i tried pot... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
recycle
big
...and 468 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614225
Today 7
Topics 127549
  
 
Messageboard index
i tried pot...
 

offline corticalstim from Canada on 2003-04-18 08:09 [#00656613]
Points: 3885 Status: Regular



...for the first time last night

i did a bowl and a half, and a popper

got a bit of a buzz - but im sure it will be better the next
time >:D


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2003-04-18 08:18 [#00656631]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



i didn't get high the first time..

but the second time my soul was ripped into shreds.

have fun.


 

offline corticalstim from Canada on 2003-04-18 08:19 [#00656632]
Points: 3885 Status: Regular



heheh


 

offline Tab from manchester (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 08:21 [#00656634]
Points: 374 Status: Regular



i got stoned for the first time up a tree, it was real
horror trying to get down


 

offline nlogax from oh, you must be the brains (Norway) on 2003-04-18 08:21 [#00656635]
Points: 4653 Status: Regular



pot is kinda nice, now, isn't it :)


 

offline catharsis from Toronto (Canada) on 2003-04-18 08:23 [#00656639]
Points: 836 Status: Regular



Ya. I'm probably not the first to tell you this, but
smoking is an art. Inititally, the anxiety of smoking
creates a sort of defensive barrier.

As you progress, you gradually learn to relax and overcome
the natural resistance that occurs when you first begin.

You will learn how to make the best of it.
I didn't get high my first time. Now? :)


 

offline corticalstim from Canada on 2003-04-18 08:25 [#00656642]
Points: 3885 Status: Regular



my friend was impressed by my talent - he called me a pro
:D

he said that i did the first popper better than he's ever
seen a n00b do


 

offline LuxExTenebris from ehh... tenebris? (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 08:31 [#00656645]
Points: 478 Status: Addict



my dad said he tried the shit in Vietnam but it didn't do
anything so he got scared and never tried again

i'll try this year


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 08:33 [#00656647]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



when its good shit,its good shit


 

offline Kill Switch from Belgium on 2003-04-18 08:40 [#00656657]
Points: 661 Status: Regular | Followup to catharsis: #00656639



As you progress, you gradually learn to relax and
overcome
the natural resistance that occurs when you first begin.


What do you mean by that natural resistance?



 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-04-18 08:44 [#00656663]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



when you realise it's fun it gets more fun because there is
no anxiety


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2003-04-18 08:46 [#00656668]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker | Followup to corticalstim: #00656613



heh nice one, had some last night aswell ;)
I remember my first choof, on a bong called "Mr. Bungle" :D



 

offline Kill Switch from Belgium on 2003-04-18 08:49 [#00656670]
Points: 661 Status: Regular



Do you mean that people have a natural anxiety barrier
thowards using pot?
I never experienced that. I'm more anxious when I'm not on
pot. It always had that relaxing feeling for me, and always
will. :)


 

offline Zombiekev from Ardmore (United States) on 2003-04-18 08:51 [#00656673]
Points: 2857 Status: Lurker | Followup to corticalstim: #00656613



most people don't hold their hits the first couple of
times.

trust me, you'd be blazed to shit if you held your hits.


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-04-18 08:52 [#00656674]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular | Followup to Kill Switch: #00656670



i was meaning that people are nervous because they don't
know whats it all about. i must say nowadays i have no
anxieties whatsoever with being stoned (not even
public-placa paranoia)


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 08:53 [#00656676]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



I really don't enjoy the high of pot.

Or what it does to you.

Did you guys see that commercial that says that one joint
has as much tar as 4 cigarettes? I never knew that.


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-04-18 08:55 [#00656680]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00656676



yes but i'd like to see the person who somes 5 joints per
day.. (ok me when park season hits but thats just me)

anyway that kind of comparison sucks ass since i don't think
many smokers smoke even half as much as cig smokers.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-04-18 08:56 [#00656682]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



more like 10 + no filter


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 08:59 [#00656687]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to neetta: #00656680



well it's still good information to no. any tar is bad tar.
but whatever floats whoevers boat. ;)


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-04-18 09:00 [#00656690]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular | Followup to corrupted-girl: #00656687



hehe good phrase, my favourite :)

of course one must know what kind of shit one inhales.
ignorance sucks.

do you smoke cigs?


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-04-18 09:07 [#00656707]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



wheres mine!!



 

offline cuntlips from kendwoos (Aruba) on 2003-04-18 09:12 [#00656728]
Points: 5 Status: Lurker



kill drugs before drugs kill you


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 09:19 [#00656743]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to neetta: #00656690



no. cigs are pretty sick.


 

offline Kill Switch from Belgium on 2003-04-18 09:20 [#00656748]
Points: 661 Status: Regular | Followup to cuntlips: #00656728



Wash your mouth!


 

offline Laqeuro from New York City (United States) on 2003-04-18 09:25 [#00656765]
Points: 3167 Status: Regular



well come to the world of drugs

sit down and grab a pipe

the first time i smoked it did nothing to me

the second time i did i was gone


 

offline Laqeuro from New York City (United States) on 2003-04-18 09:29 [#00656774]
Points: 3167 Status: Regular



i've got a sack of weed waiting to be smoked in my closet
but alas! i have the flu

=(


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 09:30 [#00656777]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



maybe you have sars


 

offline Laqeuro from New York City (United States) on 2003-04-18 09:32 [#00656779]
Points: 3167 Status: Regular



sars?


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2003-04-18 09:33 [#00656784]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



:O


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 09:34 [#00656789]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to Laqeuro: #00656779



mm hm


 

offline LuxExTenebris from ehh... tenebris? (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 09:45 [#00656811]
Points: 478 Status: Addict | Followup to cuntlips: #00656728



You meant KILL THEM ALL FOR DRUGS BEFORE THEY KILL YOU


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 09:45 [#00656816]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular | Followup to LuxExTenebris: #00656811



hahah!


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-04-18 09:52 [#00656826]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



corrupted girl, please do NOT believe any of those
rediculous commercials. yes, hypothetically one joint (by
the way, is there a universal standard size for 'one
joint'?? no, of course not, so this part of there campaign
is fallible, right off the bat) MAY contain as much tar as 4
cigarettes. but without specifying (which is the trick here)
what kind of cigarette (different brands have different
tar/nicotine levels) and who's to say they didnt use
ultra-light cigarettes to determine this 'fact'?

if you rolled a rediculous joint ..like one the size of my-
..like one that's REALLY big.. with extremely potent, near
g-13 marijuana, there is going to be a rediculous amount of
tar right?

well, whoever came up with this commercial very well may
have used a joint like that to make this commercial work
(remember, saying "one joint" means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. that
could be near the size of a blunt or almost as thin as a
toothpick) and found the cigarette brand with the lowest
tar/nicotine per cigarette with an ultra-light variety, and
began their dubious 'scientific' study.

given the open-endedness of this bullshit, they coudl just
as easily have said one joint contains as much tar as one
and a half packs of cigarettes, but oh.. we'll leave out the
minutae, like the fact that those 30 cigarettes are Doral
Ultra-Lights and the joint was filled with dirt weed and was
the size of a roll of quarters.

second.. that tearjerker where the palatable young black kid
with white features visits the roadside crashsite where his
younger brother died. we are told that the driver was under
the influence of marijuana.. we are also told, I believe,
that the lil' brother was the driver.. this detail is
utterly useless for one.. as it makes no difference other
than to make the commercial 'sadder' and more touching so
we're reminded of this depressing scene each time we think
of someone lighting up, I guess.

they also tell us that something like two out of every three
teenagers killed in roadside car accidents wa


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-04-18 09:53 [#00656828]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



they also tell us that something like two out of every three
teenagers killed in roadside car accidents was found with
marijuana in their systems.. this is not convincing.. you
could replace the word "marijuana" with the word "chocolate"
and their argument would be just as convincing to me. while
it may be true that marijuana was detected in the SAMPLE
GROUP tested (meaning, in order to test the validity of this
statement, you must know the size of the sample group and
whether or not it was a biased, random, specific sampling of
people.. there could have been only 2 people out of say, 500
roadside accidents in which marijuana was detected.. but
they chose a group of three that just happened to include
the 2 isolated incidents.. this is an extreme example but it
helps make the point clearer) anyway, it could.. though it
is HIGHLY doubtful it COULD be true that 67% of all
teenagers killed roadside accidents had marijuana in their
systems. what does this tell you about marijuana though!?
nothing. this doesnt even indicate whether or not they were
DRIVING!!! so someone who hit a joint once or twice, sitting
in the back seat of the car that crashed ends up
contributing to this false statistic..
finally, stating that marijuana was in their systems does
not necessarily mean it was the CAUSE of the accident. like
I said before about 'chocolate,, it could be determined that
80% of all drivers (and let's not forget the passengers! as
this ad campaign certainly did not) of fatal car crashes all
had chocolate in their systems at the time.. does that mean
chocolate was the cause!?! nooo. it could have been
raining/sleeting in some instances, or they could have been
hit by a drunk driver for all we know, but most likely.. it
was ALCOHOL.. which, by the was is the funniest part about
this whole thing.. because thirty seconds after these
commercials end, there's usually a budweiser or bacardi
silver commercial waiting in the next time slot. they seem
to forget that, in america, drunk driving is the number one
cause of t


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-04-18 09:54 [#00656829]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



they seem to forget that, in america, drunk driving is the
number one cause of teenage deaths.. oops! I guess they just
let that one slip.. honest mistake, really.

then there's the one about the young girl that gets pregnant
'because she smoked marijuana' and it 'impares your
judgement' yeah. like no one has ever gotten really drunk
and fucked some random person w/out a condom. I dont know
about you, but when I smoke marijuana (in social
circumstances) I can hardly SPEAK to anyone .. let alone
FUCK them.. and nevermind the fact that smoking marijuana
can, through extended use, many times lead to impotence (it
should be noted that whilst I am a vehement advocate of the
legalization of this drug.. I cant STAND smoking it
anymore.. though I wish to eventually get over that and
start enjoying it again)
alright, now after that informative diatribe, why dont you
reciprocate the gesture by sending those infamous pictures I
seemed to missed out on

;)


 

offline Laqeuro from New York City (United States) on 2003-04-18 09:58 [#00656835]
Points: 3167 Status: Regular



well put!


 

offline Q4Z2X on 2003-04-18 11:10 [#00657007]
Points: 5264 Status: Lurker | Followup to corticalstim: #00656613



what the fuck is a popper?

p.s. i've been smoking for like 5 years, and have never
heard the term..


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-04-18 11:11 [#00657008]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular | Followup to Q4Z2X: #00657007



amyl nitrate


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-18 11:12 [#00657010]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



cooking with cannabis, it's clean and nice!


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-04-18 11:12 [#00657011]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



theo, you are really cool


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-04-18 11:16 [#00657014]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



yeah.. that's another point.. even if smoking this otherwise
harmless herb was just as dangerous as ingesting A LEGAL,
CARCINOGENIC BIOHAZARD (one whose longevity is perpetuated
by ubiquitous promotion and corporate) financing) in any
proportion, no one said you had to SMOKE IT GODAMNIT!!! you
can eat it, DRINK it (believe it or not - green dragon,
anyone?) take it in the form of a palliative etc etc.. those
ad campaigns NEED to be taken off the air


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-04-18 11:21 [#00657024]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular | Followup to neetta: #00657011



why thank you sweetie


 

offline corrupted-girl on 2003-04-18 11:29 [#00657044]
Points: 8469 Status: Regular



I know the effects of damn pot. And all drugs and booze and
cigs.. and polution.. and candy.. and sugar.. and fat and TV
and coldness.. and over-heatness... and scatching too hard..
not getting enough calcium... having cancer... falling down
the steps.. getting grass stains on your knees.


 

offline Theocide from Escondido (United States) on 2003-04-18 11:38 [#00657057]
Points: 264 Status: Lurker



try not to smoke weed everyday because it becomes a job.
like... a really boring and emotionally crushing job.

This is my life.


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 12:13 [#00657113]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker | Followup to Theocide: #00657057



an expensive job..


 

offline Laqeuro from New York City (United States) on 2003-04-18 12:32 [#00657150]
Points: 3167 Status: Regular



not TOO expensive

weeds the most inexpensive drug out there

10 bucks goes a long way with me


 

offline B3n from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-18 12:35 [#00657158]
Points: 4700 Status: Lurker



nah, you can steal fire extinguishers and sniff em

thats why they're always missing on the underground..


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-18 12:40 [#00657162]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker



see, theo. i usually like what you have to say...i just
can't read all that. hoo. too much. attention span of a
autistic, a.d.h.d. chihuahua here.


 

offline ambsace from canaDUH. on 2003-04-18 12:41 [#00657163]
Points: 6326 Status: Lurker



oh. and marijuana stinks.

s'a pun. get it? ...right.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2003-04-18 13:22 [#00657226]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



marijuana smells great, feels great... heh, first time I
tried it I got pretty ripped.


 


Messageboard index