 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 (nobody)...and 95 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613722 Today 3 Topics 127517 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
that i'm actually not sure what his precise policy is, or the intended strategy, but -- mmm, middle of the album, luke vibert reliably says: yes, it's time for this album's sloppy headfuck track, i.e. juicy luke vibert off tally hoe! for musipal, your one for this album is "It Is Always Now, All Of It Is Now" shuffle put it on again, and i'm nodding, and thinking: we need to get luke vibert as a guest onto fox news. hello, luke vibert, thanks for fox news. then vibert says, "it is always now, all of it is now" and the way fox news goes the host will have a counter-argument to this, and i dunno, i'd watch it |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
that fox news has a serious talent problem. even the third-rate lou dobbs has been blammed; grave times indeed. i think we still have Sean Hannity? he's perfect, actually Sean Hannity: Is it not only true, Mr. Vibert, that you not only composed "It is Always Now, All Of It Is Now" earlier, but if we were to listen to it later, it would then also be later? Luke Vibert: But if you listen to it now, it would still be now! Sean Hannity: That may be true, but is it not also, perhaps, bits of the past, and bits of the future, mixed up to create something not quite as good as either? Luke Vibert: Errrr and this is just pilfering a line from The Might Boosh and this is how they'd get him. careful on there luke |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Luke Vibert approved |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Either the present is eternal or it doesn’t exist. I’m not sure. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Both, you are correct! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Secret handshake |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yes we are doomed to live out whatever our current state might be, we lack perspective for anything else. felt quite trapped the other day thinking about this, but it ought to be liberating |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Been thinking about this: assuming god was able to break free from now, meaning he is able to experience past present and future at will, he would have to do so at a particular point of "time" relative to his existence. If god has his own evolving intuition (meaning what he instantly knows at any particular time) he should then have to re experience every point of time at every change in his intuition. Basically even then you woulndt have the complete view of all that could happen, even god would be as trapped as us in his conciusness (nowness). Could god come up with the predicates to understand his own being? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i don't think we understand time. what happens if it has an up-down axis or more as well as past>present>future being a unidirectional linear thing? and the block universe takes everything as being now, how does that work if now has more than one set of ordinates? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
that is just what i imagined while thinking about experiencing the past or future with your current self, it would add dimensions of time, or it would have to happen in another dimension of time. what i wonder is however conscious god is, he would still be trapped in whatever his "now" is, however vast. as consciousness seems to always be a delimitation of things, a cut from reality. if he could know it all at once then how boring would that be? or how noisy? noisy as death |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
just showed up in my playlist (whether serendipity or tracking algorithm) and PBS spacetime is usually worth a watch. the arrow of time gets a nice exploration here |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
