 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)belb ...and 241 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613463 Today 1 Topics 127501 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
okay, i wasn't there and i'm sure loadsa crazy shit happened 'off-screen' but i must say, after a bit of braindance in my kitchen, it looked pretty crappy. I DID see the origional 1971 version on friday and it looked fucking great. muSically it was solid and there were dare-i-say it, braindance-moments in some of the percussion bluesey bands.(dunNo who they were)- the jamming, the raw energy the sheer liberating fun of it all. 2002> all-in-all it's just-a big fucking wall! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
It did look very up and down. Queens Of The Stone Age were fantastic, but the rest of the bands they showed were mostly popular shite... |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah the 1971 film was great - showed how shit and fake Glastonbury has become - when i was there in '98, it was full of fronters and snobs -- when i asked for a henna tattoo of the OHM sign, they didn't have a clue :S |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
