|  | 
        
         |  | 
        
         |  Junktion
             from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2003-05-27 05:16 [#00716316] Points: 9713 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | I'm about to make a search engine, but I can't figure out what to write in the SELECT-thingy...
 something like this maybe?
 SELECT * FROM table WHERE row LIKE 'string'
 
 Is this completly bogus?
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  ecnadniarb
             on 2003-05-27 05:18 [#00716318] Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | No that is right...although you would have to do the comparison on a field rather than the row.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Junktion
             from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2003-05-27 05:22 [#00716321] Points: 9713 Status: Lurker | Followup to ecnadniarb: #00716318
 | 
| 
     
 
 | my problem is that the searcher (somewhat like the one on this site), should be able to search from multiple tables
 and rows...
 
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  ecnadniarb
             on 2003-05-27 05:27 [#00716323] Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
 | 
| 
     
 
 | yes, you just seperate the different tables you want to search using comma's don't you?
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Junktion
             from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2003-05-27 05:31 [#00716331] Points: 9713 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | can I write this? 
 SELECT * FROM table WHERE (row1, row2, row3) LIKE 'string'
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  grinningcat
             from london (United Kingdom) on 2003-05-27 05:36 [#00716342] Points: 1073 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | try it bruv 
 sql is a piece of shit. people should just use access!
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Junktion
             from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2003-05-27 05:53 [#00716383] Points: 9713 Status: Lurker | Followup to grinningcat: #00716342
 | 
| 
     
 
 | no access sucks for two reasons. ..1 easy to hack - 2. not as easy to program to do cool stuff
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  alnuit
             on 2003-05-27 05:53 [#00716384] Points: 1113 Status: Lurker | Followup to Junktion: #00716331
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Nopes. That would gomore like 
 SELECT * FROM myTable WHERE
 myTable.columnA like '%value1%' AND
 myTable.columnB like '%value2%' AND
 myTable.columnC like '%value3%';
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Junktion
             from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2003-05-27 06:30 [#00716439] Points: 9713 Status: Lurker | Followup to alnuit: #00716384
 | 
| 
     
 
 | cool man thanks...I didnt know if I should use the % or not...
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  thethirdball
             from Polly Pisspot (Canada) on 2003-05-27 07:38 [#00716482] Points: 1629 Status: Lurker
 | 
| 
     
 
 | Dude, 
 Although this board is wonderful for many things - SQL
 tutorials is not one of them.  For a wicked MB about
 computer problems - peep - CLICK Arstechnica Openforum.
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  Junktion
             from Northern Jutland (Denmark) on 2003-05-27 07:41 [#00716485] Points: 9713 Status: Lurker | Followup to thethirdball: #00716482
 | 
| 
     
 
 | thanks man ;) 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         |  epohs
             from )C: on 2003-05-27 07:49 [#00716497] Points: 17620 Status: Lurker | Followup to Junktion: #00716439
 | 
| 
     
 
 | just to kinda answer your question real quick; the % is just a wildcard character... just like the * in windows.  since
 you are using the LIKE keyword instead of = you are probably
 looking for a string in the middle of a larger string...
 not, the exact string; in which case you would use:
 
 SELECT * FROM myTable WHERE
 myTable.columnA = 'value1' AND
 myTable.columnB = 'value2' AND
 myTable.columnC = 'value3';
 
 
 
 
 | 
        
         |   | 
        
         | Messageboard index
 
 
        
 |