You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
Now online (2)
belb
recycle
...and 405 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
US Army Intel leaks on wikileaks
 

offline anirog on 2010-04-06 06:58 [#02375230]
Points: 762 Status: Regular



wikileaks

us-intel-wikileaks

The second link is amazing! Please read page six & page 7

"Wikileaks.org claims to have developed an uncensorable
version of the publicly available Wikipedia interface"

basically the u.s army admits to censoring wikipedia

"Wikileaks.org uses its own coded software combined with
Wiki,MediaWiki,OpenSSL, FreeNet, TOR, and PGP to make it
difficult for foreign governments, FISS, law enforcement
agencies, and foreign businesses to determine where a leaked
document originated from and who was responsible for leaking
the document"

basically the u.s army admits to hacking websites they dont
like

"Wikileaks.org claims that any attempt at trace routing of
IP addresses, MAC addresses, and other identifying
information of a home computer submissions (as opposed to
cyber café submissions) through Wikileaks.org‘s Internet
submission system would require a knowledge of information
available only to Wikileaks.org programmers and to a rights
organization serving the electronic community, or would
require specialized ubiquitous traffic analysis of Internet
messages and routing systems. Nevertheless, it remains
technically feasible for FISS, law enforcement
organizations, and foreign businesses that have the
motivation, intentions, capability, and opportunity to gain
online access or physical access to Wikileaks.org
information systems to identify and trace whistleblowers
through cyber investigations, advanced cyber tools, and
forensics"

essentially the u.s army admits to tapping peoples home
computers


 

offline kei9 from Argentina on 2010-04-06 18:11 [#02375267]
Points: 434 Status: Regular



great read.


 

offline kei9 from Argentina on 2010-04-06 18:57 [#02375283]
Points: 434 Status: Regular



also, amazing video on the front page. when the ban drives
in "those are not kids waving their hands, those are RPGs!"
"roger"
those people shooting down from the sky should get their
eyes checked.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-06 20:42 [#02375297]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



thanks for posting. Pretty fucked up.


 

offline freqy on 2010-04-06 21:26 [#02375302]
Points: 18724 Status: Regular | Show recordbag




time for a new world order of a pleasant kind.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-04-06 22:22 [#02375311]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"those people shooting down from the sky should get
their
eyes checked. "


they were not necessarily looking through the same
optics/monitor that is shown in the video (at that time).

and you are watching this from the comfort of your computer
and not in a stressful/tense moment ... hence you are
relaxed, and everything was pointed out for you in the video
(highlighted) ... so based upon that you see/know the truth
in hindsight/context.

whereas these gents did not;

war is ugly. the camera man should not have been hanging
around people with AKs and RPGs, period. that was also
during a time of rampant RPG attacks...so the pilots were
probably under a bit more stress than you sitting at your
keyboard attempting to give your analysis of the situation.


 

offline wavephace from off the chain on 2010-04-06 22:25 [#02375313]
Points: 3098 Status: Lurker



FUCK YOU ELUSIVE


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-06 22:35 [#02375315]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #02375311



that's all pretty apparent. i dont think anybody here is
overly stressed. its nice to actually know about what's
happening. you should have put that post in the youtube
comment section, it would have applied better.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-06 22:39 [#02375316]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



i meant *i dont think anybody here is really trying demonize
the soldiers involved. and i agree that the journalist
should have taken better precaution.


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2010-04-06 22:45 [#02375318]
Points: 12424 Status: Lurker



But did they actually have weapons? I've read that it was
all tripods and cameras and stuff.
Plus did they really have to shoot some unarmed guy putting
badly wounded people in his van?


 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2010-04-07 00:14 [#02375346]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I could see two men carrying weapons and 2 men carrying
camera equipment


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2010-04-07 00:48 [#02375362]
Points: 31230 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



wat


 

offline kei9 from Argentina on 2010-04-07 00:56 [#02375369]
Points: 434 Status: Regular



@elusive of course they were not watching this in the shitty
quality of a youtube video. what were they looking at if
they were not watching the monitors? pictures of naked
women? "oh for god sake kyle" *kyle cums* "haha, sorry"
thats how stressed they were, mate. "its their fault for
bringing kids to a combat" oh my god they must sleep like
babies at night. -
this guys in the ground had no weapons. you think they would
be standing in a circle in the middle of the street holding
RPGs?

also, why shoot the van? really. they were just picking a
wounded guy. they were not holding their AKs shooting to the
air screaming "Alah!!" but "kyle" at this point is proly
thinking "oh fuck they, are taking him away... Im sure they
are going to give this fucker medical care, and Im so far
away from my girl friend, or any real pussy for that matter"


so yeah, basically, fuck you elusive.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-04-07 01:16 [#02375375]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



if you want to lecture me on the weapons systems of the
ah-64, then you got some serious street credit to build.

they found expelled rpg and weapons.
the journalists were hanging around guys with weapons.
period.

it was during a heightened period of combat with heavy RPG
use throughout ...

you are making your conclusion from the luxury of sitting in
your chair at home..where everything was drawn out for you
in the video...making it obvious what and where mistakes
were made. also, by watching from the luxury of your home,
the emotions of live combat are removed ... and you make
decisions/draw conclusions in an entirely different manner -
especially since your life isn't in direct danger.

in time of combat, things are a little different. you are at
a heightened sense of alertness, and reaction time / threat
analysis can be compromised.

if you were stuck in war time with your buddies getting
KIA/MIA around you, and during a heightened period of RPG
use ... you might release stress in ways you might look back
on in disgust. that is war and it is ugly. realize this.

sometimes a human has to get in that mindset by saying
things like "fucking prick" to be able to kill. if you
cannot understand this, then thank god you haven't been put
in that position in your lifetime. sometimes shit is said
out loud to convince oneself that what they just did isn't
as big of a deal...this is for mental stabalization. just
because the language disgusts you from the few minutes of
this video doesn't mean the gunner isn't necessarily like
that in real life...dont be so quick to judge.

it's easy to point things out when there are little pointers
and you can rewind and scrutinize on the video.
things are a little bit different in the height of combat
and things are live. realize this.



 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-04-07 01:22 [#02375376]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



ah, here is a good read

here



 

offline kei9 from Argentina on 2010-04-07 01:33 [#02375377]
Points: 434 Status: Regular



everyone in the military should eat balls.

if you put yourself in a position were you might have to
kill people you dont even know, you are a prick. period. is
this clear enough?

If they cant tell those are fucking kids, then how can they
tell an RPG from a cows leg? "that mutant cow is armed to
the teeth kyle! shoot it, shoot it! oh fuck this is
stressful there are armed cows everywhere" What I really
mean is this: if they dont know what they are shooting at
(because they dont have the right tecnology or just because
they are plain idiots in a can in the sky) they shouldnt be
shooting at all.

(and as far as I know everyone in the military is a fucking
idiot so all the shooting should be done by civilians)

huzzah


 

offline kei9 from Argentina on 2010-04-07 01:36 [#02375378]
Points: 434 Status: Regular



oh and I dont think this guys are "evil" I just think they
are dumbasses and actually feel sorry for them.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-04-07 01:46 [#02375380]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



no, you've just never been in a combat scenario - so you
don't really have room to talk.

nor, from your language, do i think you've ever been in the
professional workforce, either.



 

offline kei9 from Argentina on 2010-04-07 01:55 [#02375381]
Points: 434 Status: Regular



so, only veterans can talk about this shit?

you are not my boss, so I can talk to you however I see fit.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-04-07 01:57 [#02375382]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



so, let's get back on topic then - can you start lecturing
my on the weapon systems of this particular ah-64?


 

offline kei9 from Argentina on 2010-04-07 02:08 [#02375384]
Points: 434 Status: Regular



I could google it. but who cares? really. Its not about what
weapons they had on their flying can, its about how they
used them. All I know is they shooted whatever weapons they
had on "hostile" people thata hadent even noticed first, and
then over a van that was trying to help a wounded man. lets
put it like this: what is the "ah-64" had been shot down by
and RPG and then the "rebels" would have shot medics trying
to assist the wounded in the back? you would be thinking
"bastards, paki bastards"


 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2010-04-07 02:14 [#02375387]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



how come they didn't notice the chopper? or take cover?


 

offline rad smiles on 2010-04-07 02:18 [#02375388]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



come on people now---SMILE on your brother, EVERYBODY get
together, try to LOVE one another RIGHT NOW!


 

offline rad smiles on 2010-04-07 02:21 [#02375389]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



elusive, were/are you in the military?


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-04-07 02:25 [#02375391]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



negatory.
i have depth knowledge on these topics, however.
career level stuff/engineering level weapon
systems/protocols/etc.

and of course know the people to engage on how things work
"in the real world"

the cover-up is what everyone should be upset about.
not what spews from the gunner's mouth



 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-07 02:40 [#02375393]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



"the cover-up is what everyone should be upset about"

that's what i was upset about. Even my original assumption
that they killed innocent civilians for no reason wasn't
misplaced with any amount of higher morality.

I have family that are in the army, and i was thinking about
joining after college.

kei9, if you're an American, you're speaking out of your
ass. If you're some hypocritical Euro, then by all means go
spout off, Euros aren't worth the dialogue.



 

offline kei9 from Argentina on 2010-04-07 02:42 [#02375394]
Points: 434 Status: Regular



you are not getting the point, I think. I dont care what he
says, as long as he is not killing children. you care more
about "the words used" than I do

"nor, from your language, do i think you've ever been in
the
professional workforce, either."

who cares what they said? kyle might have been saying "I
want to stab those fuckers down there, stab em in the ass
with my big thick cock and then set them on fire" and I
wouldnt care, in fact Id "lold" if he had said that insted
of killing them for no reason. I mean, those people were
obviusly not in an agressive situation. although Im sure
they knew of this "shoot anything with something hanging
from its shoulder" algorithm this thugs seem to have been
instructed to use to determine what to open fire on next,
and could have been more careful.

rad smiles is rite, we should hug and kiss, you can show me
all those fancy weapons after he have sex, Ill go "wow"


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-07 02:44 [#02375395]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to kei9: #02375394



how do you actually know just because the video started
where it did that the situation wasn't previously escalated
before the video started recording?


 

offline kei9 from Argentina on 2010-04-07 02:49 [#02375396]
Points: 434 Status: Regular



@pulseclock Im writing from argentina, thats south america.
if you enlist they might send you down here at some point,
to kill me because I was born in the country of el che. ring
me up, Ill buy you a beer. cheers.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-07 02:52 [#02375397]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to kei9: #02375396



I don't think we have a war currently in argentina. So i
think you're good. The only reason i'd want to enlist is
because of money, i have no desire to kill anybody.


 

offline kei9 from Argentina on 2010-04-07 02:53 [#02375398]
Points: 434 Status: Regular



they were standing in a circle, man. do you see that? they
were not ducking behind debris. As far as we know they might
have been chating about hot american women on the tv when
they got shot.


 

offline kei9 from Argentina on 2010-04-07 02:55 [#02375399]
Points: 434 Status: Regular



make your money in some other way. please. try not to put
yourself in the situation were you might have to shoot
somebody for no good reason other than just being told to.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-07 02:57 [#02375400]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to kei9: #02375398



So standing in a circle means they are pro-American? If it
were me, and i saw a helicopter circling me and the people i
was with, i would not stand around circle and wait for the
helicopter to just keep on flying.

Innocent or not, those people were just in the wrong place.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2010-04-07 03:00 [#02375401]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



"this knob. turn right. full."


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-07 03:00 [#02375402]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to kei9: #02375399



I'm well aware of what i'd be doing, i agree that a lot of
soldiers are being falsely led, either by their superiors,
or the american agenda in general, that's why joining after
college would be better because you'd go through OCS to be
an officer and as i understand there's a lot more options
available, like not having to serve in the infantry. I'm
sorry that i'd have to leanr how to defend myself from
danger, but i'd feel like that risk is worth it when my
country i was born in provides people with good lives.


 

offline kei9 from Argentina on 2010-04-07 03:01 [#02375403]
Points: 434 Status: Regular



they should shoot anyone who isnt pro-american? maybe that
helicopter is in the wrong place actually, have you thought
about that? anyways no one is huging nor kissing me so Im
off for a while now. cheers.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-07 03:07 [#02375404]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to kei9: #02375403



You're trying to be ontological in a matter-of-fact
discussion. It's just not gonna work, the deed is done, no
use to try and justify it or reason out why it was wrong for
the simple fact that you aren't any of the individuals
involved. Maybe if you weren't someone from an electronic
music messageboard i would be inclined to get all
philosophical about something like this and go into the
corruption which is allowing this kind of thing to happen in
the first place.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-07 03:10 [#02375405]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to elusive: #02375401





"That knob. Turn right, full."


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-07 03:13 [#02375406]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



were you at Flying Lotus on the 1st?


 

offline PORICK from fucking IRELAND on 2010-04-07 03:14 [#02375407]
Points: 1911 Status: Lurker



elusive still hasn't responded to the fact that they
proceeded to obliterate a van and obviously unarmed people
who were trying to help the dying reuters man.

a popular counterargument to this bandied about is that they
have to do this, because people will otherwise get there,
remove all of the arms for later use, and take photos of
bodies lying on the ground, unarmed, painting the Americans
as merciless killers of civilians.

I find this pretty odd: Kill innocent, unarmed people, in
order to prevent them from putting out propaganda that
tricks people into thinking that the Americans kill
innocent, unarmed people.

Also, elusive, get off your fucking high horse. Talking down
to people, basically telling them that they can come back
and debate war and politics with you once they've learned as
much as you know about weapons of killing makes you come off
sounding not just like a complete arsehole, but one of those
creepy gun-nut loons that everyone hates.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-07 03:19 [#02375408]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



Did they know that he was a Reuters reporter? The
only reason people think Americans are merciless killers is
because people like you who have no idea what they're
talking about.

"Talking down
to people, basically telling them that they can come back
and debate war and politics with you once they've learned as

much as you know about weapons of killing makes you come off

sounding not just like a complete arsehole, but one of those

creepy gun-nut loons that everyone hates. "

No actually it makes people either get offended like you, or
go and read and to prevent these emotional outbursts which
are unhinged.


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2010-04-07 03:56 [#02375409]
Points: 12424 Status: Lurker



Thank god you're informed enough about Europeans to write
them all off as hypocrites.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-07 04:09 [#02375410]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02375409



notice i said, "hypocritical Euros," not "Euros" and yes
that wasn't thought out well. I'm all too human too. Maybe
more vocal than i'd like to be.


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2010-04-07 04:39 [#02375415]
Points: 12424 Status: Lurker



you're a great man and a great thinker


 

offline wavephace from off the chain on 2010-04-07 04:46 [#02375416]
Points: 3098 Status: Lurker



killing/war is bad


 

offline wimp on 2010-04-07 06:06 [#02375425]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



@pulsecok: " the deed is done, no
use to try and justify it or reason out why it was wrong
for
the simple fact that you aren't any of the individuals
involved"
...really? there's no use in trying to reason why our
troops murder unarmed men chilling on a street from hundreds
of yards away up in the sky in an armored helicopter with
state-of-the-art weapons systems? who would you leave the
reasoning and justifying to? opaque military officials safe
in offices lining their pockets with blood$$$?


 

offline kei9 from Argentina on 2010-04-07 06:07 [#02375426]
Points: 434 Status: Regular



haha
wavephace, thats a nice avatar for such a name.

kudos


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-07 06:18 [#02375427]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to wimp: #02375425



what are you going to do about it by discussing the morality
behind it?


 

offline wimp on 2010-04-07 06:34 [#02375428]
Points: 1389 Status: Lurker



@pusclock—"what are you going to do about it by discussing
the morality
behind it?"

maybe have an understanding of why MEANS maybe shouldn't
justify ENDS, why there is an endless supply of iraqis
willing to risk their lives to chase out US troops wielding
chickenshit aerial weapons.. checkit:

"Dartmouth is all about contrived problems, nothing real.
The “case study” method is big there, part of a system
which deludes its followers into thinking that application
can be learned by simulation. A little of that doesn’t
hurt, but a lot is worse than worthless: it fills you with
false confidence that complex problems are fully amenable to
method —like repairing machinery is— but when you try to
fit human beings into the abstract simplifications of method
you discover they have to be forced to obey the theory. And
sometimes they force back. Iraq, Afghanistan, Sudan, all
gifts of think-tank methodology, and all impervious to
solution by method."

-weapons of mass distraction, john taylor gatto

killing these unarmed men on the street is not going to end
our war in iraq..


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2010-04-07 06:38 [#02375429]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



Goodnight.


 


Messageboard index