frost vs nixon | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
(nobody)
...and 359 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614103
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
frost vs nixon
 

offline lupus yonderboy from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2009-01-17 19:24 [#02265573]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker




looking forward to this one. bought the independent today
with the original interview. . . Michael Sheen looks pretty
impressive . . . i think might have to rent all the
presidents men as a warm up. . .


 

offline beneboi from WATMM on 2009-01-17 20:49 [#02265606]
Points: 53 Status: Addict



it's ok from what i understand it isnt very accurate



 

offline lupus yonderboy from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2009-01-17 21:32 [#02265627]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker




yeah i just finished watching the originals and when
compared with the trailer it seems clear they've exercised a
bit of dramatic license with the facts. . .


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2009-01-18 03:38 [#02265693]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



i'm annoyed they had to fictionalise some of it, surely they
could have made a compelling film without doing that?


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2009-01-18 04:54 [#02265715]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



haven't seen the movie yet, but the documentary is awesome.
that interview was filmed beautifully. just long shots where
you can actually nixon physically respond to the
interviewer. it shows all the magic in the non-verbal
department. it's hard to believe this movie has something to
add, other than to display actors trying to emulate those
details.


 

offline noseburger on 2009-01-18 05:05 [#02265717]
Points: 1198 Status: Lurker



the independent is like a left-wing mail these days.
harumph.


 

offline BoxBob-K23 from Finland on 2009-01-18 08:04 [#02265758]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular | Followup to goDel: #02265715



yea, having seen both, i can't say if this fictionalized
film is really worth all the effort... the interviews speak
for themselves.

however, at least the film tells a very neat narrative, even
if they did invent half of it - but if they did, I feel
sorry for them. The actors are good, the historical settings
look convincing... it's a pretty good movie, but the way it
tries to dramatize a rather trivial story is cringe-worthy
at times. And why on Earth would they add FAKE talking heads
to a movie?? insane.


 

offline lupus yonderboy from 1970. (United Kingdom) on 2009-01-18 08:30 [#02265766]
Points: 1985 Status: Lurker




it's got 90% at rotten tomatoes so far. . . seems worth a
peep. . .


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2009-01-18 09:25 [#02265788]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



having just seen the movie, the funny thing is that it makes
sense the movie is dramatized. they could have gone the
realistic way and actually followed the transcript of the
interviews, instead of mixing it all up and ram it into a 5
minutes climax, but that would automatically reduce the
movie to just a copy of the interview and making it
redundant, one, and two, the movie would blatantly fall
short when directly compared to reality. that 5 minutes
climax, it's like they forced reality through a compressor -
perhaps by necessity - and squeezed every bit of real
emotion out of it. the problem is not necessarily with the
actors, but with the given time. i think i'll save a copy of
the documentary and delete the movie from hd.


 


Messageboard index