The Army/Heathrow Airport | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
recycle
dariusgriffin
...and 303 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614282
Today 3
Topics 127553
  
 
Messageboard index
The Army/Heathrow Airport
 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-02-11 14:56 [#00551304]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



"The prime minister gave his personal authorisation for
soldiers to be drafted in to boost security at Heathrow
airport and other sites in London, says Downing Street.
A total of 450 troops have joined 1,000 extra police
officers in patrolling the airport as part of a tightening
of security at sites across the capital.

The heightened security is linked to intelligence concerns
that al-Qaeda may try to use surface-to-air missiles in the
UK or US this week. "

I think there is something, big time, that 'we' are not
being told here!!!

Did anyone else see this in the news today?


 

offline C738 from Outer Space on 2003-02-11 14:59 [#00551309]
Points: 1722 Status: Regular



Nope, but I did read 83% of the british people is against UK
joining USA.


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-11 15:09 [#00551318]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



yeah i heard about this

and also apparently they've received a message/video (no one
knows yet) from Osama bin laden.....


 

offline Jedi Chris on 2003-02-11 15:15 [#00551323]
Points: 11496 Status: Lurker



http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/2749659.stm

They have tanks there as well?!?!?!


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-11 15:20 [#00551325]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to Jedi Chris: #00551323



hahha, cause MORE mayhem on the roads around heathrow (just
one letter away from deathrow)


 

offline mccabe from fuck knows .......I`m lost !!! on 2003-02-11 15:21 [#00551326]
Points: 908 Status: Lurker | Followup to C738: #00551309



Our new poll, similar to the research being done inside
Downing Street, tells us what progress Tony Blair has made
in building support for his policy on Iraq

We've had 90-days of intense anti-Saddam propaganda since we
last carried out our huge survey of British opinion over
Iraq.
Our new poll, similar to the research being done inside
Downing Street, tells us what progress Tony Blair has made
in building support for his policy on Iraq, but also what
buttons he needs to press to get public backing for a war.
Back in November we asked which country people regarded as
the greatest threat to world peace. Number one - not
surprisingly perhaps - was Iraq. Second the US. Third -
Israel.
Now, though, Iraq has actually slipped down to third place.
Second is North Korea. And the country Britons regard as the
biggest threat today - the United States. On this evidence,
Tony Blair is losing the Propaganda War.
So after endless speeches, dossiers, blurry photos and
crackly phone intercepts, how convincing is the case for
war?
We asked - true or false: Saddam has chemical and biological
weapons. 74% the vast majority think that is true.

He's hiding weapons from the UN - 71% believe that.
Saddam has strong links to Al Qaeda? Only 33% think that's
true - 34% say it's false the remainder said they didn't
know.
Last Wednesday US Secretary of State Colin Powell played
America's propaganda trump card at the UN. The Iraqis
dismissed it as a stunt.
Was Britain convinced?
62% of people did not think his evidence amounted to proof
that Saddam has weapons of mass destruction.

But look at this: 21% of the public - thats one in five -
thought his evidence was fabricated.
65% of people think the government's case against Iraq is
weakened by Channel Four News revelation that they'd copied
chunks of an intelligence dossier from a twelve year old
student thesis.

Looking now at what I call truth and consequences. What does
the public really think is Tony Blair's motivation for
possible war against I


 

offline mccabe from fuck knows .......I`m lost !!! on 2003-02-11 15:23 [#00551329]
Points: 908 Status: Lurker | Followup to mccabe: #00551326





Looking now at what I call truth and consequences. What does
the public really think is Tony Blair's motivation for
possible war against Iraq?

Did people think he was driven by a sense of morality and
justice or political self-interest?

A clear gender split on this question - among men, 41% think
his motives are pure, 38% think its self interest. But among
women only 30% said it was a moral issue, 46%, almost half
are cynical about his motives. In fact women across the
survey are more sceptical

So what can Tony Blair do?

Three months of case building and look what's happened.

This was the situaion last November - 13% said yes to
military action, 9% no, 76% needed persuading.

Today - still 70% of people need to be convinced.

So would a second UN resolution do the trick? If Tony Blair
had UN backing for war instantly his problem would be solved
82% would back military action. Without any UN support only
28% would back an attack alongside the Americans.

But here's something very interesting - if Tony Blair got a
majority of the Security Council to back military action -
even if one or two countries vetoed a second resolution -
62% would go to war.



 

offline mccabe from fuck knows .......I`m lost !!! on 2003-02-11 15:24 [#00551330]
Points: 908 Status: Lurker



Anyway..........i think the tanks are just for show.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-02-11 15:29 [#00551333]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



getting ready for osama
here's the latest news from cnn
"Purported message from Osama bin Laden calls on Muslims to
show solidarity against U.S.-led military action in Iraq."


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2003-02-11 15:29 [#00551334]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Followup to mccabe: #00551330 | Show recordbag



ha


 

offline b0nk from 1969 in the sunshine (United States) on 2003-02-11 15:48 [#00551352]
Points: 1121 Status: Regular



i saw on the news that bin laden supposedly released another
tape. that with all this hype is a little scary. that
surface to air missle shit is scary as well.. i live really
close to jfk airport too


 

offline mccabe from fuck knows .......I`m lost !!! on 2003-02-11 15:56 [#00551360]
Points: 908 Status: Lurker | Followup to b0nk: #00551352



hehe......im just trying to figure out who`s yer picture
of.....either saddam or freddy mercury.......or it could be
tom selleck :D


 

offline diablo on 2003-02-11 16:04 [#00551369]
Points: 3242 Status: Lurker



I live near Heathrow... right on the flightpath! Whoopie!

In all honesty though, it is impossible to tell what is
genuine "defensive"(?) measures and what is possibly
propaganda gearing us up for a "war." I really don't know
what to believe.


 

offline mccabe from fuck knows .......I`m lost !!! on 2003-02-11 16:10 [#00551373]
Points: 908 Status: Lurker | Followup to diablo: #00551369



I`d go with the propaganda........unfortunately :(


 

offline xian_ecci from los angeles on 2003-02-11 16:37 [#00551392]
Points: 251 Status: Regular



'On this evidence,
Tony Blair is losing the Propaganda War.

well you're sure racing ahead.

'What does
the public really think is Tony Blair's motivation for
possible war against Iraq? '

probably to keep little UK from becomming an insignificant
part of world politics, but promoting what they believe in.

if you believe that our actual aim is to oppress and kill
inocent Iraqis, then keep bashing your government.

no one wants war. it will happen one way or another.




 

offline flea from depths of your mind (New Zealand) on 2003-02-11 17:26 [#00551407]
Points: 9083 Status: Regular



the whole excercise can be summed up in these words

Scaring the bejesus out of the dissenters into submission
for a possible war


personally I have seen this scenario played out many times
in many places on this planet...to the letter


 


Messageboard index