Iraq war | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
belb
...and 223 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613463
Today 1
Topics 127501
  
 
Messageboard index
Iraq war
 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-05-25 15:27 [#02381263]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular



I must now talk with you about something that bothered me
deeply, the Us invasion of Iraq in 2003. Maybe you recall
all these peace protests around the world, at that time, and
the rainbow pace flags that became popular. I was also
deeply convinced that this war was wrong. But not anymore.
It really bothers me that when Saddam shot missiles to
Israel no one was actually protesting.No one was protesting
to support the liberals in Iraq either.And no one paid
attention to the fascist Ideology of Saddams Bath party.It
is probably true, Iraq was invaded because of the
oil.Democracy wasn't much of a concern for the neocons. But
it was Bush and not the liberals who brought up the issue of
womens rights in Iraq. I now believe the Iraq war was
justified, it was the right thing done for wrong reasons.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2010-05-25 17:14 [#02381287]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



So it's "probably true" that Iraq was invaded for oil and
you still believe it was justified.


 

offline anirog on 2010-05-25 17:22 [#02381289]
Points: 762 Status: Regular



weaponry


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-05-25 17:30 [#02381292]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to anirog: #02381289



so why then are North Korea denouncing the attack, was it
foul play within their own ranks?


 

offline anirog on 2010-05-25 18:28 [#02381298]
Points: 762 Status: Regular



Dunno.. Maybe their Chinese overlords told them to keep
their mouths shut?


 

offline anirog on 2010-05-25 18:34 [#02381299]
Points: 762 Status: Regular



I bet the Chinese had some involvement in the attack
actually.


 

offline anirog on 2010-05-25 18:40 [#02381302]
Points: 762 Status: Regular



Those damn sanctions on iran make beijing angry plus the
russians double crossed them


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-05-25 18:45 [#02381303]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular | Followup to Barcode: #02381287



Sure. I don't care about the oil, or the wmd's, i am only
motivated by ideological reasons. There is something worse
than capitalism and bourgeois society: its barbarous
abolition. And that is what Germany stands for, that is what
national socialism and fascism stand for, that is also what
panarabic-nationalist ideas and islamist ideas stand for
today. These ideologies stand for an anti-capitalism full of
resentments, which does not want to abolish the misery
caused by the capital, but rather wants to re-organize it in
a national-collective.


 

offline HIGHLANDER from Israel on 2010-05-25 18:47 [#02381304]
Points: 394 Status: Regular



did you read christopher hitchens' new book?


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-05-25 18:52 [#02381305]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular



No, but i read Paul Bermans book 'Terror and liberalism'


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2010-05-25 19:11 [#02381309]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



So what are you saying? They went in for the wrong reasons
(oil) but the end result will be democracy, therefore you
agree? Perhaps the Iraqis don't want democracy - perhaps
they want to be led. If they wanted democracy there would
have been revolution. The government is born out of the
people, not the other way around.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-05-25 19:23 [#02381311]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular | Followup to Barcode: #02381309



The end results could be a stable democracy, if you look at
the last elections, the chances aren't bad.These people
won't just rise up and establish a democracy, they were
probably too poor or to afraid to rebell against Saddam. And
most of all, they aren't used to a democratic culture like
we are in the western world.


 

offline Steinvordhosbn from London (United Kingdom) on 2010-05-25 19:31 [#02381313]
Points: 3185 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



We've been here before


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-05-25 19:40 [#02381314]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular | Followup to Steinvordhosbn: #02381313



Yeah, so what?


 

offline Steinvordhosbn from London (United Kingdom) on 2010-05-25 19:48 [#02381316]
Points: 3185 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Well if that's your attitude...


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-05-25 20:02 [#02381320]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular | Followup to Steinvordhosbn: #02381316



Posting a link to an article without an additional comment
is a bit lame. What are you trying to tell me?


 

offline Steinvordhosbn from London (United Kingdom) on 2010-05-25 20:14 [#02381326]
Points: 3185 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I look at like if through some oversight I'd enrolled at the
Technische Universität Berlin and whilst I lay in my
dormitory bed trying to wank away the nightmare I heard
bellowing through the wall some humourless troll attempting
to be provocative about "the invasion of Iraq 2003" and I
got up and walked past their door with my cock out, making
sure they saw, before catching a plane to Jeddah.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-05-25 20:27 [#02381332]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular | Followup to Steinvordhosbn: #02381326



So, because i don't share your opinion i am being
provocative?Whatever


 

offline Steinvordhosbn from London (United Kingdom) on 2010-05-25 20:45 [#02381337]
Points: 3185 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Talk the Belgian Buns, Hans. I guess when it comes to
Geopolitik, like our respective views on the recreational
use of cough mixture or the fucking of one's own mother,
we'll have to once again agree to disagree.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-05-25 20:47 [#02381340]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular | Followup to Steinvordhosbn: #02381337



Geopolitics is an outdated term, do you know this?


 

offline Steinvordhosbn from London (United Kingdom) on 2010-05-25 20:51 [#02381341]
Points: 3185 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Stop talking to me, you make me feel weird.


 

offline anirog on 2010-05-25 20:54 [#02381344]
Points: 762 Status: Regular | Followup to Monoid: #02381340



Did you know cyberwar is a loaded term? Usually bantered
about by the u.s gov.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-05-25 20:55 [#02381345]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular



Seriously, what are you trying to say with that article?You
must be a bit more precise because i can not read your mind.


 

offline anirog on 2010-05-25 21:08 [#02381352]
Points: 762 Status: Regular



Richard Armitage

Life after public service:

There was some media speculation that President Bush would
appoint him to a key security position such as Director of
the Central Intelligence Agency, Director of National
Intelligence or Defense Secretary. As of the start of July
2007, Armitage had not re-entered public service. On May 10,
2006, he was elected to the board of directors of the
ConocoPhillips oil company.

In October 2006, Armitage lobbied – on behalf of the L-3
Communications Corporation, a company providing
intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance products –
some key people in Taiwanese political circles regarding the
possible sale of P-3C marine patrol aircraft to the ROC
military. Those who received his personal letter included
Premier Su Tseng-chang, President of the Legislative Yuan
Wang Jin-pyng, and opposition People First Party leader
James Soong.

Armitage stated in the letter that he wished the Taiwan
government would reconsider the purchase from Lockheed
Martin, the dealer the United States government had
designated. Instead, he hoped that the right to negotiate
the purchase should be made through an open and fair bidding
process.[8] The letter was made public by PFP Legislators on
October 24, 2006 in a Legislative Yuan session discussing
the military purchases.[9]


 

offline anirog on 2010-05-25 21:16 [#02381357]
Points: 762 Status: Regular



Mitch McConnell

In August 2007 McConnell introduced the Protect America Act
of 2007, which allowed the National Security Agency to
monitor telephone and electronic communications of suspected
terrorists inside and outside the United States without
obtaining a warrant.

McConnell remains one of the strongest supporters of the
Iraq War, which he considers a central part of the War on
Terrorism. He holds the view that the violence in Iraq is
perpetrated primarily by al-Qaeda and other international
jihadists who would otherwise be engaged in terrorist
actions within the United States. In an interview with CNN's
Anderson Cooper on January 10, 2007 (after President Bush's
announcement of an escalation in troop levels in Iraq),
McConnell claimed that the war in Iraq was a success because
it had prevented terrorist attacks in the U.S. since the
September 11 attacks. He warned that if the United States
withdrew from Iraq, "the terrorists would come after us
where we live."


 

offline the_cub on 2010-05-25 21:22 [#02381360]
Points: 36 Status: Addict



as if you lot can do international politics. but try all you
like


 

offline anirog on 2010-05-25 21:32 [#02381370]
Points: 762 Status: Regular



people fell for it


 

offline freqy on 2010-05-25 22:20 [#02381376]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i remember at the time , many missles BANG BANG BANG BANG
BANG X 100000 ...through the plane infra red cameras
,thinking....WTF?...
AND if i hear the words "weapons of mass destruction" one
more time i'll get on a cargo plane and ram the white hose!!


 

offline freqy on 2010-05-25 22:28 [#02381379]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




that would be at 3am after i induce a fire alarm of course!


b******s hit the twin towers when everyone was in
there.during the day . ...now that really did suck ***t

pure polluted evil doings


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2010-05-25 22:44 [#02381382]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker | Followup to Monoid: #02381311



I respectfully disagree, the Taliban show the effectiveness
of guerrilla warfare. You can quite clearly see how, with
all the will in the world, a tin pot army that recruits any
old loser can withold the might of the US and all its allies
armed only with land mines, AK47s and a mastery of their own
landscape. Undoubtedly a majority of Iraqi's want peace, but
it's a bit simplistic to imagine they would achieve it with
or without Saddam, the country has always been unstable and
riddled with factionalism and probably always will be.


 

offline anirog on 2010-05-25 23:01 [#02381384]
Points: 762 Status: Regular



Just go a facebook friend request from Hope Graham who's a
member of NewLife Church in Florida... & her wall states
that she has her T-shirt and & panties on. Now I'm paranoid
maybe i should shut up ;)

Hope Graham


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-05-26 01:17 [#02381396]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to HIGHLANDER: #02381304



which new book, and why'd u ask? I have the god is not great
book


 

offline HIGHLANDER from Israel on 2010-05-26 08:21 [#02381412]
Points: 394 Status: Regular



http://www.amazon.co.uk/Hitch-22-Memoir-Christopher-Hitchen
s/dp/1843549212/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1274858431&s
r=8-1

Because he is a left wing marxist in favour of the Iraq War
and he has persuaded many lefty children to change their
minds. Apparently one lefty kid joined the army because of
Hitchens and ended up getting killed in Iraq


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2010-05-26 14:37 [#02381429]
Points: 11005 Status: Regular | Followup to Barcode: #02381382



I am sorry, but the last elections in Iraq were clearly lost
by those parties that supported al-qaida and Iran. If the
shite mayority stays stable, after the americans are gone,
the iraqi democracy will act as an model for Iran. The
influence of the clerical fascist sunnite parties is also
crumbling. Those who said democracy isn't possible in Iraq
were after Kuwait, Jordan and Pakistan once again wrong,
with their analysis.


 

offline jnasato from 777gogogo (Japan) on 2010-05-27 09:44 [#02381530]
Points: 3393 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Have you actually been to "Iraq"? I flew over where it
supposedly is in an unmarked helicopter, and it was just
flat land.

All your media is controlled. You are in a cage, being fed
pellets of food and info, to comfort you into thinking that
there exists others than yourself. But you are wrong. It
is all in your head. And you are tripping so hard right
now, that you've forgotten that you're tripping so hard
right now.

AWAKEN, and be Free.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-05-27 15:56 [#02381568]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to jnasato: #02381530



dude. that is some hardcore dis-info.


 

offline jnasato from 777gogogo (Japan) on 2010-05-28 10:43 [#02381639]
Points: 3393 Status: Regular | Followup to pulseclock: #02381568 | Show recordbag



"dude. that is some hardcore dis-info."

...Says the illusion to the illusion.


 


Messageboard index