internet "jargon" | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
recycle
...and 273 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614278
Today 25
Topics 127553
  
 
Messageboard index
internet "jargon"
 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2003-02-23 22:48 [#00568499]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



not programming jargon, but those inane web terms like
"rotflmao". i hate when otherwise intelligent people use
these things in IM conversations. "LOL!!!!!111".
annoying. whose with me?
is the internet corrupting us?


 

offline theo himself from +- on 2003-02-23 22:49 [#00568501]
Points: 3348 Status: Regular



wtf?


 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2003-02-23 22:51 [#00568502]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



i guess i should have seen that coming.


 

offline skyfarmer from a bigger, more complex and tun (Russia) on 2003-02-23 22:59 [#00568504]
Points: 1112 Status: Addict



wtbhf?, i'd say.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2003-02-23 23:01 [#00568505]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



rtfm


 

offline skyfarmer from a bigger, more complex and tun (Russia) on 2003-02-23 23:29 [#00568513]
Points: 1112 Status: Addict



lol


 

offline b0nk from 1969 in the sunshine (United States) on 2003-02-23 23:29 [#00568514]
Points: 1121 Status: Regular



blehh the only thing i find annoying is when i have to type
something for school and i start typing "u" instead of "you"
"wut" instead of what etc.. other than that its all good


 

offline skyfarmer from a bigger, more complex and tun (Russia) on 2003-02-23 23:44 [#00568519]
Points: 1112 Status: Addict



yeah, even worse for me: i'm russian, but i write stuff half
rus half eng


 

offline ISayNothing from Mt. Pus (Sweden) on 2003-02-24 00:17 [#00568524]
Points: 575 Status: Regular



kunts?


 

offline blrr from the block on 2003-02-24 00:23 [#00568526]
Points: 585 Status: Lurker



i hate fucking web-abbreviation-things


 

offline skyfarmer from a bigger, more complex and tun (Russia) on 2003-02-24 02:37 [#00568570]
Points: 1112 Status: Addict



no, some are good. like wtf and lol

8)))_____ _ _ _ _ _


 

offline glass_eater from a blind nerves area (Switzerland) on 2003-02-24 02:53 [#00568597]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



ahah sometimes i say lol
sorry for that
no way its not "sorry party day" today


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-24 02:54 [#00568599]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



I really like it... and especially also the :-) ;-) :-D :-p
:-( little faces!

It's kind of exciting too... for the first time in hundreds
of years this is actually a completely new element in the
written language. I think there are many artists who tried
to create something like that (new letters to the alphabet
and such, or things to express emotions in written text) and
now with the internet it just created itself :-) You've got
to love that! I do! :-D


 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2003-02-24 03:10 [#00568623]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular | Followup to surrounded: #00568599



right on! although i dont approve of using words like 'lmao'
coz u usually dontknow what they mean, i love the smily
faces....so much variety


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-02-24 03:15 [#00568631]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to surrounded: #00568599



It's a danger to our society. Have you never read 1984? We
are bastardizing the language to make us less articulate.
Less articulate=less intelligent=less questioning. Newspeak.
It's double plus bad. I'll never use it.


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-24 03:23 [#00568637]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to bill_hicks: #00568631



You're kind of right about it making us less articulate... i
must agree with you there. It's especially sad to see kids
grow up with this... and they will never learn to write
properly without smileys.

But still... to say that it also makes us less intelligent
is kind of a huge leap! I don't think this has even been
researched. You saying that is based on nothing, expect your
own paranoia.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-02-24 03:32 [#00568644]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



Being less articulate doesn't make you less intellengent
then? I think you'll find that there is a direct
corellation.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-02-24 03:34 [#00568647]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



care to explain how?


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-24 03:36 [#00568649]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00568644



Stephen Hawking?


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-02-24 03:41 [#00568653]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to Jarworski: #00568649



Stephen hawkins is extremely articulate.


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-02-24 03:42 [#00568654]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to bill_hicks: #00568653



*hawking


 

offline JAroen from the pineal gland on 2003-02-24 03:43 [#00568655]
Points: 16065 Status: Regular



the paast insaaid the preesentt.....


 

offline eXXailon from purgatory on 2003-02-24 03:48 [#00568668]
Points: 6745 Status: Lurker



1 0\/\/|\| j00 fUxX1|\|g f4Gg075

;)

Heheheheehhehe


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-24 03:51 [#00568671]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to bill_hicks: #00568644



"I think you'll find that there is a direct
corellation.
"

well i beg to differ.

Maybe someone who writes "rofl!!! and lmfao!!! :-p" all the
time seems less intelligent... but who's to say what
goes on inside his head?


 

offline skyfarmer from a bigger, more complex and tun (Russia) on 2003-02-24 04:39 [#00568721]
Points: 1112 Status: Addict



do you dig my 'maniac' smiley?..

8)))))______ __ _ _ _


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2003-02-24 04:47 [#00568731]
Points: 24596 Status: Regular



I agree with Bill


 

offline Kill Switch from Belgium on 2003-02-24 05:28 [#00568775]
Points: 661 Status: Regular



Maybe I don't get the whole point but why should it be
considered less articulate? In addition to normal use of
language, it adds something. It gives a view of how someone
is feeling while writing a post. We don't have bodylanguage
on the board and I think they are also good to avoid
misunderstandings.



 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-24 05:36 [#00568784]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



"It gives a view of how someone
is feeling while writing a post.
"

Yeah, but a very articulate person would be able to express
in his words how he feels, and wouldn't need smileys to
communicate this...


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-24 05:36 [#00568785]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to skyfarmer: #00568721



... i don't get it....


 

offline skyfarmer from a bigger, more complex and tun (Russia) on 2003-02-24 05:43 [#00568790]
Points: 1112 Status: Addict



it's a eye-popping face with saliva dropping from its
mouth.

a MANIAC (tm) Smiley by Skyf...etc


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-24 05:45 [#00568795]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to skyfarmer: #00568790



but why does it have 5 mouths?


 

offline Kill Switch from Belgium on 2003-02-24 05:53 [#00568804]
Points: 661 Status: Regular | Followup to surrounded: #00568784



I agree but imagine that we explain in every post, put in
beautiful and clear words, the feeling we want to express.
They're gonne be a lot of long messages out there and most
people like it short and to the point.
But I'm also worried about the kids growing up with this
kind of language. Maybe it's just an evolution in the
computer era which make us the last generation in tradional
language.


 

offline skyfarmer from a bigger, more complex and tun (Russia) on 2003-02-24 06:01 [#00568811]
Points: 1112 Status: Addict | Followup to surrounded: #00568795



It's laughing maniacally, trembling with obsession, so it
seems that way ;)

but actually it's a tradition for portraying wide and
intense smiles :))))))))))


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2003-02-24 06:04 [#00568814]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker



The Ultimate smiley is the ^_^

A happy cat, maybe?
Kawaii!!!!!!!


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-24 06:07 [#00568817]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



"most people like it short and to the point."

Exactly! :-)
That is ofcourse also how smileys and things like lol, lmao
were invented in the first place... the internet is fast,
people want to talk fast. Short and to the point.

But when i write a longer e-mail (let alone a real letter) i
try not to use them smileys... when you've got the time and
space for it, i say write as much and beautiful as possible
;-)

But for places like this... i'm still a huge fan of smileys!
I do not know what the future will bring... but i do think
it's exciting to be here and witness all these changes
happening to language.


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2003-02-24 06:07 [#00568818]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I never type out ''lol'',''lmao'' or ''wtf''... but I've
read them so much during my internet travels that they're
part of my psyche... there's been a couple of times when
someone said something funny in real life and I actually
said ''laugh out loud''.


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-02-24 06:09 [#00568821]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



it really worries me to use those words, since i use them in
real lie too nowadays.. usually i am surrounded by net geeks
who understand it but sometimes it is just so embarrassing
to explain :D i think the internet has truly damaged some of
my linguistical abilities.


 

offline skyfarmer from a bigger, more complex and tun (Russia) on 2003-02-24 06:14 [#00568825]
Points: 1112 Status: Addict



"surround yourself with music, not people"

this quote means so much to me...


 

offline Loogie from Oxford (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-24 06:41 [#00568842]
Points: 1371 Status: Lurker



on the subject of internet jargon,
what does BUMP mean?


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-24 06:45 [#00568847]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to Loogie: #00568842



Bring Up My Post i believe...


 

offline nacmat on 2003-02-24 07:30 [#00568876]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



the other day I was chatting with someone spanish in the msn
gamezone... while playing checkers...and I still wrote lol


 

offline magiker from Östersund (Sweden) on 2003-02-24 08:07 [#00568897]
Points: 865 Status: Lurker



"stfu b4 i kill ewe"
that one i've seen

::]


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2003-02-24 08:09 [#00568901]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i'll stick with this :)


 

offline TonePu5her from lincoln !UK! (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-24 09:02 [#00568972]
Points: 3640 Status: Regular



Not half as confusing as London Slang.
Apples and Pairs-Stairs
Dog and bone-telephone
etc.



 

offline Paco from Gothenburg (Sweden) on 2003-02-24 10:00 [#00569036]
Points: 2659 Status: Lurker



The most annoying things for me are:

"Would of" as in "I would of gone if I could get me grammar
straight."

Now if you shorten "Would have" it SURE AS HELL DOESN*T TURN
INTO "OF"!! YOU FUCKING CUNTS!

..alright, so the correct way is "Would've" as in "I
would've gone, but there is no hope of ever getting this
across to enough people."

Same applies for "Should've".

-P


 

offline hintowe from D.C. (United States) on 2003-02-24 11:03 [#00569085]
Points: 4 Status: Regular



i have to agree with bill_hicks.
the more we compress our thoughts, and the more we compress
the tools that allow expression of thought, the less we
think.

it probably doesn't make a significant difference at this
point, but it's the trend that counts. if it continues to
roll language into a smaller package, inevitably we'll have
less to express ourselves with, and then less reason to do
so.


 

offline hintowe from D.C. (United States) on 2003-02-24 11:05 [#00569087]
Points: 4 Status: Regular



i have to agree with bill_hicks.
the more we compress our thoughts, and the more we compress
the tools that allow expression of thought, the less we
think.

it probably doesn't make a significant difference at this
point, but it's the trend that counts. if it continues to
roll language into a smaller package, inevitably we'll have
less to express ourselves with, and then less reason to do
so.


 

offline skyfarmer from a bigger, more complex and tun (Russia) on 2003-02-24 21:15 [#00569862]
Points: 1112 Status: Addict



The opposite seems to make you post double posts :\


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2003-02-24 21:27 [#00569871]
Points: 27799 Status: Regular



i think you may find simplifying speech leaves more room in
your brain to deal with more important stuff like... err....


 

offline rF from __e____e_________e______q_____ (Australia) on 2003-02-24 22:33 [#00569892]
Points: 956 Status: Lurker



i dont use 'lol' 'lmao' etc, or emoticon things, or capitals
either.. however i do have my own variations of words eg.
awesomahj . .. colaboracione.. sucore .. and so on whowhat
sometignh


 


Messageboard index