|
|
Nameless
on 2003-08-24 07:53 [#00834647]
Points: 150 Status: Addict
|
|
i want a hadrware sequencer.
Why don't steinberg make a hardware version of cubase?
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2003-08-24 07:54 [#00834648]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Because no-one would buy it.
|
|
Nameless
on 2003-08-24 08:04 [#00834658]
Points: 150 Status: Addict
|
|
i would.
|
|
Nameless
on 2003-08-24 08:04 [#00834660]
Points: 150 Status: Addict
|
|
anyone know what the closest thing to it is?
|
|
ecnadniarb
on 2003-08-24 08:07 [#00834664]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
Yes a dedicated PC running Cubase...
|
|
Oddioblender
from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-08-24 08:09 [#00834666]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker
|
|
Have you tried a Roland Groovebox? I hear they're stellar.....
|
|
Oddioblender
from Fort Worth, TX (United States) on 2003-08-24 08:10 [#00834667]
Points: 9601 Status: Lurker
|
|
there's a picture on this board somewhere of Squarepusher's recent hardware setup for his live shows, might want to start there.... hahaha.
|
|
Nameless
on 2003-08-24 08:15 [#00834673]
Points: 150 Status: Addict
|
|
poor.
|
|
Skeptopotamus
from Home (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-24 08:17 [#00834674]
Points: 625 Status: Regular
|
|
Take a lookie at what doepfer have to offer. It's all good.
|
|
J Swift
from United Kingdom on 2003-08-24 08:31 [#00834684]
Points: 650 Status: Regular
|
|
Yeah dude! I've seen that doepfer thing before! Looks amazing!!
I've got a drum machine patched into my setup for triggering samples and stuff when I need a change from stareing at the screen... But using tracker software does feel a lot like using a hardware sequencer - You don't need to use the mouse much, which makes everything feel MUCH less fiddly.
|
|
Messageboard index
|