|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-08-02 13:30 [#00805639]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
I just went to see it. Anyone seen it? Anyone want to see it?
|
|
mappatazee
from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-08-02 13:31 [#00805640]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker
|
|
no, and not really, no
|
|
Morton
from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-08-02 13:31 [#00805641]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict
|
|
nah
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-02 13:32 [#00805642]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker
|
|
I was gonna go today but said fuck it. I love the first film, think the second one's half and half. Should I bother?
|
|
Sepix
from Major City (Austria) on 2003-08-02 13:33 [#00805643]
Points: 3110 Status: Lurker
|
|
seen it. awesome movie.
|
|
aquagak
from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-08-02 13:34 [#00805644]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular
|
|
i saw it, but no comment
|
|
nlogax
from oh, you must be the brains (Norway) on 2003-08-02 13:34 [#00805645]
Points: 4653 Status: Regular
|
|
it's purely a visual thing - i bet the movie sucks dingleberries, but the visuals ought to be ball-twitching
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-08-02 13:37 [#00805646]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
Don't go and see it, it is verry weak as a sequel. It is not the most shite film out therre by anymeans but it lets the otherr two down something rrotten. It was bad frrom the starrt with the starr shaped glasses. T1 was a fucking thrrillerr not a comedy. This took it too farr.
|
|
Morton
from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-08-02 13:38 [#00805647]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict
|
|
tx is nice though
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-08-02 13:39 [#00805648]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker
|
|
Damn rright.
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-02 13:42 [#00805650]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker
|
|
I'm suspect about it for so many reasons - a female terminator; pointless story; Arnie's facelifts; 12A certification; Daleks.
But it is the fucking Terminator. Maybe I'll go next week.
|
|
mc_303_beatz
from Glasgow, Scotland on 2003-08-02 13:43 [#00805651]
Points: 3386 Status: Regular
|
|
i liked it though the guy who played john conner was a shite actor. and claire danes was a whiny bitch throughout the whole film. if they made a T4 the should get eddie furlong to play conner. it would have been MUCH better had he been in it.
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-08-02 13:46 [#00805652]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to mc_303_beatz: #00805651
|
|
I agrree 100%, it would have been grreat if he had taken on the parrt again.
|
|
aquagak
from Berlin (Germany) on 2003-08-02 13:50 [#00805653]
Points: 4397 Status: Regular
|
|
t3 suck's, but t4 will rule!
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-08-02 13:52 [#00805655]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to aquagak: #00805653
|
|
I was thinking about that... if they made a T4 what would the plot be. The starrt - middle - end?
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2003-08-02 14:01 [#00805668]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular
|
|
i saw it. it was about as good as i expected it to be. maybe slightly better. But i had LOW expectations.
|
|
evolume
from seattle (United States) on 2003-08-02 14:03 [#00805672]
Points: 10965 Status: Regular
|
|
i like nick stahl he was very good in 'in the bedroom' and 'bully'
a much better actor than edward furlong.
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-08-02 14:04 [#00805673]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to evolume: #00805672
|
|
He just neverr fit the parrt.
|
|
DJ Xammax
from not America on 2003-08-02 15:14 [#00805739]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker
|
|
*puts on an Arnie voice
"We need a new director"
|
|
pantalaimon
from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-02 15:18 [#00805746]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
it was alright, Danes and Stahl were good... though the whole film seemed rushed and had way too much comedy for a Terminator film. There were some interesting parts but I just cant help but feel that with a more talented director it could have been much, much better. I personally would have liked Ridley Scott to have directed. It wasn't as bad as it could have been though.
I'm kinda glad Cameron didn't direct, i'd rather see the Battle Angel Alita film he's working on than T3.
I'd give T3 **1/2
T1 **** T2 ****1/2
|
|
qrter
from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-08-02 15:19 [#00805748]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator
|
|
I'll probably go to see it.
but to get a former model to play the terminator - please. it feels kind of offensive - "yeah, we'll put some babe in leather and everybody'll love it". FUCK OFF!!
what a cheap and obvious trick.
but, like I said, I'll still see go and see it..
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-08-02 15:23 [#00805756]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to pantalaimon: #00805746
|
|
Yes too much comedy. And also he said too much when he need not have.
|
|
pyro5hit9rind
from Pickering (Canada) on 2003-08-02 20:08 [#00806102]
Points: 315 Status: Lurker
|
|
i saw it, it was okaaaaaay i guess.. t2 was waaay better. but t3 had nukes!!
|
|
J198
from Maastricht (Netherlands, The) on 2003-08-02 20:18 [#00806118]
Points: 7342 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
fucking class. better than matrix reloaded.
'i'll be damned. a cop when you need one!'
well ace!
|
|
Spacecadet
on 2003-08-03 03:13 [#00806299]
Points: 1790 Status: Lurker
|
|
they should do a film where it's just set in the future and conner and his crew fight the machines, that'd be a good movie, but leave arnie out of it, i bet T3 is just a typical hollywood money spinner, i mean come on, no james camron?????
|
|
DeLtoiD
from Ontario on 2003-08-03 03:38 [#00806307]
Points: 2934 Status: Lurker
|
|
"talk to zee hand"
fuck off....
|
|
aphextriplet
from your mothers bedroom (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-03 03:53 [#00806310]
Points: 4731 Status: Lurker
|
|
i liked it.
|
|
Dolleater
from Afrika Bambaataa on 2003-08-03 04:58 [#00806327]
Points: 4819 Status: Addict
|
|
The plot was a bit thin, but if you can get past that then its a fun film to watch. Some of the scenes were corny as god knows what, but funny all together. Such as that scene where the T-x creates modem sounds from her mouth. Or the scene in which Arnold aquires his clothing.
|
|
Dolleater
from Afrika Bambaataa on 2003-08-03 05:09 [#00806329]
Points: 4819 Status: Addict
|
|
Perhaps not "thin", but full of holes.
|
|
Jazembo
from The Earth ball on 2003-08-03 08:36 [#00806434]
Points: 2788 Status: Regular
|
|
ARNIE IS THE MAN!
|
|
forck_02lynix
from brooklyn on 2003-08-03 08:43 [#00806448]
Points: 4000 Status: Regular
|
|
yeah what the crap. arnold was the comic relief in this film!
i thought it kept well with the story, brought the whole thing futher along, but me and my brother agreed that it should have stopped after T2.
|
|
qrter
from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-08-03 11:17 [#00806611]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator
|
|
how is this girly Terminatrix better than the Robert Patrick Terminator?
I mean, as a model in a continually developing series of robots?
what I heard from it, it sounds like the Patrick one was a better version.
|
|
pantalaimon
from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-03 11:37 [#00806624]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
the TX can create weapons and tools (with moving parts) at will, the other one could only change its shape.
|
|
promo
from United Kingdom on 2003-08-03 11:39 [#00806625]
Points: 4227 Status: Addict
|
|
Yeah the whole film is shite without the original cast. It needed Linda Hamilton and Edward Furlong. Crikey a T3 movie without Linda Hamilton is just fucking stupid. Can you believe the half wit producers felt it was a good idea to kill off Hamilton's role and make her not the centre piece. That is apparently why she didn't go for it. Crikey all they had to do was chop and change the script anything to get her on board. If they'd had the original cast and characters this movie could have been one of the biggest follow up movies ever. Why do they get it so wrong? I mean its like the Matrix Reloaded what a bag of shite. The first one was ok there was the novelty factor but the second was just complete rot.
I am not going to watch T3. Its not a Terminator movie without the original characters. Blah.
|
|
Ophecks
from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2003-08-03 11:39 [#00806627]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
I want to see it, I expect it to be dumb popcorn cinema so I can't be disapointed.
The TX is overrated though... not that hot. I'd rather Claire Danes.
[geek]She's more powerful than the T-1000 though... she can do everything he can do, and more. He couldn't change himself into complex machines, like guns, but she can[/geek]
But Robert Patrick is just much cooler than her and I'd expect him to beat her ass anyway. The underdog always wins in that series.
|
|
pantalaimon
from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-03 11:44 [#00806630]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #00806627 | Show recordbag
|
|
LOL, he wasn't saying he was cooler, just that she wasn't more advanced.
The film needed an extra 30 mins for a stronger story and a decent director who can direct more than just action.
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-08-29 03:17 [#00841109]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
ok its not as shit as I expected
but still is shit
though not as fucking shit as reloaded, which is a piece of pathetic shit
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-29 16:05 [#00842079]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker
|
|
Saw it. Not horrible, but just... ehh.
|
|
danbrusca
from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-29 16:10 [#00842083]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ophecks: #00806627
|
|
Claire Danes has gone seriously downhill since Romeo+Juliet.
I would though.
|
|
Jarworski
from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-08-29 16:12 [#00842085]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker | Followup to danbrusca: #00842083
|
|
Yeah man, what happened to her nose?
|
|
Anus_Presley
on 2003-08-29 16:15 [#00842086]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to danbrusca: #00842083
|
|
trrue.
|
|
Messageboard index
|