|
|
chapman
from United Kingdom on 2002-05-08 12:04 [#00210838]
Points: 1134 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
tune/phob.... how about....
when a topic gets closed, 100points get taken off any members who posted in the topic.
maybe that would deter spammers?
|
|
jonesy
from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-05-08 12:07 [#00210841]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker
|
|
And when they lose 100 points what will happen? We don't get prizes for points. You've heard the refrain: "What do pints mean?" too many times. Don't watch so many gameshows friend.
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2002-05-08 12:09 [#00210845]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00210841
|
|
Yeah but maybe the worst spammers are the ones that care most about points.
|
|
Sido Dyas
from a computer on 2002-05-08 12:09 [#00210847]
Points: 8876 Status: Lurker | Followup to jonesy: #00210841
|
|
haha!! who the hell is that??? the avatar?
|
|
jonesy
from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-05-08 12:10 [#00210848]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker
|
|
Who came up with the word 'spammer'? Doesn't 'troll' mean the same thing? Is another language slowly evolving on here?
|
|
chapman
from United Kingdom on 2002-05-08 12:11 [#00210849]
Points: 1134 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
exactly... most dont care about points, but if someone gets negative points then they would be recognised as a general twat :)
and yes, quite a few spammers seem to do it just to get their points up.
|
|
jonesy
from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-05-08 12:12 [#00210851]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker
|
|
Its the saintly crooner from County Donegal, Ireland Mr Daniel O' Donnell. I like to wear my jumper over my shoulders when I get warm so I do.
|
|
Bob Mcbob
on 2002-05-08 13:14 [#00210921]
Points: 9939 Status: Regular
|
|
i am appauled by this whole conversation. penaltys for posting? why! its harming no one. many times what started out as a useless topic had grown itno a useful one, or at least an insight as to how other members of the board think.
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2002-05-08 14:39 [#00210964]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker
|
|
chapman should get 100 points taken off for such a wasted topic!!
|
|
jonesy
from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-05-08 14:46 [#00210966]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker
|
|
Any spammers should recieve a dry buggering from each and every member every time they post crap like what I'm writing now innit?!
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2002-05-08 14:52 [#00210971]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker
|
|
bend over then jonesy odonell
|
|
jonesy
from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-05-08 15:07 [#00210978]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker
|
|
Gulp!
|
|
Ceri JC
from Jefferson City (United States) on 2002-05-08 15:22 [#00210994]
Points: 23533 Status: Moderator | Followup to chapman: #00210838 | Show recordbag
|
|
How about just the people who spammed? I don't see why I should lose points because some troll amde it go off topic a hundred posts later...
|
|
smokehammer
from Saigon (Vietnam) on 2002-05-08 15:23 [#00210999]
Points: 1463 Status: Lurker
|
|
electric shocks should be delivered to all people who disagree with me. A straight 240v current through their mouse should do it.
but only 17.3 points ought to be deducted, or 2.7 points for each offensive word, whichever is the greatest. Plus a 14-minute "sin-binning" (username blocked for 14 minutes). Plus re-habilitation session of 2 minutes staring at a picture of a field of lillies.
you know it makes sense :D
|
|
Messageboard index
|