Wireless connections | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (2)
belb
010101
...and 572 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614087
Today 0
Topics 127542
  
 
Messageboard index
Wireless connections
 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-10 11:18 [#02235830]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker



Cables like to make your blood pressure rise to dangerous
levels and insist on getting tangled even when initially
left in a perfectly ordered state. They are disgustingly
uncooperative in live situations in particular.

When will wireless technology replace physical audio cables?
Could it even happen? I suppose setting up all the different
radio waves or whatever they are would pose far more
problems than they would save. And then there's the quality
of the signal. And cost.



 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2008-09-10 11:22 [#02235835]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



good question, i refrain from having wireless at home just
because i'm unsure about the side effects.


 

offline noseburger on 2008-09-10 11:22 [#02235836]
Points: 1198 Status: Lurker | Followup to CS2x: #02235830



fidelity
interference
batteries


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-10 11:22 [#02235838]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to mohamed: #02235835



What side effects do you mean, good sir?


 

offline FlyAgaric from the discovery (Africa) on 2008-09-10 11:24 [#02235842]
Points: 5776 Status: Regular



it's sluggish and the expenses are ghastly. they charge
ridiculous rates when you exceed your cap. vodafone sucking
africa DRY.


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2008-09-10 11:25 [#02235843]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Followup to CS2x: #02235838 | Show recordbag



actually i don't know what i'm talking about, but i don't
trust those who say that all these waves have absolutely no
effect on the human body. they've said the same things when
mobile phone technology came out if i remember well.


 

offline noseburger on 2008-09-10 11:31 [#02235847]
Points: 1198 Status: Lurker



rob i think you need to make yourself clearer


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-10 11:32 [#02235850]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to noseburger: #02235836



"fidelity
interference
batteries"

Could these problems be overcome in time, though?
Eventually, perhaps, it'll be possible to connect equipment
wirelessly without a loss in audio quality, with signals
that automatically correspond without interference or lots
of painful setting up, and very long lasting batteries.


 

offline CS2x from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-10 11:33 [#02235851]
Points: 5079 Status: Lurker | Followup to noseburger: #02235847



I was just referring to plugging in instruments in a studio
or on stage. :-)


 

offline FlyAgaric from the discovery (Africa) on 2008-09-10 11:37 [#02235852]
Points: 5776 Status: Regular



oh.


 

offline mohamed from the turtle business on 2008-09-10 11:37 [#02235854]
Points: 31229 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



oh too


 

offline Skink from A cesspool in eden on 2008-09-10 11:56 [#02235857]
Points: 7483 Status: Lurker



I'll stick with wires in my studio.


 

offline Sandy from Morocco (Morocco) on 2008-09-10 12:15 [#02235859]
Points: 1493 Status: Regular



Guys, I think the waves have already had an effect on
mohamed.


 

offline mylittlesister from ...wherever (United Kingdom) on 2008-09-10 14:00 [#02235887]
Points: 8472 Status: Regular



wireless connections for live performance already exist -
wireless microphones, wireless guitar leads.

bring wireless connections into the studio could pose a
problem though. currently, the loss in quality in no way
makes up for the convenience.


 


Messageboard index