AE and time signatures | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 376 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614224
Today 6
Topics 127549
  
 
Messageboard index
AE and time signatures
 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-11 11:20 [#00644995]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



ScreamUnheard said

"I try counting the time and figure out what beats they on,
but they aren't really sixteen notes, nor are they
triplets..... Has anyone figured out what they are?"

i assumed the time signatures of confield and most of draft
7.30 weren't of integers. what do you all think?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2003-04-11 11:23 [#00645005]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



How about assuming they pay no attention to time signatures
:D

Electronic music has surpassed all that old music stuff. lol


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-11 11:29 [#00645012]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



just because you don't make music with a time signature in
mind doesn't mean the music has no time signature. but i
agree, i can't imagine ae writing the music the ol'
*whatever you call those lines*

also, maybe it's not that the time signatures are not of
integers, maybe the time signatures are in a constant flux.
eh?


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-11 11:30 [#00645013]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



"writing their music on the ol' *whatever you call those
lines*"


 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2003-04-11 11:31 [#00645014]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



I think they use some shuffle which makes it harder to guess
the timesignatures


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-04-11 11:36 [#00645020]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



I'd say most of the time they follow the standard, 4/4 time
signature, though many times (like in sim gishel, vproc and
most notably in iv scose poise) they speeed up and slow down
the bpm throwing everything off completely, momentarily.
other times they simply delay snare hits and pull little
time-stretch tricks on it.. I do agree with ecnadniarb in
that they do throw away/ignore a lot of the rules most
people follow in musical composition. I think they're doing
a great thing by balancing both conventional structural
adherence and free-flowing capricious liquidity.. after all
it is about the sounds (in theirs and many others' case,
soundscapes) produced and not the method or the
technical math behind it that ultimately matters


 

offline bob from Nottingham (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-11 11:50 [#00645028]
Points: 4669 Status: Lurker



going to go and listen to this album again........ :)


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-11 12:02 [#00645039]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to theo himself: #00645020



of course the time signatures aren't imporant for
appreciating the music. i just find it interesting is all.

personally, i doubt they have a straight time signature with
the ocassional speed up or slow down. i'm pretty sure that
the flux is continuous. from reading interviews i gather
they are capable of doing this digitally.


 

offline E-man from Rixensart (Belgium) on 2003-04-11 14:28 [#00645252]
Points: 3000 Status: Regular | Followup to jupitah: #00645039



i'm sure i can count 4/4 on most of ae's tracks, but with
digital composing you can just syncopate it or put spaces
between sounds to make it totaly sound like another
tempo/time signature so you never know...


 

offline mc_303_beatz from Glasgow, Scotland on 2003-04-11 14:33 [#00645255]
Points: 3386 Status: Regular



In the song x2zrr38-099 on the Litz EP by early Autechre The
timing is 7/8 then goes to 5/4 followed by two bars of 2/3
and a passage of 6/4. Dizzying


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2003-04-11 14:34 [#00645259]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



damn geeks


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-11 15:35 [#00645339]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



they used a gong on confield.


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-11 17:14 [#00645495]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker



Yes, most Ae is in fact in 4/4. Especially Draft, off-beat
as it is...it's all in 4/4.

Not sure about Confield....


 

offline DiaZoHeXagoN from The city of angels (United States) on 2003-04-11 18:48 [#00645580]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker



Im not really sure of this, but I dont think time signs,
really give the speed...I think they just show which note
gets what beat...I think the words like "presto" and "largo"
give the speed


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2003-04-11 19:28 [#00645596]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



Tri Repetae is all 4/4


 

offline Cfern from Sacto (United States) on 2003-04-11 19:35 [#00645598]
Points: 1384 Status: Lurker



hmm the first two songs on lp5 are various different time
sigantures layered on top of each other:polyrythms... track
2 has 5/4 4/4 3/4 and 7/8 at least... a really head fuck
cichli is 5/4 track 4 from chiastic slide

cfern is 6/4 and like some tracks like bine have no time
signature....

but the majority are 4/4

caring about music doesn't make you dork does it? not if
your a musican or one who studies music..


 

offline boket from Australia on 2003-04-11 23:32 [#00645757]
Points: 198 Status: Lurker



'hub' from chiastic slide is really interesting in terms of
time signatures. sounds like about 3 competing time scales.

though i've never tried to figure out exactly what's going
on, in case it all turns out to be something simple after
all. heh.


 

offline tibbar from harrisburg, pa (United States) on 2003-04-11 23:34 [#00645759]
Points: 10513 Status: Lurker



i hear alot of 4/4 stuff going on with other time sigs on
top of it. some of it is waltz time in a 4/4 frame. anything
goes, i guess.


 

offline Zombiekev from Ardmore (United States) on 2003-04-11 23:45 [#00645768]
Points: 2857 Status: Lurker



autechre flows to some funky beats.


 

offline Archrival on 2003-04-12 04:32 [#00646098]
Points: 4265 Status: Lurker



I always rap to AE tracks, Draft 7.30 would be a dam fine
album with some MC-ing on top! :)

I flip to every track on Draft even Tapr has a steady beat n
time signature.

Nice AE.


 

offline Bremzen from utrecht (Netherlands, The) on 2003-04-12 05:18 [#00646170]
Points: 653 Status: Lurker | Followup to mc_303_beatz: #00645255



what is a 2/3 time signature?


 

offline hanal from k_maty only (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-12 09:12 [#00646360]
Points: 13379 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



they really did use a gong,but there u go


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2003-04-12 15:26 [#00647078]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



"lateralus" is in a time signature of 9/8/7


 

offline DiaZoHeXagoN from The city of angels (United States) on 2003-04-12 18:47 [#00647329]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker | Followup to Bremzen: #00646170



2/3? never heard of it myself...perhaps every dotted quarter
note gets the beat?



 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-04-23 15:32 [#00665269]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



oh my, you know Autechre really aren't such gods as some
people make them out to be... they make excellent music, but
they follow the same rules as everyone else, and most of
their music is in 4/4... for instance, I played Pen Expers
on my big stereo downstairs the other day REALLY loud, and
sure it sounds offbeat and glitchy, but I was nodding my
head to the beat, and it was straight 4/4... I think most
times Autechre's music is misleading... however, they have
experimented with some not so common time signatures like
5/4, and I believe 777 is in 7/4 time...


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-04-23 15:33 [#00665271]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to cygnus: #00647078



that doesn't exist... I agree lateralus seems pretty
weird... it's probably just a couple time signatures
switching back and forth, rather then only one for the whole
song...


 

offline DaWeeze from WANTED IN 16 STATES! on 2003-04-23 15:41 [#00665278]
Points: 5213 Status: Addict



Characi off of Cichlisuite EP is 13/8...


 

offline xian_ecci from los angeles on 2003-04-23 15:41 [#00665279]
Points: 251 Status: Regular | Followup to jupitah: #00645012



'i can't imagine ae writing the music the ol' *whatever you
call those lines*"

i'd love for someone proficient at writing it to try,
though... d'be nice to look at.


 

offline MachineofGod from the land of halo's (United States) on 2003-04-23 15:48 [#00665298]
Points: 3088 Status: Lurker



theres lots of clicks and beeps and sounds between beats so
people think its often not in 4/4 but it is a lot of the
time like all of you have said. Im not too good at counting
but I can do 4/4 and 3/4 and 6/8 but other than that I cant
count too well--musically that is.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-04-23 15:53 [#00665309]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



of course the time signatures are in [whole] integers!

p.s. guys only some autechre tracks are in 4/4, and even
those usually incorporate autechre's most identifiable
trait: layering of different time signatures. y'all noticed
that before, right?


 

offline DaWeeze from WANTED IN 16 STATES! on 2003-04-23 16:13 [#00665348]
Points: 5213 Status: Addict | Followup to titsworth: #00665309



layering of different time signatures. y'all noticed that
before, right?


Of course. LP5 and Confield is LOADED with them.


 

offline Dael from the low end (Australia) on 2003-04-23 17:08 [#00665430]
Points: 968 Status: Lurker | Followup to DaWeeze: #00665348



confield has some really interesting time signature
construction, whenever I put the album on it really keeps me
on my toes..


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-23 19:51 [#00665608]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



i know for a fact that on some tracks from confield and
draft that the beats are shifting. if you tap your feet in
a straight linear rhythm you will soon be off beat before
long. not 4/4.


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2003-04-23 19:55 [#00665610]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



even the beatles didnt always stick to one time signature
throughout songs.

:D


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-04-23 19:58 [#00665616]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker



it is one thing to shift from one time signature to another,
but that is not the case i refer to. i'm talking about a
continous shift, rather than steps. curves. maybe it's
just my fantasy, but that's what i hear.


 

offline ScreamUnheard from Redmond, WA (United States) on 2003-04-23 20:50 [#00665689]
Points: 117 Status: Regular | Followup to jupitah: #00644995



Hahaha, it's funny that I kind of started this thread, and
it isn't really about what I count 4/4 on most tracks, but
on some tracks, either they are using some twisted rhythms
or I can't really subdivide to figure out what notes they
are using... (sixteenth notes, sixteenth note triples, maybe
10th notes? I don't know) I could be wrong, but some of
their rhythms seem, so off beat, and I was thinking it might
be because they are using some strange notes.... Or I suck
at music! A distinct possibility!


 

offline rF from __e____e_________e______q_____ (Australia) on 2003-04-23 22:51 [#00665824]
Points: 956 Status: Lurker | Followup to Cfern: #00645598



"hmm the first two songs on lp5 are various different time
sigantures layered on top of each other:polyrythms... track

2 has 5/4 4/4 3/4 and 7/8 at least... "

acroyear2 is in straight 4/4 (to me at least)
777 is in 7/8 or 7/4, depending on when you divide the
bars..

the only tracks on confield that dont appear to be in 4/4
are vi scose poise, cfern and bine.. i can tap a constant
beat to all the other songs.. except when lentic catachresis
goes all fast near the end..

and draft is almost all made of 4/4 beats.. just some of
them twist sometimes.. like in iv vv iv vv viii how it
timestretches and in xylin room where the beat pauses every
now and then.. not sure about tapr yet.. i'm sure it has a
time signature of some sort.. just havent listened closely
enough yet..

and it took me such a long time to figure out that cichli is
in 5/4.. it just seems to flow so naturally..


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-04-23 23:30 [#00665844]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



OK, I can't even pin a beat on fold 4 wrap 5, but it still
sounds musical in all respects. It seems like maybe the
time signiture slows down or changed halfway through each
measure, but then its comes back in at what it was before.
It's crazy. They are genii


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2003-04-24 09:15 [#00666609]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker | Followup to mappatazee: #00665844



well, I don't know but fold 4 wrap 5 is in 4/4 time as well!


 

offline ScreamUnheard from Redmond, WA (United States) on 2003-04-24 13:50 [#00666966]
Points: 117 Status: Regular



One thing is in "IV VV IV VV VIII" there seems like 2
different rhythms where there are 2 snares right close to
each other... One could be sixteenth notes, but I'm not sure
what the other one is. I haven't really looked into it, but
it's darn cool.


 


Messageboard index