play, so ..

in Dad - the bassline is in 13/16 and the song is in 13/x I
would say or 13 time.


 

offline ten fingers on 2003-09-07 04:48 [#00853624]
Points: 32 Status: Addict



I get confused when you say its actually a 13th note. Its
been a while since Ive had to read sheet music but I don't
beleive memory is failing me when I read 13/16 as 13
notes/beats/whatever per measure, 16th is the value of said
note. I see what you're saying in that it doesn't need to be
a 16th note when you're counting VSnares and the like
because its kindve arbitrary, you could just as easily call
it a quarter note and say it has a ridiculously high tempo,
but Im not following the 13th note bit there.


 

offline deforrest gate from East London (United Kingdom) on 2003-09-07 06:55 [#00853700]
Points: 127 Status: Regular



Well it's called a sixteenth note because the conventions
for classical music were 4/4 basically and the notes are
called x/2 minims, x/4 crotchets, x/8 quavers, x/16
demi-quavers.

So there isn't a name for a 13th note - and there is no
actual difference to how a 13th note would sound compared to
a 16 th note in a 13 time song - mathematically there may be
- fuck knows. Maybe thy are shorter when played in 4/4 for
instance a song in 8/13 (which doesn't exist) would be
supposedly 8 quavers each of length 13/16ths of a quaver.
god this is boring, sorry.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-09-07 06:58 [#00853701]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



A thirteenth note would have to look like a black cat or a
guy walking under a ladder and everyone's Sibelius would
need a patch to be able to show it.


 

offline A0001 from Iraq on 2003-09-07 07:03 [#00853703]
Points: 14 Status: Lurker



why are people who haven't heard vsnares replying to a
thread called why do you hate vsnares?

Are you the kind of people who would wander around ranting
on at strangers if the nurse ever allowed you to go ouside?



 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-09-07 07:09 [#00853706]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to A0001: #00853703



people can rreply to what they want.
why arre you talking about something otherr that vsnares?

Arre you the kind of perrson who would wanderr arround
rranting on at strrangers if the nurrse ever allowed you to
go ouside?


 

offline ten fingers on 2003-09-07 07:14 [#00853709]
Points: 32 Status: Addict



Ah ok deforest I see what you're saying now. Jesus I really
need some sleep, it took me 4 reads to figure our "duh hurr,
no such thing as a whole number 16th of 13".


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-09-07 10:02 [#00853863]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



I think working in different time signatures seems
interesting but hard. I wouldn't know how to do it to be
honest. I still feel complicated stuff can be done in 4/4
but I'm probably wrong. Surely you don't have to change the
time signature but just shift the notes to emulate the
particular effect/time signature you want?


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2003-09-07 11:08 [#00853984]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



That get's very confusing in time.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2003-09-07 12:57 [#00854078]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to promo: #00853863



Yeah but changing the time signature makes it easier to copy
and paste measures when you're working with oddball phrase
lengths.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-09-07 13:22 [#00854108]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



Interesting. Its something I'll have to look into.


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2003-09-07 13:29 [#00854119]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker



Thanks for the replies everyone. It's a shame though that in
all these posts no-one could give me a straight answer.


 

offline J Swift from United Kingdom on 2003-09-07 14:01 [#00854158]
Points: 650 Status: Regular



Most snares stuff I've got is in 7/4, and quite a bit in 5/4
too... I always thought dad was just regular 4/4 though. (I
think it's all in something/4 cos of the way tracker
software works, doesn't use regular music time sig's..)
But yeah, writing in these time signitures opens up an
entire world of melodies and rhythms that haven't been
touched in the electronic scene, pretty much ever!
You can do a lot with 4/4, I think everything Aphex's done
has been in 4/4, but it does have a nice simple quality to
it and loops very smoothley - I think a lot of ppl don't
realise how difficult it is to write electronic music in
such untouched time sig's, I certainly think Snares is one
of the most talented guys in the scene - Just that a lot of
his music is pretty inaccessible.


 

offline promo from United Kingdom on 2003-09-07 18:34 [#00854446]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict



I can imagine that most of what Aphex does is 4/4. I still
believe you can achieve plenty of cool rhythms in 4/4. Other
time signatures seem interesting but I wouldn't have an idea
how they work, I only understand 4/4.


 

offline ten fingers on 2003-09-07 22:11 [#00854600]
Points: 32 Status: Addict



Dad is most defintely not 4/4, after all those posts when I
drove home I played it a few times in my car. Its impossible
to count in 4's 6's or 7's. Unfortunately, I couldn't spare
the attention span while driving to try counting past those
but Im willing to beleive 13


 

offline deforrest gate from East London (United Kingdom) on 2003-09-08 02:26 [#00854715]
Points: 127 Status: Regular



It's definitely in 13 - so is January.



 

offline od_step_cloak from Pleth (Australia) on 2003-09-08 02:57 [#00854721]
Points: 3803 Status: Regular



I think some people think 4/4 is like 4 steps to a beat (and
think triplets are called 3/4), so I think language is maybe
the barrier.



 

offline nene from United States on 2003-10-08 16:12 [#00895047]
Points: 1475 Status: Lurker



I can understand people not liking snares' music, but the
hateration on snares fans gets on my nerves. and saying the
man is untalented shows nothing but ignorance.

p.s. anyone who thinks his programming is random or lacks
structure doesn't get it. I don't mean they have bad taste,
they just don't get it. I know this sounds elitist but it's
true.


 


Messageboard index