black on black crime. | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
yoyoyoyoyo
recycle
...and 332 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614280
Today 1
Topics 127553
  
 
Messageboard index
black on black crime.
 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-01 20:31 [#00424547]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



this isn't the best place to pose this question as there is
only one known black person (Archrival, who doesn't even
come here anymore), but i'll ask anyway:

why do some people consider black on black crime as
something worse than black on non-black crime? the closest
i've heard to what can be considered an explanation is that
the level of violence among african americans is so high
already that it's especially tragic when a black man kills
another black man. it's a statistical fact that african
americans are are persecuted and discriminated against by
the police, the government, the education system, employers,
etc., but do you think the life of a black man is somehow
more precious than the life of a man of another race? i
guess that's where i fail to see the value of stressing
"black on black crime" because i see all races as equal,
despite knowing of their discrimination and dwindling
numbers (whether they're being slaughtered in the streets or
locked up in penetentaries).

your thoughts.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2002-11-01 20:45 [#00424557]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



I know this white supremacist guy... whenever there's a
story about a black gang shooting up another black gang, he
likes to smile and say "the negro problem is solving
itself".

He's got a point. Black on black violence does the work of
white racists so they don't have to.

But in general, one person's life is worth as much as any
other person's life, unless they annoy me.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-01 20:46 [#00424558]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to fleetmouse: #00424557



yea, agreed.. and it's sad that some blacks actually believe
that a black life is worth more than a white life, but then
again it's not exactly like white people have clean hands
when it comes to racist behavior either.

i don't think solving the problem of black on black crime is
what's necessary. i think ending violence itself is the best
approach.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-11-01 20:49 [#00424559]
Points: 24596 Status: Regular



persecuted minority should stick together to be
tough--internal cannibalism not good.


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-11-01 20:49 [#00424560]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker



first i'd like to THANK YOU for an interesting and
thoughtful question!

second.....i always thought that the majority of people
thought just the opposite. that BLACK on WHITE crime is
worse than BLACK on BLACK.

i have a interest on crime tv series...real crimes....and it
seems to me that for the most part it's considered worse
when a Black person kills a White person. whites killing
whites and blacks killing blacks are more common place.

i agree all races are equal.....unfortunately there is a
prevailing prejudice that still exists....esp in the
US....and it would be naive to not admit that it prevails
how the police/judges/wardens....etc treat blacks.....as
opposed to how they treat whites.

the white man gets the benefit of the doubt.....the black
man doesnt =/



 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-01 20:54 [#00424570]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to LeCoeur: #00424560



i'm talking about minorities, especially african-americans,
not the majority of people. that's why i said this probably
isn't the best place to pose this question.

but i see what you mean. the white majority, though they're
not explicit about it, is enraged when blacks murder or rape
whites because of implicit white supremacy. i hate it. it's
no worse if a white person does it, but the reaction is
amplified when a black man committed the crime. they've been
portrayed as demons by the media for centuries (beginning
with newspapers in the 1800s). that's why blacks almost
always get harsher sentances than whites in trials.


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-11-01 21:04 [#00424574]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00424570



ahhh yes....i see your point. and i'd have to agree.

thinking about a recent case.....where a black man was
beaten to death in chicago but a mob of black children of
all agaes......ranging from 7-18 i believe. the community
was outraged at the horror of the crime, as well as what
will eventually happen to those children.

a few exceptions of the white outrage tho...or at least it
seems to be maybe because of the media attention...when a
white man kills a black man for racist reasons....remember
that black man that was dragged to death by 3 white
men....that produces outrage in both the white and black
communities.

the sentencing and KILLING of blacks has always been
proportionally worse than white criminals. statistics don't
lie.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-11-01 21:11 [#00424579]
Points: 24596 Status: Regular | Followup to LeCoeur: #00424574



so it's true--bush really IS the most popular president
ever...oh god no. no no no! NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
NO NO NO NO


those cursèd statistics


 

offline Clic on 2002-11-01 21:12 [#00424580]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular | Followup to marlowe: #00424559



I witnessed Marlowe's post. -Clic (11:14 - Friday, November
01, 2002)


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-11-01 21:18 [#00424584]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00424579



dork.......you know what i meant.....

*clobbers you with mah club*


 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-11-01 21:25 [#00424591]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



I read up about Jam Master Jay or whoever he is, and it
pissed me off that he seemed like a peaceful enough guy,
none of that gang shit that's so prevalent with rappers...
if you're gonna kill ANYONE, why'd it have to be him? Paint
the walls with Justin Timberlake's brains, please, don't
waste your bullets on Run DMC.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-11-01 21:33 [#00424595]
Points: 24596 Status: Regular | Followup to LeCoeur: #00424584



but you ignored my 1st post :(


 

offline glass_eater from a blind nerves area (Switzerland) on 2002-11-01 21:40 [#00424599]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular



where did u hear that???

btw crime is bad
colours are beautifull
theres nothing more to think about


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-11-01 21:43 [#00424601]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



i could be wrong, but how i see it, is black on black crime
is looked at as worse, because the blacks got enough shit to
deal with.

when they are killing each other, its just adding to the
hardships.

its like theres no unity. you got the racist motherfuckers
giving em enough shit, a black person has a hard life as it
is.

Then they kill each other, and its like, they arnt even
sticking together.

thats how i see it... could be wrong


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-01 21:50 [#00424607]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to Zeus: #00424601



yea i think that's about it


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-11-02 00:35 [#00424767]
Points: 24596 Status: Regular



so to sum up, persecuted minority should stick together to
be tough--internal cannibalism not good.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-02 00:54 [#00424783]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00424767



but don't you think the "black on black" element of crime is
a bit over-stressed? a lot of people really DO believe it'd
be better if whites were killed instead


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-11-02 01:09 [#00424793]
Points: 24596 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00424783



over-stressed by whom? Black film-makers? the media? white
liberals? I don't know, since I don't associate with any of
those.

It would seem sensible to stick together if you're a
minority in a huge country--shooting each other over the
most trivial, and often Western-Oriented issues is absurd to
the point of insanity--and it plays into the hands of
certain sections of society who lap it up and use it as
propaganda. It should be stressed time and again, especially
to the black gangs, that killing each other is moronic. Look
at the Jews--they've stuck together for thousands of years
now--imagine if Jesus had been killing his brethren rather
than killing Romans with his Cosmic Powers®

Boy, It's 8am and I'm really typing the ether instead of the
network. G'night.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-02 01:13 [#00424795]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to marlowe: #00424793



i meant over-stressed by the real life people who refer to
black on black crime, but yes also by black film makers

i just don't see black on black crimes as any more petty
than most street crimes (blind to race)

you're right tho, it does play into people who manipulate
the data and turn it into extremist political agendas (re:
crime, education, government support)


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-02 11:56 [#00425067]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



anyone else care to weigh in?


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-11-02 11:59 [#00425072]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



i dont know man...

what i said earlier was the feeling i get when i hear blacks
talking about black on black crime.

when i hear whites talk about it, its usually more like who
cares. like they are just evil black people, so it doesnt
matter.

im making huge sweeping generalizations here, but its a
general question...



 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-02 12:05 [#00425083]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



yea it's a very open ended question

people shouldn't be afraid to answer, i'm not gonna label
anyone a racist cos it's such an unexplored topic IMO.. so
people aren't gonna have fully formed opinions


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-11-02 12:21 [#00425118]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



blacks in the U.S. have been discriminated against for
hundreds of years and continue to be victims of that
practice today.... but for some reason it itsn't a big deal
any more
it should be
if i lived in a country where this was happening i'd sure as
hell be quite concerned
(yeah blacks are discriminated against in canada for sure,
and statistically probably have to put up with lower
economic and social envirmoents too.. but its not as bad as
in the US from what i understand (there are no ghettos in
canadian cities... juts bad neighborhoods))
i mean, there are no ghettos like the ones in Chicago, NY,
LA, Washington etc..

i think our culture/society is a little ahead of itself.....
we think too highly of ourselves

the fact that a group of people, defined so only by their
skin colour, live in such ways and endure such
discrimination even today is just sad.. people seem to
forget about that when they talk about how civilized we are


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-02 12:31 [#00425139]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to AMinal: #00425118



i agreed, it's glossed over by most people.. the only people
who are constantly aware of black urban plight is (not
surprisingly) blacks themselves.. so i guess it's only right
they continue to stress "black on black" crime, so as to
make others aware of the epidemic that is contributing to
the wiping out of their race


 

offline BILE from São Paulo (Brazil) on 2002-11-02 12:42 [#00425158]
Points: 1769 Status: Regular



we need some more white on white crime to even things out


 

offline LeCoeur from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-11-02 13:43 [#00425336]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker | Followup to BILE: #00425158



hehehe........i think there's a lot of dat going around too.


bile.....your avatar reminds me of a french artist......his
name begins with F.....he did some medical sculptures.....


 

offline BILE from São Paulo (Brazil) on 2002-11-02 13:44 [#00425341]
Points: 1769 Status: Regular



i found this by going to google and searching for
"prosthetics"


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-11-02 13:45 [#00425344]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



I think it is stupidity. Like those anti racism hearings
this year where the blacks threw all the non-blacks out, it
was all over the news papers here. That was racism at its
best.

Think of it this way, they have an ALL BLACK CHANNEL on tv,
but the second you put an ALL WHITE CHANNEL on tv its really
racist. Thats fucking stupid.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-11-02 13:47 [#00425349]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



Does not calling colors on each other, such as white on
white, or black on white, or black on black and so on, cause
a situation where it puts up boundries? I mean, they do it
to themselves now,,, whatever racism they get its only done
on by them. Do you know how many black people IVe heard say
that blacks cannot be racist?


 

offline BILE from São Paulo (Brazil) on 2002-11-02 13:47 [#00425353]
Points: 1769 Status: Regular | Followup to REFLEX: #00425344



yeah, but that's ONE channel... how many white channels
already exist on TV? too many to list


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-11-02 13:48 [#00425354]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to REFLEX: #00425344



there is a very real black subculture
in music, comedy, everything

its not racist to awknolege that... is it?

the mainstream culture is the white culture..... every other
chanel on tv is the white entertainment network lol


 

offline BILE from São Paulo (Brazil) on 2002-11-02 13:49 [#00425356]
Points: 1769 Status: Regular | Followup to AMinal: #00425354



exactly what I was saying


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-11-02 13:51 [#00425362]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to BILE: #00425356



yeah you posted while i was typing so i didn't see yours


 

offline BILE from São Paulo (Brazil) on 2002-11-02 13:53 [#00425365]
Points: 1769 Status: Regular



no, no, I'm just agreeing with you :)


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-11-02 14:01 [#00425373]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to REFLEX: #00425344



many, such as myself, would argue that while there there is
no "White Entertainment Television", 99% of tv
programs/networks are catered toward the white majority
already. in addition, BET is white-owned (viacom, who also
own mtv, vh1, etc.), so it's not even black tv.. it's what
whites want blacks to be (stupid, culuturally ignorant,
behind the times, materialistic... ever WATCH bet? it's a
fucking abomination.)


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-11-02 14:09 [#00425382]
Points: 24596 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00425373



I saw it a couple of times when I was in the States--I
couldn't watch it, it kinda made me feel nauseous.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-02-13 10:06 [#00553880]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



*looks at dj spinna review and some others from the last
couple weeks*

they really need to stop reviewing hip-hop.


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-02-13 10:06 [#00553881]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to titsworth: #00553880



whoops wrong thread... ehh, pretend the above was posted in
the pitchfork media thread


 

offline b0nk from 1969 in the sunshine (United States) on 2003-02-13 10:25 [#00553910]
Points: 1121 Status: Regular



if one black kills another, its really no different then a
white killing another white. either way its stupid and
tragic to see anyone get killed especially over something
stupid like gang shit. i dont think people really look at
it being any different from murders of any race. the way i
look at it is that they were stupid enough to chose a life
of crime and thats how it ended their life. i think black
people really have a lot of opportunities to excel nowadays,
atleast in the ny area. it maybe "harder" than for a whtie
person, but anyone can work hard and achieve their goals-
racism isnt as evident as it once was to where a black man
cant get a college degree through student loans and get a
successful job.

well ofcourse that can just be in nyc, its too diverse for
you to be racist and you wouldnt achieve anything by being
racist


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-02-13 10:27 [#00553913]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to b0nk: #00553910



i think you miss the point about the precious nature of a
black life, especially while young, and fail to see the
tragedy of the situation or the endless cycle of violence
surrounding blacks in poverty..


 

offline afxNUMB from So.Flo on 2003-02-13 10:28 [#00553916]
Points: 7099 Status: Regular



I think people used to think that way, but times have
obviously changed, and the next generations wont think in a
narrow-minded fashion of black on black...There's more
violence and hate then black on black violence.

This thread is depressing me


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-02-13 10:29 [#00553918]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to afxNUMB: #00553916



how's it narrow-minded? it's easy for you to say that i
suppose since you're removed from the reality this thread's
about.

slavery still exists, it's just changed forms...


 

offline afxNUMB from So.Flo on 2003-02-13 10:33 [#00553924]
Points: 7099 Status: Regular



"removed from the reality this thread's about"

Narrow-minded doesnt have to mean something bad or
wrong...its just the way people think. I know more about
racism and slavery than you think Titsworth.



 

offline afxNUMB from So.Flo on 2003-02-13 10:36 [#00553926]
Points: 7099 Status: Regular | Followup to titsworth: #00553918



Boy youre gonna carry that weight a long time!

Titsworth, youre gonna carry that weight a long time!



 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-02-13 10:36 [#00553927]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to afxNUMB: #00553924



you're hispanic right? so yea you would know a bit about
racism, but considering you listen to so much "white music"
(as you've probably been accused of before by people you
know) and have enough money to spend on the internet, you
might as well be as far removed from the situation i'm
talking about as most of the other people on here. no
disrespect, i have nothing against hispanics, i'm just
making a point that your ethnicity doesn't necessarily mean
you relate to black on black crime anymore than some white
dude in maine.


 

offline afxNUMB from So.Flo on 2003-02-13 10:37 [#00553929]
Points: 7099 Status: Regular



blah blah blah your accusations are tiring me...shutup!


 

offline DJ Xammax from not America on 2003-02-13 10:48 [#00553941]
Points: 11512 Status: Lurker



Where I live the worst thing you can be is Asian if you want
to avoid name-calling. Or, like me, half-caste but mistaken
for Asian pretty often. I've recieved a lot of racial abuse
since early school, and about 70% of it is because I look
asian. What a shit country (England).


 

offline b0nk from 1969 in the sunshine (United States) on 2003-02-13 10:53 [#00553946]
Points: 1121 Status: Regular



no well if you dont agree with titsworth than you never
right, so dont worry

no i dont take away from the value of a black life, life is
life, no one is worth more. if people are going to get
caught up in crime than thats what happeneds no matter what
race you are. just because you are poor doesnt mean you
have to live a life of crime- its the mentality that people
owe you someting for being black which is what your implying
that they feel they have to live lifes of crime. which is
bs.. why make a thread when your going to bash people
opinions whihc you ask for


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2003-02-13 11:10 [#00553958]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



just cos i defend my point with a passion doesn't mean i'm
not listening to you and making an effort to understand what
you're saying, and often times i end up even changing my
mind.

i'm saying the life of a struggling black youth is very
precious in the context of their life obstacles that whites
don't have to overcome. that's why it's all the more tragic
when they kill each other because of gang violence and drug
war that the white society has created (not white
individuals, especially not the white middle class or lower
class; more like government and corporations).


 

offline b0nk from 1969 in the sunshine (United States) on 2003-02-13 11:12 [#00553959]
Points: 1121 Status: Regular



no one forces anyone to do drugs or join a gang its
completely voluntary. yes it maybe harder for poor people or
struggling black youth to say no, but its not impossible and
it does occur


 


Messageboard index