When Art Crosses The Line | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 380 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2613454
Today 7
Topics 127500
  
 
Messageboard index
When Art Crosses The Line
 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-04-05 13:02 [#00159055]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



Ive been reading and seeing some stuff lately about some
pretty strange "art" lately.... like the mesuem of death in
the states somewhere, cant recall at the moment, I thought
that would be cool - what with my morbid facination and all.


But then I mean what about those videos that were made in
Canada... Toronto i think where those art students skinned 2
live cats.... sick, but people complained it was art.

Whats your opinion. I guess the stand I take is the logical
one - anything can be art, and should be as long as its
legal. But this may not be exactly how I feel... hard to say
I guess. Shit... well anyone?


 

offline supreme from Antwerp (Belgium) on 2002-04-05 13:08 [#00159061]
Points: 5444 Status: Regular



have you ever been to the Saatchi&Saatchi-gallery in
london?
they did some line-crossing things too



 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-04-05 13:09 [#00159062]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



Explain please!

>;D


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 13:10 [#00159065]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



Art has nothing to do with legality. The sole interest of
art is aesthetics. Simple as that. I do not approve skinning
cats in the name of art, but wouldn't deny it artistic value
prior to witnessing (although it was probably just relying
on shock value than on any other valid aesthetic). Anyway,
art has nothing to do with laws or moral. Vienna aktionists
used to have huge happenings with animal sacrifictions and
bloodbaths some 30 years ago, and I'm sure you can find many
more similar examples in history. What I am saying, our
moralistic reaction to something is a separate thing to our
aesthetic reaction.

BTW, finally an interesting topic...


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-04-05 13:12 [#00159067]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



Meho Krljic::. yeah I thought it would be somewhat
interesting. I mean I agree with you totally, just that I
was saying what I heard.... I was throwing it in becasue
they were arguing the legality of it all, that was one
point, does it cross the line, I mean legally it does......
so therefore in the eyes of our governmet it is not art, but
people are crying out for art.....


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-04-05 13:12 [#00159068]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00159065



what about conceptual art? that doesn't have to be
aesthetic


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 13:21 [#00159090]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



reflex: just because it's banned it doesn't stop being art.
Is that obvious or what? It may not be socially acceptable,
but that has nothing to do with it's aesthetic values
(notice that I'm not trying to say that every provocative
work of art has value).

marlowe: well, the theory has it that with conceptual art
the aesthetic (damn, what a difficult word to type) is in
the action itself, like, when Duchamp brought that bottle
rack to that museum and exhibited something manufactured
automatically and in large series of nearly identical
copies, as a unique, valuable work of art, the aesthetic was
in altering everyone's vision. Do we value aesthetically
only the things that claim to be art? If so, bringing an
ordinary thing to a museum makes it a work of art. What are
the absolute aesthetic axioms etc.


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-04-05 13:24 [#00159092]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00159090



so you mean the idea is the aesthetic? the mechanics of
thought?


 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2002-04-05 13:27 [#00159099]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular



Meho, the girl in your picture has got a nice art.


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-04-05 13:27 [#00159100]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



It's Arts job is to cross that line...

that's the whole point or else it's just another Chocolate
Box pic or meaningless...

in fact, it shouldn't just cross it...it should shit on it &
rub our noses in it...(and then sell the results to the rich
& artless...)...

Was the Cat Skinning thing just a way of finally proving
once and for all that there's more than one way to skin a
cat?...

Have you a link, REFLEX?...

p.s. Didn't understand the "as long as it's legal"
bit....care to elaborate?...


 

offline supreme from Antwerp (Belgium) on 2002-04-05 13:33 [#00159110]
Points: 5444 Status: Regular | Followup to REFLEX: #00159062



I thought you maybe knew that gallery.
they exposed statues,made out of human blood.
there was also a portrait from a murderer(who killed some
children but I don't know that word in english....)
made out of children's hand prints

A big controversy....


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 13:35 [#00159113]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict | Followup to marlowe: #00159068



well, it's some kind of an idea that art is generally
something to do with our spirit and minds rather than with
rough material representations, if you catch my drift


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 13:35 [#00159117]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



and I know bondage is an art, jivver


 

offline marlowe from Antarctica on 2002-04-05 13:39 [#00159123]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to Meho Krljic: #00159113



but everything is art - so therefore nothing is art -
therefore art doesn't exist - therefore
*BZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz PHUT*


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-04-05 13:39 [#00159124]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Followup to supreme: #00159110 | Show recordbag



That was the SENSATION show a few years back...the piece was
a pic of Myra Hindley (A famous Child murderer - the Moors
Murders...) done with kids handprints....

Outstanding stuff...

The exposed body thing is called BODY WORKS (on in London at
the mo...£10 to get in)....the artist/dr has developed a
way to preserve the body called Plastination (sp?)...Imagine
a skinn body with all the veins etc all in 3D...

Will try and dig up a link....One piece is a guy on a Horse
holding his & the horses Brain in each hand....

You need to see Pics to fully appreciate this...



 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-04-05 13:42 [#00159129]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



link for ya...

http://www.plastination.com/english/plastination.htm ...

Big Article in this months MODERN PAINTERS (not online tho)
but worth having a look thru if you see the mag...


 

offline regital from Baltimore (United States) on 2002-04-05 13:44 [#00159135]
Points: 800 Status: Lurker



I attend an art college and am a photographer so this is a
topic we talk about ALL the time.

What is Art?

Everyone has an opinion, I think art is anything that makes
you see something in a way you've never seen it before,
something that conveys emotional meaning, or something you
just likw to look at. I think when some artists do art just
to shock: Serrano and the guy who did the shit painting of
Mary in NYC it's fine, but it gets to be a cycle of how can
you top yourself next. Sort of boring and predictable.
Skinning a cat... I haven't heard about that. Who's the
artist?

Another popular topic has also been:

When is nudity art, and when is it pornography. That debate
is just as confusing.


 

offline supreme from Antwerp (Belgium) on 2002-04-05 13:45 [#00159137]
Points: 5444 Status: Regular



I've seen a lot of plastinates in real life,
It's an exhibition,called
Korperwelten,(www.korperwelten.de)
by professor Gunther Von Hagens
they were beautiful,(aesthetic,if you want to..)but were
they legal?
The exhibition was not allowed in the netherlands...


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-04-05 13:45 [#00159138]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



My mistake.... It's called BODY WORLDS...

Great site (in German & English) at http://www.koerperwelten.com/index2.htm ....


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 13:48 [#00159142]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



marlowe: no, art has to have a predominantly aesthetic aim
(not practical one etc.) so not everything is art. But, yes,
every person is an artist, but even knowing that, that
doesn't mean that every person is a good artist: saying
something is a work of art means just that it's intentions
are aesthetic (that damn word again), but it doesn't mean
it's any good.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 13:51 [#00159145]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



regital: read the definition I posted below. That goes for
the line between art and pornoghraphy too: Porn (which I am
downloading a shitload of as we speak) reduces images to
certain focal points, thus most frequently forsaking the
overall aesthetic of a visual composition etc. Even though,
some porn has a lot of visual aesthetic value.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-04-05 13:57 [#00159153]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



jand: wow thats pretty sweet... shit.

What I mean was, I DONT agree with what they were saying,
but I mean the legal thing was the governments opinion not
mine, whatever I think is art is art, and whatever I think
crosses the line to me, crosses the line right? i just was
speaking about how the Canadian government deems anything
art as long as it was done/is legal.


 

offline regital from Baltimore (United States) on 2002-04-05 13:57 [#00159154]
Points: 800 Status: Lurker



The body is a very beautiful thing... the trick is
representing it that way. Porn seems to be like you said [
Krljic ] very flat.


 

offline regital from Baltimore (United States) on 2002-04-05 13:58 [#00159158]
Points: 800 Status: Lurker



Reflex... who were the artists that skinned the cats?



 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-04-05 14:01 [#00159160]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



regital:: cant recall right now.. sorry, two art students in
university/college I believe. got busted pretty good by the
cops.

its all preception i guess.. I GUESS..... because I mean
look at strippers, that can be called art, but is it
SMART?.... but then again some people dont care right, and
then again.. again some people dont even think about it
being art. Its just some brainless ho up on stage? I guess..
but thats not the important part.

Porn can be art, but thats more the "erotica" stuff.....
Porn is driven to make a point, FUCK, FUCK FUCK.... and
thats it. It may be degrating in some situations and in
others, not.. is it art? thats up to you to decide.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 14:04 [#00159166]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



porn's main aim is different than art's but porn (as well as
stripping) can be art when it walks a clear aesthetic line.
If you guys listened to merzbow, than you'd know that
bondage, that most of us see only as subsection of porn is a
real critically acclaimed art in Japan. It all breaks down
to shapes, forms and composition ALONG with the obvious
power/sexual context of it. See my avatar for fuckssake.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-04-05 14:06 [#00159172]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



Meho Krljic::. yes I was going to make a comment about your
avatar earlier. I understand that music and the messages
that this stuff gives out.

My personal view as porn as art, or stripping is that its
something that floats in the middle of the line, it can be
art or not depending on your standpoint, me.... I dont think
its art personally unless it was made for that sake, like
most erotica.


 

offline regital from Baltimore (United States) on 2002-04-05 14:09 [#00159176]
Points: 800 Status: Lurker



Another interesting fact one of my teachers was yammering on
about was that music is the only "art" documented to cause
an involuntary response in the body of joy. AKA serotonin
rush. Hmmmmmm is that why I listen to so much music? I would
rather be a musician than an artist.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 14:09 [#00159178]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



well, yeah, I agree, it has to have an aesthetic intent,
otherwise it ends up with so-called pornographic reduction


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-04-05 14:12 [#00159181]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



Meho Krljic:. true... and to think of it, it may be harsh
but in all logical and reasonable terms {for myself, so in
my opinion} I dont really have respect for what they do in
porn, I mean sure I may like it from time to time.. only
really when im without a girlfriend... which I have had a
good one for a while now... so scratch porn off the list...
I may respect them as people if I ever met any, but I
mean.... I dunno its just.. whatever a non issue I think.

Strippers are fun to go to now and then... for special good
party occasians... but I dont like sitting there for too
long, I feel.. "lower"? I guess, in my opinion again its not
art and I see the girls as.. lower beings who are just..
toys. Id never want to see one of my chick friends be like
that way. Its not art to me at all.

But moreso... ART...... paintings.. I guess music is like
that too... music.... effects the brain ... responses are
triggered.


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 14:19 [#00159190]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



reflex: um, I guess that most of the stripping and porn we
run into has nothing art-related to it. But that doesn't
mean it doesn't exist. And I do not a priori feel less
respect for those people than for other people. A person is
a person.


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-04-05 14:28 [#00159202]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



I know a person is still a person, just the way I view it
ofcourse. I can agree to disagree with you no problem. thats
fine. Its not like I hate them as a person, I just dont
respect what they DO.


 

offline jand from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-04-05 15:31 [#00159321]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag



How do feel about Jeff Koons and his series of painting of
himself & his ex-porn star wife (and one time Italian MP)
making love etc?....

Or Mapplethorpes Homo-Erotic photographs?...

Check em out on Google and let me know your thoughts...

p.s. REFLEX - Did you really use the word "chick" or am I
tripping?..;)..


 

offline Meho Krljic from Beograd (Yugoslavia) on 2002-04-05 15:45 [#00159346]
Points: 6617 Status: Addict



we've been through this a couple of weeks ago, haven't we?
OK, I'll say it again: stripping of being a porn actor/
actress is no worse than being a trashman or an office
assistant like me. But suit yourself


 

offline jonesy from Lisboa (Portugal) on 2002-04-05 15:48 [#00159352]
Points: 6650 Status: Lurker



What about pornography being linked to violence against
women?


 

offline REFLEX from Edmonton, Alberta (Canada) on 2002-04-05 23:03 [#00159804]
Points: 8864 Status: Regular



jand::. i said the word chick man..... yeah!

not all porn is violence against women. some can be though,
ive seen my fair share of that.


 


Messageboard index