Atonal and fractal musicks | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 588 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614128
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Atonal and fractal musicks
 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-08-25 20:23 [#00836516]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



what's your opinion on them? me, i personally find nothing
more unwinding that sitting in front of a keyboard and
improvising in the keys of C, D, F or G. Those are my
favorites though I enjoy the others as well. It's even
better when it comes out sounding good. Some of my best
melodies have stemmed from this. I use a fractal midi
generator named Oblivion on occasion, and sometimes I'll
generate something that I enjoy. In fact, my Twinkle Monster
track uses a fractal melody bit I generated with Oblivion.

ANyways, thoughts?


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-08-25 20:27 [#00836521]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



what on earth are you talking about?


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2003-08-25 21:22 [#00836537]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



finally, somebody else who appreciates randomized music! i
haven't used Oblivion, but i'd love to try it out. i have
done a lot of randomized music experiments in the past with
various programs. i used a fractal-based program twice over
the last two years for two different albums.

additionally, i just discovered a great program called
MusiNum, which allows you to input numbers into the
variables of a mathematical formula to create a multitude of
patterns. i find it very easy to use and extremely useful,
once you get the trick. it's midi-based and you can have as
many voices as you want. i recorded a recent full-length
album using this program. the one drawback with it is that
it is very tricky to create user-scales.

i really dig that atonal random music as well.


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-25 21:26 [#00836539]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



who were the 2 viennese brothers (maybe just friends) who
had a heavy influence on atonal music?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-08-25 21:27 [#00836540]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Fractal music is not random. Also it doesn't take much
talent to produce what is essentially noise.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-08-25 21:28 [#00836541]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to mylittlesister: #00836539 | Show recordbag



Bring back Miffy...


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2003-08-25 21:36 [#00836544]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



proper noise music does in fact require talent. noise is
just as valid as any other music. manipulating the sounds a
computer outputs and telling it how to make those sounds
(even when software does most of the work) also requires
some talent. besides, who cares if someone making music has
talent at all as long as the end result has something
interesting in it?

also, we have been discussing both random and fractal music.
perhaps i was vague or inaccurate with those terms.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-08-25 21:38 [#00836545]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Listen to my latest track and tell me what you think then if
you like random sounds, even though it isn't all that random
people seem to think it is.

psychobabble

I would actually really value your opinion on it.


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2003-08-25 21:55 [#00836559]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



psychobabble - this track is excellent! it's very dense and
there are a lot of things going on at once, but there's also
a definite "heartbeat" to it. i can't tell - how much of
this is in fact random? i really like this track just the
way it is - it's hard to imagine any changes would make it
better. it's great how it's short and concise - i'm very
into that with music. and it also sounds like there's alot
of subtle, implied melodies. i'm impressed. have you done
any more like this?


 

offline r40f from qrters tea party on 2003-08-25 21:58 [#00836560]
Points: 14210 Status: Regular



oddioblender - can we hear the track you were referring to
in your first post? "Twinkle Monster"?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-08-25 21:59 [#00836562]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Thanks for listening. It is alcually the first track of
that kind I have done. What I did was set out a defined
pattern for the track then randomised around that pattern.
Basically so that although there is a level of randomisation
it is around events rather than the whole (if that makes
sense). Then I went back in and tweeked aspects of it to
get it sounding the way I wanted it :D


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-08-25 22:01 [#00836564]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



Twinkle Monster you can get from the download section of
http://www.oddioblender.tk

I'm sure he won't mind be promoting his music in his absence
:D

I am gonna have another listen to it myself.


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-08-25 22:15 [#00836576]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



i still dont understand.

Keys of C,D,F, & G?

would that defeat the purpose of having Atonal music... as
in no TONAL center?



 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-08-25 22:18 [#00836580]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00836576 | Show recordbag



Don't get hung up on terms...It's not hard to understand
what he was getting at, even if it was incorrect
terminology. :D


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-08-25 22:20 [#00836585]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



no, I really dont understand what he is trying to say


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-08-26 01:04 [#00836671]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



*sighs

he means pressing those shiny white buttons on his keyboard
at random to create melodies


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2003-08-26 01:06 [#00836674]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker



Improvisational piano playing is the lick.


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-08-26 01:08 [#00836677]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



if youre good at it, that is

pressing random keys just sucks, imho


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2003-08-26 01:09 [#00836678]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker



Then you're not doing it right.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-26 09:54 [#00837128]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular



psychobabble is awesome. It shreminded me a bit of a track
that used to be at www.mp3.com/ouchbot (beer belly track)


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-08-26 09:58 [#00837129]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #00837128 | Show recordbag



Thanks mister :D

I was hoping you would listen to it because I knew out of
everyone here you would be the one who would understand
where I was coming from :D!!!


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-26 10:33 [#00837177]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular



*tries to look distinguished and snooty as the one who would
understand where you were coming from*

Do you do the randomization by hand (by mouse) in some
software program, or do you have some software program that
does the randomization by itself. (The latter would be much
more useful if you could control exactly what you wanted it
to logically do... autechre must surely use something like
this or their thumbs would fall off from too much clicking)

Also, what things were randomized... position, pitch,
volume... I'd have to listen to it again.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-26 10:34 [#00837178]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular



(or pointer fingers rather- not thumbs unless they fashioned
SNES joypads as mouses)


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-08-26 10:42 [#00837188]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



It is actually randomisation of everything based around
individual events. Basically I create multiple copies of
the same drum hit and slightly offset them from each other,
then move these into different positions, blah blah
blah...it is really quite tedious, but I liked the final
result :D


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-08-26 21:45 [#00837878]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00836585



I meant randomly playing within those keys - i've done
atonal before, but fractals within keys - fractals CAN be
within key right? sorry for the confusion.


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-08-26 21:48 [#00837882]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



i write most of my atonals on oblivion... i really typed
that wrong. sorry, zeus - thanks for pointing that out. :D


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-26 21:55 [#00837894]
Points: 21454 Status: Regular



I made my own version of "fractal melodies" like this:

1) play, say 4 evenly spaced notes (say, c,g,d#,f

2) now space these out X4 like this:

c___g___d#___f___

3) now take the basic "geometry" of the "cgd#f", shrink it
in length so it can fit in each of those gaps, and raise it
semitone by semitone (not discriminating between white and
black keys) until the "c" is equal to the key of the larger
scaled c, g, d#, or f.
or something.


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-08-26 21:57 [#00837899]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #00837177



well on oblivion, you basically choose variable (numbers)
what keys/notes/octaves it may hit, the scale type and
harmonics if you want any.


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2003-08-26 22:01 [#00837906]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



this is a very interesting topic..
i'll have to check out those programs..
nice work guys..


 

offline Oddioblender from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-08-26 22:02 [#00837908]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker



it's very refreshing experimentation to be sure.


 


Messageboard index