RAM upgrade.. | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 164 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613450
Today 3
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
RAM upgrade..
 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-07-07 14:44 [#00769834]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



the limit for my system is 1 GB.

I have only 128 MB.

apparently what I need is DDR 266

but for my system all I can find is SDRAM .. can I get this
instead? is it just slower than DDR?

I have 3 slots for RAM memory. since RAM is only as fast as
its slowest module, might it be a good idea to replace the
original one as well?

getting 1 512MB chip, and 1 256 MB chip to be placed
alongside the 128 MB chip
is the best plan for optimization, correct?


 

offline Job a boj from Land of the Lost Timezone! (Canada) on 2003-07-07 14:47 [#00769840]
Points: 498 Status: Regular



DDR get DDR

remember

DDR

If u cant get DDR
then get something that can get DDR

i have 512 DDR


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-07-07 14:47 [#00769842]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



is there that much of a difference between DDR and SDRAM


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-07-07 14:50 [#00769848]
Points: 27790 Status: Regular



errr hold on

it depends on what your motherboard takes. check whats
already in it. if its sdram (which it should say on the
memory) then you can only put sdram in that slot. and again
if its 100 mhz or 133 mhz make sure to match the same one up
in the other slots.


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-07-07 14:59 [#00769869]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



okay.. are there any other places like crucial that are just
as good


 

offline eXXailon from purgatory on 2003-07-07 15:02 [#00769873]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker



Stick to what the sticker on your current RAM module
says!




 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-07-07 15:15 [#00769885]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to eXXailon: #00769873



Not all RAM is clearly and understandably labelled. Theo,
check the mainboard manual for details...or download it from
the manufacturer


 

offline Sanguine from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-07-07 15:21 [#00769891]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker



So I went and did some research so I could explain the
difference to ya, and since I was clueless as to exactly
what was different between the types of RAM... here's what I
came up with

DDR is basically more advanced SDRAM. The reason it is way
better, and the reason you CANNOT put SDRAM in a DDR slot,
is because it transfers data twice per clock cycle, which
was the big new technology. DDR thus stands for "Double Data
Rate"

Even if you don't care... a clock cycle is a square wave, it
has a rise and a fall each cycle. SDRAM only transmitted
data on the rise of the clock cycle. DDR transmits on both
the rise and the fall.

So you have to get DDR for a DDR slot, because it doesn't
know what to do with SDRAM.

Also, I'd just use the 256 and 512 or 2x512... you won't
need much more than that, the extra 128 will probably end up
just causing problems.

Personally, I'd grab 2x512 sticks since RAM is getting so
darned cheap nowadays... I'm running on a gig right now on
this box.

Hope that helped!


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-07-07 15:31 [#00769906]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



wouldnt two 512s put me over my limit


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-07-07 15:34 [#00769911]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to theo himself: #00769906



No....'cos 512x2=1024 which is 1Ghz

The numbers double with computers
1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-07-07 15:34 [#00769912]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00769911



1Gb not Ghz


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-07-07 15:36 [#00769914]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



I thought it was 512 MB

hmm.. so how much could I get if I kept the original 128


 

offline Sanguine from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-07-07 15:42 [#00769922]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker



Just take out everything and put in 2x512... the 128 is
essentially worthless


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-07-07 15:42 [#00769923]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



what about buying industry standard/generic RAM? or buying
ram from gateway's site produced by kingston or some other
company


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-07-07 15:43 [#00769924]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



but I have 3 spaces for ram


 

offline handoverthecart on 2003-07-07 15:43 [#00769927]
Points: 2017 Status: Lurker



i have been wondering about a ram upgrade recently as well.
my machine is 1.4 GHz Celeron but it only has 128 MB of ram
and im running windows xp. everything runs amazingly SLOW.
even if i want to bring up a right-click menu it takes a
second or two to load up. the only reason that i can think
of for this is memory. will getting 2 512 MBs to replace my
128 solve the problem?


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-07-07 15:48 [#00769933]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



that's exactly what happens with me


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-07-07 15:52 [#00769939]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



are there any other critical-esque sites out there ??


 

offline Sanguine from San Francisco (United States) on 2003-07-07 16:06 [#00769959]
Points: 859 Status: Lurker



Check Crucial... they have a selection menu for which menu
you need

Don't worry about the third slot, 2x512 is all you need.

Getting ONE 512 should fix your problem.

If you're doing music, you'll use the RAM up to 1Gig
(assuming you're using Win XP). if you're doing heavy
plugins or processing.

If not, then 512 is more than enough... the last numbers I
read was moving up from 128 to 512 is around a 50% increase
in performance, and it's absolutely necessary to have at
least 256 RAM when you're running win XP

So yes, it will probably solve your problem of speed... but
I don't know the details of your box so I couldn't say
definitively one way or another


 

offline eXXailon from purgatory on 2003-07-07 16:15 [#00769982]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00769885



Not if you buy cheap crappy RAM :P


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-07-07 16:32 [#00770034]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Sanguine: #00769891



wow. that's really helpful. all i knew before was that SD
has two notches on the bottom...and DDR only has one. yeap.
i'm a bank of information.


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2014-03-07 08:21 [#02468770]
Points: 19368 Status: Lurker



THAT'S what I call RAM upgrade

welcome to 2014


 


Messageboard index