Perception = ? | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
belb
...and 412 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614114
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Perception = ?
 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-06 06:02 [#02284357]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Cognitive is to do with the brain, so no.


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-04-06 06:23 [#02284363]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



Why are you worried about it?


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-06 06:25 [#02284365]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



LAZY_TITLE

and if that's not good enough...

LAZY_TITLE


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2009-04-06 06:28 [#02284366]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



I dont think you can compare animals to computers. The human
cognition is more like a mirror. It doesnt just reflect (or
reverberate) it bends the light. This means the human brain
constructs some parts of reality, which a computer does not
(it just interprets the input)


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-06 06:32 [#02284368]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



The brain functions in exactly the same way as a computer,
but a lot more sophisticated. The sensory input received by
the brain on a minute-by-minute basis becomes vastly complex
and enormously varied, shaped by an individuals culture and
environment.

This massive knowledge pool enables each individual to
appear to have a unique mind, unique personality - but that
is completely superficial.

The fact is, we are carbon copies, automatons and, unless
mentally disabled, all of us function in exactly the same
way - there is no uniqueness there at all.

Furthermore, any intellectual input is completely
meaningless. There is no such thing as British, Asian,
Atheist, Monk, Christian, it's a complete
fabrication/invention of the mind - you're nothing. Your
life is meaningless and valueless over and above what nature
intended - for you to procreate.

Still, we have to do something with our time, so we have to
induldge in this world of complete fantasy, where thoughts
and ideas are actually supposed to mean something. Of
course, they don't.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-06 06:34 [#02284369]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



That's why self-importance, in any field, is utterly
preposterous.


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2009-04-06 07:20 [#02284381]
Points: 31230 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02284369 | Show recordbag



you always try to explain something that can be understood
only by living


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-06 07:21 [#02284382]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Surely there is no harm in looking into other religions.
just find one you think will make you happier and then begin
to practice when your family are not around, or when you
move out or something.

How old are you, out of curiosity? Surely if you are of a
certain age, your family won't ostracise you, or do anything
too bad, as they will repsect your right as a mature
individual to have whatever beliefs you like!

I am sure I don't fully understand what your situation is
and I am making it sound easier than it really is for you.
Therefore, please explain a little more about your family
backround.


 

offline Exaph from United Kingdom on 2009-04-06 07:22 [#02284384]
Points: 3718 Status: Lurker



"Perception is reality" — Paul Rand.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-06 07:24 [#02284386]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker | Followup to : #02284372



Isn't Occam's razor the principle of deconstruction? That's
precisely what I'm doing, telling you in the simplest of
terms that you're a machine, you're not unique, and anything
you superimpose above eating, sleeping and fucking is
completely meaningless. What could be simpler than that?


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2009-04-06 07:52 [#02284394]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to Exaph: #02284384 | Show recordbag



i'm glad you quoted that


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-06 08:00 [#02284395]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



Perception with the physical eye only.


 

offline Monoid from one source all things depend on 2009-04-06 11:23 [#02284420]
Points: 11010 Status: Lurker



If you compare the human brain with a computer, you got the
intelligence of a pocket calculator (a very cheap one)



 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-06 11:54 [#02284427]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



Pfff, what you call YOU isn't even real, let alone
legitimate.

Through the sophistication of thought you are enabled to
shaped an opinion about yourself that is entirely false and
your self-imposed insecurity leads you to fear the opinions
of others which are also entirely false.

So you are pitifully motivated or accomplished - so what?
Who says you have to be motivated? Maybe you don't even want
a job. What do you want by the way? That's all that is
important. What you want, not what others want for you.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-06 12:23 [#02284436]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



You're pretty fucked up aren't you? Get back to basics for
god sake.


 

offline TroutMask from New York City (United States) on 2009-04-06 12:23 [#02284437]
Points: 472 Status: Regular



Perception is awareness acquired through the senses, into
valid concepts that identify the facts of reality.

A=A
A thing is itself. It can only be one thing at one time.



 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2009-04-06 12:24 [#02284438]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



your original statement is false logic. so no.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2009-04-06 13:03 [#02284447]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



the brain is more similar to a hologram than a computer


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2009-04-06 13:07 [#02284448]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to TroutMask: #02284437



"A=A
A thing is itself. It can only be one thing at one time."

then what's to separate something from say what it was 10
minutes ago and what it is now? it's different.
tautologies are static and can't admit change or becoming.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2009-04-06 13:18 [#02284452]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



so our realities are like complex hologram projections that
aren't just interpreting matter/energy "data" but actually
constructing an environment from it..

and also we have no higher purpose other than eating,
sleeping, and shitting and anything above that is
superimposed..

i think just the idea that we actually co-generate an
environment in which to live does more than imply something
more to thought and consciousness than just something
superimposed.



 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2009-04-06 13:22 [#02284453]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



the mind (and the whole nervous system since it's an
extension of the brain) acts as an 'analogue' to the world,
which it is specially tuned (through evolution) to pick up.
really you're in a wash of noise, all sorts of
electromagnetic radiation and radiowaves etc. all over the
place, but because of the specialized structure of your
physiology, you're able to perceive things.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2009-04-06 13:34 [#02284459]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



yea, it's neat how that all worked out so well.

everything is just neat, and that is its purpose. the
higher purpose is to take a minute and just say
cool.


 

offline TroutMask from New York City (United States) on 2009-04-06 13:46 [#02284463]
Points: 472 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #02284448



Context.

Something presently, and something from ten minutes ago, are
different things.


 

offline QRDL from Poland on 2009-04-06 13:48 [#02284466]
Points: 2838 Status: Lurker | Followup to : #02284450



Nah, I'm pretty much in the same point right now. Since that
fucking salvia experiment all the questions that I learned
to ignore over the years came back, but wherever I go with
the though, in a matter of a couple of steps I always face
the oldest question of why anything exists rather than
nothing. All the religions, as far as I know, give only
makeshift answers to that if any. More so they tend to add
an unjustifiable claim of the desirability of eteral
existence.
I was advised to read Hume, gonna rent some of his works as
soon as possible.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2009-04-06 13:50 [#02284467]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker



then where/when is it ever the same thing?


 

offline TroutMask from New York City (United States) on 2009-04-06 13:55 [#02284469]
Points: 472 Status: Regular | Followup to mappatazee: #02284467



Never.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2009-04-06 14:08 [#02284481]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



Objectivists don't understand the difference between states
of affairs and statements about states of affairs. They
think logic applies to physical reality, not to language. In
this, they are identical to presuppositionalist Christians
of the Van Til - Bahnsen - Plantinga variety. Constantly
confusing induction, deduction and physics.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2009-04-06 14:10 [#02284483]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to QRDL: #02284466



Chapter 9 of this is the best of Hume on
induction. The rest of the book is good too but this is the
money shot.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2009-04-06 14:25 [#02284486]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to TroutMask: #02284469



so A never equals A? :)


 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-06 15:37 [#02284504]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



All of your emotions and feelings are produced by various
chemicals in your brain. emotions being merely chemicals
processed in an organic computer like brain makes some
people feel hopeless of being special, but this would be a
mistake. Don't become despondent, we are still special, we
can still process complex feelings and emotions which are
valuable to us subjectively. Most of the time we are not
introspective and aware of this as a physical process and
who cares how this process works anyway? The fact of the
matter is that it works well and it helps us to be creative
inspire others.. and build things

The technicians who built the first computers were obviously
influenced by their own minds in which they built a machine
that processes/stores/interacts and so on. that's why they
seem similar to us in their operation.

Even if science can completely explain how our brains work,
does that disprove us being special or spiritual? i'm not
saying i believe in God, just stating that if God were real,
there is nothing wrong with humans tinkering with his
reality and how it works.

There is actually a part of your brain dedicated to thinking
metaphysically, try to be more positive about it because if
you start to see it negatively it will only get worse.

I too was born into a christian family and i spent years
trying to understand the nature of reality, only to find
many paradoxes along the way. I still to this day have
moments of confusion about what is real. but as you get
older you find a more solid view point and things get
easier.

regards

Larn


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-06 16:07 [#02284507]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker | Followup to larn: #02284504



"Special", compared to what?


 

offline Cliff Glitchard from DEEP DOWN INSIDE on 2009-04-06 16:26 [#02284509]
Points: 4158 Status: Lurker



perception is nine tenths of the law.


 

offline Sandy from Morocco (Morocco) on 2009-04-06 19:19 [#02284536]
Points: 1493 Status: Regular | Followup to Cliff Glitchard: #02284509



i thought it was deception...


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2009-04-06 21:39 [#02284541]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



fart penis


 

offline Fah from Netherlands, The on 2009-04-06 22:37 [#02284547]
Points: 6428 Status: Regular



i woke Retape up with a morning fart last weekend


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-04-07 00:10 [#02284552]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



the mind is a constituent element of the universe. whats
wrong is that the mind has developed a sense of time.
suddenly we are no longer constitutents of the universe, but
meaningless, mortal fragments suspended between "life" and
"death", allowed a few short-lived pleasures followed by
pain and ultimate annihilation. this is not true. what is
true is that there is no end and beginning to us, we have
been here all along. we are eternal

just remember - you and that computer you're typing on were
forged in a giant, burning radioactive magnet suspended in a
vacuum at one point. how does that make you feel


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2009-04-07 02:27 [#02284562]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



i've had some crazy ideas about consciousness and
perception. the words fractal and tessellating come to mind.
chaos, infinity, shrinking and expanding at an exponential
rate. all possibility and none all at once divided by
itself, always with recurring numbers. the now being all of
that squeezed down a thin tube, all linking up and layering
over like a zoetrope, resulting in a very unique, very
individual perception of reality.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2009-04-07 02:28 [#02284563]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Show recordbag



i say i've had, but more it's the ideas have had me!


 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-07 03:34 [#02284570]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Followup to Barcode: #02284507 | Show recordbag



well I can confidently say that human beings are the most
complex life form or carbon based entity in the known
universe. we don't know what else is out there, but the
universe is astronomically expansive and the laws that
govern it are intricate and very powerful. We have a planet
that can sustain life with all the elements/chemicals
required, with just enough heat and a right sized moon to
keep the earth on a 23 degree axis allowing the seasons to
change through the year.

With all the variables we need to have a planet to sustain
complex life like ours the odds of it even being possible
are staggering, i would have more chance of hitting a royal
flush 5 times in a row.

It just so happens that we are positioned on one of the
outward spiral arms of the galaxy so that we can observe the
whole system with our observatory equipment. This enables us
to learn how the universe operates and gives us a chance to
understand our physical reality.

even if we are power hungry, greedy, perverted masturbators
we still have a beautiful planet and universe to explore
which i think makes us special. You could compare it to
another part of the galaxy were giant slugs are trying
desperately to find food but can't move fast because of the
heavy gravity and intense heat...



 

offline cx from Norway on 2009-04-07 04:32 [#02284575]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular



Barcode, you are oversimpiflying immensely.
First off, nobody has given a scientific theory for the
phenomena of consciousness. There is a gap between
consciousness and the neurons, atoms, brain and physical
systems.
This gap is so vast that we will never in our lifetime get
close to closing it.

It's funny then, that this very consciousness is the root of
everything a person experiences. We have to assume a
physical reality exists, but we can in no way prove it.
Everything we create, say, think and do stems from this
consciousness we have. Complex abstract thoughts make up the
very fabric of existence.
And you are trying to say none of that means anything, and
that it's all a fantasy, when you don't even know why or how
it all exists?

But here's some food for thought for you barcode..
Assume that what you say is true, wouldn't that mean that
all these fantasies and dreamworlds we have created, would
still be created by the universe, and not by us?
We didn't create our consciousness, the universe did.
Why did it do that?
And also why shouldn't our thoughts mean something to us
subjectively when they can? Is suicide the only real option?
Or should we create our reality when we can, our society,
why go for apathy and nihilism?


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2009-04-07 04:45 [#02284576]
Points: 12424 Status: Lurker | Followup to cx: #02284575



Assume that what you say is true, wouldn't that mean
that
all these fantasies and dreamworlds we have created, would
still be created by the universe, and not by us?

The conditions that made you create these fantasies were
created with the universe.

We didn't create our consciousness, the universe did.
Why did it do that?

It happened randomly.

And also why shouldn't our thoughts mean something to us
subjectively when they can? Is suicide the only real
option?
Or should we create our reality when we can, our society,
why go for apathy and nihilism?

dunno


 

offline cx from Norway on 2009-04-07 05:46 [#02284582]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular



'dunno' doesnt exactly answer anything :P


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2009-04-07 05:46 [#02284583]
Points: 31230 Status: Lurker | Followup to mappatazee: #02284486 | Show recordbag



YOU WIN.


 

offline dariusgriffin from cool on 2009-04-07 06:55 [#02284593]
Points: 12424 Status: Lurker | Followup to cx: #02284582



I'm just not sure what you're asking. You just do what you
do.


 

offline mappatazee from ¨y¨z¨| (Burkina Faso) on 2009-04-07 08:30 [#02284603]
Points: 14294 Status: Lurker | Followup to larn: #02284570



how do you define the most 'complex'? potatoes have more
genes than humans.


 

offline cx from Norway on 2009-04-07 08:49 [#02284604]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular | Followup to dariusgriffin: #02284593



Well it was in response to barcode.
He said it's all meaningless and that everything we do and
believe in is fantasy and maybe not even worth doing.
I asked why is this the case, who decides whats worth what
and why/how


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-07 09:49 [#02284609]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker | Followup to cx: #02284604



Nobody decides what's worth anything, because there isn't
anybody to decide.

Try and understand, what YOU call YOU doesn't even exist.
Your physical body exists, but the labels you give yourself,
whether they be your name, religion, beliefs etc., are
completely false and have no meaning beyond identification.


As darisugriffin mentions, it appears as though the universe
created our species randomly - what makes you think there is
any design or purpose?

When you know something you don't have to believe in it,
when you dont know something then faith or belief will not
show any evidence of whatever is not known to exist.
Therefore belief is pure romanticism.

Just accept the truth. Your only meaning or value to nature
is to reproduce, once you have done that you are better off
dead where the worms can feed from your dead carcass.

Your only meaning or value to another human being is to
fulfil them in some way. If you have nothing to offer then
nobody is the slightest bit interested in you. To perpetuate
that, and to give this life more meaning, to avoid the
ghastly boredom of living in a Western society, man has
invented a plethora of idelogies based on nothing. It's a
fairytale existence, and you best go along for the ride -
the alternative is even more misery.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-07 10:03 [#02284615]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



AND ANOTHER THING... what's all this talk of nihilism!?? I
am offering you the complete opposite of nihilism.

Belief IS confusion, religion IS fear, ambition IS pressure.
That stress will lead you to an early grave.

When you negate all of that, what is left? A relaxed mind,
at peace with itself and living in total clarity. You accept
everything for what it is and find joy in the simplest of
pleasures. You are no longer a dumb, manipulated sheep,
pushed and prodded by society all over the place to satisfy
their lust to take advantage out of you and pickpocket your
intellect.


 

offline Raz0rBlade_uk on 2009-04-07 10:17 [#02284621]
Points: 12540 Status: Addict | Followup to Barcode: #02284609 | Show recordbag



there isn't anybody to decide? are you denying that people
exist?

you draw a different definition between YOU and your body.
isn't YOU the sum of all, body and brain combined (brain
being mind)

sidenote. did you know that the body doesn't need the brain
for certain reflexes. for example, if you have your hand
over a flame. the message for you to move your hand is built
into the body and needs no message from the brain to perform
the function.

you say a name is false. nothing more than identification.
what was it ever more than identification?

i think that to know something is to believe in it. i know
that when i drop a ball it will fall to the ground. i know
it will happen and i believe it will happen. as if for a
moment doubt is brought into me when the ball is in my hand,
my knowledge may become uncertain but my belief that it will
fall is my conviction of how certain i am of my reality. a
lot of the time though beliefs are outside of provable
realms of daily existence and thus i am tempted to call them
unknowable and unbelievable. i could tell you that last
night i had a dream about a clown. you have no way of
proving that and i have no way of proving it. whilst i don't
remember any dream i had last night, it would be possible
for me to convince myself that it actually happened and will
be able to make you believe too indeed that a clown appeared
in my dreams.

you speak of nature. before you said that YOU don't exist.
are you not a product of nature. are you not in some
respects a part of nature, just like how a rose is a part of
a plant? what does nature really want? do things not only
replicate if and as much as possible as they can. do we not
have this quality to thank for this conversation now?

talk to me more about value and worth. 'nature' seems to
have a drive towards replication but where would we be
without knowledge of agriculture. if there is information
that helps keep life sustainable then surely you can say
this has value.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2009-04-07 10:32 [#02284626]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker



And then a demon came and ate the amateur epistemologists.

A demon named Cuddles.


 


Messageboard index