|  | 
        
         |  | 
        
         |  Anus_Presley
             on 2003-08-02 14:06 [#00805677] Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Phob and the crrew talk about how much money this all costs (and i don't doubt them)etc.. and no spamming and all that
 yet the MB's thrreads arre archived frrom 3 yearrs ago, why?
 Why not delete posts that arre morre than 3 months old orr
 something? I don't get it.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Jarworski
             from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-02 14:09 [#00805681] Points: 10836 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | If I remember rightly the old ones don't cost any money to be there, it's new messages that cost $$$
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  nobsmuggler
             from silly mid-off on 2003-08-02 14:09 [#00805682] Points: 6265 Status: Addict
 | 
| 
     
 
 | there was something about this in another thread its a dedicated server or something like that
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Anus_Presley
             on 2003-08-02 14:09 [#00805683] Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Ahh well, that would explain it. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  corrupted-girl
             on 2003-08-02 14:10 [#00805684] Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to Jarworski: #00805681
 | 
| 
     
 
 | How that does work? 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  corrupted-girl
             on 2003-08-02 14:10 [#00805685] Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00805684
 | 
| 
     
 
 | oh nm 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Anus_Presley
             on 2003-08-02 14:11 [#00805688] Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I was also currious if anyone knows: does it cost alot morre to post a thrread than a simple message?
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  DaWeeze
             from WANTED IN 16 STATES! on 2003-08-02 14:12 [#00805691] Points: 5213 Status: Addict | Followup to Anus_Presley: #00805677
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I would guess that the XLT crew have more important things to do (wink, wink) than worry about archives. Besides, the
 only times people bring up old topics is either to compare
 notes to where they are now (less likely), or to alleviate
 boredom and/or troll (more likely).
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  DaWeeze
             from WANTED IN 16 STATES! on 2003-08-02 14:14 [#00805692] Points: 5213 Status: Addict | Followup to Anus_Presley: #00805688
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I wouldn't think so. That's just a message that happens to start a new topic. Nothing different except that.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Anus_Presley
             on 2003-08-02 14:14 [#00805693] Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to DaWeeze: #00805691
 | 
| 
     
 
 | "I would guess that the XLT crew have more important things to do (wink, wink) than worry about archives"
 
 If cutting costs is so damn imporrtant I think getting rrid
 of pointless arrchives (if as i thought they werre costing
 money) would be verry imporrtant.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  nobsmuggler
             from silly mid-off on 2003-08-02 14:31 [#00805710] Points: 6265 Status: Addict
 | 
| 
     
 
 | http://xltronic.com/mb/topic.php3?topic=42308&start=0 
 try this it might help explain
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Phobiazero
             from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2003-08-02 18:33 [#00806023] Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | we're paying a fixed amount of money each month. but as soon as the full site is online we might exceed some of the
 bandwith limits and we have to pay even more. the current
 limit is "ridiculous" high tho - so i guess we'll make it!
 
 we really need a dedicated server for xltronic so the
 choices are not that many. back in v3 and v4 i was asking on
 the mb if someone were willing to host artworks and samples,
 but i got negative results.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  big
             from lsg on 2003-08-02 18:39 [#00806029] Points: 24091 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | talking about deleting: i had this question (fourth message from the top)
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Phobiazero
             from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2003-08-02 18:50 [#00806032] Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Followup to big: #00806029 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | * evidence material * to statue examples of WHAT is forbidden
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  big
             from lsg on 2003-08-03 05:45 [#00806342] Points: 24091 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | that makes some sense but it is a choice: for evidence you could save it for
 yourself. for showing what is forbidden you could make a
 message instead of the thread which says: closed because of
 this and that.
 eventual bans on the other hand should limit the shit as
 well though.
 
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Phobiazero
             from the next Xltronic (Sweden) on 2003-08-03 05:56 [#00806347] Points: 10507 Status: Webmaster | Followup to big: #00806342 | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yes, obviously we already made that choice. 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  big
             from lsg on 2003-08-03 06:01 [#00806351] Points: 24091 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yes, was just wondering greetinx
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  big
             from lsg on 2003-08-03 06:40 [#00806379] Points: 24091 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | maybe my idea was a bit dictatorshit censorship-like and would have diverted the crap to the mods
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         | Messageboard index
 
 
        
 |