quaristice cd1 vs cd2 | xltronic messageboard
 
You are not logged in!

F.A.Q
Log in

Register
  
 
  
 
Now online (1)
dariusgriffin
...and 210 guests

Last 5 registered
Oplandisks
nothingstar
N_loop
yipe
foxtrotromeo

Browse members...
  
 
Members 8025
Messages 2614028
Today 22
Topics 127536
  
 
Messageboard index
quaristice cd1 vs cd2
 

offline nacmat on 2008-03-17 16:52 [#02185987]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker



this had to be done

as much as people praise the extra ltd cd, and despite the
fact that I like it... I have to say that cd1 (the album
itself) is far better


 

offline rad smiles on 2008-03-17 16:53 [#02185988]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



thats why its cd1


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-03-17 16:59 [#02185989]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



vinyls cd1 vs vinyls cd 2


 

offline jackeroffer from Aruba on 2008-03-17 17:03 [#02185991]
Points: 1038 Status: Lurker



cd1 is definitely better, but the (longer) versions of the
songs on cd2 are superior to the ones on CD1 (besides chen9
which unfortunately the extended version is kind of throw
away)


 

offline Rook from United States on 2008-03-17 17:14 [#02185994]
Points: 179 Status: Lurker



Albitizz>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Altichyre
The PlcLcPc>The Plc
IO(mons)>IO
Phylopn>plPHon
Perlence-range3>Perlence
SonDEre-ix>SonDEremawe
Tankraken>Tankakern
Fol4>Fol3
90101-61-01>90101-5l-l
chenc 9x>chenc 9
Notwo>nofour.x


 

offline cygnus from nowhere and everyplace on 2008-03-17 17:17 [#02185995]
Points: 11920 Status: Regular



what is there to be 'versus', its all one thing

do you think a squirrels going to think hey should i finish
eating this acorn or starve?


 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-03-17 17:18 [#02185996]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



compare or starve



 

offline nacmat on 2008-03-17 17:32 [#02186001]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to cygnus: #02185995



go ahead make a big deal out of an internet thread


 

offline melack from barcielwave on 2008-03-17 17:35 [#02186002]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular | Followup to cygnus: #02185995



culture


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2008-03-17 17:35 [#02186003]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



one thing is better than another FACT


 

offline melack from barcielwave on 2008-03-17 17:35 [#02186004]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular | Followup to nacmat: #02186001



well, then again, what your opinion of quaristice, nac?


 

offline earthleakage from tell the world you're winning on 2008-03-17 17:36 [#02186005]
Points: 27795 Status: Regular



no reason is required or asked for


 

offline rad smiles on 2008-03-17 18:02 [#02186007]
Points: 5608 Status: Lurker



Let me tell you something, pendejo. You pull any of your
crazy shit with us, you flash a piece out on the lanes, I'll
take it away from you, stick it up your ass and pull the
fucking trigger 'til it goes "click."



 

offline jules from United States on 2008-03-17 18:03 [#02186008]
Points: 754 Status: Lurker



im just glad we have both to listen too


 

offline jonestm from American Samoa on 2008-03-17 18:18 [#02186012]
Points: 114 Status: Lurker



If CD2 had WNSN it would be the best by far.
with CD1 having WNSN i think CD2 is only slightly better.


 

offline tolstoyed from the ocean on 2008-03-17 19:02 [#02186023]
Points: 50073 Status: Moderator



first i think cd1 is better then i think cd2 is better then
i think cd1 is better then i think cd2 is better then i
think i think i think. well i like cd 1 more.


 

offline BoxBob-K23 from Finland on 2008-03-17 19:23 [#02186032]
Points: 2440 Status: Regular



cd1, ultimately, for many reasons (flow of the album, range
of ideas, nothing has time to get old) - but cd2 has some
indispensable gems as well.


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2008-03-17 22:37 [#02186055]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker



cd2. only because i don't want to get used to the shorter
track lengths from cd1.


 

offline futureimage from buy FIR from Juno (United Kingdom) on 2008-03-18 00:22 [#02186088]
Points: 6427 Status: Lurker



CD1 I think.


 

offline vlari from beyond the valley of the LOLs on 2008-03-18 05:32 [#02186138]
Points: 13915 Status: Regular



it's a tie innit


Attached picture

 

offline elusive from detroit (United States) on 2008-03-18 05:32 [#02186139]
Points: 18368 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



jeezous


 

offline melack from barcielwave on 2008-03-18 05:37 [#02186140]
Points: 9099 Status: Regular



should i get this album? why (not)?


 

offline nacmat on 2008-03-18 09:06 [#02186175]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to melack: #02186140



did you like autechre over the years?

this is less sofisticated than confield-draft-untilted but
has parts from all of them plus a nice spontaneous feel to
it

I ll amke a review after a few more listens

but it seems like the simply focused on enjoying the music

its easier but also less groundbreaking if you aim that

its beautiful, deep and firm


 

offline thatne from United States on 2008-03-18 09:57 [#02186177]
Points: 3026 Status: Lurker



i agree with goDel


 

offline goDel from ɐpʎǝx (Seychelles) on 2008-03-18 13:45 [#02186227]
Points: 10225 Status: Lurker | Followup to thatne: #02186177



you did the right thing


 

offline ecnadniarb on 2008-03-18 13:50 [#02186229]
Points: 24805 Status: Lurker | Show recordbag



I have the special edition but haven't listened to CD2 yet.
CD1 is alright but I don't find it as listenable as earlier
releases. Definitely better then Untilted and Draft though.


 

offline larn from PLANET E (United Kingdom) on 2008-03-18 14:02 [#02186234]
Points: 5473 Status: Regular | Show recordbag



i agree with thatne


 

offline _gvarek_ from next to you (Poland) on 2008-03-18 14:36 [#02186247]
Points: 4882 Status: Lurker



cd1


 

offline Vin3islih from United Kingdom on 2008-03-18 15:57 [#02186286]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular



cd1 is best. I actually got a bit bored by the longer
versions on cd 2, although it had a highlight with Fol 4 and
a couple others I forget the names of. That first cd is
immense.

The metal edition package is a beauty. Glad I got it.


 

offline w M w from London (United Kingdom) on 2008-03-18 16:00 [#02186287]
Points: 21451 Status: Lurker



lp5


 

offline nacmat on 2008-03-18 16:26 [#02186300]
Points: 31271 Status: Lurker | Followup to w M w: #02186287



there you have it, the intelligent internet persona


 

offline maximus from OKC (United States) on 2008-03-18 22:34 [#02186385]
Points: 121 Status: Regular



somebody's trying to get in my room


 

offline Combo from Sex on 2008-03-21 11:45 [#02187040]
Points: 7540 Status: Regular



First AE album I didn't bought: is not good!


 

offline Vin3islih from United Kingdom on 2008-03-22 05:39 [#02187230]
Points: 1066 Status: Regular



you may be too idiot to understand Quaristice. This not
good.


 

offline asymmhead from south pasadena (United States) on 2008-03-22 05:53 [#02187234]
Points: 232 Status: Regular



i like them both for their reasons... disc one is better as
a whole... and disc two is better as single tracks... it's
been said here though already!


 


Messageboard index