I don't like cgi movies | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 359 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613462
Today 0
Topics 127501
  
 
Messageboard index
I don't like cgi movies
 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-06-01 21:43 [#02382198]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular



I don't like these computer animated movies from pixar etc.
I have the feeling, it does not take much effort to create
such a movie on the computer anymore, and the graphics look
really cheap. I actually think that hand animated movies
have more artistical value. Strange huh, tho i prefer
computer generated music over hand made music


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2010-06-01 21:45 [#02382199]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker



come on, you can't dislike wall-e


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-06-01 21:55 [#02382202]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular



I did not watch.But most of these pixar movies seem to
revolve about talking animals. I want to talk about the
technical aspect of these movie.Electronic movies actually
creates unique and new soundscapes, but what artistical
merrit does the computer provide for animated movies, what
could not be done the traditional way?


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-06-01 21:57 [#02382203]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular



Sorry i am drunk, i meant 'electronic music' not movies.


 

offline wavephace from off the chain on 2010-06-01 22:06 [#02382207]
Points: 3098 Status: Lurker



dinosaure for example in jurassic park. there are not real
dinosaures you need to make a computer 1


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2010-06-01 22:15 [#02382210]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker



i think pixar uses computer graphics in the right way. they
use it as a means to tell a story, and are often quite
traditional in their approach to directing - no bullet time
camera spinning nonsense, just bare bones story telling.

wall-e, for example, would lose its grandness if it hadn't
been computer animated, and the photorealism makes an
interesting contrast with the cartoony elements. same with
Up.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-06-01 22:30 [#02382213]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular | Followup to AphexAcid: #02382210



Okay, i did not watch those movies, because they seemed like
they were aimed at a younger or more family oriented
audience


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2010-06-01 22:46 [#02382216]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #02382213



i'd recommend them both. if you have any interest in
animated films, you'll surely enjoy them.


 

offline Terence Hill from Germany on 2010-06-01 23:04 [#02382222]
Points: 2070 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #02382213



read.
this too
(both .pdf links)

We're in this kind of transitional state of software
hybrids. There are hybrids which work very well, and then
there's some which are shit but sell anyways.

just don't expect any good films coming out of
mainstream Hollywood in 2010++ and you'll be fine. Film is
film. Simulated reality system is simulated reality system.
Combine the two and you'll end up with awkward bastards like
"CGI-film".


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-06-01 23:07 [#02382223]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular | Followup to AphexAcid: #02382216



Ok, i will maybe download 'wall-e', but are Pixar the
Autechre of the movie buisness......doubt it


 

offline jnasato from 777gogogo (Japan) on 2010-06-04 14:25 [#02382431]
Points: 3393 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Yah, CGI shit is much easier nowadays, but difficulty
doesn't determine artistic integrity. So it's a moot point.
The only thing that's pretty fucking retarded- given the
faster workflow nowadays- is the inflated cost of such
services. When CG shit is still costing over $1,000 a
second
, something is wrong. That's why films can
cost $200 million +, which is FUCKING RIDICULOUS.

Quarter of a billion could be used for so much benefit, but
they're spending it to make shit movies? That's fucked up.

If one can't make a SOLID film for under $50 million,
something is seriously wrong with one's working method.


 

offline Torture Garden from Feelin' 2Pacish on 2010-06-05 18:53 [#02382649]
Points: 974 Status: Lurker



yeah, that's really strange monoid. jesus christ, shut up.


 

offline wimp on 2010-06-05 18:57 [#02382650]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



in my universe, i would be stoked pay over an hour's wage
to watch something like this in 3d.


 

offline freqy on 2010-06-05 19:11 [#02382651]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



would be nice to see that in HD.


 

offline cwnt on 2010-06-05 20:25 [#02382663]
Points: 951 Status: Regular



cgi is for queers
fuck u geoge lucas u prick


 

offline jnasato from 777gogogo (Japan) on 2010-06-05 20:45 [#02382665]
Points: 3393 Status: Regular | Followup to cwnt: #02382663 | Show recordbag



"fuck u geoge lucas 2.0, u prick"

Fixed!

Cuz 1.0 was pretty fucking badass. I sincerely believe he
just lost his creative drive and narrative ability, like
perky 16 yo tits becoming 3 feet long and covered in
mushrooms.


 

offline cwnt on 2010-06-05 21:25 [#02382667]
Points: 951 Status: Regular



prolly he had good ppl working for him back in the day
blatant he got no good ideas of his own


 


Messageboard index