new ipod nano | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 291 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
new ipod nano
 

offline stefano_azevedo from Pindorama (Brazil) on 2008-09-18 14:37 [#02237944]
Points: 4396 Status: Regular



terrible, uh?


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2008-09-18 14:45 [#02237955]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



LAZY_TITLE


 

offline retape from http://retape.net (Norway) on 2008-09-18 14:47 [#02237957]
Points: 2355 Status: Lurker



LAZY_TITLE


 

offline Cliff Glitchard from DEEP DOWN INSIDE on 2008-09-18 15:05 [#02237968]
Points: 4158 Status: Lurker



me no likey


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-18 15:08 [#02237970]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



its ok, fatty nano is far better though


 

offline pantalaimon from Winterfell (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-15 05:02 [#02245552]
Points: 7090 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I never thought the day would happen, but I had a look at
other mp3 players and found the iRiver clix 2, its a year
old but it has a much better screen, sound quality and user
interface than even the latest nano...

you know in asia the ipod is something like 16th in the best
selling mp3 players? maybe the know something we don't.

i've had ipods since the very first one, this is the first
time i've ever touched a different make, had to re-encode
all my aac files though which was a pain in the arse!


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-15 07:29 [#02245564]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



I-Pods are shit, no question. Everyone knows they are
designed to break after one year, just after the warranty
finishes.

Try I-River like you said, or Cowon if you have the cash.


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2008-10-15 07:30 [#02245565]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Followup to Tractern: #02245564 | Show recordbag



so are mac optical drives


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-15 07:36 [#02245566]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Ineeed, indeed!

I used to think Mac shit was cool- oh, how naive was I...

They are overly priced- I don't know why people buy them,
and nor do they. Just because they are fashionable or
something. They are good for design apps and such. And they
are easy to customise though.


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2008-10-15 07:41 [#02245568]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Followup to Tractern: #02245566 | Show recordbag



cmon it's not all shit, there are other reason why people
buy macs other than the ipod fashion. more than the fashion
thing i don't get why people mystify macs like they were
saint computers, they're just machines, they break and have
their tricks like every other one don't cha think



 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2008-10-15 09:10 [#02245590]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



c'mon, that whole thing about ipods breaking after the 1
year warranty is up is such a thing of the past. i've had
mine for two years now and that thing has taken a fucking
beating and shows no signs of giving up anytime soon. and i
have heard of one friend out of many ipod owners who has had
any trouble in the last few years.


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-15 09:19 [#02245597]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Perhaps youre right, but I still don't like them. Those
could just be exceptions to the rule.

The fact that you can only play the weird IPod format (M4A?)
is silly, too. Just a way for Apple to control what their
customers can do with their products.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2008-10-15 09:32 [#02245607]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



what are you talking about? all of my music is in mp3 format
and the ipod plays it just fine, fuck proprietary.

and that would be a hell of a lot of exceptions considering
i went to college in the us (read: EVERYONE has an ipod).

as a matter of fact, the only person i know who has had an
mp3 player fail on them didn't have an ipod. so he bought
one.

also if you don't like the ipod software, you can always get
rockbox on it.


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-15 09:58 [#02245626]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Yeah- a lot of people convert all their music to iTunes,
though. I donn't see the point, it is like the equivelant of
192KBPS.

Also, it is not good that iPod control the market- it means
they can monopolise it, make shit products that everyone
still buys and profit from it all.

iPhones look pretty frickin awesome, though. That's the
exception to the rule, I guess.


 

offline Advocate on 2008-10-15 10:02 [#02245627]
Points: 3319 Status: Lurker



great, a new ipod anal. another one you can put up your ass
and smuggle from china to the rest of the world. good one,
apple people.



 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2008-10-15 10:09 [#02245629]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to Tractern: #02245626



hold on, so you just called apple's whole product line shit,
then said the most unnecessary, bloated piece of hardware
they sell is the exception? ha!

seriously, the iphone blows in comparison to smart phones in
the same (and lower) price range.


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-15 10:15 [#02245633]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



It depends what you want to do with your 'smart phone'.

It may be be less powerful than, say, a Blackberry. But it
more customisable, which is, in a rare moment for Apple,
cool.


 

offline 1up from greater manchester (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-15 11:32 [#02245663]
Points: 2302 Status: Regular



i fucking lovemy ipods. i've had three for over 6 years now
and they all work fine. but i did just get my ipod touch
last week in the u s of a. half motherfuckingprice over
there.


 

offline 1up from greater manchester (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-15 11:33 [#02245664]
Points: 2302 Status: Regular | Followup to Tractern: #02245633



eh? less powerful than a blackberry? in what way?



 

offline 010101 from Vancouver (Canada) on 2008-10-15 11:34 [#02245665]
Points: 7669 Status: Regular



I like my iPod, I like iTunes, I like my macBook.

Am I wrong?


 

offline jules from United States on 2008-10-15 12:15 [#02245678]
Points: 754 Status: Lurker



ive had the same ipod since 2003.

Tactern says,"Yeah- a lot of people convert all their music
to iTunes,
though. I donn't see the point, it is like the equivelant of

192KBPS."

lol...ignorance is bliss i suppose


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-15 13:40 [#02245718]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



Oh, sorry. My bad.

What is the equivelant quality then?

And maybe not everyone converts their music to iTunes. Not
people on here, but still a lot of people I wouldn't doubt.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2008-10-15 15:56 [#02245789]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to Tractern: #02245718



i highly doubt anyone who doesn't know enough not to use
aac/m4a format knows enough how to convert their mp3s in the
first place. the only way itunes will do this automatically
is when importing from a cd, but that is hardly the way
people get their music nowadays.

and it has actually been shown that the apple formats have a
better size/quality ratio than mp3s. you can set the bit
rate for it just like any other audio format.


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2008-10-15 15:58 [#02245790]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



1) The iPod range is the best range of MP3 players on the
market.

2) The iPhone is the best consumer smartphone on the market.
The thing is a joy to use and I've owned a lot of smart
phones.

There is no doubt that I am right because I always am, so
just accept my words above as fact and move on with your
lives.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2008-10-15 16:05 [#02245792]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular | Followup to ecnadniarb: #02245790



Okay. Now that that's settled, what's next on the agenda?

Cookies: for 'em or against 'em?


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2008-10-15 16:07 [#02245793]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Followup to hedphukkerr: #02245792 | Show recordbag



Cookies as in food or internet text files?

Personally I think both are yummy.


 

offline hedphukkerr from mathbotton (United States) on 2008-10-15 16:09 [#02245795]
Points: 8833 Status: Regular



I was thinking of the snack thing, but we can discuss those
little digital bits if you want.


 

offline Tractern from Brighton (United Kingdom) on 2008-10-15 16:09 [#02245796]
Points: 4210 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



haha- fair enough, ecnadniarb.

Whoever is right, I do tend to go on a bit...

Not too fussed about cookies, though. =)


 


Messageboard index