the pianist | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in
Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
w M w
...and 370 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614262
Today 9
Topics 127551
  
 
Messageboard index
the pianist
 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2002-11-24 16:12 [#00454516]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



saw it today-this was certanly money wasted
i went to see it mainly because of polanski but this was
just stupid imo
i saw this in numerous films before, and i cant really see
why didi this film win in cannes festival-i guess people
just like spectacular films-this is true it is very
spectacular, but i wouldnt watch it again
i hope polanskis next film is going to be back to his normal
:)


 

offline Amonbrune from Vancouver (Canada) on 2002-11-24 16:18 [#00454519]
Points: 7327 Status: Addict



That movie came on tv once...it looked really boring...so i
didn't watch it


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2002-11-24 16:25 [#00454524]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



you had this film on tv already?
lucky canadians hehehe, im sure it will take ages for this
film to be shown on out tv-not that i care :)


 

offline Dolleater from Afrika Bambaataa on 2002-11-24 16:51 [#00454537]
Points: 4819 Status: Addict



I think a dic reference is in order here.

Do you wanna see my pianist?

 

offline Zombiekev from Ardmore (United States) on 2003-03-19 20:07 [#00605032]
Points: 2857 Status: Lurker | Followup to tolstoyed: #00454516



i just saw this film, it was actually quite decent.

it was pretty realistic and disturbing.

 

offline corticalstim from Canada on 2003-03-19 20:08 [#00605034]
Points: 3885 Status: Regular



whats it about?

 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-03-19 20:10 [#00605038]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



ppl who know what's up keep saying it was weak for polanski,
but some smart non-movie buffs say it was powerful. i'm
torn, yo.


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2003-03-19 20:21 [#00605042]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker



have not seen it, i wanna see it, interesting premise
(especially for a historian), i'll get back to you after i
see it!


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2003-03-19 20:22 [#00605043]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator | Followup to Amonbrune: #00454519



you probably mean Michael Haneke's "La Pianiste". quite a
different film.


 

offline sadist from the dark side of the moon on 2003-03-20 00:04 [#00605149]
Points: 8670 Status: Lurker



i'm ashamed for it....


 

offline bill_hicks from my city is amazing it is calle on 2003-03-20 02:11 [#00605209]
Points: 4286 Status: Lurker



dudley moore's a tiny pianist

 

offline Charles D Ward from ASS, okay? (United States) on 2003-03-20 02:14 [#00605210]
Points: 1072 Status: Addict



I think it's about a perverse pianist chick

I've read the book, it was really bad

 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-03-20 02:43 [#00605227]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator | Followup to Charles D Ward: #00605210



see qrter's comment...

 

offline Charles D Ward from ASS, okay? (United States) on 2003-03-20 02:48 [#00605232]
Points: 1072 Status: Addict | Followup to tolstoyed: #00605227



Thanks.

I've read a book named something like that.

I don't care about what you are discussing.

IT IS A FUCKING PERVERT PINASIT CHIKC UND I HATE THAT
FILM

and I've never seen the other one ^_^

 

offline TonyFish from the realm of our dreams on 2003-03-20 03:39 [#00605301]
Points: 3349 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #00605043



that was fucked up.

 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2003-03-20 11:22 [#00606137]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



huh, i thought this was a powerful movie, especially for
polanski.
the complete characteristic lack of sentimentality worked in
its favor. i'm not quite sure how you can say it was a waste
of money.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2003-03-20 12:10 [#00606205]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



i don't know how to explain this really;
film was obviously pretty expensive but it didnt convince me
in either way, there are just to many cliches and not a
single sentimental scene, nothing to remain in my memory,
and this may sound bad, but with some additional comic
inserts this film would be easily marked as a parody movie.
ofcourse this is just my opinion!

it seems that film touched many people so obviously im wrong
about saying "money wasted"...



 

Messageboard index