You are not logged in!

Log in

Now online (8)
Tony Danza
Roger Wilco
...and 25 guests

Last 5 registered

Browse members...
Members 8025
Messages 2563658
Today 132
Topics 124725
Messageboard index
cry me a river

offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2019-07-01 03:18 [#02581539]
Points: 12889 Status: Addict

boo fucking hoo



offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2019-07-01 03:26 [#02581540]
Points: 12889 Status: Addict

if you have $400mil, and you make $150mil/year, and your
worst nightmare just bought your songs for $300mil, and you
really, really, gave a shit... couldn't you just offer $350?
none of this makes sense


offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2019-07-01 03:41 [#02581542]
Points: 21386 Status: Regular

You can copy/paste information like music. Only douche
masters can make money, and tons of it, off of something
with zero scarcity, only government created artificial
scarcity, because it's all a shit pecking order of shit
heads making it illegal for people on skid row to live.

Check this out... there's at least 2 types of law: 1)
law law (the curses and spells they spell out to
control) 2) money law (also algorithmic computer law but
will ignore that for now)

money law says you can't have a house. law law
says you can't live in your car, in a tent, anywhere,
because you don't have a house. So to be poor is to
automatically be branded a criminal, enforced with a
tensegrity of opposing laws, making it impossible to
oblige, even though they are weaponized illegitimate shit,
adam kokesh for president.

Anyway, youtube/google owns her music if anyone, even though
it can be copy/pasted because they own almost everything.
But that ass clown probably just 'invested' a big some of
money as a guaranteed win in a rigged market to turn it into
even more money. He just wants to turn money into more
money, an activity illegal for poor people to do, and
doesn't care who owns it. He's probably illuminati.


offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2019-07-01 04:25 [#02581552]
Points: 12889 Status: Addict

i guess my basic point is this -- she's filthy, filthy rich.
rich enough to hire lawyers; usurp control of her shit.
instead, she's just complaining via twitter from some house
that costs more than i will likely make in my whole life.
kurt cobain, like, you can feel it -- music was what was
keeping that guy alive, it became this horrible monster, and
thus, so did he -- but when taylor swift is throwing a drama
meltdown over the loss of money she's made hundreds of
millions off of, i find it hard to empathize


offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2019-07-01 04:25 [#02581553]
Points: 12889 Status: Addict

money^H^H^H^H^H licensing deals


offline EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2019-07-01 04:50 [#02581555]
Points: 12889 Status: Addict

is aphex twin an empowered man?

purportedly, he spent years avoiding releasing music because
he didn't want his ex-wife to get part of it in a settlement


online mohamed on 2019-07-01 07:11 [#02581561]
Points: 28672 Status: Addict | Show recordbag

it is blessed if thou bastard break the waters sometimes..


online Tony Danza from Cats! on 2019-07-01 12:59 [#02581566]
Points: 1766 Status: Regular | Followup to w M w: #02581542

yeah I agree with wMw here, this is a battle between
rentiers - which is to say, wealth extractors posing as
wealth creators. If it weren't copyrights to a song
catalogue it would be patents on button design on cell
phones, something dumb that adds nothing to anyone's life
but merely acts as a private tax.


Messageboard index