Mainstream view of electronic music | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 281 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613474
Today 12
Topics 127502
  
 
Messageboard index
Mainstream view of electronic music
 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-08-06 14:44 [#00339031]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



"Electronic music cannot express as much emotions as
totally organic one. There is much more of a passion between
a musician and his instrument than that between a man and
his computer programs. "
This is a quote that i found at a Radiohead messageboard,
and it seems to express the general publics views. Why do
they think this? It doesn't make any sense.


 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2002-08-06 14:47 [#00339034]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker | Followup to zaphod: #00339031



I know, A mechanical instrument is made of the same stuff as
any other instrument. What difference is there. It's nothing
to do with the instrument, only the artist.


 

offline Ceri JC from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-08-06 14:49 [#00339041]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Indeed, electronic instruments will eventually sound
exactly like the best example of their real world
equivalents. They will also have a far greater range of
sounds than traditional instruments could ever hope to
achieve.

Look at moby, he writes a song on guitar first because it is
simple, then writes it on computer using electronic
instruments.


 

offline princo from Shitty City (Geelong) (Australia) on 2002-08-06 14:51 [#00339043]
Points: 13411 Status: Lurker



"Look at moby" -- ewww... NO!



 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-08-06 14:51 [#00339044]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict | Followup to princo: #00339043



heh. not a good example.


 

offline electro from detroit on 2002-08-06 14:52 [#00339045]
Points: 2880 Status: Regular



music is full of emotion regardless if it is organic or not
the most important thing to me is honest, creative music
when i heared orbital insides when it came out i used to get
goosebumps when ever i hear out there somewhere
and that was electronic
every kind of music has emotion or feeling
even stupid popy songs



 

offline electro from detroit on 2002-08-06 14:53 [#00339047]
Points: 2880 Status: Regular



lets exclude moby yes



 

offline zaphod from the metaverse on 2002-08-06 14:56 [#00339056]
Points: 4428 Status: Addict



people are too stuck with the tradition of the guitar band
to understand that electronic music is generally more
expressive than any other.
its just really annoying trying to convince someone that it
can be expressive and having them say, no theres no way
thats possible.


 

offline progeriak from belgium boarder (France) on 2002-08-06 15:01 [#00339069]
Points: 222 Status: Lurker



moby beurk (as french says)
Im a drum and guitar player.
I love Gipsy jazz.
People who says those kind of shit never tried to do an
electronic sound.
Theres no difference between someone behind a drum and
someone behind a beatbox. Just a question of "technique".
i prefer a beautifull beep than a Satriani solo.



 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2002-08-06 15:02 [#00339072]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker | Followup to zaphod: #00339056



Thing is, playing the guitar live (I'd imagine) is a
different thing. Thats where emotion can be strumed directly
and is different kind of expression to programing live.

Does anyone agree with that or see where I'm coming from?


 

offline electro from detroit on 2002-08-06 15:06 [#00339078]
Points: 2880 Status: Regular



agree with you chri5py
i saw smashing pumpkins live a few times and they are much
more emotional than on cd
i dont want to admit it but i almost cried when i was at the
ADORE tour
cause the show was the opposite of the cd

it goes back to the artist anyway


 

offline Chri5py from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2002-08-06 15:08 [#00339080]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker | Followup to electro: #00339078



exactly... both points of The instruments not mattering and
the direct interaction with instruments like the guitar both
come down to what the artist is feeling.


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-08-06 15:12 [#00339081]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



i think people have follow this opinion because, for
example, when u play the guitar or piano the notes/chords
you play can be slightly altered to affect the mood of the
piece, and these alterations are sometimes subconcious
decisions, but in electronic music ALL those small
alterations have to be programmed in, so they lose the....
natural-touch(?).

well, something like that. hard to explain.

electronic music is programmed in beforehand, non-electronic
music is played at that exact second. A Jazz improvisation
would be very hard to do with electronic music, because it
wud all have to be predetermined... unless you had someone
playing it over the music of course.


 

offline electro from detroit on 2002-08-06 15:16 [#00339085]
Points: 2880 Status: Regular



but still
this is a classical example
lets say bjork
her music is very electronic yet the most expressive
you can feel her music no matter how electronic it gets
and on cd she is not less emotional than live

when she wants to express her self with a certain melody or
tune and you cannot get that certain melody from a regular
instrument you go and you PROGRAM and put effects on the
piece of music you are making



 

offline ecnadniarb on 2002-08-06 15:16 [#00339086]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I personally think it is a lot easier to channel emotion
into a traditional instrument, but thats not to say you
can't do the same with an electronic equipment.

The main difference between a guitar and a track made on a
computer is that the emotion in the guitar usually reflects
the emotion of the player at that moment in time, whereas
electronic music tends to reflect the general mental state
of the person during the time the track was produced.


 

offline electro from detroit on 2002-08-06 15:17 [#00339087]
Points: 2880 Status: Regular



doesnt make it less emotional or expressive



 

offline Clic on 2002-08-06 15:18 [#00339088]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular



You have to put the emotion there. It doesn't just 'exist'.


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2002-08-06 15:29 [#00339098]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



when i saw squarepusher live, i saw the first electronic
musician truly pour out emotion while he 'just twiddled
knobs'.

To me it had equal energ to strumming a guitar or beating a
drum. He felt the rythmn, he knew the sounds that would come
and he twised the controls. Until you witness a true pro. do
that you cannot say they are not the same.
Also, i saw a 2-piece dublin electronica outfit do the same
and they had were colaborating with that same live energy.
Couple with the range of sound you can get....its better all
round.


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-08-06 15:35 [#00339102]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



electronic music is not less emotional or less expressive,
but that's the way people will see it unless they witness
otherwise.


 

offline skodt from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-08-06 16:04 [#00339153]
Points: 672 Status: Regular



electro: u used bjork as an example.
dumb.
she uses a classical instrument: her voice.

electronic music is less expressive in the fact that it is
all, for the most part, non-improvisational.
if someone does improvise, then that woud require playing a
traditional instrument.
knob twiddling is harldy improv.
electronic artists are emotional adn anyone can get into a
tune, but it's what you get out of one, or how it hits you.
electronica does have emotion, but i would love to hear
something that is as emotional as say gsybe! or rachel's.
i doubt that will ever happen.
i make both traditional and electronic adn mix the two on
other occasions.
so phooey on youey!


 

offline KEYFUMBLER from DUBLIN (Ireland) on 2002-08-06 16:16 [#00339175]
Points: 5696 Status: Lurker



"if someone does improvise, then that woud require playing a

traditional instrument"
...so you can't improvise on a pc? I DO IT ALL THE BLOODY
TIME!...to do it at a gig, live will take years of practice
though (like an instrument)

Lets get it down to basics...playing music on any device =
......Awareness of musical ability of the device - check
......An idea (not dependent on device - check
.....practice to fully grasp the devices range - check
.....the device responds instantaneously to your impulses -
check

sound! -check

..sorted....



 

offline electro from detroit on 2002-08-06 16:16 [#00339176]
Points: 2880 Status: Regular



dumb you
how electronic homogenic was?
yes she uses her voice to record it on her laptop to make
sure she gets the right sound and tune when she records
dumb


 

offline zguru from Lindale (Texas) (United States) on 2002-08-06 16:32 [#00339211]
Points: 1562 Status: Regular



you should see how people react when i play any sort of
electronic. i work at a summer camp, and i play music over
the house system sometimes. either they blow it off as "gay
sounding", "drug driven raver crap", or my friends just say
"that must be Zack's music, cause it's weird".

that's the mainstream opinions I've heard.


 

offline digital messiah on 2002-08-06 16:34 [#00339216]
Points: 249 Status: Lurker



dumb


 

offline Riccardo from somewhere beyond the ultraworl on 2002-08-06 17:06 [#00339286]
Points: 869 Status: Lurker



since i don't play any instrument at the time and i don't
use pc to make music i'm not able to say what the truth
is,but i think that musicians are concerned their ideas
coinciding with the music,i mean they have to reproduce
something in their mind through some instruments and pc
gives you more possibilities to express your ideas


 

offline Riccardo from somewhere beyond the ultraworl on 2002-08-06 17:08 [#00339287]
Points: 869 Status: Lurker



so a big applause to electronic music...no other type of
music gives me the same feelings


 

offline skodt from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-08-06 17:12 [#00339293]
Points: 672 Status: Regular



give me a rubber band and i'll expres my ideas!
he he he.
if you are improving then you are playing live, which means
you have to use a trigger device which is a taditional
instrument.
who;s dumb>
riiiiiiiiiight!

björks music is far from moving anymore.
it all sounds so repetative and redundant.
sorry, but that's my opinion.
electronic music rawks, but knob twiddlers will never be
able to compare with the nuances of live music.
the intimacy and ability just isn't there


 

offline electro from detroit on 2002-08-06 17:15 [#00339299]
Points: 2880 Status: Regular



dumb
bjork
Live @ Shepherds Bush Empiretraditional instruments
electroinca
moving
dumb



 

offline ExHore from Stamford, Ct. (United States) on 2002-08-06 17:17 [#00339303]
Points: 2157 Status: Regular



look, when i saw the word 'mainstream' i began to feel
depressed. just dont talk about mainstream and theyre fuck
ass shit opinions.


 

offline Riccardo from somewhere beyond the ultraworl on 2002-08-06 17:17 [#00339304]
Points: 869 Status: Lurker



the problem i've noticed with electronic performed live is
that an individual experience and that everyone lives on its
own without sharing it with anyone...but as far as nuances
ithink that there are a lot,every bjork's track changes from
gig to gig and according to the people she asks to accompany
her during her concerts...but anyway i'm not a rock fan so
i can't change my thought on that for now


 

offline electro from detroit on 2002-08-06 17:22 [#00339306]
Points: 2880 Status: Regular



ok
anybody saw AIR live?



 

offline Laserbeak from Netherlands, The on 2002-08-06 17:26 [#00339312]
Points: 2670 Status: Lurker



I think it's not the soundgenerators themselves but the
sequencers that control them make much electronic music
sound very sterile compared to accoustic music. When
electronic musicians play something wrong they quickly
correct it on their computer that's why it often misses
nuances that give the piece character.


 

offline digital messiah on 2002-08-06 17:26 [#00339313]
Points: 249 Status: Lurker



dumb


 

offline Riccardo from somewhere beyond the ultraworl on 2002-08-06 17:32 [#00339316]
Points: 869 Status: Lurker



the great thing in electronic performed live is that you
only have to listen to the music,if it's not bjork of
someone very important you don't take care of who is on
stage...last year i saw autechre live but they could be two
simplepeople of the crowd i couldn't dinguish them...in a
rock concert people on stage are so important,if you go to
a u2 concert don't you mind of the stage ,the images bono or
things like that? but that's not music that's more a show


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-08-06 17:46 [#00339331]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



who of us cares about the "Mainstream view of electronic
music"? as long as people are still making electronic music
we should be happy. why do we need mainstream acceptance or
understanding if we have no problem finding, enjoying, and
creating electronic music? i have a radio program and i make
a huge effort to get people turned onto electronic music,
but in the end if they don't like it i don't care. if they
do like it i'm happy. i recommend the same philosophy for
the rest of you - be a good human being and introduce people
to excellent electronic music; if they like it be happy, if
not don't fret!


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-08-06 18:10 [#00339373]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker | Followup to electro: #00339306



electro: i saw AIR live in june 2001, they were amazing. one
of my favorite concerts actually.


 

offline revpersona from Plainfield (United States) on 2002-08-06 19:35 [#00339511]
Points: 3167 Status: Lurker



Yes, I don't care for Moby either, but you can't deny how
talented he IS.

Oh and actually he has a really good song: "God moving over
the face of the waters" -- That song kicks ass.


 

offline Mickey Mouse from The Moon on 2002-08-06 19:52 [#00339520]
Points: 4130 Status: Addict



Hmmm.... Electronic music in the 50's was considered
experementing with different sounds and attaching things on
drums.... There was this one book I found on the library
about this man making this crude monosyth and hooking it up
to his vacum cleaner. Wierd stuff.... Oraganic music like
classical.. or jazz... it has its place, just like I think
electronic music has its place. Thing that gets me though...
When people get this thing like... oh you make electronic
muisc... I see.. so there are no real instuments. Me,
coming from a classical music background... I say.. no I
play piano and the sax... and they go... ooooo so you do
play an instrument, and then in their minds they think its
ok. Personally I dont think it makes a damn difference
weather you can play an organic instrument.. (all people can
play the kazoo... all people can play intruments (some
better then others). Music is about getting your feelings
out. So some people best think there feelings and expression
can be done with singing.. others with an instrument, some
with computers. To get stuck on this... oooo you cant play
an intrument... how can you be a musician... or how can it
be "real" music, really is quite stupid. Squarepusher in an
interview said that he used his studio setup like a kind of
intrument.. messing with everything he could to make a
controlled choas. People can be soo close minded sometimes
when it somes to music... what music is... and what music is
acceptable. Sad really


 

offline electro from detroit on 2002-08-06 20:29 [#00339550]
Points: 2880 Status: Regular



i loved AIR live
the music was transformed live
one of my favorite shows i've seen
my favorite bands live are AIR, Smashing Pumpkins and
Orbital



 

offline Ophecks from Nova Scotia (Canada) on 2002-08-06 20:32 [#00339553]
Points: 19190 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



Fuck the mainstream. There's all kinds of tiny little rivers
branching out from this ''main stream'', and they're fun as
hell to explore, but still have a connection to the central
system...

What the fuck am I babbling about?


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-08-06 20:38 [#00339557]
Points: 21427 Status: Regular



real instruments allow your consciousness to easily channel
"feelings" to your fingers (unless you're playing a nose
flute or somethin).... it's a single conscious creation.


 

offline wayout from the street of crocodiles on 2002-08-07 01:50 [#00339899]
Points: 2849 Status: Lurker



why do some people think that live improvisation is the only
way to effectively channel emotions?
i think it has more to do with your familiarity with the
equipment your using
i can program a melody in sawcutter within a few minutes
which expresses how im feeling at the moment a lot easier
than with a guitar or something...because ive never played a
guitar..but have been using sawcutter for months
when you become familiar with what your using ( be it
computer software or a physical instrument) to the point
where you can do things without thinking about them... thats
when you can effectively use it to express yourself...
and i dont think that the creation has to be instantaneous
to retain emotion...compare it to other forms of art...a
painting or a film can take months to create, and still be
very emotional..


 

offline The_Funkmaster from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-08-07 01:57 [#00339904]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker



well, I have only seen like one group in concert ever, so
live playing is not that important to me... it's the
recorded music that matters, it's what I'm listening to all
the time... and well, some of the most beautiful and
emotional music I've ever heard has been electronic...
however, some of the most beautiful music I've ever heard
has also been mixtures, or pure non-electronic music...


 


Messageboard index