selfishness | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (4)
recycle
Hyperflake
dariusgriffin
DADONCK
...and 376 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614353
Today 74
Topics 127559
  
 
Messageboard index
selfishness
 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 03:25 [#00538454]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular



i dunno if any of you guys are gonna think this is a
pointless thread, but it's something i've been thinking
about lately and i thought i'd share it with you guys

i've come to a conclusion that everyone is, to a certain
degree, selfish.

think about it....you're with your
girl/wife/boy/husband...you "suddenly" buy her/him a present
just out of the blue, "just because you love them"...if you
thin about it, okay, maybe 90% of it WAS just because you
love them, and you want to make them happy...but the other
10% is because you want them to love/like you more and you
want them to be with you

in that kind of respect i think that everyone's selfish in a
way anyways

i think you could put that theory to things like hyelping
with charities too....it is a great thing to work for and
with charities, and help people, but i think that people who
do, still want to feel like they've done something....so
it's still kind of selfish in a way, if you know what i
mean

i relaly hope that i don't offend anyone with this thread,
because i feel like every thread i start nowadays seems to
piss people off and i don't want to cause upset (well,
really i just want people on here to like me, see....there's
the selfishness in that statement!)


 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2003-02-03 03:30 [#00538460]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular



selfishness is the only difference between science and
religeon. in science you Should be selfish (survival of the
fittest, eat all the food and leave none for teh other
monkeys) and most religeons say you Should Not (do unto
others...give poor people your money etc)


 

offline Morton from out (Netherlands, The) on 2003-02-03 03:31 [#00538461]
Points: 10000 Status: Addict



boy you have a lot of spare time on your hands ey?

;)
:P

i don't see how you could offend someone with this, i agree
with ya
:)


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 03:32 [#00538462]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to Bob Mcbob: #00538460



yeah but, isn't that being selfish too?

if you're looking at it from a religious point of view, you
give to the poor, feed and house the homeless etc etc etc

you're trying to do good deeds, absolve previous sins,
etc.....what for?

think about it......

so that you appease god, so that he likes you, and you get
to go through his big golden gates (yes i know that
statement is stereotypical, but i'm not religious)

it's still selfishness to a way


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 03:33 [#00538463]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to Morton: #00538461



lol

well, i've had a few problems, and i've had time to think

i sometimes like to actually think about things instead of
puting up pointless threads!
:)

thanks for your agreement

do you have anything else to add to it?

i'd be interested to hear what you have to say


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 03:34 [#00538464]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to Bob Mcbob: #00538460



btw i'm not trying to slam down your opinion, i'm just
saying that to me, that still seems like a partly selfish
act, because a religious person would do that to ensure
their entrance to heaven


 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2003-02-03 03:44 [#00538466]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular | Followup to oscillik: #00538464



giving to someone else and getting something in return is
not selfish, its only selfish if you get more then they do,
other wise the good deeds either way cancel each other out.

And if as you say there is no religeon, how can giving to
the poor be selfish?


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-02-03 03:47 [#00538469]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to oscillik: #00538464 | Show recordbag



Yes I agree with your point. Lots of acts of (supposedly
altruistic) kindness have at least a small element of
"ulterior motive" about them.

Have you read the Unabomber's Manifesto? Lots of interesting
stuff about "Over socialisation" and survivalism in that.

Also have you read John Forbes Nash Jr.'s game theory? I
think this is actually the best balance between the two
extremes, even from a purely survivalistic point of view.
I'm sure you've heard the analogy of two rival companies
agreeing not to advertise (actualy keeping sales the same as
if they had both advertised, but saving a lot of money).
This is an example of where "pure surivalism" would not of
been the best option.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 03:48 [#00538471]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to Bob Mcbob: #00538466



i'm not saying that there is no religion, i just don't
attribute myself to a religion

if anything, my religion is music ;)

but the amount that is given/recieved isn't a measure of how
selfish an act is, what is a measure is the motive behind
the act, no matter what is gotten from it

that's what i'm trying to say

even the most nicest, most generous of deeds, there's still
a little inkling of selfishness there...i think it's part of
the human condition

i think there's just degrees of selfishness, you know, like
blatent selfishness, and the other kind, which is what i'm
talking about

:)

please accept my apologies if i've offended you


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 03:50 [#00538474]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #00538469



no i haven't read any of that literature, but then again i'm
not really a reader!

i will have to look them up, they sound interesting :)

i don't understand the point of two rival companies....

one of them would be the leading company, surely?



 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2003-02-03 03:52 [#00538475]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular



you havent offended me and i see what your saying, im just
not sure that 'selfish' is the right word to use, sure you
want to get something out of everything you do, but thats
just instinct or whatever, selfish seems like too strong a
word....


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 03:55 [#00538476]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to Bob Mcbob: #00538475



but it's the only word i can think of that perfectly
describes what it is

like i said, i think it's just degress of selfishness (hmmmm
sounds like a title of a song...*ding* i've an idea!)

there's the typical spoilt brat kind of selfishness and
there's the kind that i'm talking about

i know what you're saying thoug, it does seem kinda harsh to
say that it is selfishness....but i think that's just
because there's the stereotype, you know?

say the word selfish to someone and they'll most likely
think of a spoilt brat


 

offline Bob Mcbob on 2003-02-03 04:01 [#00538477]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular



ever seen the friends episode 'the one where phoebe hates
pbs'? some of teh points you made were made by joey, i
sugest you watch that ep even if u dont watch friends
usually.....


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 04:02 [#00538479]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to Bob Mcbob: #00538477



no i haven't seen that one

i think i've missed quite a lot of them :(

i'll try to look out for it if i can!

i love watching freinds, it's funny as hell i think anyways
:)


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 04:10 [#00538495]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular



anybody else got any opinions?

am i talking total bullshit?

or am i, for once in my life, saying something that's
right?

:)


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-02-03 04:40 [#00538534]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to oscillik: #00538474 | Show recordbag



"i don't understand the point of two rival companies....


one of them would be the leading company, surely? "


Imagine there are a few (there can be several, the example
still works)leading brands in a particular field. Lets say
for example, Tesco, Sainsburys and Kwiksave all have roughly
equal market shares...

There are 2 main reasons for advertising, making people
aware of your product/service and stealing a rivals
clientelle. As they are all well known already and the only
benefit they would gain would be from stealing a rivals
customers. Imagine one of them has a big advertising push
spending 100 million on advertising. This would be a
seeingly logical, survivalist thing to do. However, Imagine
the other 2 match the amount of advertising to cancel it
out. No one has benefited (apart from the ad companies)
their market share stays the same and they are all down 100
million. It is better to have a contractual agreement not to
advertise for that year and they will all be about 90
million better off (they would of course attract a few of
the smaller companies customers away).

This is an example of how Game Theory often makes better
sense than pure selfish survivalism.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 04:41 [#00538536]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to Ceri JC: #00538534



ohhh i see now :)

thanks for clearing the murkey mess of the depths of my head


 

offline Lust Incarnate from the edge of the deep green sea (United States) on 2003-02-03 05:22 [#00538565]
Points: 833 Status: Lurker



I think selfishness is kind of a survival instinct. Or it at
least stems from that. Even in the scenario with purchasing
something for your loved one because 1) you love him/her; 2)
you want to be with him/her, the second motive comes from
the first one. Why do you want to be with him/her? BECAUSE
you love him/her.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 05:23 [#00538568]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to Lust Incarnate: #00538565



exactly

it must be some kind of survivalistic instinct

like i said in a post above, it's part of the human
condition


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-03 06:56 [#00538728]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



It's a common theory i think (or atleast i've heard it a
couple of times before by various people :-)).

You may still be right though... i don't know... i don't
like to look at life that way ;-) Indeed everything you do
may be out of selfish considerations... but you don't have
to accept it.


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-02-03 07:03 [#00538747]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular



i used to have a really bad problem thinking i was selfish.
i have done lotsa bad stuff just thinking that if i can't do
this i'm selfish. i used to have no idea what healthy
selfishness was. and look at me now - 19 year old loser with
mental problems and lots of guilt. the world is for the
selfish i have noticed.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 07:03 [#00538748]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to surrounded: #00538728



you're right, you don't have to accept it

that's why we don't view it as being selfish
:)

from reading posts you've put up and replied to on here, i
consider you one of the intellctuals on here

:)


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-03 07:08 [#00538763]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to neetta: #00538747



nice guys always finnish last and all that? Hehe... yeah...
sometimes it seems unfair that the most selfish bastards who
can elbow their way to the top usually seem to have the most
succes in life :-/

But i still believe that if you try to be a "good" person
(whatever that exactly means, but you know...)... you will
eventually become happy. Happier atleast than the folks who
think only of them temselves :-)


 

offline Refund from Melbourne (Australia) on 2003-02-03 07:09 [#00538767]
Points: 7824 Status: Lurker



when I act I don't think about whether I'm being selfish or
not,. and I don't particularly care either,..


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-02-03 07:10 [#00538768]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular | Followup to surrounded: #00538763



yeah but the thing is you just get stepped on. i'm really
flat you know.


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-03 07:11 [#00538769]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to oscillik: #00538748



wow, an intellectual? moi? :-p
I never looked at myself like that... but thanks anyway :-)
I do consider that a very nice compliment!

But don't underestimate yourself, this was quite a
philosofical topic that you started here!


 

offline Jarworski from The Grove (United Kingdom) on 2003-02-03 07:11 [#00538772]
Points: 10836 Status: Lurker



I became far more selfish once I started taking drugs. Right
now I'm smacked out on heroin and I won't share it with
anyone.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 07:13 [#00538777]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to surrounded: #00538769



lol

yeppers, you seem to be a very intellectual and
philosophical person

thank you for your compliment too

i try to be smart, but i think i'm probably just blagging my
way through!

heh


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 07:14 [#00538778]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to neetta: #00538747



it is sad that it seems only the selfish win....and okay,
maybe they do win....they win the big houses, and the flash
cars etc etc etc

but i can probably garuntee that 99% are not actually happy


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 07:14 [#00538779]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular



and if they are, they're a sad breed


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-02-03 07:15 [#00538780]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker | Followup to oscillik: #00538777



In my eyes you're all stars!


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-03 07:15 [#00538781]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to neetta: #00538768



"i'm really flat you know."

lol ;-)
yeah but like you said you are only 19 years old. If you
just keep this up and not become a selfish person,
eventually people will start noticing it and respecting you
for it.

I may sound idealistic, but i really do believe that. And
what the hell, what the world needs now is more idealists!
;-)



 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 07:17 [#00538784]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to bill_hicks: #00538780



you too bill

:)


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-03 07:17 [#00538785]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to oscillik: #00538778



my point exactly... selfishness can get you a long way in
the materialistic world... but in the end you have to ask
yourself if that is really so important.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 07:18 [#00538786]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to neetta: #00538768



surrounded is right

if you stick to your guns, people will take notice, and you
will be known as that lovely girl/woman/lady/person (sorry,
but i don't wanna offend you by labeling you with something
that you might find offensive) who isn't selfish

:)


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-02-03 07:19 [#00538788]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular | Followup to surrounded: #00538781



i'm as flat as eric!

anyway, i will try to keep up bewing me. sometimes i just
feel like a complete failure.


Attached picture

 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 07:20 [#00538791]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to surrounded: #00538785



exactly

my definition of happiness is being with the person you
love, living in an area where you're not scared to go
outside for fear of being
persecuted/attacked/killed/mugged/beaten up

and living in a home that you have shaped and characterised


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-03 07:20 [#00538793]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular



"i try to be smart, but i think i'm probably just
blagging my way through!
"

hehe, ssssssh, best keep that to yourself ;-)

But seriously though... it's not like i have read all the
work of the great philosophers or anything like that :-p If
i really do sound intelligent, it's only because my own
thoughts and theories and what i've accidentally picked up
here and there... just blagging my way through so to speak
;-)


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 07:21 [#00538794]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to neetta: #00538788



i know that i don't know you, or the circumstances for your
impending sense of failure, but i don't think you're a
failure

you're still here, and that is proof that you're not a
failure

surely that must count for something?

:)


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 07:22 [#00538796]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to surrounded: #00538793



lol

see?

you've got a point there too!!!



 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-03 07:22 [#00538797]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to neetta: #00538788



he, my name is erik ;-)

I'm not flat though :-p Doctor said i need to lose some
weight :-s There's too much erik in this world.


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-02-03 07:25 [#00538799]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular | Followup to surrounded: #00538797



i've been rapidly loosing weight lately :o dunno why. no
reason to it.


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 07:25 [#00538802]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to neetta: #00538799



could be stress?

i've heard that stress can affect weight?



 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-03 07:27 [#00538804]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to neetta: #00538799



well it can't be from posting on this board ;-) I post like
crazy but nothing happens.

Anyway, if i remember correctly you live with your fiancee,
and you recently sold your first painting... how could you
possibly think of yourself as a faillure :-)


 

offline neetta from Finland on 2003-02-03 07:31 [#00538805]
Points: 5924 Status: Regular | Followup to surrounded: #00538804



my fiance isn't happy living here :(


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-03 07:33 [#00538808]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to neetta: #00538805



ohw...

That's pretty bad :-(
And when you say "here", do you mean finland? Or not happy
living with you? :-o


 

offline uzim on 2003-02-03 07:47 [#00538822]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



i agree with you oscillik...
i'm pretty sure everything we do, we do it for ourselves -
as indirectly as it can be. like you said... we help the
poor, the needy, friends etc. because it make us feel good
about it (or at least we have hope it will)...

now if, in cases like that, we make other people happy too
in our selfishness, this isn't a problem is it?


 

offline oscillik from the fires of orc on 2003-02-03 07:48 [#00538825]
Points: 7746 Status: Regular | Followup to uzim: #00538822



exactly

no it isn't a problem if you're helping someone else out
with this kind of selfishness

thank you for your support with my theory :)


 

offline uzim on 2003-02-03 07:51 [#00538828]
Points: 17716 Status: Lurker



but... would cases of depressed people giving away things
they like just because they don't care anymore - though
being buried so deep into their cocoon of sadness and total
lack of caring/motivation that they wouldn't feel happy
about making good actions? just nothing at all?

maybe that would exist though...
in that case that wouldn't be selfishness...

(would it be selfish from the people to accept what the
depressed one gives them?)


 

offline surrounded from it won't be hard anymore to li on 2003-02-03 07:52 [#00538829]
Points: 3787 Status: Regular | Followup to uzim: #00538822



"this isn't a problem is it?"

it depends...

i once knew a guy who said to me that he hoped, he
would one day see a little child drowning in a lake or
something, so that he could rescue it and people would see
him as a hero...

that made me quite sick :-s

But normally, in cases such as oscillik described, i don't
think it is a problem... it doesn't matter to the people
you're helping what your motivations are.

It's just that you can feel guilty about it. But like i
said, you don't have to accept being selfish. You can always
keep trying to truly do things just for other people,
just because you want them to be happier. It's an ongoing
struggle, but still...


 


Messageboard index