|
|
Monoid
from one source all things depend on 2010-06-01 21:43 [#02382198]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular
|
|
I don't like these computer animated movies from pixar etc. I have the feeling, it does not take much effort to create such a movie on the computer anymore, and the graphics look really cheap. I actually think that hand animated movies have more artistical value. Strange huh, tho i prefer computer generated music over hand made music
|
|
AphexAcid
from Sweden on 2010-06-01 21:45 [#02382199]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker
|
|
come on, you can't dislike wall-e
|
|
Monoid
from one source all things depend on 2010-06-01 21:55 [#02382202]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular
|
|
I did not watch.But most of these pixar movies seem to revolve about talking animals. I want to talk about the technical aspect of these movie.Electronic movies actually creates unique and new soundscapes, but what artistical merrit does the computer provide for animated movies, what could not be done the traditional way?
|
|
Monoid
from one source all things depend on 2010-06-01 21:57 [#02382203]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular
|
|
Sorry i am drunk, i meant 'electronic music' not movies.
|
|
wavephace
from off the chain on 2010-06-01 22:06 [#02382207]
Points: 3098 Status: Lurker
|
|
dinosaure for example in jurassic park. there are not real dinosaures you need to make a computer 1
|
|
AphexAcid
from Sweden on 2010-06-01 22:15 [#02382210]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker
|
|
i think pixar uses computer graphics in the right way. they use it as a means to tell a story, and are often quite traditional in their approach to directing - no bullet time camera spinning nonsense, just bare bones story telling.
wall-e, for example, would lose its grandness if it hadn't been computer animated, and the photorealism makes an interesting contrast with the cartoony elements. same with Up.
|
|
Monoid
from one source all things depend on 2010-06-01 22:30 [#02382213]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular | Followup to AphexAcid: #02382210
|
|
Okay, i did not watch those movies, because they seemed like they were aimed at a younger or more family oriented audience
|
|
AphexAcid
from Sweden on 2010-06-01 22:46 [#02382216]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #02382213
|
|
i'd recommend them both. if you have any interest in animated films, you'll surely enjoy them.
|
|
Terence Hill
from Germany on 2010-06-01 23:04 [#02382222]
Points: 2070 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #02382213
|
|
read. this too (both .pdf links)
We're in this kind of transitional state of software hybrids. There are hybrids which work very well, and then there's some which are shit but sell anyways.
just don't expect any good films coming out of mainstream Hollywood in 2010++ and you'll be fine. Film is film. Simulated reality system is simulated reality system. Combine the two and you'll end up with awkward bastards like "CGI-film".
|
|
Monoid
from one source all things depend on 2010-06-01 23:07 [#02382223]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular | Followup to AphexAcid: #02382216
|
|
Ok, i will maybe download 'wall-e', but are Pixar the Autechre of the movie buisness......doubt it
|
|
jnasato
from 777gogogo (Japan) on 2010-06-04 14:25 [#02382431]
Points: 3393 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
Yah, CGI shit is much easier nowadays, but difficulty doesn't determine artistic integrity. So it's a moot point. The only thing that's pretty fucking retarded- given the faster workflow nowadays- is the inflated cost of such services. When CG shit is still costing over $1,000 a second, something is wrong. That's why films can cost $200 million +, which is FUCKING RIDICULOUS.
Quarter of a billion could be used for so much benefit, but they're spending it to make shit movies? That's fucked up.
If one can't make a SOLID film for under $50 million, something is seriously wrong with one's working method.
|
|
Torture Garden
from Feelin' 2Pacish on 2010-06-05 18:53 [#02382649]
Points: 974 Status: Lurker
|
|
yeah, that's really strange monoid. jesus christ, shut up.
|
|
wimp
on 2010-06-05 18:57 [#02382650]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker
|
|
in my universe, i would be stoked pay over an hour's wage to watch something like this in 3d.
|
|
freqy
on 2010-06-05 19:11 [#02382651]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
would be nice to see that in HD.
|
|
cwnt
on 2010-06-05 20:25 [#02382663]
Points: 951 Status: Regular
|
|
cgi is for queers fuck u geoge lucas u prick
|
|
jnasato
from 777gogogo (Japan) on 2010-06-05 20:45 [#02382665]
Points: 3393 Status: Regular | Followup to cwnt: #02382663 | Show recordbag
|
|
"fuck u geoge lucas 2.0, u prick"
Fixed!
Cuz 1.0 was pretty fucking badass. I sincerely believe he just lost his creative drive and narrative ability, like perky 16 yo tits becoming 3 feet long and covered in mushrooms.
|
|
cwnt
on 2010-06-05 21:25 [#02382667]
Points: 951 Status: Regular
|
|
prolly he had good ppl working for him back in the day blatant he got no good ideas of his own
|
|
Messageboard index
|