star wars rogue one | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
belb
EpicMegatrax
...and 87 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2608947
Today 23
Topics 127234
  
 
Messageboard index
star wars rogue one
 

online EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2016-12-24 11:53 [#02509330]
Points: 24418 Status: Addict



still haven't seen it


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-24 13:02 [#02509345]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



it seems like one of those films that you can infer exactly
what will happen before you see it, I hope I'm wrong


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-24 13:03 [#02509346]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



I sincerely hope Carrie Fisher recovers,


 

online EpicMegatrax from Greatest Hits on 2016-12-24 18:29 [#02509396]
Points: 24418 Status: Addict



while fisher's cocaine habit was in remission for years, it
will never recover completely. the franchise reboot did her
in


 

offline umbroman3 from United Kingdom on 2016-12-24 18:31 [#02509398]
Points: 6096 Status: Regular



just watched passengers. nice little romantic sci fi film.
very simple movie with two hot people falling in love on a
spaceship.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-24 19:43 [#02509403]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I'm not a massive star wars fan. I think the Lucas films are
ok but elevated by excellent production design, composition
etc. Rogue One is one of my favourite star wars movies,
thanks largely to it not being bogged down with the han
/luke /leia stuff. I also think Edwards is a really good
director and it was pretty evident to me where reshoots had
been done that didn't fit with his 'save it for impact'
ideal, all of the vader stuff, everyone getting
unceremoniously wiped out just because etc.

7/10 for me despite Forrest Whitaker's moaning


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-24 23:55 [#02509422]
Points: 21386 Status: Regular | Followup to freqy: #02509238



It's live action (based on some anime I guess but I knew
nothing about the anime and it stands on its own). It
features a girl that eats potatoes, a really pissed off
double agent giant, retarded giants, baby giants, and all
kinds of awesome stuff. And it only stars asians because
china kills and harvests the organs of all other races (or
japan I guess, whatever).


 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-27 08:39 [#02509497]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i thought they would focus more on a story line based on
bounty hunting adventures through the galaxy, boba fet, that
weird half man half lizard guy you only see for about 2
seconds in the original movie, with sleezy bars, light
sabers in the wrong hands, maybe something more dark not for
kids, but the money isn't there for that


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-27 18:07 [#02509502]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



bugger princess Leia kicked the bucked,


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-27 18:12 [#02509503]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



going to be feel really weird watching star wars from now
on, don't think i'll be able to watch for a while


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-27 18:14 [#02509504]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



heres one for Freqy


 

offline umbroman3 from United Kingdom on 2016-12-27 18:35 [#02509508]
Points: 6096 Status: Regular | Followup to Hyperflake: #02509502



fuck


 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 16:03 [#02509519]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Rik and Princess Carrie. :..)



 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 17:40 [#02509571]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



are you going to see it in 3d?


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-28 17:46 [#02509573]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



in 2d I hope, 3d films makes me feel like I'm watching
through somebodies letter box with Vaseline on my eyeballs


 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 17:56 [#02509574]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



its more noticeable where the camera is focused at.

you wanna look at an object but its just really blurred

I cant wait for when each person has an iris focus thing
sensor....each person has own real time render.

so you could be looking at an object ona table and focus but
i could look at the mountains in the distance through a
window..

like real life type of stuff.


 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 17:59 [#02509575]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




focus where ever we want, i mean

a cinema of say 200 people all with that ability

.the cinema could tap into everyones iphone to use the cpus
of each person.in flight mode...if you do this ..reduces
ticket price by 20 percent. else you have to use their rack
of pcs.


 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 18:00 [#02509576]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



do they have iris/focal tracking yet on playstations and
stuff ?



 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-28 18:00 [#02509577]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



perhaps they can spray a mist of lsd onto your tounges and
beam the pictures straight into your retina with a blue
laser, like clockwork orange


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-28 18:01 [#02509578]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker | Followup to freqy: #02509576



I think so yeah they had that Kinect device which I think
was something similar, my brother works for computer
department at university and he says that have stuff that
can virtually map a room in real time so they can make stuff
like the holodeck almost


 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 18:05 [#02509579]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




yeh i seen that room maper thing.

I we hope don’t wake up from xlt like in back to
reality.

dwain dibbly?!



 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 18:06 [#02509580]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



*I hope we


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-28 18:07 [#02509581]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



yeah I wonder if when we die out consciousness just shifts
to a different version of ourselves in the multiverse, I
mean like is our consciousness extended into infinite
dimensions and our body anchors it here temporarily


 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 18:14 [#02509582]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




quite likely.

another good reason to make the world a better place, in the
future,
if not for other people...then just in case we become other
people. lol



 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 18:17 [#02509583]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



and all animals too. and even the plants. all connected.

cant be a bad thing for all life to live free from pain.



 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-28 18:18 [#02509584]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



LAZY_TITLE


 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 18:52 [#02509586]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



great now all my infinite heads hurt ....from all the splits
from this point on

lol


 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 18:54 [#02509587]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



notice the lol

to try and cancel it out a bit. lol/

lol lol
lol lol lol lol

thats better


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-28 18:56 [#02509588]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



there is an infinite amount of universes where rod hull
fell off his roof

and an infinite amount of universes he didn't


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-28 19:11 [#02509597]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



information density


 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 20:16 [#02509598]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



if there are both infinite fallings and non fallings of rod
and emu (emu,who survived always)

if you say there are infinite moments ...the only way to
find this out would be to ask god or visit each universe to
double check your theory.

we would need to be able to live forever, to be able to
travel in a machine that can take us to the various moments
where rod dies or not dies.

so we need an infinite amount of time to do this.

Are there infinite times when we succeed in our mission and
infinite times we fail?



 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 20:22 [#02509599]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




LAZY_TITLE


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-28 20:59 [#02509602]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



that's the prob you see, cos its by definition infinite we
would never reach the end cos at any point there is still
and infinite number of rods to check

just between the numbers 0 and 1 are an infinite numbers of
numbers, and between each of those is an infinite number of
numbers, that's a way I sometimes try and comprehend
infinity, some infinities are bigger than other which is
weird





 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 21:05 [#02509603]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



¨by definition infinite we would never reach the end cos at
any point there is still and infinite number of rods to
check ¨

and infinite chances we would fail too.

we can´t half infinitie ... but we can infinitely half
1..into .5 .25 and so forth

i have spent and infinite amount of time on this post. you
can tell by dividing the time i took into fractions

i think i may make it to the end and click reply....here
goes... i hope..





 

offline freqy on 2016-12-28 21:08 [#02509604]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



^ so i made it to the end of that infinite time frame
thing.

hey halving one .5, .25, .is inverted infinitea .. into the
realm of minus.



 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-28 21:16 [#02509605]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



the only solution is to evolve into a supreme being and know
instantaneously the condition of rod hull in all
configurations, schroedingers Rod


 

offline freqy on 2016-12-29 06:04 [#02509612]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




You mean ...keep him close at hand, like he kept Emu close
to him? by placing ones hand up.......oh hypie no.. of all
the things to do with supreme powers



 

offline freqy on 2016-12-29 06:21 [#02509613]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



resolution limits, grain limits

take a ruler twang it on the edge of a desk.
cut off an inch twang it.
then cut off half an inch and twang it
a quarter.....then an eighth...

eventually you cant cut any more off as the rulers material
will not allow this.

same with all physical things?

I wonder if time itself has a frequency sample rate
resolution, or grain thingy?

i wonder if physical space has a limit like dpi on a
printer.

if so, there is no such thing as infinite, except in maths.
but then its not possible to type numbers forever. unless
time goes on forever. if time does not go on forever you
have to take that into your formula, else its a fail.



 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-29 06:27 [#02509614]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



^ yeah its the Planck length


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-29 06:33 [#02509616]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



the ruler still extended in n dimensional space, you're
just subtracting the ruler arbitrarily from the bit we can
comprehend cos our brain cant comprehend infinity, just a
finite piece of plastic

im making this all up apart fron the planck length


 

offline freqy on 2016-12-29 06:40 [#02509617]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



lol. that almost made sense. but i get planck length. : )

What about movement in space?

if i throw a ball to you and film it with a high speed
camera

and then select a time of 20 percent and view where the ball
is.
say it is 2 meters in your direction,

but then i select 20.0000000002 percent of time. but the
ball will still appear at 2 meters in the exact same place
as i am stuck on the same frame within the sequence, as my
camera was not great.

i just wonder. if i had super powers to create a camera with
infinite frame rate recording capabilities. would i then
find the movement of the ball in space has a limit in its
fps?

i dont know if that makes sense.



 

offline freqy on 2016-12-29 06:42 [#02509618]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



like the camera is so good. it can see the resolution of
space time through the strobe movement of the ball?


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-29 06:47 [#02509622]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



seen this


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-29 06:51 [#02509623]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker | Followup to freqy: #02509617



yeah its an interesting idea, your saying that infinity only
works in a mathematical context, if we had an infinite frame
camera we wouldnt see any movement i guess not that it
wouldnt be recorded, but the first frame would be reproduced
infinitely and the second one, so we would never get to the
second frame, well a quantisized frame


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-29 06:51 [#02509624]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



is the universe analogue or digital


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-29 06:52 [#02509625]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



your saying how can a ruler be subdivided in a finite way in
an infinite universe, i dont really know


 

offline freqy on 2016-12-29 06:56 [#02509626]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i always in visage gravity as waves that we ride on. so if
i fall ut a tree ..i ride the wave to the ground. is that
right?


 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-29 06:56 [#02509627]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker



good video


 

offline freqy on 2016-12-29 07:03 [#02509628]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




Maybe the universe has a frames per second resolution of
100000000 fps.

so if i have an infinite fsp camera ...and I am able to
place all those frames on a infinite sequencer time
line....i will see that the fps of the universe as the ball
travels across the screen,

so every 1000000000fps the ball will move another inch or
what not.

weird to think the fsp limit is with the universe.. not the
camera. lol



 

offline Hyperflake from Wirral (United Kingdom) on 2016-12-29 07:06 [#02509629]
Points: 30733 Status: Lurker | Followup to freqy: #02509626



i think cos gravity exerts forces alot less than other
fundamental forces the gravity wave would be negligible,
thats why its take so long to detect gravity waves as you
have to have something monumentally violent to create
them/distort spacetime


 


Messageboard index