pop music vs other music | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 141 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613471
Today 9
Topics 127501
  
 
Messageboard index
pop music vs other music
 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2002-07-28 00:40 [#00327481]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



whoa! I just read the thread "avril lavergne shocker" I
started a few days ago.. some nice comments there..

thought I'd start a new thread to voice my opinion as the
other one has gotten rather huge.

I agree that there is good pop music and bad pop music, as
in in every genre. I do dislike bands like the
aforementioned Avril, Shakira and I really despise Jive
fucking Jones. ofcourse, anyone should listen to anything
they like.

what is harmful about this kind of pre-fabricated slighly
marketed crap (and in this I'm also paraphrasing Henry
Rollins), is that huge amounts of money are poured in their
development - money that could be spend to invest in more
interesting bands/people.


 

offline Taoist Blockade from Wales on 2002-07-28 00:43 [#00327483]
Points: 1169 Status: Lurker



Those people are the ones who are most marketable. It is the
music "business" afterall.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2002-07-28 00:50 [#00327485]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



I don't necessarily agree.

they are the most marketable because they are being kept as
the most marketable kind of music - these acts get a HUGE
pr-thing, other bands/acts (and I'm not only talking about
obscure electronics now) have to make their own name.

nothing really new is allowed to be introduced.


 

offline Taoist Blockade from Wales on 2002-07-28 00:53 [#00327488]
Points: 1169 Status: Lurker | Followup to qrter: #00327485



thats true, but do you think its easier to handle someone
who you hired, or someone who is trying to be an artist in
their own right? If both sell the same amount of records
after being buoyed up on an extravagant PR campaign, I would
choose the hired pawn if I were the record exec, easier to
deal with. At the same time though, there are great bands
who breakthrough to the mainstream )Nirvana, Pearl Jam, more
recently, You Will Know Us By The Trail Of Dead, Radiohead)


 

offline Steamtank from Melancholia Isle (Poland) on 2002-07-28 00:58 [#00327490]
Points: 1271 Status: Regular



oh i would not say so....
there is a lot of new trends incorporated(i should have used
other word but i dont want to check it in the dictionary ;o)
) into this "bad" pop-
the neptunes producing britney spears and so on
but this kind of pop will always be artificial soulless
hybrid....


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2002-07-28 01:01 [#00327493]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



yeah I know why the record companies do it like this - its a
quick fix. you pump money into someone, who makes one cd
that sells millions, than either keeps repeating that
success exactly for a few years, or flutters out. either
way, a lot of money is made.

I know that.

record companies invest on the long term in the way that
they try to keep the musical taste thats 'hip' in a kind of
stasis for as long as is inhumanly possible. they don't
invest in people that will develop in their own right.


 

offline weatheredstoner from same shit babes. (United States) on 2002-07-28 01:02 [#00327494]
Points: 12585 Status: Lurker



lets not forget about those Satan spawned boy bands. If
money had a dick Nsync would be riding it till their asses
were sore.


 

offline qrter from the future, and it works (Netherlands, The) on 2002-07-28 01:05 [#00327498]
Points: 47414 Status: Moderator



I think quite a lot of money could be made by splitting up a
budget over a whole lot of smaller projects.

this sounds really horrible and elitist, but some people
need to be shown that there is better stuff out there.


 


Messageboard index