Discuss. | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 512 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Discuss.
 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2009-03-14 08:22 [#02279371]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



In a recent editorial in Organised Sound, Tony Myatt
suggested that 'Computer Music' is now a term that should be
used to describe IDM and that words such as
'electroacoustic' and concepts such as Schaeffer's 'modes of
listening' are now meaningless. Discuss.

I have to do a 2500 word essay on this subject, I'd be
interested to know what you lot think on the matter.


 

offline yoyoyoyo from Sweden on 2009-03-14 08:24 [#02279372]
Points: 3200 Status: Regular



fuse and bass


 

offline Brisk from selling smack at the orphanage on 2009-03-14 08:35 [#02279375]
Points: 4667 Status: Lurker



use those 2500 words to describe why music journalists are
pompous, trendwhoring idiots who need to pigeonhole
everything into convenient genres just to make sense of it
all.

"writing about music is like dancing about architecture"

oh and fyi, nu-idm is the term that should be used.


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2009-03-14 08:48 [#02279381]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I told my lecturer that I thought the term IDM was an
oxymoron and he scowled at me.


 

offline big from lsg on 2009-03-14 09:03 [#02279383]
Points: 23727 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



what's wrong with dancing about architecture?


 

offline Zephyr Twin from ΔΔΔ on 2009-03-14 09:03 [#02279384]
Points: 16982 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Well, I'd prefer 'computer music' over IDM any day. Computer
music, as I see it, could sound like anything, any style or
genre, whereas I think most people who follow such music
have a preconceived notion about what an 'idm' record should
sound like. Of course, shedding those preconceptions isn't
really worth much if the music itself still sounds exactly
like "idm." I guess the change has to come from everyone.
Calling it something else won't stop the people who really
want to make music and call it "idm." But we can hope.


 

offline obara from Utrecht on 2009-03-14 09:40 [#02279392]
Points: 19377 Status: Regular



useful quotes


 

offline Indeksical from Phobiazero Damage Control (United Kingdom) on 2009-03-14 09:46 [#02279393]
Points: 10671 Status: Regular | Followup to obara: #02279392 | Show recordbag



Thanks!

I can't find the fucking Organised Sound article cited in
the essay title anywhere without paying to view it. sigh.


 

offline kaara on 2009-03-14 10:05 [#02279398]
Points: 384 Status: Regular



what's wrong with the term IDM?



 


Messageboard index