You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
(nobody)
...and 297 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613460
Today 3
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
...a boycott on the purchase of music...
 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 17:45 [#00235740]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



Core- How many artists do you think are actually
complaining? You'd be surprised how many of them actually
CARE. They're asked and pressured into a lot of things and I
don't think they really care at all.. Totally. Work with it.
Thom yorke supports it *Thumbs up*. He purposely went on the
net and promoted Kid a before its release with IBlips and
things playing his music. SOME of it got on the net and
that’s the way he wanted it.. His EMI were being such
paranoid bitches at the time reviewers and things in the UK
were FORCED to listen to the abum in Booths. That’s why a
lot of the initial reviews said, “What the fuck? This
doesn’t sound like radiohead at all.. it’s a bloody fine
album I bet, I just need more time with it”.

Yeah, its not like Aphex is out there complaining to Warp
about his stuff being heard.. That's the POINT of his music
isn't it?


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 17:48 [#00235742]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



LOL.

trust me, the artists who publicly support mp3 file-sharing
are in the minority, and they are only doing it in a
desperate attempt to appear 'down' with 'the kids'.

(this comment isn't directed specifically at Thom Yorke, by
the way)


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 17:48 [#00235743]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



these artists u mention are accomplished artists tho...
maybe there is a difference for smaller artists?


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 17:49 [#00235745]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



The only two real 'musicians' who complained were first
metallica for the napster thing.. That was a total joke
though, haha, they didn't know half of what they were
talking about and it looked to me like their label came to
them and went, 'Help us out please.. we'll promise to push
your albums harder if you do.' He seriously had no idea how
napster even worked.
And the second 'muscians' that come to mind are Oasis. Their
name is synomis with joke though, that was a bloody
publicity stunt hiring a detective and all that.. A
publicity stunt and reaction to radiohead ACCEPTING free
music.

The majority of artists out there who understand what
they're on about support this I'd bet.


 

offline astrid-gil-botn from Londinium (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 17:49 [#00235746]
Points: 1649 Status: Regular



tom yorke is fucking rich and signed to a major - do you
really think that artitss are not bothered about mp3's -
whaty then in germany did druqs have sony's liscenced anti
mp3 software on it - this is germany where cd sales have
dropped by 70% in the last 3 years due to file sharing cd
burning and other forms of bootlegging


 

offline Asche XL on 2002-05-26 17:50 [#00235747]
Points: 4241 Status: Lurker



i dont trust core whatsoever, i think its the avatar


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 17:50 [#00235748]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to Thelonious Punk: #00235740



heheh, Thom Yorke is trying his best to show his "working
class" appearence

like when he wore that:
SALE
SALE
SALE
t-shirt thingy.

I hav no bad feelings for Thom Yorke, he can do as he
pleases, as long as it hurts no1 elses and he keeps making
good music! He does hav quite a strong position of
influence, u must remember this


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 17:52 [#00235749]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



exactly. well said, astrid-gil-botn.

it's easy for so-called 'alternative' artists like Thom
Yorke, Courtney Love and Michael Stipe to publicly support
'free' music on file-sharing, because these jokers have
already made enough fucking cash to retire on ten times
over.


 

offline astrid-gil-botn from Londinium (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 17:53 [#00235750]
Points: 1649 Status: Regular



why do us indy labels like touch and go - dischord and
cranky not give out promo's ? well one reason is mp3ing


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 17:53 [#00235751]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



As I stated earlier, we're only talking about the big boys,
the big companies and the big artists.. these are the only
ones relevant to this. The smaller artists and albums are
getting heard..again, this is the point.. you get into their
music..you buy their albums.. I've NEVER burned a cd as I'm
stating.. it isn't a case about kids and/or being down with
them..what the hell do 'kids' know about indie labels and
shit if it wasn't for free music? I'm sure there's more
burning of major label stuff otherwise they wouldn't be so
pissed and taking the legal action like they are..


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 17:54 [#00235753]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



there isn't.


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 17:57 [#00235758]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



Its a misconception that these people get rich from selling
albums.. man I feel like I'm repeating myself here.. You get
rich by fame alone, the mp3's have nothing to do with that
so why should the big companies care? They aren't looking
out for the little indie labels thats for sure and therefore
this isn't about them. They're probably earning more because
of it.

I think thom is the BEST for doing what he's doing. If
you're in that kind of media posistion its your
responsibilty to do things like he has.. namely dropping
third world debt etc.. he is NOT making friends (or money)
from this at all, he's done it because he believes in it.



 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 17:57 [#00235759]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



i dont know why, but i cant imagine ppl downloading SClub7
and burning it onto CD...


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 17:59 [#00235762]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



there isn't what? Burning of major label stuff? Well slap my
ass and call me a sissy.. why are these companies sueing
instead of working with? Again, they can't be trying to help
the competition (smaller labels) just because they're
feeling nice.


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 17:59 [#00235763]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to Thelonious Punk: #00235758



Lonius, we're talking about mp3s, not Africa.

"rich by fame alone"... im sure the millions of albums
helped them with their financial problems tho!


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:00 [#00235764]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



I can. There's a lot of freaks out there.


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:01 [#00235767]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



there is more file-sharing of indie material. it's a fact.


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:01 [#00235768]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



Nah, the millions of albums helped their labels and extended
their contracts.. read my threads about contracts.. its
true, they get like a quater of a cent per every 4 cd..
That's a FACT for major label artists.


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:02 [#00235772]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



Hrmm..and where are your stats to prove it Core? Where is
the follow up stats to show how many people BOUGHT those
records after downloading said tracks?


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:02 [#00235773]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



the major labels want free music on the net banned, because
they see it as a threat. They want to neutralise that
threat.

Lonious, pretend ur in the major label. Wot would u do, to
insure that u made profit and that people got what they
want? explain ur choices, otherwise they hav no meaning, and
u cud just say anything


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:04 [#00235774]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



indie artists are struggling to make a living from their
music. and that is a fact too.

it's important for indie artists to be allowed to make a
living from it full-time, otherwise they'd have to work in
day-jobs doing life-draining office work or whatever.


 

offline astrid-gil-botn from Londinium (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:04 [#00235775]
Points: 1649 Status: Regular



thom yorke - indie rebel (tm) - once you have secured a
position within the music industry as a potentially secure
seller then you are able to demand more -
you are sayin g that majors probably make more from mp3's
ahh so this is why they are suing providers then?


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:04 [#00235776]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



I would work with the technology because within a month of
wasting my profits on long drawn out court cases there will
be ten more file sharing agents up already. And since they
can't destroy all of them at once, it will never end unless
they work with it.


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:05 [#00235777]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



thelonius, do a search on 5 major acts like elton john etc
on soulseek or audiogalaxy.

then do the same search on artists like global goon and
mu-ziq.

then get back to me.


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:06 [#00235779]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular | Followup to Thelonious Punk: #00235776



how wud u secure ur position and make sure that people got
what they wanted tho? wot wud u advise people (the general
public) to do?


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:08 [#00235784]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker




HUH?! WHat the? Way to twist my words astrid.. I said
they're sueing it from lack of knowledge and the
unwillingness to work with them. Of course once you have
attention you're able to say more, and have more of it
listened to, what's your point? Does it make him (yorke) bad
because he chooses to go against what his labels want? He's
his own person, get off his case man.



 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:10 [#00235788]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



thelonius, in principle your suggestion that the labels work
WITH the filesharing thing is correct of course... but in
practice, it's currently killing indie music.


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:12 [#00235792]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker




There's a lot of indie stuff you CAN'T get on audiogalaxy..
not because its blocked but because there wasn't anyone
available to burn the cds dammit. They need awareness of
their music too and promotion which they don't get enough
of. I still buy my cds, I'd think I'd be able to get into
more if I was at first able to listen to it.. With indie
stuff that's only possible through downloading or borrowing
a friends cd or something (unlikely at best that they'd have
what I wanted though).



 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:13 [#00235795]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



"I'm a reasonable man get off my case"

we're not on his case lonious!


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:15 [#00235796]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



how is that killing them? What's killing them is the fact
that the mainstream is getting less indie in itself. As I
stated before, if they were willing to take risks and earn a
profit that way instead of pedalling crap, things would be
better for everyone. Then a lowering of cd costs and/or
having more of it going to artists would be in order as
well. Indie won't die though, good music will always be out
there if people are willing to give it a chance.


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:15 [#00235797]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



oh well, I've gotta go...

see ya


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:16 [#00235799]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



Yes you are. His poor brief case doesn't deserve that kind
of treatment!


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:16 [#00235801]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



Bye sister! (:


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:17 [#00235802]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



*sigh* i'm off too


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:19 [#00235805]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



Ahh, well it was a good debate either way you look at it.
I'm still sticking to my guns though, this case is
insignificant because there will be another file sharing
program popping up in a week anyway. :) Bye.


 

offline astrid-gil-botn from Londinium (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:20 [#00235807]
Points: 1649 Status: Regular



the mainstram is majors - and music made by people signed by
them indie means independently prduced music on labels owned
by enthusiasts


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:21 [#00235809]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



astrid, it's a waste of time :-(


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:21 [#00235811]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



ermm, what's your point though?


 

offline astrid-gil-botn from Londinium (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:23 [#00235812]
Points: 1649 Status: Regular



btw - thelonius - i'm not having a go at thom yorke - he's
probably not aware...


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:23 [#00235814]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



its not a waste of time, I don't think we could really prove
who its hurting and why until someone actually got in and
showed us the facts or if the indie labels banded together
to HELP the mainstream labels take down audiogalaxy.. we
don't see that happening or any press statements even
mentioning such, you have to ask yourself why.


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:24 [#00235815]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



the point is, we work within the indie music industry, and
you don't. and no matter how long we waste our time arguing
on this board, you will never come round to our opinion
until you are working and living on this side of the fence.


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:25 [#00235816]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



aware of what? He said what he said and did what he did in
regards to his own music..


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:27 [#00235817]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



well, maybe, that doesn't change the facts though. Its the
majors battling this thing and you guys aren't.. ?! How much
of this is effecting you, how can you be sure if people like
aphex and other important artists aren't saying anything
about it.


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:28 [#00235818]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



because basically it's 'not cool' to be seen speaking out
about it.

and that's the problem.


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:30 [#00235821]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



if it were as big a problem as you say it is then you'd
think they would look past that? Seeing as they do have
integrity or more of it when compared to mainstream pop
acts.

The only people who would be concerned with being 'cool' and
down with kids would be oasis..and look at what they did?


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:32 [#00235823]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



Maybe a few of them recognise the fact that its kind of
useless to squash one bug, when they'll only be a thousand
more on the way.. Maybe they see the need to work with
them...


 

offline core from London (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:34 [#00235824]
Points: 1536 Status: Lurker



every band that speaks out about it gets shot down and
accused of all sorts of things.

big bands speak out and get shot down because they're
perceived as having enough money already.

medium sized indie bands are too scared to damage their
image by being seen to speak out about the problem.

small, unknown artists actually support the filesharing
culture because it obviously gives their music exposure they
always dreamed of, but when they finally get signed and
start to make a living from their music, the reality sinks
in that in fact the biggest losers in this whole situation
are the indie bands who are just managing to scrape a living
out of their music.


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:38 [#00235827]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



well, maybe that's just life.. Suffering for your art and
such.. hrmm.. If you went into expecting to be rolling in
money then well, I doubt your music would sound good
anyway.. I'd love to think you do it because its the only
way you're able to survive (in a none secular way), through
your art.


 

offline astrid-gil-botn from Londinium (United Kingdom) on 2002-05-26 18:47 [#00235836]
Points: 1649 Status: Regular



no.....it's filesharing...ho hum


 

offline Thelonious Punk from *fap fap fap* on 2002-05-26 18:50 [#00235838]
Points: 581 Status: Lurker



I don't know man, I want hard proof and stuff before I start
being so bold as to blame it ALL on file sharing. What I do
know for a fact is that combating this in court like this
won't do shit for anybody. They should start talking and
stop the fighting maannn.. *peace sign*


 


Messageboard index