ochre's setup | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (3)
DADONCK
belb
dariusgriffin
...and 289 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613452
Today 5
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
ochre's setup
 

offline meldo from Sweden on 2010-06-03 05:59 [#02382337]
Points: 485 Status: Lurker



http://christopher.leary.usesthis.com/


 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2010-06-03 06:32 [#02382338]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i'm sure he uses the ohm boyz delay then lol


 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2010-06-03 06:54 [#02382339]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular



if he namedrops his ftp-clients, he should also mention what
kind of router and isp lol


 

offline yellow head on 2010-06-03 14:57 [#02382360]
Points: 71 Status: Lurker | Followup to meldo: #02382337



lol


 

offline Brisk from selling smack at the orphanage on 2010-06-03 15:21 [#02382361]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker



His chair looks nice. I've been tempted to splash some cash
on a good, work chair (my current one is awesome, but the
leather is quite literally falling to bits) but £500 is a
lot of money to plant your ass into. Hmm.


 

offline lupus yonderboy from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2010-06-03 18:29 [#02382366]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker




my old work had them and they are terrific chairs but £500
- fuck.


 

offline HIGHLANDER from Israel on 2010-06-03 18:37 [#02382367]
Points: 394 Status: Regular



what shoelaces does he use?



 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2010-06-03 19:20 [#02382369]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



nice chair


 

offline horsefactory from 💠 (United Kingdom) on 2010-06-03 19:48 [#02382370]
Points: 14867 Status: Regular



sweet chair and ftp client combo


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-06-03 21:37 [#02382375]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



the website should auto-link those highlighted items to
amazon.com


 

offline man o war from Isle o'Man on 2010-06-03 21:50 [#02382376]
Points: 1 Status: Lurker



I remember asking him about his setup 8 years ago and
getting some smarmy "trade secret" reply. He mustn't be
getting much attention these days.


 

offline csl on 2010-06-03 22:58 [#02382380]
Points: 130 Status: Lurker | Followup to man o war: #02382376



Care to elaborate? Trade secret? I was probably more
embarrassed about my setup back then than anything else.

I <3 my chair.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2010-06-04 08:29 [#02382402]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



A good chair is an extremely important addition to any
studio. I am kind of proud of mine. I bought it from a
thrift store, it cost me $25, and I have never found a more
comfortable chair.

Need to replace it soon, tho :(


 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2010-06-04 09:28 [#02382403]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I have a really nice blue suede chair, it's comfy but the
sad part is i'm sitting in front of an empty desk as i sold
all of my equipment. This was to fund my china adventures
and get married

So i basicaly traded my music gear for a wife... damn what
did i do? :(


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2010-06-04 09:32 [#02382405]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular



my chair is shit. it makes me slouch into stupid shapes in
order to get comfortable


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-06-04 14:53 [#02382433]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



people will spend $500 on chairs and $1000s on speakers and
yet wont do shit for room treatments/acoustics/absorption to
stop comb filtering.



 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-06-04 16:01 [#02382445]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



im going to make a full thread/discussion on it soon, but
what's with studio people/producers making music in rooms
with crappy acoustics?

you dont need some wicked studio .. but there's tons of DIY
stuff out there you can do on the cheap to get a better flat
response out of your room.

and it fucking makes shitty speakers sound amazing -
especially taming the first/early reflection points.

cant even tell you how much crisp/clearer analords are when
the room is made a little dead.



 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2010-06-04 16:44 [#02382451]
Points: 31145 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #02382445 | Show recordbag



please make a thread about it


 

offline retape from http://retape.net (Norway) on 2010-06-04 16:44 [#02382452]
Points: 2355 Status: Lurker



who says we can't/aren't doing that


 

offline csl on 2010-06-04 17:02 [#02382462]
Points: 130 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #02382445



Absolutely. I didn't include it in my interview because it's
a given if you're at all interested in getting the most from
your gear. Can't make sound EQ judgements if you can't hear
it properly.

I've made up 18 2'x4'x4" acoustic panels to place around the
room; makes an incredible difference. Here's a great
DIY guide to making cheap, effective panels.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-06-04 19:55 [#02382513]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



hell yeah. i dont know why room treatments get no love /
discussion / etc... fairly cheap, easy, and make a world of
a difference.

next up, some qrd diffusers!


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-06-04 20:11 [#02382522]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



csl,
check out gearslutz.com forum - crazy cool d00ds/diy stuff.

*(studio building / bass traps) sub-forums.


 

offline Phresch from fucking Trondheim (Norway) on 2010-06-04 21:55 [#02382536]
Points: 9989 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



bass traps?


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-06-04 22:46 [#02382549]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



yes.
unless you like having massive peaks/nulls in your room.

i have a 150hz peak that is driving me crazy that i'm having
a hard time sorting out

no mic, so doing it by ear...and no cloud traps just yet


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2010-06-06 00:13 [#02382674]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #02382445



I know someone who has spent most of their gear budget on
treatment. I don't think its necessarily ignored, per se,
but its definitely the least sexy part of a studio.


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2010-06-06 01:39 [#02382676]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to Taxidermist: #02382674



I'd recommend spending money on the gear first and recording
whatever sounds good in your room. If you can hear it, the
information is there. Spend some money on getting it
mastered properly and they'll compensate for the crappy
sound of your room. Then start getting anal on the sound of
your room.

It's like fannying around fine tuning a hi hat for 3 hours
etc.

Make the track while it's hot and get all focused on
everything being just so once you've got something worth the
effort.

It's like the old thing of audiophiles listening to the
speakers and not the music.


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2010-06-06 04:08 [#02382701]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Followup to JivverDicker: #02382676 | Show recordbag



Hi, I like to play around with Logic and don't make anything
worth sharing but I've been giving some thought to getting
serious about learning all I can to improve my mixes and
just wanted to say that this seems like excellent advice.


 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2010-06-06 05:59 [#02382712]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



using a local rec studio is a good idea, you can also learn
a thing or two


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2010-06-06 14:05 [#02382727]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular



hello !


 

offline bob from Nottingham (United Kingdom) on 2010-06-06 16:07 [#02382738]
Points: 4669 Status: Lurker | Followup to csl: #02382462



What shoelaces do you use?


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-06-06 21:05 [#02382755]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



jivver, for once i disagree.

fixing your room (exception - unless your room is a square
small box) is relatively cheap to do with DIY absorption

not to mention, when you buy a mic and start taking room
measurements and experimenting and doing *cheap* absorption
---- i feel you are accelerating your understanding in
acoustics to a degree far finer than most would normally
subject themselves to.

why spend an extra $1000usd on speakers when you can spend
half that on your room?

not to mention, the wholy DIY mentality and trial by error
and understanding your room by trial+error is part of the
whole learning process... i think in the long run, it is far
more rewarding .. no ?


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-06-06 21:06 [#02382756]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



jivver, i know your knowledge/experience preceeds your
comments, but

"If you can hear it, the
information is there"
... the human ear is the most
easily tricked of all ... simple absorption panels at
early/first reflection points can easily cure a host of
problems ... especially for someone working with dynamic
stereo imagine, no ?


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-06-06 21:10 [#02382758]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



"It's like fannying around fine tuning a hi hat for 3
hours
etc.

Make the track while it's hot and get all focused on
everything being just so once you've got something worth
the
effort.

It's like the old thing of audiophiles listening to the
speakers and not the music.
"


no one is saying get all obsessed with your room.

but tossing (literally ... THROWING) mineral
wool/rockwool/fiberglass into a corner will make large gains
in taming room modes/peaks/etc.... that is simple fact.

you dont have to obsess to install a $20 fiberglass panel at
an early reflection point ....

room treatment is by far the cheapest way to hear your
music.
the mere fact that it can be done cheaply DIY only adds to
the effect....the user (by doing it do-it-yourself) does one
of a few things ... 1) learns about acoustics in the
process, 2) learns room fundamentals 3) learns about their
room and puts time and energy into their room

by getting the user active into making an understanding of
why their room sounds poorly and how to make it better (at a
relatively cheap cost via DIY) is really something to be
proud of.

audiophiles can brag about spending the big bucks, but
building your own superchucks or bass traps at a
ridiculously cheap cost is truly impressive for the end
user.



 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2010-06-06 21:35 [#02382761]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



you can treat your room, but paying out for some decent
nearfield monitors should be good enough man


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-06-06 21:57 [#02382764]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



that's completely false.

nice try, tho ...


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-06-06 22:03 [#02382765]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



ha hanal was giving me shit about lack of importance on room
treatment talking how he only listenings to old 80s hip hop

it all mattesr.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-06-06 22:04 [#02382766]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



and quite a baffon any human is who tries to pretend his
hearing is somewhat without the lacking of everyday
problems.

why is the cheapest link in the chain often regarded as
snake oil??


 

offline Brisk from selling smack at the orphanage on 2010-06-06 22:06 [#02382767]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker



music first
room after

that is all


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-06-06 22:07 [#02382768]
Points: 18367 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



you realize garbage in garbage out, no ?



 

offline csl on 2010-06-06 22:16 [#02382770]
Points: 130 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #02382522



Yep, I'm all over that forum with my morning coffee. Some
passionate, clever folks on there.


 

offline Brisk from selling smack at the orphanage on 2010-06-06 22:28 [#02382772]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #02382768



all i realise is that even the worst music in the world
still sounds like the worst music in the world, whether its
in a perfectly created monitoring room or in a bathtub.

loads of producers have crappy monitors/setups but still
make amazing music. i'm with jivver - many audiophiles get
too obsessed with the speakers/room and listen to that more
than the music itself.

if you have both equally good, then it's awesome of course.


 

offline Brisk from selling smack at the orphanage on 2010-06-06 22:30 [#02382773]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker



it's also another reason i prefer headphone listening over
speakers most of the time - less arsing around with
placement and irate neighbours.


 

offline retape from http://retape.net (Norway) on 2010-06-06 23:10 [#02382780]
Points: 2355 Status: Lurker



I think elusive means:
if you're gonna improve your home studio, start with the
cheap DIY fixing your room stuff.


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2010-06-06 23:20 [#02382781]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular



I agree with everyone in here, as usual. With my coffee,
cheers!


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2010-06-07 02:04 [#02382812]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular | Followup to retape: #02382780



I agree with Elusive to an extent but that's like number 5
on the list to tick. I wouldn't enjoy the pure excellence
of the bass tones on a five hour DJ set from Dane Bowers, or
an accomplished mix of Jordans top ten favourite audio
cuddles.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2010-06-07 06:04 [#02382823]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to Brisk: #02382772



Its true that good music is good music and bad music is bad
music and everything in between, regardless of monitoring
situation. But music with bad mastering is still music with
bad mastering, regardless of how good it is, and its much
more enjoyable when music your listening to has passable to
good mastering.

I had one song I was really happy with, and I was showing it
to someone in their bedroom, and their room seemed to
amplify certain bass frequencies making them comb. If I had
mastered it in a better environment than I did that probably
wouldn't have happened, and I would have been a lot less
embarrassed.

I think a lot of those musicians that you are talking about
do end up getting additional help with their mixes before it
gets published or put online.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2010-06-07 06:05 [#02382824]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #02382758



Who is this end user your referring to? If your talking
about the listener, the room treatment you use is the last
thing they should notice. If they can tell what you have
done, then you have done something horribly, horribly wrong.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2010-06-07 06:10 [#02382825]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



Before people get too much further into this thread, I
suggest everyone read the following article on CDM, and
watch the first half of the video.

Article

Its a bit of a long winded rant, but I think its well worth
it. The video is fantastic (altho I would ignore the last
half where he just does a bunch of A/B'ing cheesy music).


 

offline Brisk from selling smack at the orphanage on 2010-06-07 09:51 [#02382830]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #02382823



yeah, thats my whole point. write the music, make it sound
good in your room, then send it to be mastered properly so
it sounds good in all rooms.


 

offline csl on 2010-06-07 10:37 [#02382833]
Points: 130 Status: Lurker | Followup to Brisk: #02382830



But in acoustically treating your room, making it sound good
in your room will generally make it sound good in most
rooms. This is the point -- you'll hear less of your room
colouring the sound, and more of the music directly coming
out of your monitors.

The mastering engineer will then not have to work so hard
reversing what you may have done in order for the music to
sound good in your own room. e.g. if you've compensated for
a huge bass null in your room with a huge boost, then the ME
will have to cut, which may then affect the punch of the
kick etc. It becomes too much of a compromise.

This is really one of those areas where you end up preaching
to the converted, as you don't know what you're missing
until you treat your room.


 


Messageboard index