|
|
joey
from montréal (Canada) on 2002-03-27 03:07 [#00144817]
Points: 1220 Status: Lurker
|
|
Can you say no?
|
|
-V-
from Ensenada Drive on 2002-03-27 03:16 [#00144822]
Points: 1452 Status: Lurker
|
|
no, I can't...
|
|
Clobe Smith
from san francisco (United States) on 2002-03-27 03:19 [#00144823]
Points: 512 Status: Lurker
|
|
matters
|
|
joey
from montréal (Canada) on 2002-03-27 03:34 [#00144827]
Points: 1220 Status: Lurker
|
|
the total collapse of the universe occurs when trying to answer this question.
|
|
Donna Simpson
from morgantown (United States) on 2002-03-27 03:35 [#00144828]
Points: 286 Status: Lurker
|
|
yes
|
|
joey
from montréal (Canada) on 2002-03-27 03:35 [#00144829]
Points: 1220 Status: Lurker
|
|
AAAAAHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
|
|
Zombiekev
from Ardmore (United States) on 2002-03-27 04:51 [#00144888]
Points: 2857 Status: Lurker
|
|
sometimes
|
|
xlr
from Boston (United States) on 2002-03-27 04:55 [#00144890]
Points: 4904 Status: Regular
|
|
sure.
|
|
pachi
from yo momma (United States) on 2002-03-27 08:10 [#00145119]
Points: 8984 Status: Lurker
|
|
if i dare attempt to respond my neurons will overreact
|
|
alice
from Italy on 2002-03-27 08:12 [#00145121]
Points: 8 Status: Lurker
|
|
why?
|
|
nanotech
from Sukavasti Amitaba Pureland (United States) on 2002-03-27 08:16 [#00145125]
Points: 3727 Status: Regular
|
|
to a phatty blunt?! hells no!
|
|
korben dallas
from nz on 2002-03-27 08:16 [#00145126]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular
|
|
indeed!
|
|
korben dallas
from nz on 2002-03-27 08:16 [#00145129]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular
|
|
a type of self referential inconsistency :)
|
|
IronLung
from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2002-03-27 08:17 [#00145131]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
that would always depend on what is being asked.
|
|
korben dallas
from nz on 2002-03-27 08:19 [#00145133]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular
|
|
actually - not entirely.
as it is ambiguous as to whether the question is a rhetorical/command - or a general question in which case yes would be perfectly acceptable.?!!
|
|
LeCoeur
from the outer edge of the universe (United States) on 2002-03-27 08:29 [#00145154]
Points: 8249 Status: Lurker
|
|
YES i can say no. although sometimes it's hard for me to say no to someone i love....ehehhe
but i suppose it's like that foreveryone!
|
|
Chri5py
from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-27 08:40 [#00145178]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker
|
|
here's another wierd one....
"I always lie"
|
|
Chri5py
from my Solarbear (United Kingdom) on 2002-03-27 08:40 [#00145179]
Points: 2903 Status: Lurker
|
|
wierd -> weird
|
|
IronLung
from the 91fwy in soCAL (United States) on 2002-03-27 08:43 [#00145186]
Points: 8032 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag
|
|
ok Korben, good call...your right....
I actually say mor NO's these days thatn I do Yes's.....I am not sure why...Maybe I am just getting cranky and old...
;)
|
|
aneurySm
from Ypsilanti (United States) on 2002-03-27 08:45 [#00145192]
Points: 1699 Status: Lurker
|
|
fuzzy
|
|
korben dallas
from nz on 2002-03-27 08:46 [#00145196]
Points: 4605 Status: Regular
|
|
chri5py -
such as:
'this statement is false.'
or:
'the following statement is false. the preceding statement is true.'
godel used this paradox to prove that mathematics is incomplete ? as when applied to principia mathematica exposed the same sort of weirdness/ or "strange loop" .. cool stuff
|
|
Messageboard index
|