 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 (nobody)...and 112 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613408 Today 0 Topics 127499 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
if you have $400mil, and you make $150mil/year, and your worst nightmare just bought your songs for $300mil, and you really, really, gave a shit... couldn't you just offer $350? none of this makes sense |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
You can copy/paste information like music. Only douche masters can make money, and tons of it, off of something with zero scarcity, only government created artificial scarcity, because it's all a shit pecking order of shit heads making it illegal for people on skid row to live. Check this out... there's at least 2 types of law: 1) law law (the curses and spells they spell out to control) 2) money law (also algorithmic computer law but will ignore that for now) money law says you can't have a house. law law says you can't live in your car, in a tent, anywhere, because you don't have a house. So to be poor is to automatically be branded a criminal, enforced with a tensegrity of opposing laws, making it impossible to oblige, even though they are weaponized illegitimate shit, adam kokesh for president. Anyway, youtube/google owns her music if anyone, even though it can be copy/pasted because they own almost everything. But that ass clown probably just 'invested' a big some of money as a guaranteed win in a rigged market to turn it into even more money. He just wants to turn money into more money, an activity illegal for poor people to do, and doesn't care who owns it. He's probably illuminati. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i guess my basic point is this -- she's filthy, filthy rich. rich enough to hire lawyers; usurp control of her shit. instead, she's just complaining via twitter from some house that costs more than i will likely make in my whole life. kurt cobain, like, you can feel it -- music was what was keeping that guy alive, it became this horrible monster, and thus, so did he -- but when taylor swift is throwing a drama meltdown over the loss of money she's made hundreds of millions off of, i find it hard to empathize |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
money^H^H^H^H^H licensing deals |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
is aphex twin an empowered man? purportedly, he spent years avoiding releasing music because he didn't want his ex-wife to get part of it in a settlement |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it is blessed if thou bastard break the waters sometimes.. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
yeah I agree with wMw here, this is a battle between rentiers - which is to say, wealth extractors posing as wealth creators. If it weren't copyrights to a song catalogue it would be patents on button design on cell phones, something dumb that adds nothing to anyone's life but merely acts as a private tax. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
