what I think about Obama | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 294 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
what I think about Obama
 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-01-20 12:13 [#02266493]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



My view on the world prevents me from being really happy
about Barack Obama becoming president. We have reached a
point as humans where very powerful people have a lot of
influence and accompanying that influence is tremendous
might, and destructive power. I am talking about Nuclear
Weapons, chemical weapons, bombs, submarines that shoot
missiles that blow people and buildings apart, planes that
drop absolutely dreadful devices that explode and tear apart
humans.

What I don't like is the Government. I do not like that this
institution that has the means to enforce its beliefs via
these types of devices. It is pretty obvious that across the
planet there are folks who have a lot of power themselves do
not agree with the United States, and also possess devices
that destroy human beings.

So, no longer being tolerant of the existence of dreadful,
scary weapons that explode and tear apart tissues and
ligaments and muscle, I cannot be in support of anyone who
has command over a military who possess such weapons. Guns
kill people. Bombs kill people. They are barbaric,
devillish, awful devices that I have come to believe Humans
should no longer require to sort out their differences. I
cannot support ANYONE who thinks their existence is OK for
even a second. I have seen too many pictures of maimed
children and I do not want to see anymore. The answer is not
to fight against those who would choose to use them against
us. The answer is to appreciate, live and love life as it is
while we have it, and do nothing more. If life brings
killing we can't respond to it with more killing. You don't
extinguish a fire with gasoline.


 

offline ET from Canada on 2009-01-20 12:19 [#02266495]
Points: 100 Status: Regular



i thought my existence was ok for a few seconds

is that bad?


 

offline ET from Canada on 2009-01-20 12:21 [#02266497]
Points: 100 Status: Regular



btw you should consider rethinking your shit because i know
you are wrong and i can prove it to you with theory


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-01-20 12:23 [#02266499]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to ET: #02266495



I think you should feel like your existence is OK for your
whole life man. No, that's not bad.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2009-01-20 12:23 [#02266500]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



one good thing about WATMM and other boards is that its
easier to post this picture when you really need
to.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-01-20 12:25 [#02266501]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to ET: #02266497



I have thought it over and over, my friend. You can't really
say "Peace!" while holding a gun! You can't be in charge of
a military that kills a bunch of kids, and then say,
"Tolerance!" Can you?


 

online dariusgriffin from cool on 2009-01-20 12:32 [#02266505]
Points: 12423 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #02266500



why?


 

offline rad smiles on 2009-01-20 12:33 [#02266506]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



cygnus is right. thanks, cygnus.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2009-01-20 12:35 [#02266507]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



war is not pretty, and more people should be exposed to a
non sanitized picture of what war looks like. disarmament
is not easy, though, and maybe not entirely smart. i agree,
in a modern global society we should be moving away from the
idea of conquests, but there is still a real need
for countries to have a system of defense.


 

offline rad smiles on 2009-01-20 12:38 [#02266508]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



defense vs the ability to destroy humanity many times over
is much different.


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2009-01-20 12:41 [#02266509]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



cygnus is right that it would be nice, if everyone could
just get along, but to say you don't support the
military AT ALL because those weapons exist is terribly
naive. do we just lay down our guns, open our borders, give
everyone a flower and hope for the best?

should there be police? the military is just a larger
version of the police, really. can you condone the
existence of one and not the other? maybe everyone should
have just billy clubs and a whistle.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-01-20 12:45 [#02266510]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #02266507



War is completely dreadful. Disarmament is actually very
easy, it is easier than creating armament. Guns can be
smashed and compacted just like cars! Thousands of cars are
actually smashed and compacted into tiny cubes every day and
then sent off to have their materials recycled.

I say that there is no need to fear anything. I do not think
there is a reason to defend. There is the need to appreciate
the short, fleeting existence as a human being that we have,
and that's it. Even if our death comes swiftly and unfairly,
at least we did not end more lives trying to "defend" our
own. Defending by keeping guns and missiles and bombs is
like trying to prevent catching on fire by dousing yourself
in gasoline. If you want to paint a wall with Red paint,
you do not use Green paint. If you want to spread Peace, I
question whether you really can do that with all that
military power behind you!


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-01-20 12:52 [#02266511]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #02266509



>> do we just lay down our guns, open our borders, give
everyone a flower and hope for the best?


Guns kill people. Don't they? You certainly wouldn't have
to open the borders ALL the way but at least don't have army
rangers standing there ready to shoot someone!

Police are fine! But guns, man! Guns and billy clubs hurt
people. It hurts to be hit by a billy club or shot by a gun.


 

offline swift_jams from big sky on 2009-01-20 12:55 [#02266513]
Points: 7577 Status: Lurker



The media sucks.


 

offline Samuel L Jigsaw from swine flu central on 2009-01-20 12:58 [#02266515]
Points: 345 Status: Regular



So what do you think about Obama, then? It seems you left
him behind after your first sentence in this thread!


 

offline glasse from Harrisburg (United States) on 2009-01-20 13:05 [#02266518]
Points: 4211 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



oh right sorry, not even billy clubs. maybe they can talk
them out of whatever they want to do.

here is the thing. nature, is red in tooth and claw, and so
are people. sometimes people get hurt, sometimes they die.
we just cannot say everyone on the count of 3
because the other people aren't going to put theirs down
when we say 3. actually, nuclear weapons and other wmds are
disarmed in this way. russia disarms some, and we do, and
so on. of course this is in a time of peace, don't think
that is happening right now.

i agree with the idea of it not being enough to just
survive, but also to be worthy of surviving. i get that,
but i am not going to go so far as pure pacifism, either.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-01-20 13:10 [#02266521]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to Samuel L Jigsaw: #02266515



What I think about Obama is that he does not represent the
spirit of Peace, Tolerance, Acceptance or Oneness as much as
Bush did. I think he is no different than Bush.

I saw some of the most awful, unforgettable images from the
clashes in Baghdad, Fallujah, Afghanistan and other places
where women, young men, children were just maimed and torn
apart and laid out on streets just dead and never coming
back to their families. They were killed by weapons used by
the military.

So, Barack is in this seat of power where he has more
influence than he ever has in his entire life, and he has
said nothing about setting an example to the rest of the
world by completely disarming the military. That is the only
thing that a president can do! That is the essence of
tolerance, and peace. Isn't it? Barack is not for peace or
hope.

He has said, "To our enemies, know that we will defeat
you." If you are a rational thinking adult with a working
brain, you can dissect that statement, and read it properly
as, "It will be necessary to kill some more people." I say,
No More Killing ANYBODY!


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-01-20 13:15 [#02266522]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



And you might say, "Well, he's almost completely for peace
and hope. He is on the way there. He's an improvement over
Bush."

Come on. If you are rescuing a drowning person you don't
pull them to just-below the surface of the water. You bring
them to the surface.


 

offline rad smiles on 2009-01-20 13:21 [#02266523]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



completely disarming the military is completely impossible.
it won't happen. however, bringing down the nukes and wmds
from having enough nukes and wmds etc to destroy the planet
over and over and over again to a realistic level of defense
is something that should be reached. it won't, though.


 

offline cyrstal dude from LA all day! (United States) on 2009-01-20 13:23 [#02266524]
Points: 900 Status: Addict | Followup to cygnus: #02266521



give the guy a fucking chance first! i think he is at least
a return to normal after 8 years of treating the planet like
a gigantic game of RISK, ffs.

i think we're gonna be less warlike now because iraq was
such a huge screw up anyway.



 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-01-20 13:24 [#02266525]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to glasse: #02266518



Nature is brutal. Nature is about, "Survival of the
fittest." Humans are so bright and intelligent though. What
humans should realize by now is that no matter how long we
prolong our lives, and no matter how short we cut the lives
of others in the hopes of prolonging our lives, we
eventually die. There may be "Survival of the Fittest", but
humans are capable of realizing that even the fittest
survivors die off in the end. The T-Rex may have been the
most poweful dinosaur on the planet, but a meteor still
destroyed all of them.



 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-01-20 13:33 [#02266529]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to rad smiles: #02266523



Most automatic rifles, sidearms, missiles and bombs are made
of metals and some plastics. Those materials are easy
crushed and recycled. The explosive compounds that are
inside those devices can be diffused easily using other
chemical compounds, and other processes. There are also
plenty of laboratories and unused spaces across the planet
where this can be done in a safe, quick way where humans
won't get hurt by them accidentally.

I actually do not care if the whole world is destroyed
multiple times over. If I die, I don't care. There is no
continuity for this body. The chemicals that its made up of
will diffuse eventually, anyway, and my memories of
everything that are largely responsible for my personality
are going to disappear too as if it never happened. The
realization of this is actually responsible for all of the
tolerance I have for the world I'm apart of.

I have no desire to make a copy of myself. If no one agrees
with me, that's perfectly fine. I think if a man has a
desire for every man around him to be like himself, then
that will eventually end up in dispute, conflict, and
eventually (if it escalates to it), maiming and murder. I
can,however imagine a world where everyone is like me and I
don't see anyone holding guns or blowing up kids or cheering
on a guy who orders a plane to drop a bomb on some kids. I
do not support Obama because he has sworn to command
soldiers instead of disarm soldiers.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-01-20 13:37 [#02266531]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



If the world goes up in nuclear flames, let's all remember
that we elected yet another person who promised we would
defend "Peace" and "Tolerance" and "Hope" with the very
antithesis of those concepts: guns and bombs and military
might!


 

offline rad smiles on 2009-01-20 14:03 [#02266532]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



my point was more the number of nukes, wmds, etc is enough
to destroy the planet numerous times. obviously after the
world is destroyed once it won't much matter what happens
next...

a goal we should have is to draw those down to a level that
seems reasonable for defense at the very least. these
weapons shouldn't exist. you see how much damage war can do
without the use of nuclear weapons so it only stands to
reason having them won't help anything. however, its
unrealistic to see anything like that happening so i'm just
saying striving for a drastically reduced number of them
seems reasonable. it just doesn't seem realistic though no
matter who gets elected.


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2009-01-20 14:04 [#02266533]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



he hasn't fuking done anything yet.
Get off his penif.


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-01-20 14:06 [#02266534]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular



i'm too ill to read this thread. i read the first post. this
is all bollocks. it's naive. humanity is so much more
complex than this idealistic rubbish. it's so short sighted
to completely poopoo every little change just because it's
not a complete turn around. it's spoilt tbh. we are the
morally fat bastards that are all like;"give me more peace,
love and happiness right now". but you cannot ask that of
humanity. things are moving so fast and people are learning
so quick, and you just say NOT GOOD ENOUGH because there are
still weapons that hurt people?!!! as long as there is any
kind of conflict of interest or a disagreement that cannot
be settled with words, then we fight. the only way we'll
have no weapons is if the whole world settled everything
with words, like some fucking sickening anger management
circle toss. everyone wants utopia and people are so comfy
and detached from the realities of life that you actually
have the audacity to demand it now, when 50 years ago the
obamas of this world were lynched, beaten, excluded from
society. 50 years and now we're here, please have more
respect.
sorry tho i still like you loads :)


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-01-20 14:12 [#02266536]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to AMPI MAX: #02266534



It's really not. I feel really sad and I have a strong
emotional reaction at pictures of dead kids and moms and
soldiers. Is that spoiled that I don't want to see another
one? Ok well I guess I'll take 5 more... or maybe 10
more.... 100 more... uhmm.. how many more do we have to look
at?

as long as there is any
kind of conflict of interest or a disagreement that cannot
be settled with words, then we fight.


That is so barbaric, old, and so easily preventable. Even
with some of the largest conflicts that happen on the
planet, because you don't agree with someone doesn't mean
you have to shoot them or shove them or whatever, it's all
about tolerance. The real "winner" is the one who
surrenders, the one without fear. The fearful one is the one
holding the gun and pointing the tanks at the houses and the
schools! i like you too ampi max


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-01-20 14:16 [#02266537]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to elusive: #02266533



its unrealistic to see anything like that happening

Do you think that 500 years ago it would have been realistic
to imagine you can kill millions of people with a push of a
button? Well, we attained that possibility. So, I don't
think it's unrealistic that the opposite can be attained
again, and even more You know? I never look away from the
unrealistic, because the unrealistic always seems to become
real.


 

offline rad smiles on 2009-01-20 14:17 [#02266538]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



what motivates the people who decide to kill or start wars?
that won't stop. greed, fear, power, revenge, and etc are
powerful motivators.


 

offline futureimage from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2009-01-20 14:20 [#02266541]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker



My view is:

Obama = Good, correct politician.

Only problem is, I don't think he'll be very successful due
to:
-Massive media hype covering him for the last few months.
-Other world leaders being ignorant

As you said Cygnus, there's a lot of evil out there. One
man, unfortunately, can't stamp it out.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-01-20 14:28 [#02266545]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to rad smiles: #02266538



Fear is behind all of those. It's the belief that something
is wrong and should be righted somehow. It is a
non-acceptance of something that is happening, has happened,
or is going to happen. It is immediately manifested as
stress, tensing muscles, frowning, and restlessness in a
human being. It is the opposite of relaxing.

The body is torn apart by fear. Do you know that if you are
falling from a tree branch you are likely to cause 90% of
the damage that happens to you by tensing your muscles in
fear? Naturally, the body will just gracefully fall like a
rag doll and bounce. Fear causes muscles to tense and bones
are broken because you are bracing your entire body. You
fall and break like ice instead of spreading like water.

Fear is the motivator for all of it. And it's contagious,
it's like a sickness. The body emits fumes when it's afraid.
It's this hideous, bright, stink that everybody can smell.
Pheromones are emitted when you are frightened and other
people can smell it. Animals can.

So, the tranquilizer is acceptance and tolerance. Instead of
spreading more fear. Putting the guns and tanks and
body-shredding explosives away is probably all we need to do
to get rid of national fear. After that, it probably falls
like dominoes. We all relax. Relaxation should be spread
just like fear should. I do not see this being difficult.
Actually, the more difficult people think it is, the easier
it's likelier to actually be, IMO!


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-01-20 14:48 [#02266551]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to cygnus: #02266536



alright i'll do this. i'm ill and no one ever understands
but i'll do it.
it is spoilt. because it really wasn't long ago that we were
all scratching around in the dirt, hurt and hungry. so many
people with so much pain and no way to understand any of it
really, because it was so huge. there would have been so
much sadness and rape and anger and blood and guilt. how did
we pick ourselves up and try to be better? it's a fucking
miracle really. many years later we're sitting here saying
that things are the worst they've ever been, that things
aren't getting better fast enough. the bodies are sad but
there are so many less, so many less. you're saying you
don't want any, stomping your foot and screaming that life
should be nicer right now. instead of understanding the
tragic nature of us poor soft fleshy lil things, you believe
we should be god like, completely pure. it's just too
impatient.
but i understand, you and me live in a world where we were
taught to feel this outrage. shit man, you just want things
to be good and i do too. it's not like i sit and watch the
blood clotting on the sandy streets of iraq and think 'why
try harder'. but you have to be patient and respect a change
like obama and understand why weapons and military and
innocent deaths are all part of the slow painstaking climb
to a better life. one day we'll have less of those things as
long as we keep faith in the hard working people who
contribute these small but precious changes. i admire your
empathy (i'm not being patronising) but accept that it takes
a very long time to change one person, let alone a country.
america and the whole world still has so many ugly mind sets
and stupid prejudices to battle past, but 50 years ago there
were many more. today really is a miracle for so many, join
in bruv ;)


 

offline Samuel L Jigsaw from swine flu central on 2009-01-20 15:34 [#02266557]
Points: 345 Status: Regular



I'll post this again in the vain hope that somebody reads
it

Zbigniew Brzezinski

Also..

"Obama = Good, correct politician."

Haha.


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2009-01-20 15:39 [#02266558]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Followup to AMPI MAX: #02266551 | Show recordbag



the world is in war like it has been in the past, but you
don't perceive it.


 

offline BeatenDownCar on 2009-01-20 15:56 [#02266565]
Points: 81 Status: Lurker



The world is separated by societies and large amounts of
populations. Connections are what we need, not separatons.


 

offline fleetmouse from Horny for Truth on 2009-01-20 16:17 [#02266567]
Points: 18042 Status: Lurker | Followup to BeatenDownCar: #02266565



When a separaton meets a togetherton, they are annihilated
and energy is released. This is the principle of the Obama
warp drive.


 

offline Barcode from United Kingdom on 2009-01-20 16:43 [#02266570]
Points: 1767 Status: Lurker



Obama can't lose. america is at rock bottom, the only way is
up. If he can't turn the economy round he'll blame
everything on bush, if he does he's a hero.

And he will, because america is cash rich plus they've sunk
every other country on the way down. They will rise to the
top ahead of everyone else again probably.

As a politician, he seems very similar to Tony Blair -
intelligent, polished, great speaker. But they're the ones
you need to watch, they can talk their way out of anything,
and Americans are so fucking gullable. He'll walk all over
them.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2009-01-20 16:45 [#02266571]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker



sieg nuess: you can't draw a line in the sand and expect
the world to conform to your wishes. do what you can to
promote your ideals, and try to understand more clearly the
source of those ideals.

there's a reason that there was no one who represented your
ideals on the ballot.

i'm in tune with your ideals, but wait until the iron is hot
to start swinging your hammer.

thanks,

pz



 

offline recycle from Where is Phobiazero (Lincoln) (United States) on 2009-01-20 16:58 [#02266572]
Points: 40062 Status: Addict



About time some white rich fcuk isnt in the house


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2009-01-20 17:41 [#02266582]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



this is kind of like saying someone who owns a gun is a
murderer even if its never been fired.



 

offline JivverDicker from my house on 2009-01-20 17:51 [#02266584]
Points: 12102 Status: Regular



Cygnus is jealous. He's made some MAD beats on a pretend
Machinedrum. It doesn't matter.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2009-01-20 18:09 [#02266589]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to JivverDicker: #02266584



let the rhythm hit 'em.


 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2009-01-20 19:43 [#02266604]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I don't have an opinion and I never watch the news so I have
no idea what is going on in the world, I like to stay in my
own reality microcosm existence and worry about my own life.
although it is exciting when i hear about bombs and nuclear
attacks or floods, fires ect I might tune it then and enjoy
some exciting news with a cup of tea.


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2009-01-20 22:38 [#02266619]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular | Followup to JivverDicker: #02266584



plaidzebra its not that id want anyone to conform to my
wishes, i just think warlike behavior is so barbaric and
outdated. its got to go!

i took this for you jivv

saskrotch = do you see obama pulling apart the military and
getting world leaders together and just saying "lets get rid
of all the guns and tanks and take all that money and put it
into medicine and research" ? Do you really see him doing
that?

He's on that afghanistan "defense" shit like bush was...
also I heard him talking about Syria the other day


 

offline cx from Norway on 2009-01-20 23:32 [#02266620]
Points: 4537 Status: Regular



I don't worry so much about Obama.. If anything I worry that
he's /too/ passionate and might end up changing too much for
the worse..

As for war, I think a lot of people value your sentiments in
this thread, but hey, we can't change the world in 1 day.
Most people in the western world do not want war, and the
really terrible stuff is isolated to worse parts in the
world, where there are long on-going conflicts.. Europe is
pretty much completely peaceful now.. As is the United
States and Canada..

I believe that maybe the whole world could be included in
the free market and the treaties one day, but it sure as
heck ain't going to happen in one week, or even 1 decade..
Then we could all fuck each other up and go global nuclear
war, but that's stretching it a bit too.
Whatever the case may be, I think you should always hold
your principles of peace.. Maybe I'm being naive, but the
less aggressive assholes we have in this world the better,
maybe not because it helps against wars, but because it
helps us in our daily lives here in the western world..

The great psychological and societal shift so many are
searching for might just end up a self fulfilling prophecy
one day..


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2009-01-21 01:32 [#02266632]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



"saskrotch = do you see obama pulling apart the military
and
getting world leaders together and just saying "lets get
rid
of all the guns and tanks and take all that money and put
it
into medicine and research" ? Do you really see him doing
that? "

do you think world peace is actually an attainable goal? it
would be fucking awesome, but its never going to happen,
because there will always be someone, somewhere, pissed
about something, and ready to use lethal force to do
something about it.

i am not pro-war, just pro-reasonable thinking.


 

offline roygbivcore from Joyrex.com, of course! on 2009-01-21 01:37 [#02266634]
Points: 22557 Status: Lurker



i also want to say that there is absolutely no connection
between what i said and what you asked me regarding it


 

offline BoxBob-K23 from Finland on 2009-01-21 01:57 [#02266637]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular | Followup to rad smiles: #02266508



I don't think Obama's a dove, but I also don't think he's
going to be starting a war on Iran as some people are
saying. Note that the proper preposition to use is "on"
rather than "with", because America only wages war ON people
it knows it can overwhelm (even though Iran would be a lot
tougher than Iraq). It never starts a war "with" any
country. Otherwise they would have attacked Russia and China
already.

But that's not the point. Obama's the point. Or is it war?
Well, forget about Obama for a moment, war needs to end. War
is a mistake. It's an illness. It's a planetary cancer,
sometimes localized, sometimes global (like a whole-body
leukemia or AIDS syndrome). Hate, fear and war are
self-defeating. They don't even exist. They are shadows,
mere shadows. Only goodness/God exists, and she is love.


 

offline AMPI MAX from United Kingdom on 2009-01-21 04:17 [#02266659]
Points: 10789 Status: Regular | Followup to cygnus: #02266619



"do you see obama pulling apart the military and
getting world leaders together and just saying "lets get rid

of all the guns and tanks and take all that money and put it

into medicine and research" ? Do you really see him doing
that?"

wow. that really is completely unrealistic. you don't
understand human nature if you think it could ever be that
easy.


 

offline plaidzebra from so long, xlt on 2009-01-21 10:06 [#02266711]
Points: 5678 Status: Lurker | Followup to BoxBob-K23: #02266637



i'm very glad to hear you say that.


 


Messageboard index