SO ARE UK MILITARY PILOTS ... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
big
dariusgriffin
...and 307 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614249
Today 18
Topics 127550
  
 
Messageboard index
SO ARE UK MILITARY PILOTS ...
 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 13:33 [#00611991]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to danbrusca: #00611952



why not they are civilian victims of the Gulf
War...geezzzzzzzzz

You mean poor nutrition caused by the sanctions and the
inadequate Food for Oil program you are so fond of as
inavailabilty of essential chemotheapry required for those
afflicted with cancers caused by the DU

what you mean is IAEA was good at coverups in the Gulf War -
Gulf War Syndrome which I could scan but its rather long as
well as about your local friendly nuclear plant belching
xray smoke

all you are trying to do is not working...there's plenty of
information besides the misinformation you are feeding on


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 13:35 [#00611996]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to rockenjohnny: #00611980



I agree bush has fscked up


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-03-23 13:44 [#00612008]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



chek the latest press interview of him.
theres some very worried people out there.. bush could
barely speak

the coalitions finding it tough all of a sudden.



 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-23 13:45 [#00612010]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Red: #00611991



LOL, you probably think I'm just as misinformed as I think
you are ;)

Actually, that's not quite true, I just think you're
exceptionally biased towards sources of information that
back up your view and refuse to acknowledge anything that
brings that into doubt.

As for civilian victims of the Gulf War, I have to say once
again that there is no intention to deliberately target
civilians. Your logic on that is all fucked up.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2003-03-23 13:47 [#00612014]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker



its too late to be speculating now



 

offline OK on 2003-03-23 18:30 [#00612346]
Points: 4791 Status: Lurker



danbrusca have you always been this stupid?


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-03-23 19:10 [#00612406]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



"If France and Russia have been making deals with Iraq
then it's obviously no problem to you that the US would have
traded with them also, so it's clearly not an issue who Iraq
has or has not traded with in the past. Glad that's
sorted."


big difference being that neither France or Russia have
initiated a "moral" war against Iraq.


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 20:49 [#00612596]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to danbrusca: #00612010



i am sorry but you are so misinformed you dont even know
about very public views of the people whose side you are
taking- an example here is an excerpt from US Secretary of
State Colin Powell's book called My American Journey where
he is expressing his views about the Kurd and Shi'ite
rebellions that ended up with so much of the atrocities and
bloodsheds that are being now used as one of the cases
against Saddam, all carried out right under the US's noses
after Bush senior repeatedly urged these innocent people to
stand up against Saddam

He said "Neither revolt had a chance nor frankly was
their success a goal of our policies. President Bush's
rhetoric urging the Iraqis to overthrow Saddam hoewever may
have given encouragement to the rebels. But our practical
intention was to leave Baghdad enough power to survive as a
threat to an Iran that remained bitterly hostile towards the
US"

As indicated so clearly by this statement not only are the
Americans killing the civilians directly with full intent
and intention (the original intent of Shock and Awe was to
use 3000 bombs and missles in one day more than any used in
any war during the entire war in recent years I will let you
do the calculations as to how many civilians had a realistic
chance of surviving that) but also on any opportunity they
get they have and will orchestrate slaughters of civilians
indirectly as they did in this case

Not a single thing you have raised has caused a moment of
doubt


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 20:50 [#00612603]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to danbrusca: #00612010



btw the way I have been quoting netural and right wing
opinions to you and refused to dip into the so called kooky
radical left wing opinion pools



 

offline b0nk from 1969 in the sunshine (United States) on 2003-03-23 20:54 [#00612610]
Points: 1121 Status: Regular | Followup to flea: #00610748



yak yak yak


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 21:00 [#00612615]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to danbrusca: #00612010



danbrusa: If France and Russia have been making deals with
Iraq
then it's obviously no problem to you that the US would have

traded with them also, so it's clearly not an issue who Iraq

has or has not traded with in the past. Glad that's
sorted."

qrter says: big difference being that neither France or
Russia have
initiated a "moral" war against Iraq.

and also the difference is while the US was imposing the
sanctions and causing much suffering to the civilians of
Iraq which according to Madeline Albright when asked if the
death of Iraqi of 1/2 million Iraqi children were a price
worth paying for sanctions "we think the price is worth
it"


The US and the UK had no problems transferring the acutal
biological and chemcial weapons through the back door while
they would not allow the much needed food and medicine for
the Iraqi children through the right channels. It just
proves what I have been saying again and again Iraqi
civilians are no more than just blips on the computer
screens to the coalition forces, a so called perfectly
acceptable collatreal damage. I find this unacceptable



 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 21:04 [#00612620]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to b0nk: #00612610



flea is no longer on this board I am so feel free to tell me
about your fetishes involving long haired tibetian farm
animals (yak)


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 21:19 [#00612633]
Points: 378 Status: Addict



Oh Dear!! Yet another "accident" they really need to train
these Coalition helicopter pilots not to crash into
mountains and ground and other helicopters. I thought that
sort of thing would be part of basic training. SO these
Pilots are far too good to be shot down by the enemies but
too dumb to keep flying the damn things without crashing??

U.S. helicopter crashes in Afghanistan, six dead:
WASHINGTON, March 23: A U.S. Black Hawk helicopter crashed
in Afghanistan today, killing all six military personnel on
board, U.S. Central Command said. "The crash was not the
result of enemy action,"
Central Command said in a
statement. The helicopter was conducting a "medical
evacuation mission," it said. (Reuters) (Posted @ 02:50
PST, Monday)



 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 21:24 [#00612639]
Points: 378 Status: Addict



This is to show that Iraqis are not exactly singing and
dancing in the streets cheering for the American Soldiers.

Iraqis Search Baghdad Allegedly for Pilot :
BAGHDAD, Mar
23: Hundreds of police and security agents searched for a
possibly downed coalition pilot Sunday, shooting into the
reeds and shallow water alongside the city's Tigris River.
They set fire to the brush in some spots, and small boats
patrolled out in the river. The U.S. Central Command in
Qatar and the Pentagon said there were no reports of any
coalition aircraft being shot down or a pilot being missing.
Al-Jazeera TV, a Qatari-based satellite channel, said one
Western pilot had been captured in Baghdad and another was
being sought. There was no confirmation from the Iraqis that
they captured a pilot in Baghdad. Security men armed with
Kalashikov assault rifles swarmed to the river after
witnesses reported seeing parachutes fall alongside its west
bank soon after air raid sirens had sounded in Baghdad.
Crowds and television cameras gathered quickly, and
hundreds of civilians tried to join the search but police
and security quickly blocked roads leading into the area.
Meanwhile, Iraqi Vice President Taha Yassin Ramadan
claimed an unspecified number of Americans had been captured
and would be shown on television. Coalition officials
initially denied the claim, but later Defense Secretary
Donald H. Rumsfeld said some U.S. soldiers might be missing.
He noted that under the Geneva Convention governing
prisoners of war, "It's illegal to do things to POWs that
are humiliating to those prisoners." Ramadan, who was
guarded by at least a half-dozen heavily armed soldiers at
his news conference, also denied speculation that Iraqi
President Saddam Hussein had been wounded by coalition
attacks. The official Iraqi News Agency said Saddam met with
top advisers today. Earlier in the day, Iraqi officials said
77 civilians had been killed and 503 wounded by coalition
air strikes across the country. Information Minister
Mohammed Said al-Sahhaf


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 21:28 [#00612647]
Points: 378 Status: Addict



Iraq says it has downed five planes, two helicopters:
BAGHDAD, March 23: Iraq said today that it had shot down
five coalition planes and two helicopters, and had stopped
the advance of invading troops near Nasiriyah and Najaf in
the south of the country. Military spokesman Colonel Hazim
al-Rawi told a press conference that four planes were downed
over Baghdad and one over the southern city of Basra. One
helicopter was shot down over the main northern city of
Mosul and the second over As-Samawa in the south, he said,
without providing any further details. Whereas, U.S. Central
Command today denied statements by Iraq that U.S.-led
coalition planes had been shot down. "We categorically deny
that they shot down any coalition aircraft," said U.S.
Marines Captain Stewart Upton, a spokesman at the Qatar
command headquarters of U.S. and British forces in the Gulf.
(AFP/Reuters) (Posted @ 16:25 PST)



 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-03-23 21:31 [#00612649]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular



lucky no fucker can be bothered to read that shit


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 21:36 [#00612658]
Points: 378 Status: Addict



A question does the Geneva Convention really apply in an
illegal war being waged without the consensus of both the UN
general assembly and the Security Council and against the
wishes of majority of the nations of the world


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 21:38 [#00612661]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to earthleakage: #00612649



you are reading it hence no links provided this time


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 21:52 [#00612682]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to danbrusca: #00612010



as I was saying about the indiscriminate bombing of Basra
while the ground troops languish outside the city Basra and
the use of WMD cluster bombs by the US/UK forces....

Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf told a news
conference in Baghdad that cluster bombs had killed dozens
of people and wounded several hundred in Basra. "Did you see
what those criminals did in Basra when they used the cluster
bombs? Seventy-seven people were martyred and 366 were
injured from these banned weapons
," Sahaf said


 

offline Cabbog from Chautauqua (United States) on 2003-03-23 21:59 [#00612691]
Points: 2294 Status: Regular



Give me bottom lines. I want two bite-sized summaries; one
from the each of you. Unlock those horns and compose
yourselves.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-03-23 22:04 [#00612697]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular



welll... yeah.. but i am bone-idol. not a real excuse
though, i've been told...


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 22:08 [#00612702]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to earthleakage: #00612697



:P


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 22:22 [#00612712]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to Cabbog: #00612691



sorry mate all war talk is now confined to these threads its
a friendly discussion due to actions taken by Ceri which led
to flea being banned. Its all now lumped into one
undecipherable mess with a general title about pilots. That
was why flea tried to start threads called prowar and
antiwar so some sense would be made out of all these
opinions flying back and forth people are entitled to their
own thoughts and feelings on the issue not to be lumped
artitary thread that dealt with only issue of the war so far
that i.e inexplicable frequency of accidents involving
coalition helicopters

The main issues here are the targeting of civilians, WMD -
American use of it, the case for and against this war at
this particular juncture of history when there were so many
opportunites before to remove Saddam but instead Saddam was
constantly being fed WMD from US/UK sources so that they
could turn a blind eye to his use of these weapons first
against Iran and then the Kurds, Depleted Uranium and the
WMD that US and UK have been actively using which are
equally destructive with long lasting effects not unlike
those of chemcial, biological and even nuclear weapons.

US propoganda as whole as instrument of war and on this
thread that keeps claiming that the planes that were shot
down were actually accidents hence the title of this thread
flea posted. Either too many of these pilots are incompetant
or the command centre is just not telling the truth...is the
issue that started this thread


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 22:24 [#00612713]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to earthleakage: #00612697



Dobbin - flea is saying that final score by Australia in the
finals is that insane or what?


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-03-23 22:26 [#00612715]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular | Followup to Red: #00612712



they banned flea..? i am in shock :( pure shock :(

i'm glad i live in finland - the news seem to understand
that most of the info coming out the area is war propaganda.
they have a dude to comment on the news bits in the studio.


anyway this war, as all wars, make me sick, especially with
all this suspicious stuff going around it. *puts on
conspiracy freak hat*

good to see you here still fighting reddy :)


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 22:36 [#00612724]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to neetta: #00612715



taa mate I hope it means he will get on with learning some
Java, but he tells me he will be doing a remix for teapot at
some stage, I will keep him busy

We get mostly propoganda here, although the odd thing slips
through the net

Its the psychology behind the war logic that makes me sick,
that us and them mentality...the force feeding of
information to give instant gratification that prolongs
terrible suffering that makes me sick


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-03-23 22:45 [#00612730]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular | Followup to Red: #00612724



do you think it is a start to an even more unstable, warry
era? that concerns me so much.

i have my free essay test soon :o i hope i can write about
something that does not have anything to do with all this.i
am sure anti-warness does not make a good grade :)


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 22:46 [#00612731]
Points: 378 Status: Addict



They bomb it and then US gets the oil and Iraq pays for the
href="http://xtramsn.co.nz/business/0,,5086-2232808,00.html
damage being caused by the US...sweet eh? Yea right the
oil belongs to the people of Iraq


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 22:49 [#00612733]
Points: 378 Status: Addict



Ignore that last post it should read...

They bomb it and then the US gets the oil and Iraq pays for
the cleanup - yea right the oil belongs to the people of
Iraq

link


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-23 22:56 [#00612736]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to neetta: #00612730



probably the prescence of troops for an indefinite period
which will infuriate the people of Iraq and the Middle East
whose own income is going to be syphoned right out of their
grasp. Iraq had been doing blackmarket oil deals with Jordan
to the US administrations chargon

too right avoid the antiwar issue with the course...it gets
you the wrong attention from the powers that mark your
assignments even though it usually goes down well with
students if you are doing presentations. I used child porn
on the net and got a favorable response from my tutor by
putting a human face to the children abused in the
international sex trade and the lack of legalisation in NZ
to deal effectively with child porn traders


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-24 00:04 [#00612764]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #00612406



Entirely unrelated to Iraq's large debts to those countries,
of course.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-24 00:08 [#00612767]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Red: #00612596



Assuming you were right and that the US and UK were
deliberately setting out to kill Iraqi civilians - something
for which there is no evidece at all - why would they do it?
Given the arms at their disposal surely they could have done
a 'better job' of it by now?


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-24 00:09 [#00612768]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Red: #00612603



I don't particularly give a fuck as to wether something is
left wing or right wing. Neither has a monopoly on truth and
lies.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-24 00:12 [#00612770]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Red: #00612615



Note, the sanctions are UN sanctions. You can't attribute
blame for them solely to the US. Don't forget that the
sanctions were UNSC approved, no vetoes being thrown about
by the french and russians there.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-24 00:16 [#00612772]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Red: #00612639



"Crowds and television cameras gathered quickly, and
hundreds of civilians tried to join the search but police
and security quickly blocked roads leading into the area."

Maybe I'm way off the mark, but if a bunch of soldiers
started firing into the River Derwent here I'm pretty sure
it would attract a crowd.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-24 00:23 [#00612773]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Red: #00612658



To answer your question, yes, the Geneva Convention does
apply regardles of wether or not a war is legal/illegal.

The Convention makes no distinction between legal and
illegal war. Such a distinction is made at the political
level.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-24 00:25 [#00612774]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Red: #00612712



The side issue of this thread is people passing off opinion
as fact.


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-24 04:31 [#00612958]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to danbrusca: #00612764



To cover your points....

I have provided plenty of up to date evidence here on this
thread of the US's and the UK's involement in war crimes in
Iraq and the Middle East

It is very clear who passed these resolutions the UK and US,
Kofi Annan is a puppet handpicked by the US to carry out
their bidding, it was the US/UK decision to go to war before
Hans Blix could give his report on the progress made by Iraq
and an attempt to force a second resolution for war would
have only been vetoed by France, Russia and China and was
not supported by the Security Council who wanted more
inspections. The US has vetoed more UN resolutions in Israel
nearly 40 times more than any other security council member.
The US was the instigator of these sanctions backed strongly
by Tony Blair who loves placing sanctions, in fact it is his
favorite word...sanctions, sanctions sanctions

like civilians and other POW from Camp Xray displayed on
camera for the world to see in cages that I would expect to
see animal rights activists going nuts if animals put in
them, forced to shave off their beards, constantly sedated,
psychoanalysed, tortured and interrogated and when the
Geneva conventions were brought up they were laughed off by
the US saying they were unlawful combantants not POW. Well
US/UK soliders fighting in an illegal war are also illegal
combatants hence not POWs so the Geneva Convention should
not apply to them either

The people were also civilians at the riverside were all
armed and waving guns and shooting at the river I witnessed
this on the evening news, there was no doubt at their anger
at the Americans who are bombing their city of Baghdad and
they want revenge for their loved ones that have fallen

Duh I have provided news reports that provide evidence of my
case as per Senate reports, newspaper reports, and excerpts
from books, websites set up for the purpose i.e
thefirethistime.org from many sources including right wing
views like this little gem

the hidden hand of the market will never work without a


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-24 04:42 [#00612970]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to danbrusca: #00612774



hidden fist McDonalds cannot flourish without McDonnell
Douglas, the designer of the F-15. And the hidden fist that
keeps the world safe for Silicon Valley's technology is
called the United States Army, Air Force, Navy and the
Marine Corps"
Thomas Friedman, NY Times, March 28 1999

The people I evidence my observations on are the movers and
shakers (hawks) of Bush's administration that make such
words into truths. They make the US foreign policy that
dictates the outcome affecting the world. The Iraq war is
an oppotune time for the Right Wing to advance capitalism,
globalisation and to oppress people. Like I saw today on DW
Tv an excited Shell Oil company spokesman asked about the
prospect of oil in Iraq commenting about how it would be
cheap to produce. How long is it until the US sets its
greedy right wing agenda to the State owned oil companies of
Iran, with its claims of WMD's....the US government right
wing campaigns are funded and the Senate is lobbied by arms
manufacturers, car manufacturers, oil companies etc...the
Right has much wealth to gain indeed


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-24 05:10 [#00612993]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Red: #00612958



1. Contrary to your belief, you have provided no evidence of
war crimes.

2. It hardly matters if the US instigated the UN sanctions.
France and Russia didn't veto them. If you wish to attribute
thousands of deaths of Iraqis to UN sanctions you cannot
deny the complicity of those countries.

3. I happen to agree that the US is violating the Geneva
Convention with respect to Camp X-Ray.

4. Again, the Geneva Convention makes no distinction between
a legal and illegal war, so both sides in Iraq should be
conduct themselves within the Convention. No doubt we could
debate the legalities of this war for decades.

Article II, Chapter I:
"In addition to the provisions which shall be implemented in
peacetime, the present Convention shall apply to all cases
of declared war or of any other armed conflict which may
arise between two or more of the High Contracting Parties,
even if the state of war is not recognized by one of them."

5. It's blatantly untrue to say the civilans by the Tigris
were all armed. In fact, there were very few arms present. I
have no doubt there's anger in Baghdad with regard to allied
bombing, but it's a little more complex. For one, there's a
natural tendency for people to develop a siege mentality and
rally around the leader in these situations, as happened in
London in WW2. The views of average Iraqis are likely to be
biased against the US and UK at this stage, after all most
of them only have access to Iraqi media.

6. I don't deny you've provided lots of sources etc, but you
consistently refuse to acknowledge any source that differs
from your view.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-24 05:17 [#00612996]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to Red: #00612970



Oh right, a Shell executive expresses an opinion and that's
supposed to be evidence of US policy.

You really need to come up with some real evidence.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-03-24 05:21 [#00612998]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to danbrusca: #00612996



Don't you think saddam's looking well?


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-24 05:24 [#00613002]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00612998



Hehe, yeah I do actually. We haven't seen Tariq Aziz in a
while, perhaps he's looking a bit pale...


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-03-24 05:28 [#00613007]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to danbrusca: #00613002



If I looked as good as him when I'm 70, I'd be happy. Maybe
being a tyrannical leader is the elixir of life.


 

offline danbrusca from Derbyshire (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-24 05:34 [#00613011]
Points: 4570 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00613007



Perhaps he uses Oil of Uday?


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-24 08:01 [#00613213]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to danbrusca: #00612993



relax danbrusca the Iraqis have said they will treat the
soliders in accord with the convention unfortunately while
in Bashra civilians are getting hit with illegal cluster
bombs while they have lost their water and power
supplies...

everyone I saw there were armed with guns and firing into
the air...saying the Iraqi people and the Middle East people
are not armed in general is a little bit naive its like
saying there's no such things as the NRA of America - to say
the least even flea has an Ak47 at home in Pakistan, its
like tribal rule

I quoted Colin Powell, Richard Perle and Madeline Albright
all members of Bush's administration, makers of US foreign
policy talking about their foreign policy.

The Republican administration election campaigns are funded
by arms manufacturers such as the lobbist Lockheed Martin,
McDonnell Douglas automobile companies such as GM major
shareholders in LM, oil companies and what used to be Enron
have a say in the balance of power that makes up the Senate,
these companies have a lot of power unlike you think
members of these corporations have a huge say in the US
economic policy

what are your sources? Mainstream media apart from I have a
source as I said that the IAEA you supplied has covered
events in the Gulf War pertaining to DU as my source is a
little long to post...but here is something to support
mydebate

The World Health Organisation (WHO) has steadfastly resisted
studies on the health effects of exposure to uranium 238
following Desert Storm, Bosnia and Kosovo. The reason for
this is that an agreement forged in 1959 between the
International Atomic Energy Agency which actively promotes
nuclear power and the WHO stating if one agency wishes to
carry out a study that affects the work of the other, mutual
agreement is required. The IAEA has never agreed to such
studies

The UN subcommission on human rights has condemned uranium
munitions as weapons of indiscriminate destruction. As they
fail:

1. The temporal test their effects continue after the war e


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-24 08:04 [#00613217]
Points: 378 Status: Addict



ends

2. The environmental test they have effects beyond those
necessary to achieve miltary objectives

3. The humanness test they have effects beyond those
necessary to achieve miltary objectives

4. The geographical test the partilces can travel to
non-combatant countries


 

offline Red from Hell (New Zealand) on 2003-03-24 08:11 [#00613233]
Points: 378 Status: Addict | Followup to danbrusca: #00613011



This should clear up the mystery after this quote of the day
(visualise a scene like Wag The Dog and hullo there's
pictures of actors on the presentation screen)

Tommy Franks "This is not a platform for propoganda but a
platform for the truth"

News report Saddam injured: report

By Our Correspondent

WASHINGTON, March 21: US intelligence sources say Saddam
Hussein was seen being wheeled out of a Baghdad residential
complex on a stretcher after the complex was struck in
"decapitation attacks" by the United States , the ABC News
reported on Friday.

Eyewitnesses saw the Iraqi leader being taken from the
complex on a "gurney, with an oxygen mask over his face,"
Thursday morning, the officials told ABCNEWS. Sources said
there was clearly a US observer nearby, watching the
complex.

When asked on Friday whether Saddam may have been injured in
the attack, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said he
wouldn't address rumours, but added ambiguously, "I don't
know how Saddam Hussein is feeling today."

Intelligence sources also said there has been a significant
lack of communications between Saddam and his military
structure since the airstrike.

They are optimistic that the attack injured Saddam, though
they are cautious about the extent.

The US officials believe that one or both of Saddam's sons
were also in the complex when it was struck. The attack was
"massive, catastrophic," the Washington Post's Bob Woodward
told ABCNEWS.



 

offline FLUX on 2003-03-25 12:12 [#00615514]
Points: 419 Status: Addict



I just thought you all might find this interesting.

Troops Fire On Own Again
26/03/2003 06:52 AM
IRN

Coalition troops have accidentally fired on their own again.


A US F-16 fighter plane fired on a Patriot missile battery,
48 kilometres south of Najaf in southern Iraq.

There were no casualties.



 


Messageboard index