Disturbing Issue | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 193 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613457
Today 3
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
Disturbing Issue
 

|REFLEX| from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada on 2001-09-03 11:25 [#00028944]



True.


 

thanksomuch from over there on 2001-09-04 02:28 [#00029146]



j-dogg: let us not forget that we are not eating these
animals that we test on, there for they are in no way part
of the food chain. no animal kills another animal that
slowly for anything but food, and the protection of young.

i have a question for you, if you or some one you knew was
attacked by some sort of preditor, (shark, tiger, snake),
would you go "oh well, that is just the way the food chain
goes.."? i hardly think so. you'd take that all to familiar
and distictly human stand point of "i wish i couls catch
that animal and bash it's brians out, and maybe even kill
the whole subspecies, or even the species." you see, we are
not the top of the food chain, and if i had the choice of
changing hands with some other level of the food chain, i'd
be right there with the man eating sharks, big cats, and
wovles!!! there has been a string of shark attacks here in
the Florida area, and there has been so much stupid talk
about going out and killing as many sharks as possible. this
is the same stupid thought prosses that aplies to wretched
animal testing. "why the hell not" additiude. "i am on the
top of the food chain.." bullshit!


 

|REFLEX| from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada on 2001-09-04 02:34 [#00029149]



I suppose???


 

thanksomuch from over here on 2001-09-04 02:58 [#00029170]



you suppose, what, reflex? i am interested in what you have
to say, being the person who posted the vid in the first
place.


 

|REFLEX| from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada on 2001-09-04 03:01 [#00029173]



I posted it, and can post man other death vids if I like. I
have many on my computer if you wish.

No - I dont believe that certain animal testing is right.
Death is part of everyday life, ofcourse if one of us got
attacked or had a near death experience we would think
differently. I myself have almost died 2 times now..... its
scary. And no I would not.... anyway.

Yeah I think that its a dose of reality, it may not be
needed to some, hence the warning, like I already said. Some
people are oblivious to this sort of thing.... or they may
know of it, and ignore it. I do not. And I do not think it
is right for people.. to do so. Ignorance is bliss, until
you find out the truth.


 

thanksomuch from over here on 2001-09-04 03:09 [#00029179]



reflex, i think you took my responce wrong, i was not trying
to be bitchy when asking you your opion, shit.

ok ok good point, at least you realize that... but, no more
death-ish vids, my fingers are much too tired from all the
talking i have done thus far on this topic.


 

|REFLEX| from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada on 2001-09-04 03:11 [#00029182]



No - I didnt take it wrong, or too personally.

Not at all. Ive always thought this about such things as
Death and testing.


 

Chilled on 2001-09-04 03:18 [#00029189]



thanksomuch...thanksomuch...your attitude has brought me
into a lightened state of euphoria,equal to that ov a
billion ducks quacking...

The answer is simple:
Bacon=good
god=what?
answer=simple

and then you have 78. i rest my case


 

thanksomuch from over here on 2001-09-04 03:18 [#00029190]



well, haven't we all? at least, i have seen in smarter
people, and tendency towards the morbid side of things..
odd....


 

Chilled on 2001-09-04 03:21 [#00029193]



i dont think you understand,please see my above post.


 

thanksomuch from over here on 2001-09-04 03:22 [#00029196]



chilled, you certainly are the best of all my pupils.
congrats, you may become a teacher one day after all.


 

|REFLEX| from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada on 2001-09-04 03:23 [#00029197]



Neither do I.


 

thanksomuch from over here on 2001-09-04 03:24 [#00029200]



chilled, i belive that post was directed to reflex....


 

Chilled on 2001-09-04 03:25 [#00029203]



I am glad you see things Ben Haskel's way...as well as
mine...although this was just ben's theory edited by me to
further make the answer closer to the pig dissection theory.


 

|REFLEX| from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada on 2001-09-04 03:27 [#00029205]



thanksomuch: because...... people who are aware, realize the
mentality behind the attrocities behind.. this sort of
morbid bacground..... I mean look.. why would someone do
that sort of thing to a pig? Last resort, last effort, dying
effort, searching for a clue, not knowing where to look,
ignorance...


 

Chilled on 2001-09-04 03:31 [#00029211]



reflex,my good dear friend,you must realize that it is all
78...read above post(posts)


 

|REFLEX| from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada on 2001-09-04 03:45 [#00029222]



78 is correct my good sir.


 

Chilled on 2001-09-04 03:46 [#00029223]



as the moon hits jupiter,therfore making it 40 past the half
hour 5 hours minus 20min ago on Jan.3,1876 AD,you are
correct! How did you ever come up with 78>? I must
inquire....


 

|REFLEX| from Edmonton, Alberta, Canada on 2001-09-04 03:58 [#00029227]



Simple.


 


Messageboard index