fruityloops gayness. | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 251 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614224
Today 6
Topics 127549
  
 
Messageboard index
fruityloops gayness.
 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-22 15:20 [#00663617]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker



okay. i've got issues with this heaping pile of...gay
(fruityloops). now...see. let's say i have a
loop-dealy...that when implemented...just goes on and on and
on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on
and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and on and
on and on and on and on and on and on until the end of the
freaking track. i want to put an END to that little
droney-dealie...and...well. yes. have something i can be
semi-proud of.

mm? anyone?


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-22 15:20 [#00663618]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker



<--- i'll give ya a smoochie.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-04-22 15:21 [#00663623]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



i told you before, man...

switch to taureg2


 

offline listentoparka from Fisherman's Cove (United States) on 2003-04-22 15:22 [#00663625]
Points: 266 Status: Lurker



no idea man, sooorry


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-22 15:23 [#00663629]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00663623



yarr. perhaps i will. after this, of course.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-04-22 15:24 [#00663633]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



sorry i cant be of more assistance


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-04-22 15:26 [#00663637]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



I feel you on FL, but then od busts out a hot tune on it,
and I'm left thinking.......wtf did I miss about how to use
this program at ALL?



 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-04-22 15:27 [#00663642]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



God, this is such a well documented "bug" and has nothing to

do with floops and everything to do with it making music
making accessible to people who know little about synths (no

offence to you, it's jsut it gets my back up when people
slag floops off for something that isn't floops' fault)

The problem is caused by not turning an envelope on on one
of
your synths. Check any TS-404s/simsynths first, they're the

main offenders.

Check each channel and turn the volume envelope on.



 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-04-22 15:28 [#00663645]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



btw, it's "tuareg 2" in case anyone searches for it.


 

offline Anus_Presley on 2003-04-22 15:29 [#00663651]
Points: 23472 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00663642



i see


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-04-22 15:30 [#00663652]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



danke, blatant... my spelling has been off lately.

pickin up my slack... nice!


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-04-22 15:30 [#00663654]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



and a link that I found

download


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-04-22 15:31 [#00663657]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to tibbar: #00663652



np m8 =)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-04-22 15:32 [#00663663]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Oh an there's nothing wrong with floops- to me that's a bit
like saying "acrylic paints crap for painting". It all
depends on the person using it.

Personally I see Reason as more of a toy (Yes, I use both)
in many respects- lack of VST implementation makes it quite
limited in some ways. And no, you can't do everything with
Subtractor and Maelstrom that you can with absynth so
there!

The problem with floops is:
a) It's easy, lots of people make music with it. A lot of
the music is poor as it tends to be "beginners" doing it. It
might be their lack of experience, musical theory, talent
etc. not the program's fault.
b) The provided samples are gash compared to Reason's. Okay,
they're getting better, but Reason is miles ahead in this
department... Answer? make your own samples outside
Floops/or import some good ones!


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2003-04-22 15:46 [#00663715]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker



i use fl for most of my tracks.
i'll put in my own sounds, or sometimes completely alter
some of the samples that come with the program and make
something different and more interesting.


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-22 15:49 [#00663730]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00663642



i'll give 'er a go.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-04-22 15:51 [#00663735]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



i know this is gonna really piss ceri off, but what the
hay!?!?

i typically dont like tracks made with fruity loops, because
you can tell they were made with it.

now before you cut my nugs off, lemme reiterate: not ALL,
but quite alot. i have heard tons of stuff coming from peeps
on here that sounds straight outta fruity loops... and that
is not good.

my reason for liking tuareg so much and using tuareg is that
it allows me to be flexible with stuff. maybe its a skill
issue, but i find myself saying "ugh, another fruity loops
artist" alot. ceri, your stuff doesnt sound like that, so
like i said, maybe you have the skill to use it tastefully.

i dunno, its all just my opinion.


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-04-22 15:51 [#00663741]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00663663



or don't use samples at all!


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-22 15:57 [#00663762]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker | Followup to ambsace: #00663730



well. it didn't seem to work. but...ah well. i'll work
around it or something...

...somehow.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-04-22 16:00 [#00663766]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00663741 | Show recordbag



Yes, I've done tracks where there is no way at all of
telling it was floops (nothing but VST softsynths making the
sounds with my own presets).

Tibbar: I agree, a lot of floops stuff, does sound like
"floops stuff"...

No one has (yet) successfully passed my challenge (which I
lay down everytime the "Floops is a Toy" debate comes
up...):

Tell me which of my tracks are in floops and which aren't.
At least one isn't...

Personally, I spot a lot of reason tunes :)

Hopefully the new features of FL Studio 4 will help lay this
argument to rest over time :)

Is Tuareg2 really good? I might check it out, I'm always
into new software...


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-04-22 17:06 [#00663892]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



ceri: check it out... all the stuff of mine on the xlt comps
and my 2 ae remixes were made with it and a simple wav
editor.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-04-22 17:07 [#00663895]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to tibbar: #00663892 | Show recordbag



Ah cool, what about your film study pieces?


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-04-22 17:15 [#00663907]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



yup... did em with tuareg2.
of course, i created my own sounds; which is always my first
step before i even plot stuff out.


 

offline disasemble from United States on 2003-04-22 17:20 [#00663912]
Points: 1448 Status: Regular



if fruity loops was called "kymalogibase 5.0.1.0
platigoldimenium2000" and it looked "fancy", people would be
all over it.

who cares about using presets? should i stop listening to
luke vibert now? god forbid i have fun listening to music.

theres a difference between using presets and using them in
a unique way. and mistake me if im wrong, but maphive 6.1
has timpani drums and e pianos.

point is, the fruity loops argument should never, ever, come
up again. i dont blast cubase users or logic users. because
they obviously found a program thats more comfortable with
them. fruity loops is more comfortable to me.

if some guy downloads fruity loops and makes a track
claiming himself to be the god of trance....dont blame
fruity loops. blame the guy, if you want.

either way i dont care. we all start somewhere.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-04-22 17:24 [#00663919]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to disasemble: #00663912 | Show recordbag



That's very true- fruity loops' name and interface do it no
favours in getting it taken seriously... it is actually a
very advanced bit of kit when you start adding external
synths and effects into it.


 

offline mojogigolo from Vic (Australia) on 2003-04-23 00:30 [#00664267]
Points: 65 Status: Lurker



true, i find that most people who knock fruity havent a clue
about how to use it in any in-depth way. "10 minutes trying
a demo-what i created sounded shit- therefore fruity is no
good."


 

offline Toejam from Perth (Australia) on 2003-04-23 00:32 [#00664271]
Points: 3077 Status: Regular



Careful...

don't let Od, the best artist at Xltronic, let you hear
that. He's very passionate about making good tracks and I
think he just uses fruityloops. Maybe it's the controller,
not the software?


 

offline Toejam from Perth (Australia) on 2003-04-23 00:33 [#00664273]
Points: 3077 Status: Regular



*best artist at Xltronic in many people's eyes, i meant.*


 

offline od_step_cloak from Pleth (Australia) on 2003-04-23 00:56 [#00664304]
Points: 3803 Status: Regular



dued what?
I'm just messing around, man. I could think of about a dozen
artists here that kick my ass but I'm not gonna get into
this.

I'm not really too passionate about making music either hehe
it's just something I do when I'm kind of not doing anything
else.

But yeah I can get a bit pissed at people bagging the
software, coz I mean I'm not the smartest kid around and I
don't have troubles gettign the sounds I want with it...and
people don't seem to mind my stuff most of the time, so I
think basically people should actually learn the software
before they get pissed off at it.

If programs built the songs for you, then there's no
challenge or sense of accomplishment.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-04-23 03:06 [#00664427]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to od_step_cloak: #00664304 | Show recordbag



Yes, a lot of people who criticise floops seem to be people
who are predominantley Cubase or Reason users who just give
it a cursory glance to re-affirm what the believe. Beneath
floops' seemingly simple interface it's bristling with
options and subtleties.

Spending hours playing with the event programming getting it
exactly as I want may be a little masochistic, but it makes
me enjoy the result all the more. I imagine people who use
trackers get the same sense of control too.


 

offline rF from __e____e_________e______q_____ (Australia) on 2003-04-23 03:28 [#00664451]
Points: 956 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00664427



I imagine people who use
trackers get the same sense of control too.


yep. thats exactly why i use buzz and other trackers..
almost no graphics, all envelopes/parameter automations/etc
are done by typing in commands.. i like it that way because
you get the precision


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-04-23 03:33 [#00664455]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to rF: #00664451 | Show recordbag



Yes, I think the problem with Reason etc. is that it sounds
great without that level of effort put into a track.

Now, if you apply that degree of care to a Reason track...


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-04-23 03:37 [#00664459]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



thats nice, but then look at cubase.

you have all that on the top and THEN more beneath...


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2003-04-23 04:55 [#00664510]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker



I agree about the poor samples you first get with FL. Best
thing to do it fuck them all up with DrumSynth. Like I do.
Ho yes.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-04-23 05:02 [#00664514]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to DJ Xammax: #00664510 | Show recordbag



Yes, I've got a few custom drumkits made entierly of my own
drumsynth sounds. With a bit of work you can make some
really good, CPU/mem efficient samples.


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2003-04-23 05:08 [#00664520]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



Jeskola Buzz is infinitely less gay than Floops


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2003-04-23 05:10 [#00664523]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker | Followup to Ceri JC: #00664514



Yeah CPU is my biggest enemy on FruityLoops, can you imagnie
the horror my 350-bar, 150 pattern, drum'n'bass mix?..good
thing you can disable FX temporarily. I often have
unbearably high CPU as soon as I use about 10 or more FX,
does this have anything to do with my shitty processor?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-04-23 05:31 [#00664555]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to DJ Xammax: #00664523 | Show recordbag



He he, you're right, floops can be a bit of a CPU hog...
it's all those VST fx mainly.

For my ae mix I had to render channels with their effects
then put them back in as .wavs to allow the CPu to handle it
and it's not like mine was a hugely complex track.

My processor is ageing and struggles with "busy" floops
tracks (the real reason I've gone back ambient? ;) ), there
are ways around it, but it does mean a lot of unnecessary
work.


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-04-23 05:50 [#00664591]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict | Followup to Anus_Presley: #00663651



LOL :D
that made me laugh


 

offline rF from __e____e_________e______q_____ (Australia) on 2003-04-23 06:53 [#00664664]
Points: 956 Status: Lurker



i just got fl studio 4 .. it looks interesting, but i'll
probably still use buzz mainly..

cpu use isnt much of a problem for me at the moment, with my
athlon xp2000+ .. hehe.. but yeah, a couple of months ago
making tracks was hell on my p2-266.. now i can put tons of
effects in and use all synths, as opposed to samples..


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-04-23 07:28 [#00664716]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to rF: #00664664 | Show recordbag



I use a 333mhz at the weekends, I often write basic bits on
that, mail them to myself then put proper synths and fx in
on my PC.


 

offline hepburnenthorpe from sydney (Australia) on 2003-04-23 07:43 [#00664726]
Points: 1365 Status: Lurker



its allways people who dont know how to use fruity that
complain about it.

learn to use envelopes, and automation!


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-23 12:34 [#00665023]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker



*shrugs* well, yeesh. excuse ME for being captain
completely-fucking-ignorant. i admit to not knowing anything
resembling shit about fruityloops...i'm just messin'
around...havin' fun. but eh. i'm learning. work with me,
people.

[/gigantic spiel of...pretending like i'm pissed off...or
something. because i'm really not. and i didn't mean
anything i said. honest]


 


Messageboard index