 |
|
You are not logged in! F.A.Q Log in Register |
 |
|
 |
 Now online (1)dariusgriffin ...and 130 guests Last 5 registered Oplandisks nothingstar N_loop yipe foxtrotromeo Browse members... |
 |
Members 8025Messages 2613947 Today 7 Topics 127529 |
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
DNA has been found to have a bizarre ability to put itself together, even at a distance, when according to known science it shouldn't be able to. Explanation: None, at least not yet. Scientists are reporting evidence that contrary to our current beliefs about what is possible, intact double-stranded DNA has the “amazing” ability to recognize similarities in other DNA strands from a distance. Somehow they are able to identify one another, and the tiny bits of genetic material tend to congregate with similar DNA. The recognition of similar sequences in DNA’s chemical subunits, occurs in a way unrecognized by science. There is no known reason why the DNA is able to combine the way it does, and from a current theoretical standpoint this feat should be chemically impossible. Even so, the research published in ACS’ Journal of Physical Chemistry shows very clearly that homology recognition between sequences of several hundred nucleotides occurs without physical contact or presence of proteins. Double helixes of DNA can recognize matching molecules from a distance and then gather together, all seemingly without help from any other molecules or chemical signals. In the study, scientists observed the behavior of fluorescently tagged DNA strands placed in water that contained no proteins or other material that could interfere with the experiment. Strands with identical nucleotide sequences were about twice as likely to gather together as DNA strands with different sequences. No one knows how individual DNA strands could possibly be communicating in this way, yet somehow they do. The “telepathic” effect is a source of wonder and amazement for scientists. “Amazingly, the forces responsible for the sequence recognition can reach across more than one nanometer of water separating the surfaces of the nearest neighbor DNA,” said the authors Geoff S. Baldwin, Sergey Leikin, John M. Seddon, and Alexei A. Kornyshev and colleagues. This recognition effect may help increase the accuracy and efficiency of the homologous |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
next |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
you think thats irrelevant? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i think that's interesting, and adds fire to the growing post-cartesian, post-newtonian view of the universe... (now we have stardust that behaves intelligently, did you see that? intelligence is not limited to the "eye" in "eye-dee-em".) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
what came first? dna or the baby dna? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
neither... it was the dna that created them. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Interesting read. 1 nanometer is pretty tiny but that's still amazing. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
could be something to do with the mystical dark matter joining them who knows |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I think he may have been referring to the sudden cut-off of your post. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
So if you got some Giraffe DNA and some Sealion DNA cut them both in half, put them in a cup shake them up. The DNA sees the other half and joins. Then you have to inject it into an egg and you get the best animal ever. I have drawn several outcomes of the experiment, but I no longer have picture posting abilities and to be honest they are childlike and disturbing. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
in regards to quantum stuff, might it be the observer who has the influence? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
So not only do you have to put it in a cup together, you have to think really hard too? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
scientists are reporting evidence of shit-thread. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
that's the way of science cups and thinking |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FU |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
as i always suspected |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
puede el adn ser medido en numeros o en algun modo entendible para alguien que no comprende la genetica? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
ahi ahi ahi que agonia! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
There were thinkers after Descartes and Newton? Preposterous. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
huau,gracias mohamed ahora comprendo mejor.lol |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
XD |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
God? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Fuck? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Did you have your first sexual encounter? was it so amazing that you must spew out the only word that excites you? CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS CATS ! |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS ALPACAS |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I have eaten alpacas. They taste better than cats or fuck. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
010101 your funny. :) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
so what did come first :/ the egg ? the dna? or the chicken? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
the dna had to exist first obviously .....so what came before that dna strand thingy?....another type of dna that split and went a bit funny creating the egg., that just so freaking was able to create a chicken that could create egg of the same variety.....now thats coincidence /. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i wish i knew what all this meant, what are they talking about :(((((( |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i lost my keys |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Creo que sí. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
i have no idea how that happened |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
it teleported off the page telepathically |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
we're talking paradigms here - they're slowly evolving, nasty things |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
bluetooth |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I will permit you to believe that God is involved in this until natural explanations are forthcoming. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I am working on a response to your question, even though I was kind of kidding around referring to the debates of yesteryear. My holyness has been questionable at best, to be honest. I too, like so many, have fallen to the vices of shit eating and midget porn (not really but sometimes normal person porn). |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
to deny our own impulses is to deny the very thing that makes us human - mouse |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Normal sexuality is normal. Don't let any churchy types tell you otherwise. This attitude that sex is filthy and somehow equivalent to shit eating is what leads to Christian Republicans getting caught with underage bisexual sheep in the crack haus. I am God and I approve this commercial. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
heres the rest of that paragraph: This recognition effect may help increase the accuracy and efficiency of the homologous recombination of genes, which is a process responsible for DNA repair, evolution, and genetic diversity. The new findings may also shed light on ways to avoid recombination errors, which are factors in cancer, aging, and other health issues. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Don't worry, not going to hijack the thread with this. Seriously, though. Who has seen What the bleep do we know? This kind of discovery comes as no suprise to me, christian worldview, Hindi worldview, whatever.. If we can influence the way that water crystals form through various stimuli including thought, it makes sense to think there is at some level everything is linked. We teleported a laser and now we find that DNA can "link up" Our technology mimics nature, and our science fiction predicts the future. |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Our technology mimics nature, and our science fiction predicts the future. Not sure where I was going with that but I think I was somehow comparing Jules Verne to the Xmen in my mind |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
that sounds about right to me although i may say that technology is nature as we are nature itself and thus like the universe is an ever expanding, ever increasing in complexity ultimate uber fractal pattern |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
"weirdness is tomorrow's reality" as decades pass, the technology in science fiction novels and books becomes more and more 'likely', and in some cases, 'old school' |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
I liked what the bleep..., but I wouldn't consider the film an authority on science necessarily - it was too much like an inspirational commercial for a new mindset for me to take it seriously... (even though I principally agree with its premises) |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
| |||||||||
|
|
Are you implying that shit eating is filthy? |
||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
Messageboard index
|
|||||||||
