Remember to tell them... | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 469 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Remember to tell them...
 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-05 12:19 [#02284250]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



Vegetarians that is.

If everyone was to turn veggie, 6.5 billion humans would
have to be fed with plants and seeds, decimating forests,
fields and woodland areas.

Other animal species would die.

Please ask vegetarians how they can justify a butterfly,
slug or earthworm having any less right to live than a cow,
chicken or pig? Why should they be wiped out because they
don't all have two eyes, a nose and smiley mouth like we do?


Vegetarians? Naive.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-05 12:56 [#02284254]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



I don't see how any animal can be killed for food without
some form of brutality being involved. I suppose its also
brutal to negate an animal of its natural environment
through farming and have it starve to death.


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-05 13:47 [#02284256]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Vegetarians are evil!


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-05 13:57 [#02284257]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Followup to Tractern: #02284256 | Show recordbag



Did you have any part in the creation and/ or running of
this site Barcode, you crazy spin doctor, you! :)


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-04-05 14:08 [#02284260]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker



Being proud of being a vegetarian has always struck me as
very peculiar.

It's like being proud of NOT hitting other people, i.e.
because you refrain from doing a particular act.

My cats and my dog doesn't give a damn about my ethical
decisions, nor does a cow or a banana.

Pride and contempt are two sides of the same coin.


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-05 14:24 [#02284262]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Followup to AphexAcid: #02284260 | Show recordbag



My cats and my dog doesn't give a damn about my ethical
decisions, nor does a cow or a banana.

So you need gratification as an incentive to be nice?


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2009-04-05 14:43 [#02284264]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



bonefish


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-04-05 16:07 [#02284269]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to Tractern: #02284262



Nature has no concern for humans.

If anyone believes that he's doing nature a favour by
refraining from eating meat, he's fooling himself. Nature
doesn't need our help.

If he's doing it for himself, he ought to keep it to
himself, as well. No need to cry it out for the whole world
to see.

Don't get me wrong. I don't have any "issues" with anyone
who chooses to be a vegetarian. All intention is selfish.
The only difference (if there are any) is whether 'we'
perceive the fact that we do it for ourselves, or not.


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-05 17:07 [#02284276]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Followup to AphexAcid: #02284269 | Show recordbag



Why must you separate them into two? Humans are part of
nature.

And where are you getting all this stuff from? Certainly no
one on this thread has said any of that stuff.

Your pre-emption and cynicism both sadden me and they sound
pretty misplaced.


 

offline staz on 2009-04-05 17:48 [#02284278]
Points: 9844 Status: Regular



vegetarians are edible


 

offline Rostasky from United States on 2009-04-05 17:55 [#02284279]
Points: 1572 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02284250



This is actually completely false. The output of food each
animal yields is less than the amount of plant food that
they are fed with.

How did you think animals were fed?


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-05 18:00 [#02284280]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I am sort of unsure whether Barcode deserves to have people
challenge him. It seems like all he ever tries to do is
create gratuitous anger and conflict.


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2009-04-05 18:54 [#02284285]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular | Followup to staz: #02284278



haha


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-04-05 19:40 [#02284289]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to Tractern: #02284280



nope, all he is doing is speaking his thoughts on topics
that are more important than other topics being spoken of on
this messageboard.

I have a question for vegetarians-

can smoking cigarettes be considered vegetable consumption?

Being a vegetarian is a personal choice, just like the
choice to wear a certain brand of clothing over another.

Eating meat is just another medium of survival like
vegetables are, though if you look physiologically, we have
teeth that suggest we should be herbivorous. But we are
obviously omnivores.



 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2009-04-05 20:16 [#02284298]
Points: 4909 Status: Regular | Followup to pulseclock: #02284289



"we have teeth that suggest we should be herbivorous"

false. our canine teeth, though less pronounced than
in full carnivores, clearly do not suggest we should be
herbivores.


 

offline Taxidermist from Black Grass on 2009-04-05 20:27 [#02284304]
Points: 9958 Status: Lurker



All the front teeth in a human are sharp. In animals that
eat only vegetables, they are flat. Predatory animals have
eyes in the front of their head; Omnivores and Carnivores.
Prey animals have eyes in the side.

Its not like nature made some special distinction for
humans. Nature is violent and cruel. There is very little
room for an animal that is neither predator or prey.


 

offline z3ek from United Kingdom on 2009-04-05 20:29 [#02284306]
Points: 42 Status: Lurker



I can see where vegetarians are coming from, the fact of
killing something else so we can eat, but what screws with
my head is why do some vegetarians think its ok to eat
fish.

fuck em' time for some Kitten and chips followed by some
dolphin soup.


 

offline Wolfslice from Bay Area, CA (United States) on 2009-04-05 20:33 [#02284307]
Points: 4909 Status: Regular | Followup to z3ek: #02284306



you still kill a potato when you uproot it from the ground.


 

offline pulseclock from Downtown 81 on 2009-04-05 20:53 [#02284313]
Points: 6015 Status: Lurker | Followup to Taxidermist: #02284304



True but herbivores also have intestines twice the size of
their bodies, like humans, what i'm saying is that humans
are not carnivores nor are they herbivores, but opting to be
a vegetarian isn't really a negative choice as eveyone
thinks it is (by consuming that which other animals survive
on). It is only negative economically, because the food
industry breeds animals for human consumption, it's not
like they're taking them from their natural habitat, it's a
regulated process which some (vegans/tarians) don't agree
with.

I applaud their futile efforts, it's very artistic.


 

offline rockenjohnny from champagne socialism (Australia) on 2009-04-06 00:58 [#02284332]
Points: 7983 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02284250



More resources are required to feed an animal for slaughter
than to exculde the animal from the food chain. That much is
plain mathematics.

We can take or leave the ethical issues.



 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-06 03:43 [#02284340]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Followup to z3ek: #02284306 | Show recordbag



I find piscetarians silly, too.

If they call themselves piscetarians It is alright. But when
they say they are 'pretty much vegetarian', that does bug me
a little. Probably not enough to actually bring it up in
conversation, though.


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-06 03:45 [#02284341]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Followup to Wolfslice: #02284307 | Show recordbag



Scientifically speaking, they can't feel pain.

In relation to z3ek's comment, I guess it's just that his
wording was slightly insufficient, but he got the point
acorss IMO.


 

offline big from lsg on 2009-04-06 03:59 [#02284342]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to Tractern: #02284341 | Show recordbag



i think that's not scientifically proven and therefor
debated

i think they are a lower lifeform though, like insects. (i
don't eat fish or meat or insects though)


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-06 05:05 [#02284350]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker | Followup to Tractern: #02284280



And meat eaters talk out their arse too.

In Western society they think eating dogs is a vile and
savage practice, yet they're perfectly happy to eat the
bacon off a pig that's had it's throat slashed.

Is a dog any more intelligent than a pig? And even if it
was, why should that make a difference?

Because dogs aren't aesthetically unattractive, don't stink
and grunt and roll in the mud, humans like them and say it's
cruel to kill and eat them - yet they don't give a fuck
about pigs. Pure hypocrisy.


 

offline big from lsg on 2009-04-06 05:06 [#02284351]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Followup to Barcode: #02284350 | Show recordbag



they're meateaters


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-06 06:22 [#02284362]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



FFS...

different folks, different strokes.

No one is going to change anyone else's diet through the
means of this thread.

I respect those who eat meat and I only ask them to respect
my wish not to eat meat.

Barcode, stop trying to be provocative.

END OF THREAD.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-06 06:37 [#02284371]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker | Followup to Tractern: #02284362



You made the fatal flaw in imagining I want to change
anyone's diet - I couldn't give a toss. On the contrary, I
have just explained why whatever path you choose the end
result is exactly the same.

Maybe you prefer to see things in black and white, I don't,
I prefer to challenge and discuss. If you think that's
provocative, then you're close-minded.


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-06 07:15 [#02284378]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Followup to Barcode: #02284371 | Show recordbag



I am just going on your history.

I remember in one thread you said you just wanted some
attention and it made a lot of sense. I have had this in
mind in relation to other threads you have started.
Obviously this isn't true of such threads as that one about
the acoustic Red Hot Car song, but most I think are
provacative, as you yourself say.

I am not closed minded, I am just tired of people re-hashing
the vegetarianism argument.

If you had come out with some news article or something,
some sign of progress or something in some way new, this
thread would have more credibility to you.

Generally, I am in a weird mood right now, as I am in my
house by myself, as most people have left for Easter
holidays. My mate came back today though, so hopefully I
will be in a better mood in the future. However, this has
only effected me to a certain degree. Even if I had been in
the best of moods, I would still find this thread a bit
annoying.

One thing I will say is that I shouldn't have put an 'END OF
THREAD' on the end there. I shouldn't assume people want to
stop talking about something, just cos I do. It would piss
me off if someone did that to me, so I'm sorry about that.

ACCEPTANCE OF CONTINUATION OF THREAD hehe :)


 

offline Ruuckspook on 2009-04-06 07:15 [#02284379]
Points: 16 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02284371



no, you are trolling. trolltroll troll trollllll troll
troll.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-06 07:27 [#02284388]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



What's wrong with trolling?


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2009-04-06 07:29 [#02284390]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



There aren't many posts her as it is, therefore each counts,
so trolling quickly adds up and forms a surprising
percentage of all posts on this board, maybe. I dunno. I'm
just the cleaner...


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-06 07:37 [#02284393]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



So delete my posts and ban me then - easily done.


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-04-06 11:53 [#02284426]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to Tractern: #02284276



To keep my reply short, I'm not talking about vegetarianism,
AS SUCH, but any assumed pride associated with it (if there
is any).

Wouldn't you find it strange if someone told you that he/she
is PROUD of the fact that he/she DOESN'T scare little
children?

So why should our preference of nourishment be any
different? It's still just pride.

I'm NOT talking about whether or not you are a vegetarian.
Read my first post again.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-04-06 11:59 [#02284429]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



What is pride anyway? An ego-boost to the self usually,
allowing one to feel morally superior over others.


 

offline AphexAcid from Sweden on 2009-04-06 12:04 [#02284432]
Points: 2568 Status: Lurker | Followup to Barcode: #02284429



In a word: yes.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2009-04-06 14:25 [#02284485]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



why did i waste my time reading this bullshit?

why why why why why?

never again...


 


Messageboard index