if you like j s bach | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 299 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613460
Today 3
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
if you like j s bach
 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-06-02 08:15 [#00246296]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker



then please check out my version of one of his Inventions
-- it's less than one minute long so it won't take long to
download

location (opens in new window)

thanks very much


 

offline titsworth from Washington, DC (United States) on 2002-06-02 08:29 [#00246305]
Points: 14550 Status: Lurker



all i got is some fucking "sportsfinder" page


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-06-02 08:36 [#00246310]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker



oops, i wrote anglefire by mistak...

location

my apologies mr worth


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-02 09:28 [#00246343]
Points: 21423 Status: Regular



Well that's probably the best thing I've heard from you IMO,
but I don't know how much of it is your own creation since
I've never heard the original bach tune. I pretty much only
liked the melody, the drums... I don't know if they added to
it, probably not, they didn't really subtract much though.
wouldve been better without them I think. It's a great
melody, great polyphony (more than one, not necessarily
exactly 2...;).


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-02 09:37 [#00246347]
Points: 21423 Status: Regular



It'd be hard for me to create polyphony like that, I still
am learning how to interweave melodies in ways other than a
simple copy/paste round. But rounds make just about any
simple melody sound much better. The best results I've had
are making one "prototype melody" and then have different
voices or octaves go along this prototype, but at slightly
different time locations of the notes (but the notes stay
true to the prototype at the time they strike)... but stuff
like that bach melody pretty much baffle me by making it
sound "correct" yet not using simple rounds.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-06-02 10:28 [#00246361]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker



try making a melody which harmonises with itself half a bar
later &tc


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-06-02 11:34 [#00246404]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



ok, here is some advice.

im assuming you have some basic theory, and you are using
sevenths chords.

a great way to work on melodies, and ocunter melodies, is to
make guide tone lines. then from that, you add flourishes.

to specify ... say you have a G minor 7 chord, moving to C
minor 7 chord, moving to D dom7 chord.

The notes in G minor 7 are, G (the root) Bflat (the third) D
(the fifth) and F (the seventh)

The notes in C minor 7 are C (the root), Eflat (the third) G
(the fifth) and Bflat (the seventh)

D major is D (the root) Fsharp (the third, from the harmonic
minor scale) A (the fifth) and C (the seventh)

the guide tones are always the 3rds and 7ths.

Now what you do, is you take only those notes, and you keep
the same note, or the one closest to it, every time you make
a chord change.

this supplies you with exactly 2 differnt guide tone lines.


So, say we start the first guide tone line on Bflat (the 3rd
of G minor), when we move to the C minor 7 chord, we stay on
Bflat, because we want to stay on the same note, or the note
closest to it. Then, when we move to D dom7, we move to C
sharp, because it is the closest third or seventh to B
flat.

so our first guide tone line is Bflat, Bflat, C sharp.

the second one, we will start on F (the 7th of G minor 7) we
move to the C minor 7 chord, and the clostest note (that is
either a is third or seventh) is Eflat. then we move to the
D major chord, and the closest note is F.

so the second guide tone line goes : F, Eb, F.

now, you add flourishes, like neighbor tones, other chord
tones, and chromatics, and passings etc.

you now have 2 seperate melodies, that will harmonize.

(just make sure the flourishes dont overlap)

and basic rule of thumb... it works if it sounds good.

if this doesnt work, then mess with it a bit.

this is a jazzy approach, just so you know... but if you
work with it enough, you can get away from a jazzy sound.

but yeah, just use your ears. theyll tell you what works

hope this was hel


 

offline Zeus from San Francisco (United States) on 2002-06-02 11:34 [#00246406]
Points: 14042 Status: Lurker



*hope this was helpful

-Zeus


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-06-02 14:16 [#00246458]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker



as helpful as i'm sure that was to w M w, he would be better
off buying a book on compositional theory, one on harmony
and one on melody - that's how i started (although i took
music in college too, which kind of helped)


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-06-02 17:22 [#00246615]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular



hm....... well the backwards sounds for the melodies was
cool, i liked that

personally... i dont think percussion, especially of this
nature, suites this kind of music......

i did like the chord they finish on, nice work.. it sounded
good reversed like that


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-06-02 17:25 [#00246621]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to AMinal: #00246615



ooh, also on ur page was a link for a prog. that kills pop
ups...... how does this work?
any side affects i should know of before i try it?
and can u still allow some to pop up?


 

offline AMinal from Toronto (Canada) on 2002-06-02 17:25 [#00246622]
Points: 3476 Status: Regular | Followup to AMinal: #00246621



*effects, whatever


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-06-02 20:42 [#00246781]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker



01) i didnt use any backwards effect! just skillfull
programming ;) hehe

02) popup killer is good - no side effects that i've ever
noticed, and i have it running all the time!


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-03 01:10 [#00247226]
Points: 21423 Status: Regular



actually that was some pretty confusing stuff to me,
probably because i"m not familiar with the definitions of
some words used... but I have to bounce this thread up so I
can actually read it instead of quickly glancing (otherwise
I'll forget) when I have time later today.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-06-03 08:55 [#00247577]
Points: 21423 Status: Regular



um... well I tried reading some music books in the college
library when I was attending, but they all pretty much
required that you know how to read sheet music (i don't) I
found one book in some other library that focused more on
the science behind it, but still it was confusing. They
mentioned how there were several sub notes or something in
one single note and I guess that's what you meant. . .
do you know any good simpler book that particularly helped
you?


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-06-03 18:10 [#00247981]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #00247577



learning sheet music isn't hard -- and the rewards are great
- even the internet would probably have enough resources to
help you on your way


 


Messageboard index