|
|
SteveWardale
from Lincoln (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-31 09:08 [#00151761]
Points: 532 Status: Regular
|
|
I'm thinking of getting SAW 1, but since Claissics is littl bit naff, I was wondiring if SAW 1 is like it or if its completely different? Also, is SAW 2 better?
|
|
EVOL
from a long time ago on 2002-03-31 09:12 [#00151766]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker
|
|
dude, SAW I and SAW II are so fucking completely different you can't go wrong with either. so get both!
|
|
jupitah
from Minneapolis (United States) on 2002-03-31 09:17 [#00151769]
Points: 3489 Status: Lurker | Followup to SteveWardale: #00151761
|
|
got to have it all my friend.
where does that pic (steve) come from btw? i think it's my favorite shot of rdj.
|
|
EVOL
from a long time ago on 2002-03-31 09:18 [#00151771]
Points: 4921 Status: Lurker | Followup to jupitah: #00151769
|
|
Yes, that pic is fuckin' bad ass!
|
|
D-Hex
from Blue Springs Missouri (United States) on 2002-03-31 09:34 [#00151798]
Points: 871 Status: Lurker
|
|
Well, SAW1 is a better, and a lil less dancy version of classics. It has some great tracks on it like the opening track xtal.
SAW II is more drug music. For me it took a while to get, but give it a lil time or just a real good listen and you will love it.
Either way, get both of them eventually.
|
|
SteveWardale
from Lincoln (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-31 17:36 [#00152031]
Points: 532 Status: Regular
|
|
The pic I found on google image (image.google.com) by searching for Aphex Twin... I'm not sure but it's most likely a shot from that helcopter interview he did, although I'm prolly wrong! I must say it's porbably the best I've seen yet!
|
|
marlowe
from Antarctica on 2002-03-31 17:38 [#00152035]
Points: 24578 Status: Lurker | Followup to SteveWardale: #00152031
|
|
best picture of RDJ? no chance!
|
|
jand
from Braintree (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-31 17:49 [#00152055]
Points: 5975 Status: Moderator | Show recordbag
|
|
Yeah, it's from the Jockey Slut interview from a couple of yrs back...
Got them to interview him in a helicopter...nice work if you can get it, I guess...
P.S. SAWI is a total IDM classic...Classics is a lot harder & more geared towards the dancefloor; SAW is more head music (altho it's pretty funky in places as well)...
|
|
The_Funkmaster
from St. John's (Canada) on 2002-03-31 17:55 [#00152062]
Points: 16280 Status: Lurker
|
|
yes SAWI and SAWII are both essential...
|
|
Clic
on 2002-03-31 18:42 [#00152108]
Points: 5232 Status: Regular
|
|
Eh... I thought SAW I was kind of lame. SAW II is really, really good though. I wish I would have never bought Classics though. Cannot get into it at all.
|
|
nazipokemon
from nottingham (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-31 19:20 [#00152157]
Points: 215 Status: Lurker
|
|
i cant undrestand SAW2 one bit, whats the fascination? i really dont geddit.
SAW1 on the other hand is a masterpiece!
|
|
Darth manchu
from Cambridge (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-31 19:21 [#00152159]
Points: 1897 Status: Regular
|
|
I LOVE CLASSICS!
|
|
Inverted Whale
from United States Minor Outlying Islands on 2002-03-31 19:21 [#00152160]
Points: 3301 Status: Lurker
|
|
You'll end up with them all anyways, so why prolong the inevitable?
|
|
SteveWardale
from Lincoln (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-31 22:04 [#00152356]
Points: 532 Status: Regular
|
|
True... true.
|
|
Asche XL
on 2002-03-31 22:45 [#00152427]
Points: 4241 Status: Lurker
|
|
Well ever RDJ release is essential ;)
SAW I and SAW II are totally dif, SAW I has beats and stuff and SAW II is alot more amiebnt with a few beats here and there. I personally like SAW II better cause I think SAW I gets boring and tedious.
|
|
D-Hex
from Blue Springs Missouri (United States) on 2002-03-31 23:15 [#00152489]
Points: 871 Status: Lurker | Followup to nazipokemon: #00152157
|
|
it takes time nazipokemon.......you will understand one day.
|
|
Messageboard index
|