|
|
hkewell
from United Kingdom on 2003-03-06 13:52 [#00583410]
Points: 196 Status: Lurker
|
|
Has this been mentioned? (I tried searching but it didn't work...).
Richard D James album in at no. 55, SAW 85-92 at 92 in all time 100 albums list.
There some interesting stuff in there, not least the White Stripes album, not yet released, in at 74.
|
|
hkewell
from United Kingdom on 2003-03-06 13:53 [#00583413]
Points: 196 Status: Lurker
|
|
Forgot the link
|
|
afxNUMB
from So.Flo on 2003-03-06 14:00 [#00583422]
Points: 7099 Status: Regular
|
|
NME I saw a green shirt with NME written on it, I dont know if it was from a movie I just finished seeing 10 seconds ago or a t-shirt someone had on.....
"drugks kill no they dont,bitch I'm for real"
think.think.think.
Anyway, about the site I HAVE no idear what I'm looking at =)
hkewell,youre new right?? velcom
|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2003-03-06 14:01 [#00583425]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict
|
|
nme is bullshit. they put the strokes - is this it? in a recent top ten albums ever made list.
|
|
hkewell
from United Kingdom on 2003-03-06 14:10 [#00583433]
Points: 196 Status: Lurker
|
|
Thanks afxNUMB, more of a lurker.
|
|
astrid-gil-botn
from Londinium (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-06 14:11 [#00583436]
Points: 1649 Status: Regular | Followup to zaphod: #00583425
|
|
yeah it used to be alright but now it's just shitty rock bands doing stuff done 20 years ago or whatever - the only innovation they have is in their haircuts
|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2003-03-06 14:13 [#00583441]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict
|
|
i hate how the "lifestyle" matters more than music now. and that list is such bullshit. there are plenty of lesser known albums that should have been on there. so much for expanding general musical knowledge.
|
|
Peter File
from the future!!! Ooooh chase me! on 2003-03-06 14:17 [#00583449]
Points: 2020 Status: Lurker
|
|
Why do they bother with these lists?
Q is even worse; I think they have a Top 50/100 singles/albums/uk albums/rock albums/dace tunes etc of All Time! list of some sort in every single issue now.
|
|
zaphod
from the metaverse on 2003-03-06 14:18 [#00583451]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to Peter File: #00583449
|
|
yeah, most mags do this because the music "industry" is shallow and music writers are all idiots.
|
|
astrid-gil-botn
from Londinium (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-06 16:46 [#00583623]
Points: 1649 Status: Regular | Followup to Peter File: #00583449
|
|
it's just a simple way to deal with things - i mean why deal with the present when you can comfortably talk about the past down the pub with your journalist mates and repeat and repeat the same tired cliches exhalting the same tired gods
|
|
astrid-gil-botn
from Londinium (United Kingdom) on 2003-03-06 16:48 [#00583627]
Points: 1649 Status: Regular | Followup to zaphod: #00583451
|
|
yes too apoint but there are alot of writers and enthusiasts pushing things along - most of the times editors ignore them - slot of it comes down to who they paid for lunch and who's advertising in the mags though...
hardly the way to push music out of the stagnacy its currently in - just looking back not even even looking sideways..
|
|
nacmat
on 2003-03-06 16:54 [#00583634]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker
|
|
its a strange list indeed
|
|
Messageboard index
|