 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (2)Roger Wilco dariusgriffin ...and 60 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2608951 Today 27 Topics 127234 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
what else are you gonna do? spoiler: they're some "songs" I stole ampi max's inst audio link. It's great because soundcloud comments can't be spammed all over your track. song2 at :50 has these nice lyrics: i.. have.. a gay pe-nis you.. have.. a gay pe-nis let's touchem togeeether touchem togeeether touchem togeee-ee-ther-er-yeah-y-yeaaah Thank you |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i could do nothing but listen to these when i get back from work |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Sounds like it might have been composed by a robot Henry VIII |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Henry VIII had 57 kids with 6 wives, and he named all of them Henry, even the girls. He formed his girls into a team of court jesters called The Girl Scouts and made them perform diarrhea cartwheels for the public, then all his subjects were forced to eat the resulting "girl scout cookies" from the ground (this is the origin of modern day girl scouts). All his boy Henries were given drugs that made them unable to lose an erection and were forced to put on puppet shows with little costumes on their penises. I keep trying to edit the Henry VIII wikipedia page with these facts but the illuminati keeps reverting it. I have the documents proving all of this. You just find any page on the internet, and print it out. I printed out this page on xltronic with my own post that I'm writing right now, that's my document. I print that same page hundreds of times even, so I have hundreds of documents. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
diarrhea cartwheels.. oh my god |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
w M w i hope you're preparing a christmas special for your music |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
are you polyphony-limited or are you just not into release? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Ren and Stimpy's Yak Shaving Day makes as little sense as the hivemind abomination "christmas". Release of what, the notes? The notes are on sometimes and release sometimes. I'm pretty sure I like polyphony more than monophony. The former is many of the latter simultaneously, so more for the brain to process and more entertaining to me. And it allows more combinations: mix A+B for 'shade' 1, mix A+C for 'shade' 2 etc. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Your music makes me laugh and appreciate your talent all at the same time. Like Funny Little Man or by Flying Lotus |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I'm glad they give you that type of feeling. I re-listen to my old melodies, often while high, and I'm impressed lol, they often sound good to myself long after they're no longer fresh in my head and have high replay value to me. I used to suck faaar more at melody. I think because I use my wetware brain to imagine/hum and I've learned to think in either c major or a minor only (so I only ever have to deal with 7 keys instead of 12) and I even by now accidentally trained myself to think in the same beats per minute whenever I imagine another melody. It's sort of a weird test that if you can play the entire track at a lower or higher octave and it still sounds good then it's musically "correct" or whatever. But this is just one conventional basic way to make music of course, another way is crazy autechre 777 algorithms etc. I'm pretty sure there's a way to make computer algorithms come up with random melodies like these on its own, but would be difficult. Funny Little Man is great, way more technical computer control ability. I just have cheeseplug tracker and lame default tones but it's a simple environment for my brain to manipulate stuff. Kind of like a pencil and blank sheet of paper, not all tied down with fruity loops plugin piano roll tutorial needing newfangled gizmos. Here's a whooooooole 'nother set of melodies: |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
A very important part of getting any kind of workflow going is limiting your tools and then learning them inside out. What you do really works. Will cheq that new one in a bit |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
That last set sounds super IDM at TWO octaves faster (4x faster). Like a lyrebird swallowed a crack covered toy piano. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
why is the volume so high on that w M w? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i like that kind of backwards loop |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i guess the volume seemed a bit too high somewhere in the first part. now its normalized |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
the one at 12.50 made me smile |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
hehe, great ending |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
lollll |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
haahahahhahahahahha |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
just like venetian snares |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
well, i preferred the original ending, the fast one sounds like a ringtone |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
That last one does sound like a ringtone ha ha (at least I guess, I've never been a ringtone connoisseur, probably because anything that a ringtone would be for is probably non free market apple shit or whatever). And the 12:50 one is one of my favorites in fast mode. And I think that one was probably quite quickly made "freestyling" melody over a simple c/f/g/g or whatever chord template, like polyphony of only 2 parts, like the less effort the better it sounds or something. The fast ones kinda remind me of this kirby star stacker song: I bet it was composed at normal speed then octaved up. Do you have an example venetian snares song that is kinda 'fast' like that or whatever? I think I'm on to something with this hyper fast stuff, the problem is making longer stuff, if you looped one 8 times in a row it might get annoying without more variation, plus it's high pitch since it's octaved up. Too bad I'm too lazy to program automated melody cuz I bet I could eventually make really fast & longer constantly varying unique snowflake patterns. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i meant ringtone in the most respectful way you could say that, never been into any ringt0n3 loop or something either. yes great feeling to freestyle accordingly, i also use musical typing couldnt be arsed to use the small midi keyboard i have. for the melodies, i use letters and memorize them so i dont have to look at the screen of the computer while 'performing' the chord (not template if its your invention imho) or even better, take advantage of knowing the position of the letter in the keyboard by heart and literallly 'perform' music on a computer with a letter medium. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i just had a feeling at a certain point of some venetian snares dynamics, or rhythmical, or whatever. i cant address you to any particular venetians snares track. sorry about that. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
'performing' as 2 or 3 keys, in the brighest cases with the add of a 4th and 5th key to the main 2 or 3, thats all i can relate about with poliphony |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
never been into mathematics in music likewise in my life, but i bet you could make some interesting combinations with a few keys if planned. but its better to discover it as if you were a kid. grown up stuff is memorizing the movement and replicate it. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
(with different keys) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
pitch is something you opened my eyes about in the past so i take the occasion to thank you about it, the melody in my shit music has surely taken benefit from it. thanks! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
previous comment not relegated to the melody actually, more like an influence of the mood of the whole of the sound files ever since. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i refrain from high pitch keys, unless the do really sound good |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
thats all it concerns for typing text about music. then everyone can give a different interpretation of your info, depending of a million of varaibles, like programs used, method, ear training ect. but i would say to anyone on this forum with a decent level of certainty that is all valuable info all that you're giving out. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
