|
|
CS2x
from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-10 11:18 [#02235830]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker
|
|
Cables like to make your blood pressure rise to dangerous levels and insist on getting tangled even when initially left in a perfectly ordered state. They are disgustingly uncooperative in live situations in particular.
When will wireless technology replace physical audio cables? Could it even happen? I suppose setting up all the different radio waves or whatever they are would pose far more problems than they would save. And then there's the quality of the signal. And cost.
|
|
mohamed
from the turtle business on 2008-09-10 11:22 [#02235835]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
good question, i refrain from having wireless at home just because i'm unsure about the side effects.
|
|
noseburger
on 2008-09-10 11:22 [#02235836]
Points: 1198 Status: Lurker | Followup to CS2x: #02235830
|
|
fidelity interference batteries
|
|
CS2x
from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-10 11:22 [#02235838]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to mohamed: #02235835
|
|
What side effects do you mean, good sir?
|
|
FlyAgaric
from the discovery (Africa) on 2008-09-10 11:24 [#02235842]
Points: 5776 Status: Regular
|
|
it's sluggish and the expenses are ghastly. they charge ridiculous rates when you exceed your cap. vodafone sucking africa DRY.
|
|
mohamed
from the turtle business on 2008-09-10 11:25 [#02235843]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Followup to CS2x: #02235838 | Show recordbag
|
|
actually i don't know what i'm talking about, but i don't trust those who say that all these waves have absolutely no effect on the human body. they've said the same things when mobile phone technology came out if i remember well.
|
|
noseburger
on 2008-09-10 11:31 [#02235847]
Points: 1198 Status: Lurker
|
|
rob i think you need to make yourself clearer
|
|
CS2x
from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-10 11:32 [#02235850]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to noseburger: #02235836
|
|
"fidelity interference batteries"
Could these problems be overcome in time, though? Eventually, perhaps, it'll be possible to connect equipment wirelessly without a loss in audio quality, with signals that automatically correspond without interference or lots of painful setting up, and very long lasting batteries.
|
|
CS2x
from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-10 11:33 [#02235851]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to noseburger: #02235847
|
|
I was just referring to plugging in instruments in a studio or on stage. :-)
|
|
FlyAgaric
from the discovery (Africa) on 2008-09-10 11:37 [#02235852]
Points: 5776 Status: Regular
|
|
oh.
|
|
mohamed
from the turtle business on 2008-09-10 11:37 [#02235854]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Show recordbag
|
|
oh too
|
|
Skink
from A cesspool in eden on 2008-09-10 11:56 [#02235857]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker
|
|
I'll stick with wires in my studio.
|
|
Sandy
from Morocco (Morocco) on 2008-09-10 12:15 [#02235859]
Points: 1493 Status: Regular
|
|
Guys, I think the waves have already had an effect on mohamed.
|
|
mylittlesister
from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-10 14:00 [#02235887]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular
|
|
wireless connections for live performance already exist - wireless microphones, wireless guitar leads.
bring wireless connections into the studio could pose a problem though. currently, the loss in quality in no way makes up for the convenience.
|
|
Messageboard index
|