On mastering | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 496 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
On mastering
 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-06-18 05:36 [#02298122]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker



So I've had the opportunity to listen to a couple of my own
tracks on some really good speakers (I believe they're
called loudspeakers), and the music sounds like ... well, it
sounds like shit. The mastering is ... off. Perhaps because
my own speakers really can't compare, or perhaps because the
masterer*(?) isn't really that good on mastering. Perhaps,
perhaps ...

So what am I suppose to do? Master the whole track, as such,
or messing around with the separate elements? Or a
combination? I've always thought I did both...

Help a fellow xltronican out.

Thanks.

* that would be me. Is masterer a real word? What do you
call the person who master music?


 

offline md_geist from Man's-Chest-Yeh? on 2009-06-18 05:40 [#02298124]
Points: 731 Status: Regular



Do you have mastering suite software? (Much expensives).

I did a (pretty pointless) music technology course at Uni,
and we never even touched on mastering, its a whole other
ting. It sounds like maybe you are just mixing?

I just put a maximizer on my stuff, using Waves. It's not
ideal, but it's the nearest thing I can do to mastering.

Maybe they are called master-bator's? Sorry shit joke.


 

offline ijonspeches from 109P/Swift-Tuttle on 2009-06-18 05:42 [#02298126]
Points: 7846 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



people who can master = master
other people = slaves


 

offline lupus yonderboy from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2009-06-18 05:58 [#02298128]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker



read this

LAZY_TITLE

buy good monitors (genelec, dynaudio). listen on many set
ups (car, outside the room, boombox, loud, quiet)- make
notes- do your best to get close. then pay a professional.


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-06-18 06:02 [#02298129]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to md_geist: #02298124



Hi, md_geist. Well, I really don't have much to master with
other than the music program, as such, as well as Sound
Forge 7.0.

Hm, perhaps I'm just mixing. I must've gotten the concepts
mixed up together.

What's a maximizer?


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-06-18 06:02 [#02298130]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to lupus yonderboy: #02298128



Thanks, lupus!


 

offline md_geist from Man's-Chest-Yeh? on 2009-06-18 08:56 [#02298138]
Points: 731 Status: Regular



Try to download (or buy if u r very rich!) the Waves Diamond
bundle. There's torrents floating about...I tried to find
you one but couldn't find one which was cracked.

It has Maximizers, Ultra-maximizers and the like. They just
basically compress all the elements of your track, and boost
it as loud as it can go without clipping. Just gives it a
nice professional sheen. It's not really mastering, but
there's so much stuff in that bundle, just have a play
around and see what you can do!


 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2009-06-18 09:12 [#02298139]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



people do things very differently and you don't always need
the top of the range equipment to master a track, but it
does help!

Just remember the fuller the frequency range you fill the
more richer the sound will be, i've heard allot of great
composed tracks on here but they sound sort of muddy and
definitely need more attention.

The sound quality will depend on what sample rate you are
going to record at, my audio interface allows me to record
at 192kHz But I have to record one thing at a time other
wise i get latency issues

some people say that can't tell the difference between
192kHz and 96kHz
but you put a few people in a pro control room and play them
a few samples on each sample rate and you will hear the
difference.

I am in no way professional, i studied at Uni but i learned
more at home using my own equipment and i'm still struggling
with getting a good sound myself. I think you just need
patience and attention to detail

A maximizer sort of enhances the frequencies and brings them
forward giving a little more brightness and clarity, i don't
use one, but i have software which does something similar



 

offline Grahf from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2009-06-18 09:16 [#02298142]
Points: 388 Status: Regular



I'm no expert, not even close, but my current technique
involves...

On the master bus stick in an EQ, cut below 20Hz

Stick in a good master bus compressor next... theres nice
SSL emulations going around. Fiddle with the settings to
taste... Theres guides on the internet but its a difficult
area that can break or make your mix. Basically the idea is
to "make the needle dance" in time to the music. probably a
ratio of 4:1 is acceptable, but i tend to go for 2:1.

next add some harmonic excitation, stereo widening at higher
frequencies.

Then max it out by putting it through a limiter - I dont let
it clip.

Izotope ozone offers quite a nice suite for doing all this.

The thing about mastering is that if it sounds better, it is
better. it'll never be its best though. ever.


 

offline lupus yonderboy from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2009-06-18 09:34 [#02298145]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker




go easy on compression. it's the modern day equivalent of
big reverbs on 80's snare drums. . . . don't need to get
into the 'loudness war' debate again tho. . .



 

offline md_geist from Man's-Chest-Yeh? on 2009-06-18 09:41 [#02298148]
Points: 731 Status: Regular



Some nice advice Grahf.


 

offline Advocate on 2009-06-18 09:50 [#02298150]
Points: 3319 Status: Lurker



i second larn about frequency range. poorly mastered
electronic music often has a lack of higher frequencies
imo.

open your music (lossless files) in a spectrogram and check
the frequency range. ideally you'd want to see frequencies
spread all across the spectrum (0 hz - 22 hz). you do not
want a cut off at, say, 14 hz.

adobe audition has a good spectrogram.

open up file i edit mode -> window -> workspace -> frequency
space editing.



 

offline Grahf from Manchester (United Kingdom) on 2009-06-18 10:09 [#02298155]
Points: 388 Status: Regular | Followup to Advocate: #02298150



Advocate - i take it you mean Khz

my understanding is that 0 - 20 Hz are such low frequencies
not even the very best subwoofers can produce these
frequencies so you should cut them off

lupus right about compression - its both a curse and a
blessing. its best used to gel the mix; over use can cause
your mix to sound like a squished big mac splatting against
a wall. basically it depends on the song - if it sounds good
it is good

the loudness war is also a big topic. generally if you
maximise your mix to the point, but not over, clipping you
dont lose so much of the dynamics. unfortunately you'll find
your mix still isnt as loud as most commercial songs as
these tend to be limited beyond clipping


 

offline Advocate on 2009-06-18 10:20 [#02298156]
Points: 3319 Status: Lurker | Followup to Grahf: #02298155



yes, khz of course.


 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2009-06-18 14:10 [#02298234]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular



kHz my Az


 

offline staz on 2009-06-18 14:28 [#02298240]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



stop being shit at mixing and stuff!

eventually it will sort it out. if not, stop.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-06-18 15:24 [#02298274]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker



Spend some money on external gear dude! Like a tape deck or
a 4 track just to get a different sound than just regular
old digital. You'll be suprised how coloring your sound can
make you want to change your sounds you're working
from/with.


 

offline -crazone from smashing acid over and over on 2009-06-18 16:16 [#02298287]
Points: 11234 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



good monitors is the answer i guess..but expensive


 

offline md_geist from Man's-Chest-Yeh? on 2009-06-18 16:54 [#02298293]
Points: 731 Status: Regular



I got a couple of ex-display KRK Rokit 5's for just over
£200 on ebay last year. They're small but very decent, and
flat response. Flat response is very important. Tannoy
Reveal's are pretty good for that.

Damn...I remember when making music was just shitty fun.


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-06-20 13:48 [#02298695]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker



Thanks people! Will read all your comments. I've been busy.
But thanks!


 


Messageboard index