bowling 4 Columbine thread | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 431 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614196
Today 0
Topics 127547
  
 
Messageboard index
bowling 4 Columbine thread
 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-01-23 07:12 [#00525070]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



just saw this last night. FUCK ME! the biggest thing was
the whole FEAR thing with the media ..."africanised bees,
AFRICANised bees, AFRICAN......."

My mother lived in Phoenix, AZ for 7 years and never knew
her neighbours...
.. the only thing they ever said to her is "when you
becoming a citizen?" cos she had no flag in her garden
THAT AIN´T NORMAL FOLKS..
..... WAKE UP!!



 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2003-01-23 07:16 [#00525075]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to KEYFUMBLER: #00525070 | Show recordbag



Good film then?

I've been considering getting it for a while. Worth owning
on DVD or is a one off watching enough?


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-01-23 07:26 [#00525096]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



one off is enough i reckon although it is chock full of
little snppets and facts and worth buyimg for sharing with
everyone you know....
Did i hear that it was edited in some American states?
the FEAR!



 

offline Pigfarmer from Ipswich (United Kingdom) on 2003-01-23 07:27 [#00525100]
Points: 589 Status: Lurker



the part from the southpark guys is so funny. He has alot of
good points in this movie.



 

offline patrik from Keele (United Kingdom) on 2003-01-23 07:29 [#00525103]
Points: 1448 Status: Regular



seen it twice in the cinema. All my mates love the film.
Once with my English class at school here in Germany.


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2003-01-23 07:35 [#00525112]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



But whats left? Has the films merits being discussed in the
states? Are people waking up? Will it all just continue?
Where is the end?



 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-01-23 10:28 [#00525353]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



yeah it was a nice flick, i saw it like a week ago, i got it
on divx just today :)

whenever i feel that im an idiot all i have to do is to see
this movie hehe
there are some weirdos out there


 

offline jupitah from Minneapolis (United States) on 2003-01-24 00:07 [#00526061]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to KEYFUMBLER: #00525112



all the points made were not exactly unkown to americans...
the film just made em very clear. most americans choose
willful ignorance, so a film like this that gets played at
the small independant theaters doesn't turn the nation
around. america continues. probably until we get smacked
in the face.

the fear thing is huge. fear and denial.


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-01-24 00:34 [#00526073]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



only thing I came away from that film thinking was:
overated

the perfect movie to make middle class americans comfortable
in their skin.


 

offline Atop from Texas (United States) on 2003-01-24 00:36 [#00526074]
Points: 400 Status: Regular



what?

fear doesn't make any one comfortable,
but you're probably anti-everything.

so even fear doesn't mean a fucking thing to ya.

A t o p


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-01-24 00:39 [#00526079]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to Atop: #00526074



what exactly does "anti-everything" mean?

sounds like empty bullshit words to me. BforC was simply a
movie for white middle americans to go, haha, the world is a
funny place in other places, silly kids with guns, hahaha,
how odd!

overated, just like Donnie Darko :0


 

offline hevquip from megagram dusk sect (United States) on 2003-01-24 00:40 [#00526080]
Points: 3381 Status: Regular



i've never seen the documentary, but i live just a few
blocks from Columbine Highschool. actually, where we're at,
it's a very white, religious community. one of my roommates
made the point that there are no porn shops here in
Littleton, a Denver suburb, where Columbine is. then again,
i hear that the film's focus is not exclusively on
Columbine. as of recent, the police here have released all
the files pertaining to the shooting and all else that
happened on that day.


 

offline Atop from Texas (United States) on 2003-01-24 00:44 [#00526082]
Points: 400 Status: Regular



hehehehe,
you're a funny place.........

Whatever you think is apparently
unique to you cause BFC was about us being manipulated by
the powers that be.

thanks for the avatar attack, very cute,
indie rock boy!

A t o p


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-01-24 10:35 [#00526893]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



BFC was about us being manipulated by
the powers that be.

us in this case simply does not = middle class white people

---------------
It's the upper class columbine schools, it's the crazy
farmers who holed up Tim McVey.

You leave asking questions about other people and not
yourself. I guess he can't appeal to every demographic, but
he could have touched on the white, middle class business
man/women.

Just a stupid movie that indie movie yahoos are supposed to
say is the best shit since "Election."

------------------
btw: I expected Marylin Manson to be much more articulate
and pointed than he was, he seemed sedated, oh well.

I do, however, want one of them shooting club Female
Swimsuit calendar or whatever the hell that was, THAT was
nice :p


 

offline xlr from Boston (United States) on 2003-01-24 10:38 [#00526901]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



I saw it over winter break. I'm a big fan of Michael
Moore's work, and I highly recommend his earlier
documentary, Roger & Me about the layoffs at General
Motors in Flint, Michigan.


 

offline MachineofGod from the land of halo's (United States) on 2003-01-24 14:52 [#00527233]
Points: 3088 Status: Lurker



the movie was great, I can see people not liking it because
of moore's opinions on things but the movie is important,
you cant say its not good, its well made and the point comes
across clearly and loudly. this movie has been out for like
3 months(still in theaters), dvd wont be out for a long
time.


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2003-06-02 22:58 [#00724822]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Welp.. I finally saw his movie.

I liked it!

There were about 9 BFC threads out there, but I bumped this
one because it had the least arguing in it...

Jesus guys..


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-06-02 23:00 [#00724824]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to pomme de terre: #00724822



you mean... this movie shouldn't be hotly debated? are you
some kind of censor or just a left wing RADICAL, man???? ;)


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2003-06-02 23:12 [#00724837]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Well now that I think about it.. i did get into 3 heated
discussion with 3 people at work today when I told them I
saw it...

Some guy (who hadn't seen it of course) was going on about
how he read something that said that the film was a bunch of
malarkie.. I didn't care though, it seems like MM merely
presented the facts and let the viewer draw their own
conclusions..

The KMART scene was great!


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-06-02 23:22 [#00724845]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to pomme de terre: #00724837



i know! all the scenes were great IMO.. anyway, it's just
the right wing striking back with these "it's a lie!!!!!"
rumors


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2003-06-02 23:34 [#00724849]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



Some NRA guy hacked his website a couple weeks back.


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-06-02 23:46 [#00724852]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00724845



sure tits, it's called a movie.

movies have editors to cut film and place it where it looks
best.

This movie is not a documentary, if you think it is, you
don't know anything about movies.

That scene with Heston @ the NRA meeting? Yeah, do some
reaserch about that cuts in that, it's pretty doctored,
basically fake.

Again, it's a movie, not real.

It's funny, cuz I hate guns too.


 

offline pomme de terre from obscure body in the SK System on 2003-06-02 23:51 [#00724858]
Points: 11941 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



the scene with heston at the nra meeting is like 30 seconds
long.. and my eyes and ears tell me where the edits are...

don't documentaries have editors too?

no amount of research is going to prove to me that charlton
heston is not a prick.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-06-02 23:51 [#00724860]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00724852



ok right and all documentaries are all one take, unedited!
national geographic goes out and films random places and
uses the footage whether something happened or not! lol.. oh
man, don't get me started..


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-06-02 23:52 [#00724863]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to pomme de terre: #00724858



or dick clarke, or is someone going to tell me that was all
CGI?? ahahahahah


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-06-02 23:54 [#00724867]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



it's not a documentary m8, take it as a typical untrue film,
and it's still boring

"Perhaps the most gripping scene in the movie is one where
Moore simply turns up at a bank, North Country Bank & Trust
in Traverse City, Michigan, opens a bank account and gets a
gun for his trouble. As he walks away, Moore chortles to the
camera: "Here's my first question: do you think it's a
little dangerous handing out guns at a bank?" It would be if
true. But in fact the bank in question only gives you a gun
if you open long-term CDs, and then you have to go to a gun
store to get the gun after a background check. The scene,
according to Lyons, was staged."

Link

-----------



 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-06-02 23:56 [#00724868]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00724867



yea i've read the propaganda m8, as i said.. the right wing
strikes back! surprising that anyone that watches a michael
moore film wouldn't expect or recognize the retaliation...
in this form it's a very weak campaign to portray this as a
"movie" as you put it.. i feel bad for you and cabbog


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-06-02 23:56 [#00724869]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



quick and simple about his lying



 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-06-02 23:57 [#00724873]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00724868



the right wing? I've lived in the most left places the
world has to offer. Marin County, CA, and here, Eugene
Oregon.

Right? the right is wrong, but so is Moore.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-06-03 00:00 [#00724875]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



you can read whatever loaded language filled literature you
want just don't come at me with it.. i've read more than
enough to know this anti-moore campaign is extremely flimsy.
so he's a comedian. DUH. the facts are still on his side and
the documentary stands up.


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-06-03 00:00 [#00724876]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



"For example, Moore splices together two separate speeches
by NRA President Charlton Heston to create the false
impression that viewers are seeing a single speech given at
the 1999 NRA Annual Meetings in Denver."

Link


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-06-03 00:02 [#00724877]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00724876



yes i've read the propoganda, so have a lot of us.. i hope
you're verifying all THEIR claims as well, you know


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-06-03 00:03 [#00724879]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00724875



if it was a comedy, I wouldn't care so much.

People think it's a documentary, and it isn't. Don't take
anything from this movie but laughs, and you have watched it
properly, otherwise, you're a sucker like everyone else who
gave rave reviews to a critical movie they didn't
understand.


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2003-06-03 00:05 [#00724880]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to pomme de terre: #00724858



i thought HESTON was really brave to meet MM ...... i mean
without a contract, etc......sure he's a wascally
wabbit......but still that took a lot of nerve IMO.

i'm not sure how willing i'd invite a man with a camera and
crew into my home spur of the mo'


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-06-03 00:05 [#00724881]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00724879



it can't be a comedy AND true? are you sure you're familiar
with michael moore's work? roger and me, tv nation, the
awful truth, stupid white men....


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-06-03 00:05 [#00724882]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00724877



it's a slippery slope, and I know what you mean, it's easy
to claim facts, especially on some webpage.

I just don't this film to go down in history as a
documentary when it seems to defy the Academy's own
definition of a documentary.

Rule explanation, kind of


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-06-03 00:10 [#00724886]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00724882



wraught with typos my reply is, christ!


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-06-03 00:10 [#00724887]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker



course a comedy can be true, but it can't be a documentary
if it contains the inaccurcies in film making this movie
contained.

as I said, take it as a comedy, more entertainment for the
masses, then sure, enjoy it with popcorn.

But just cuz some tounge in cheek white guy claims to have
solved our nations problems in a funny way doesn't mean it
is the end all solution that everyone made it out to be.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-06-03 00:13 [#00724891]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to BlatantEcho: #00724882



just be sure if you're going to be shooting holes in an
argument citing one source (all other anti-moore/BFC
articles seem to be based on the big one that was written a
few weeks back), independently verify all your claims
before you say the film is bogus. because believe me, moore
didn't spend 5 or so years on the film for it to be "fake"
or merely "entertainment" and it makes me laugh when people
say otherwise.. he's extremely professional, whether you
agree with him or not and whether or not you want his film
to succeed (and don't doubt for a minute that conservatives
want people NOT to see this film).


 

offline BlatantEcho from All over (United States) on 2003-06-03 00:26 [#00724896]
Points: 7210 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00724891



I just don't see it being a documentary.

Obviously I'm not a journo, and can't examine every article
I read. I don't believe in conspiracy theroies or anything
like that.

I'm anti-sensationalism, and I just think that film was "too
good to be true" and what I have seen supports that.

See the film, by all means, at least it gets people talking.
I'll go home now, sorry for making a fuss.


 

offline mc_303_beatz from Glasgow, Scotland on 2003-06-03 01:52 [#00724938]
Points: 3386 Status: Regular



Blantantecho, you so BLANTANTLY are full of shit. No offence
mate or anything ;)


 

offline wilcoooo from Sydney (Belgium) on 2003-06-03 06:08 [#00725209]
Points: 794 Status: Regular



did anybody see "the awful truth" of michael moore? its
coming on tv here and i wonder if it's worth watching.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-06-03 06:27 [#00725232]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to wilcoooo: #00725209



yes. I've seen it on the BBC.

it's funny and very Michael Moore.

watch it. :)


 

offline wilcoooo from Sydney (Belgium) on 2003-06-03 06:32 [#00725246]
Points: 794 Status: Regular | Followup to qrter: #00725232



ok thanks, it's tommorow on ned3 if ya want to see it again
:)


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-06-03 06:33 [#00725251]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to wilcoooo: #00725246



I think I might. :)


 

offline Donutman from Perth (Australia) on 2003-06-03 07:51 [#00725355]
Points: 234 Status: Lurker



I just wonder about criticisms that start off my calling
Michael Moore a "Fat Rogue".

I love this film, and most of what I saw I had already known
from other sources. I don't believe that it gives any
conclusions or connections, but lays out as many options as
he can see.

I can't imagine he'd risk the creditablility of the whole
film based on two simple facts, (the whole editing debate is
beyond me), but I'm willing to look at any more links you
have to offer Echo.

One or two sentences are good for making a point, but I
think there needs to be more prove their point. Link me up
to the more detailed sites that discaliam his theories when
you have time.

Thanks.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-06-03 09:24 [#00725449]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to wilcoooo: #00725209



yea i saw all of season 1 on dvd... great show! i dunno how
many seasons there were, either 2 or 3. season 1 has a dvd
(two discs), the others i dunno.

the editing and "rehearsal" debates are beyond me too dude..
i mean, what filmmaker DOESN'T use pre-production and
post-production to present his point? this is true in movies
AND documentaries, from the silliest to the most academic.

it should be obvious to anyone who watches a michael moore
film it's very one sided, so why bitch about it? if you
don't agree with him that's another matter, but he's just
presenting all the compelling FACTS and examples to show you
that ______ is wrong (globalism, rampant gun ownership, son
of a bush, etc.). if you want to endorse bush, guns, nike,
etc. then why are you even watching? it's one thing to go in
without an opinion, or to leave convinced or unconvinced,
but to see it just so you can say it's all fake? wtf? get
out of here!


 


Messageboard index